Most inhumanities start small, like the beginning of a tsunami, but then
build, as they head toward inevitable and unstoppable destruction.
It is difficult to pinpoint the precise beginning of the cultural tsunami
that has devalued human life. Did it begin with the subjugation of women?
Did it begin with slavery? The Nazis made their contribution with the
Holocaust and Josef Mengele's hideous human experiments. Surely unrestricted
abortion added to the growing list of inhumanities.
Now we have the next wave. Randy Stroup is a 53-year-old Oregon man who has
prostate cancer, but no insurance to cover his medical treatment. The state
pays for treatment in some cases, but it has denied help to Stroup. State
officials have determined that chemotherapy would be too expensive and so
they have offered him an alternative: death.
Oregon's physician-assisted suicide law allows taxpayers to pay for someone
to kill Stroup, because it's cheaper than trying to heal him. How twisted is
this? Some have called this a "chilling" corruption of medical ethics, but
medical ethics have been in the deep freeze for some time. The American
Medical Association, which once strongly opposed abortion, now buys into the
"choice" argument despite Hippocrates' admonition that physicians make a
habit of two things - "to help, or at least to do no harm."
How much is a human life worth? Body parts and bone marrow can fetch some
pretty high prices, but a human life is more than the sum of its body parts.
The reason this is important is that the federal government is now placing a
price tag on individual lives and if government ever gets to run health care
from Washington, bureaucrats will start making decisions similar to the one
made for Randy Stroup.
Various government agencies contribute estimates for a concept known as the
"Value of Statistical Life." Like housing prices, the value of life has gone
down in the eyes of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA says
human life this year is worth $7.22 million. That's a drop from its previous
estimate of $8.04 million. The Department of Transportation calculates the
value of human life at $5.8 million, an increase from $3 million. At the
Consumer Product Safety Commission, human life is unchanged from the last
estimate of $5 million.
According to The Washington Post, several federal agencies have come up with
figures for the dollar value of a human life to analyze the costs and
benefits of new programs they believe will save lives.
Saving lives is the announced intention, but if government gains the power
to determine when a life is no longer "worth" saving and orders the plug to
be pulled or the death pill to be administered, then what? This is the
future of the socialized medicine that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and the
Democratic Party wish to impose on us.
In a culture that values all life, difficult decisions can be made about a
life that is at an end and should be allowed to "go." That is a far cry from
having a government bureaucrat or panel of "experts" play God and decide,
based on cost alone, when your or my life no longer has value in the eyes of
the state.
How we view and value ourselves affects how we view and value others. If we
are mere evolutionary accidents with no moral value greater than cole slaw,
then we quickly begin viewing others as part of the vegetable family. But if
we are something far more special, even to the point of having a Creator who
has "endowed" us with value beyond that of gold, silver and paper money,
then should we not be treated as such, even by the state?
The Randy Stroup case won't be the last of its kind. Just as Jack
Kevorkian's illegal assisted suicide preceded its legalization in Oregon,
so, too, will Randy Stroup be the test case in what amounts to mandated
medical euthanasia ordered by the state.
When pro-lifers warned about the "slippery slope" more than three decades
ago, they were dismissed as alarmists. Not anymore. Their prophecy is now
being fulfilled. |