It wasn't my first thought on hearing of the massacre at Virginia Tech
University. Initially, there was just shock and outrage, followed by the
self-examination all of us do after a tragedy, as we ask ourselves if we
might have done more to prevent such a senseless loss of life.
The thought that came to me was not whether stronger gun laws might have
deterred the shooter. It wasn't about better ways to alert students through
e-mail or text-messages, as worthy an idea as that may be. The thought was:
What if just one student in either of the buildings where 23-year-old Cho
Seung-Hui conducted his one-man massacre was, himself (or herself), armed
and trained in how to use a weapon in self defense? Would that - more than
any other suggestion or strategy - have made a difference?
The shooter had to know that the likelihood of him being confronted with
force was very small. But suppose he had known that some students or faculty
would be armed? Would that knowledge have deterred him from carrying out his
evil deeds? Sounds crazy, you say? Am I advocating that everyone be armed
and our college campuses be turned into potential shooting galleries? No. In
this instance, one armed student, or professor, or campus police officer
stationed in the building might have been enough. Self-defense is an ancient
tradition, but these students never had a chance to defend themselves. They
were easy targets for a deranged man who then turned his gun on himself.
Wouldn't it have been preferable if someone had stopped him before he could murder anyone?
This is the flip side of the gun control argument. Deterrence and
self-defense can work better than fruitless attempts at pre-empting evil
intent. Let's say that stronger gun laws had made it more difficult for the
shooter to purchase a gun. Instead, he might have easily acquired a bomb and
blown himself and the others up, as is frequently done in the Middle East.
Would there then have been calls for more bomb control?
Laws don't deter people with criminal intent; otherwise our prisons would be
empty. A criminal is one who violates the law. How does the gun control
lobby propose to make lawbreakers into law-abiders? If lawbreakers are not
deterred from criminal pursuits by laws currently in place, why should more
laws deter them?
Our problem is that we try to control evil from without when, in fact, it
resides within us. Having abandoned the teaching of right and wrong and
accountability for one's actions for fear of offending a person's
sensibilities, we have unilaterally disarmed ourselves against evil. We
don't need more gun control. We need more self-control.
What is it that has made life so cheap? Why do juveniles kill for a pair of
shoes or a leather jacket? How can we turn our backs on the tens of millions
of abortions that have been performed legally in America in the last 30
years? Did we think there would be no consequences when life is treated so
cheaply?
Easy divorce, spousal abuse, drugs, and a media that celebrates crime for
profit lower our resistance level. TV crime shows are increasingly graphic
in their depictions of brutality. Blood and gore flow regularly into
millions of living rooms and we are not satiated. The cumulative effect of
such things cannot be good for our consciences, or our morals, what's left
of them. I saw a promo for NBC's "Law and Order," which advertised the
number of psychopaths they have featured on the long-running series. Nice.
Look at who is promoted in popular culture: Don Imus; Anna Nicole Smith and
the debate over who fathered her child; various celebrities sleeping with
other celebrities, marrying and divorcing fellow celebrities; celebrities in
rehab; celebrities and their next picture. Were someone to suddenly announce
a cure for cancer, to be noticed, he or she would have to compete with the
cultural swill.
Inevitably, evil finds ways to break through and nothing can prevent it, but
we might have a better chance against evil and the people it controls if
more of us were trained in how to fight back, just in case the police are
not close, as was the unfortunate case in Blacksburg, Va. |