Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Cal  Thomas :: Townhall.com Columnist
A 2007 resolution for the Right
by Cal Thomas
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Nothing focuses the political mind like defeat. With Democrats about to assume control of the House and Senate for the first time in 12 years, Republicans in general, conservatives in particular and conservative Christians especially have an important choice to make.

For at least the next two years, they can forget about confirming many, if any, judges who disbelieve in legislating from the bench. There won't be any John Robertses or Samuel Alitos getting confirmed (or probably nominated). No Judiciary Committee headed by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) will allow any through, and while the fate of the "Gang of 14" who vowed in the last session not to participate in any filibuster of judicial nominees except in extreme circumstances has yet to be determined, my guess is that their influence will not be as great in a Democratic Senate. Neither will there be a "nuclear option" because there will be no Republican majority leader who might use it.

Cross most important social issues off the conservative resolution list for the next two years. Socially conservative freshman Democrats are unlikely to press them on a liberal leadership. Liberals were happy to sleep with pro-life and anti-same-sex-marriage Democrats during the campaign, but don't look for them to be respected in the post-election morning.

The choice conservative Republicans must make is what to do for the next two years. They might consider following the example of Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.). In some ways Brownback, who is running for president, is trying to reinvent what it means to be a social conservative. To be more precise, he is trying to take the movement back to first principles, demonstrating what he is for, rather than what or whom he is against.

World Magazine, a conservative evangelical publication, followed Brownback into the infamous Louisiana penitentiary at Angola, which became known to the public through the films "Monster's Ball" and "Dead Man Walking." Earlier this month, Brownback addressed 700 inmates in the prison chapel and then spent the night in a jail cell along with writer Marvin Olasky, who says his "neighbors" were a serial rapist and a drug cartel killer.

Brownback answered questions from the inmates, who are used to hearing "tough on crime" messages from conservative Republicans, none of whom to my recollection ever began a presidential campaign in a place like Angola. When they got up the next morning, Brownback and Olasky visited Death Row. A cynic might say Brownback was grandstanding, but that cynic would have to answer "for whom?" People who back prison reform and social justice issues have mostly been Democrats and political liberals. Such issues don't play well among the "lock 'em up and throw away the key" crowd.

What I find most appealing about Brownback's approach is his positive tone. It came from a cancer scare he had in 1995. For nine months he was unsure of the outcome. "That's when I felt helpless," he said. He emerged from cancer with a clean bill of health and also a spiritual transformation. "Before 1995 I was in attack mode," he told Olasky. Now he's a changed person. The tone, though not the substance, of his politics has also changed.

Social conservatives and Republicans might consider Brownback's example. If they keep in mind the end, but change tactics, their prospects for achieving their ends might be greatly improved. Too many of their constituents have been conditioned by the negative approach. In fund-raising letters, in public pronouncements and from some pulpits has come political and ideological invective that is not only unbecoming to the source of such statements but serves as a bad example to others. It has the added downside of converting no one to the conservative point of view and turning off even some people who might otherwise be inclined to vote for Republicans.

Here's my suggested resolution for the Republican-conservative-Christian voter, courtesy of singer-songwriter Glen Campbell:

You got to try a little kindness
Yes show a little kindness
Just shine your light for everyone to see
And if you try a little kindness
Then you'll overlook the blindness
Of narrow-minded people on the narrow-minded streets.

From a political standpoint, the best part of this strategy is that it works and might even prompt more people to vote Republican in 2008.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the book, "Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America".
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Cal Thomas' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
RightWingRocker writes:
RightWingRocker writes: Friday, December, 29, 2006 12:17 AM
my suggested resolution
Here's my suggested resolution for the Republican-conservative-Christian voter:

Read the Constitution and start backing candidates who support the Constitution instead of these idiot Democrats and Republicans.
===================

The Constitution party is doing that. It is starting to gain attention. It won some state races and is beginning to organize for a larger and larger push in each election.

That is the good news and also the bad news. Why the bad?

Because they really want to return to the Constitution and many voters say the want that but don't. They actually want the centralized Federal government in education, retirment, healthcare, business regulation, law enforcement, social issues, moral issues.

For 150 years the Bill of Rights was the one in the State Constitution, not the U.S. Constitution because the Federal Goverment wasn't allowed to have any say over social and moral issues like welfare, education, abortion, marriage, etc.

The issue of religion for 175 years was also left to the States. We had laws against profanity, cohabitation, sodomy, adultery and they were all Constitutional because they were issues left to the States in the U.S.Constitution. And in each state the people, "we the people" decided whether they would be laws against some things and not against others and when we needed to change, we amended our State Constitution like we did when we did away with the state religions we had until 1833. We didn't need a Court for 175 years on most issues.

We did need the 14th amendment but, it gave Congress, not the Courts the power to reign in a state that wasn't applying its laws equally to all and protecting all with their laws. If we return to the Constitution, some conservatives are going to be upset because not all states will be conservative but, they will be what the people of that state want. Not all liberals will like it ether because some states will have laws against abortion or same sex marriage or other "state" issues but, it will be the will of the people in that state.

When a President runs, he won't run on Conservative or Liberal issues but on what is best for the nation in foreign policy, monetary policy, defense, etc. You know, the things the Constitution said WERE the job of the Federal Government.

The states and the state legislature will decide the issues "we the people want in our state." Just like Nevada ignored all the other states and legalized gambling and even prostitution in some counties, states will be the voice of the people again.

Congress will still have the 14th to make sure no state usurps the responsiblity they have to obey their Constitution and see that it applies to all people of all races and all nationalities equally. Yet, if a community wants to ban adult entertainment in their city, they can. If they want to ban same sex marriage they can. If they want to allow same sex marriage they can.

Will there be problems? Of course. Anytime you try to restore a nation hooked on socialism to its roots, there are going to problems and you can't do it in one or two Presidential terms but, at least the Constitution Party seems ready to start taking that task on.

Cal is recommending...
...something that has already proven not to work and that is George W. Bush's "New Tone" method for dealing w/Dem's. For those above who say that Repubs "come across as bullies" - well I have to wonder what planet you've been living on. Bush has bent over backwards. He has had umpteen opportunities to prosecute Dem lawbreakers and has opted not to. Many, including Hillary, should've been genuine cell mates w/Brownback. Does anyone remember the Peter Paul illegal campaign contributions to the Hillary/senate campaign? The Bush justice dept held back. Hillary should've gone down on that one. Instead Andrew Grossman (her campaign treasurer) took a slap on the wrist. If Repub's had wanted to be "Bullies" wouldn't they have been calling for Hillary's head? And what about comparing Scooter Libbey's treatment to that of Sandy Berger? No comparison. The Dem's and MSM were clearly the "bullies" again. I just don't see how anyone on our side of the aisle could accuse the Repubs of being bullies. Its the Dem's who ought to "try a little kindness". Cal Thomas is totally backwards in his thinking. DD
http://streetlevel.townhall.com
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.