Join The Debate!

Play it again, Righty.

"Wrong again.

My comment was about Christian Conservatives only. This does not deny objections from others -- it simply ignores them, because they don't belong in a comnment about Christian values, do they?"

I'm willing to be proven wrong. Show me the conservative Christians on this thread who have trashed Cal's column. I would contend that there aren't any, but maybe I missed one.

"You missed, uhhhhhhhh, your own words -- which (typically) you failed to include." Anyone who wants to read my own words can scroll on up and check them out. They haven't gone anywhere.

"Well, you ridiculed me -- explicity -- for the principle I was defending. That principle was that Foley was just as guilty as the Democrats named by Cal. Now you decline to reveal your own accusation .... Slick." No, I ridiculed you for saying that you put principle before partisanship. I think you would like to do that, but you don't. Go back and read it. Only someone who was deliberately twisting the words that were said would come up with what you came up with.

"You ridiculed me for condemning Foley." Did not. That was an easy one.

"But once again, you're about a week behind on the news ... as you were with the National Intelligence Estimate." I'm not sure how I was a week behind on the news on Foley, since it's been omnipresent (and since I read Blankley's column here on TH. The problem here is not that I'm behind the news, but that you are conflating the arguments here that are specific to Cal Thomas' column with those from other columns. It also shows that you still have not grasped what Cal said in this column. You heard what you wanted to hear, not what he was saying. By the way, someone who can't tell a rusino from a double capp shouldn't be harping on missing one item in the news.

"Summing up -- you basically misrepresented everything you posted ... again " Maybe it's me, but I think you're projecting. And I hate to say that because it's a term that Kimberly over-uses. But I think it's apropos here. Third parties welcome to pass judgement here.

"You really need to get a life -- or simply catch up with the news --- this is my last visit tio this web page and thread -- which gives you the last word, if you so choose." I do need to get a life; I can't believe I've wasted so much of it responding to you. And I should know better. I've seen you in action with other posters. I have only myself to blame. Oh, and I choose.

"For once, I hope you can avoid the Slickery, or the patronizing comments (anyone who bothers to look will see that I only play defense with you; you are the attacker, and it's almost always personal.)" That's funny. I was going to say the same thing. Hmmm. Who started this little tit-for-tat? My, that would be you on Oct. 5th, at 10:17 PM. Cheers for now.