Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, September 08, 2008
Burt Prelutsky :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dissecting Liberals
by Burt Prelutsky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


If at times, it is not easy to determine what a liberal is, it’s because during presidential election campaigns, politicians who have been voting like liberals, talking like liberals and boasting about their liberal credentials, suddenly insist that they’re really centrists as they go about trying to garner the votes of gullible Republicans and Independents. It’s rather like Michelle Obama trying to convince us that she’s just another stay-at-home mom who loves America and her kids, and in exactly that order.

Most of us on the right can spot a liberal a mile away, just as easily as experienced bird watchers can identify cuckoos, parrots and pigeons. But just in case you’re not as proficient at recognizing the odd ducks that populate the left, allow me to be your guide through the wilderness.

In America, more than 80% of African-American and Jewish voters can be safely assumed to favor liberals in any and all elections. The reason that poor blacks vote overwhelmingly for Democrats is because they have been told over and over again by plantation owners like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, that it’s only through the federal government’s largesse that they can manage to survive at all. I suppose even if an able-bodied person is told from childhood on that he lacks the ability to walk, let alone run, he will come to believe he needs a wheelchair or at least a pair of crutches.

Middle-class, church-attending, blacks often owe their unnatural allegiance to the party of George Wallace, Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd, because they listen to their ministers. Political bribes are usually frowned upon, except when the Democrats act as bagmen for the black clergy. There is a reason, you know, why white politicians get to spend so much time in black churches at election time, in spite of their insistence that “separation of church and state” is writ large somewhere in the Constitution.

When it comes to Jews, the great majority of us are secular when it comes to religion, but religious when it comes to leftist politics. It isn’t a coincidence that Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky started out as Jews, and that 39 of 42 Jews currently serving in the House and Senate are left-wingers who, while disparaging Christian belief in Jesus as the messiah, have no problem whatsoever accepting Barack Obama in that role.

I happen to know a Jewish professor who lives in the Pacific Northwest. While he may not be typical, his mindset isn’t all that different from many of my fellow Jews. When George Bush was running for re-election in 2004, Professor Sandy sent me an e-mail in which he claimed that if Bush won, America would immediately begin building concentration camps for Jews, and he was glad he lived close to Canada and would be able to escape across the border.

Most liberals will tell you that they don’t hate America, they merely hate George Bush. But when you ask them why they hate him so much, they start yammering about the invasion of Iraq, even though all the Democratic bigwigs spent the 1990s calling for regime change, and later voted for the invasion. The left also hates Bush because of the Patriot Act. They insist it’s cost us many of our basic freedoms. But I have yet to ask a liberal to name a single freedom he had under Clinton that he doesn’t have today and received a coherent answer. Yet, even I can come up with one. Thanks to Jimmy Carter, who allowed the Islamic crazies to get a foothold in Iran by turning his back on the Shah, and Bill Clinton, who spared Osama bin Laden’s life on more than one occasion, I no longer have the freedom to arrive at an airport half an hour before boarding and expect to make my flight.

There is a good reason, though, that liberals are liberals. By and large, they are people who never fully mature and who go through life, like sullen teenagers, resenting figures of authority -- be they police officers, members of the military, teachers who believe in discipline and academic standards in the classroom – people, in short, who have rules and values. These folks started out by resenting their parents, assuming their parents were responsible adults and not aging hippies, the sort of parents who set curfews and expected good grades, parents who objected to their offspring boozing, shacking up and using drugs.

For years, we have all heard Hollywood’s most prominent left-wingers vow to leave America if we assorted racists, fascists and evil yokels, managed to elect a Republican president. And although Republicans have won five of the last seven presidential elections, and in spite of my standing offer to drive any and all of them to the airport, in all that time the only movie star who has left America except to make a movie or work on his tan is Johnny Depp, who moved to France. Sean Penn and Robin Williams did the next best thing. They moved to San Francisco.

One of the most annoying things about liberals is that when nightmarish events don’t take place as they predicted -- be they concentration camps for Jews, cataclysmic hurricanes or rising sea levels -- they never admit they were mistaken. They can’t even bring themselves to acknowledge that global warming was a hoax concocted by Al Gore; instead, they merely start squawking like a barnyard full of Chicken Littles about the intentionally vague phenomenon known as climate change.

In the meantime, Nancy Pelosi turns off the lights in the House so that Congress can’t vote for increased oil drilling. Then, to compound matters, she takes time off from her book tour to go on “Meet the Press” with liberal shill Tom Brokaw and explain that her personal financial investment in natural gas exploration was simply a means by which to wean Americans away from our dependence on hydrocarbons. Brokaw, either because he didn’t know or, more likely, had no intention of embarrassing Madame Speaker, neglected to point out that natural gas is a hydrocarbon!

By the way, in keeping with the times, I’m Burt Prelutsky and I approve this message.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I was hoping you would point out Pelosi
T. Boone Pickens is an idiot at least if one is knowledgeable about energy of all sorts and can see through his scam.

That he coined Pelosi with some 'President's' stock should surprise no one if they think about how corrupt congressmen generally are.

The amazing thing is the level of cognitive dissonance that one must have to be a member of the Democratic Party. It is amazing to see how a typical liberal Democrat can believe any two competing views they confront. For example, I am dumbfounded that Obama surrogates claim that the clearly more experienced Governor Palin is not fit to run for Vice-President while their candidate Obama is running for the top job.

I believe that with little effort one could come up with hundreds of liberal positions that are internally self conflicting and yet they believe them with religious zeal.

Cheers,

Bloefeld

Liberals: Idealism trumps people
1. Equality of outcome, not opportunity. Tax the heck of "the rich" and give to "the poor" to even out the distribution of wealth.

Forget economics. The ideal of equality trumps the continued prosperity of the US.


2. Mass reduction of the military. Since liberals believe civilized people abhor violence, the military should be radically cut back. Remember Carter and Clinton?

Liberals support the troops by bringing them home so that there are no deaths. Once they bring them home, they "downsize" them.

Look at Western Europe. They "outsourced" the defense of their countries to us. Who will we outsource our defense to?

The idealism of peace trumps the nature of the real world.


3. Humans should not impact the environment. Global warming is the cause du jour. Liberals must force us to reduce emissions, or the Earth will fry.

If liberals get their way, gas prices will rise, which they admit that they want, in order to reduce gas usage.

Forget the lessons learned by the previous fads; Global Cooling and the Ozone Hole. Forget the cost to the economy, and forget YOU, as your gas expense skyrockets, and the price of EVERYTHING shipped goes way up.

The idealism of a "zero-carbon footprint" trumps the economy and your pocket book.

Thurmond
I suppose you were speaking of Strom Thurmond of old when he was still a Demagogue Rat. Unlike Old Sheets Byrd, Strom appeared to have saw the light. he was one of the first Southerners to promote and appoint qualified blacks to his personal staff and other government appointee positions.

Dumb Dems
I hear you Bloefeld. I was shaking my head in disbelief when reading the letters to the editor in this morning's paper (Denver Post). Besides the couple of letters that were pro McCain/Palin, the rest ALL harped on her 'lack' of experience. Here are some of the incredibly ignorant letters:

"If Gov. Palin had the requisite wisdom for the office of vice president of the United States of America, she would recognize that she is grossly unqualified for the job, and she would have declined the nomination."

"So, will Sen. John McCain appoint the mayor of Cincinnati to be his secretary of state?"

"Sarah Palin is the mother of a newborn with Down syndrome and of an unwed teenager who will be delivering in December - a time when she apparently plans to be spending 18 hour days transitioning in Washington and the rest of her spare time desparately trying to learn a job for which she has no relevant experience."

These people are not just ignorant about Sarah Palin's experience as well as Obama's, but about what's required of the VP.

Unfortunately, I have a sister-in-law just this stupid. She's the kind of person who moved into a new house next to the regional airport, then complained about the airplane noise. Even better, she's a teacher. She's such a moonbat that even my kids don't like being around her anymore.


Right on Burt
I just hope and pray that we can kick some of those lying Liberal thieves out in order to preserve our great country.

for the last time, i wish
chuck. concentrate now, and try to get over your ingrained racism. states rights is not a "code word." it is the 10th amendment to the constitution:“ The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. ” get over it, chuck.

An ex-patriot Act?
I'll gladly offer airport shuttle to all liberals wishing to leave the country after the McCain/Palin victory in November.. Better yet, why not pass legislation to provide federal funding to those willing to be ex-patriots so we may restore some sanity in America? That would be tax dollars well-spent .

Feds Gaining Control?
Did the federal government take over the mortgage business so they can save homes? It's been reported that the federal govt is diminishing work on the roads because sales tax from gasoline sales has been cut by 50% instead of the high cost of gasoline, so Americans are punished while they send billions of dollars to Georgia and other countries? In the 90s, the federal govt offered federal funding to each state according to reports if the states accepted Goals 2000 which mandated specific rules for each school to adhere to relating to students. They regulate the federal bank. So, who is really running the country or taking it over for our own good? And, where are they getting billions of dollars to send overseas while our people suffer without much help? They pass laws for the good of the people, some times. Perhaps, the American people are taking their eyed off the ball as they watch those with the rackets banter back and forth without enough strategies to keep our country from an economic war against rising costs of gasoline, food, and housing, which would bring this country to its knees by using the Patriot Act. AMericans were misled when they were told that the Patriot Act was temporary and would be eliminated, but it was not. Instead, American citizens are under surveillance everywhere and treated like a "number." Congress didn't tell the truth and the whole truth to the American people about the Patriot Act which in my opinion diminishes our freedoms. We are spied on while foreigners wear masks and refuse to take DMV pictures without their masks. This writer says to the American people, "America needs resolutions, not revolutions! Resolutions prevent Revolutions, but many citizens believe that we're sitting on the fence."

On the Subject of Obama's Experience

I think Mr. Obama has a great deal of “Community Organizer” experience which qualifies him to be the democrat nominee. After all a “Community Organizer” in Chicago distributes the “Walk Around Money” buying votes which is an important part of democrat election strategy.

LBJ’s war on poverty has perpetuated poverty in cities like Chicago. The “Great Society” has convinced blacks they can only survive if they take the hand outs provided by this failed program. This program has relegated urban blacks to mere slaves on the “Plantation” of the state created by the “Great Society“.

The reason blacks vote for the Democrat Party is they are the party of the “plantation” slaves to government handouts. Chicago had more murders than troops killed in Iraq this year. Unemployment, urban blight, crime drugs, unwed pregnancies, it is still the same as when the “plantation” overseer Obama organized in South Chicago. You see, the democrat party still promotes poverty program induced slavery “hammer and tong”, ……or “hammer and sickle” in the case of the democrats true ideological base, communism.

In fact, democrat slavery has been in force since their founding. The democrat controlled south prior to the Civil War provided use with Jim Crow, Dred Scott, 3/5th compromise all democrat sponsored laws handed down by the Supreme Court enforcing slavery. If it supports enslaving blacks the democrat party is responsible. The KKK was founded by esteemed members of the….you guessed it, democrat party.

Abraham Lincoln, a Republican freed the slaves. The Republicans passed the civil rights act. Only morons like Texaschuck can’t get over the fact, he is a race baiting nitwit.

Conspiracy Theorist? Ya!
Unlike famous Irish lesbian Rosie O'Donnell's fire melting steel theory which met with global skepticism and rancor from a "smart and articulate" diaspora- nods to Joe Biden experienced yes man and Veep too famous Black Irish Democratic Presidential Candidate Barry O'Bama for those kind words I borrowed.
I BIGbelly, drunken loser have a hystorical theory to offer.
On a balmy day in 1960, Robert "Hey! my white sheet has an insignia" Byrd, George "I love black school-children" Wallace and a youthful Strom "Hey, my white sheet has five insignias and a hoodie just like the rappers! Duh!" Thurmond met at an undisclosed location in Alabama to discuss securing the impending Black Vote to the Democratic Party-illumanatti style.
The main question was asked and answered and the decision to target the leader's of the Black Church "The Reverends" was made by these three godfather's of black politics.
What do "the Good Reverends" like a lot of while saving Souls brothers & Souls Sisters? CASH & A CADILLAC.
Thus, to this day the majority of Black Folks vote Democratic because it's leaders "The Reverends" are bought and paid for.

Liberals & Cuckoos
Burt, you mentioned Liberals and Cuckoos in your article. Yes, you did the right thing!

To answer your question
Texaschuck wrote:

"Why did Southern Democrats like Strom Thurmond switch to the GOP?"

Because like all southern republicans, he loved his country and believed in a strong national defense. On the otherhand, the democrats who have historically gutted our counties defenses every chance they got are willing to give up our Sovereignty to the United Nationals.

If it was up to Obama and the democrat party we would again be defeated in Iraq, like the democrat supported defeat in Vietnam.

"Retreat and defeat" are the foundation of the democrat party national defense platform.

Yo, Texax Chuck
MLK was a Republican....that's because the GOP was the party that gave them the 13th Amendment, banning slavery. The GOP also extended the Bill of Rights to the states (14th Amendment) and the 15th Amendment which gave blacks the right to vote, while white Southern DEMOCRATS, the party that they now overwhelmingly support gave 'em Jim Crow laws with poll taxes, literacy requirements and segregation (- Woodrow Wilson - another DEMOCRAT). Burt hit the nail on the head when he said that the reason blacks overwhelmingly vote Democratic is because their pastors have been bought out for their endorsements. Just listen to the Reverends Jackson, Sharpton and any of the white Dems who campaign at the black pulpit or/and use the tactics of hate rethoric (Howard Dean who 'hates' Republicans and uses racism to keep blacks voting for Dems).

Oh, and all those Southern GOP probably moved south because there are still plenty of Southern Democrats here.... and they haven't changed much....

Too much credit to Gore again
Well Burt, sometimes it is hard to recognize the liberals. For instance, like his claims for the Internet, AL Bore did not “invent” Global Warming, AGW, or even the scare over this issue. The theory of AGW has been around since the 40s but few people gave it any credence because when the proposed numbers were crunched the results did not match the observed phenomena (doesn’t that sound familiar now, as the numbers still do not match).

This hideous little non-theory lay dormant until that great conservative Margaret Thatcher came along. She began pushing this obscure theory at global summits. Some of the British scientists took this up and AGW was born.

The rest of the world saw AGW as a way to “level” the economic playing field by flattening the U.S. economy. Their economies were destitute from being mired in socialism and they needed some help. Their “scientists” began the AGW chant.

The IPCC, that great body of the U.N. was actually a product of RONALD REAGAN who wanted it as a defensive measure to quell the socialist scientists who he thought were hijacking the debate. He just did not see the fact that ANY panel working under the auspices of U.N. politicians would be even more hijacked by socialism. Particularly when the U.S. gave way to the Clinton/Gore years, there was no sanity left on the commission.

So, if anybody can be said to have invented AGW scare, it was Margaret Thatcher, a conservative.

Although Gore did not invent AGW, he has been instrumental in trying to hasten the advent of socialism by destroying the U.S. economy and his getting rich off of it was just a side effect.

http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit. asp?individual_SQL=9/20/2007@16725_Public_.htm

http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html

There are times . . .

...when I'm convinced that liberals, progressives, socialists - whatever they call themselves nowadays - are incapable of rational thought.

Talking to a liberal is like talking to a young child whose world view rests on Spongebob Squarepants and Barney the purple dinosaur.

Their world view is compartmented, as is their logic. In other words, liberals don't seem to have an integrated, holistic world view. For example, it is possible for a liberal to argue that Sarah Palin is unqualified to be vice president (because of her lack of experience) while ignoring the fact that Barry Obama has less experience and is running for president.

The reason they can do that is their compartmented logic. Barry Obama is left out of the equation and is not considered in their argument. Any reference to him is immediately dismissed as irrelevent.

The disconnect is astonishing to watch. It used to frustrate me, but now, whenever I see Nancy Pilosi, or James Carville or Splash Kennedy yammering on, I just picture the face of a little child on them and it all makes sense.

And now, when I read the idiotic posts by Kimberly, Impeachbush and the other crackpot liberals on TH, I just picture them as little children, sitting in front of Dad's computer in their Hanna Montana PJ's, laboriously typing in their tripe. In the background is the annoying voice of Barney.

Jewish Professor
I could have told your Jewish professor from the Pacific Northwest that I spent the Sabbath before the 2004 elections in Boro Park, Brooklyn, which is FULL of Holocaust survivors and the children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors-and everybody I talked to told me he or she was going to vote for Bush!!!!

Bob_C
Splash Kennedy? You shouldn't call him that. Its tacky.

Hay Vic
That global warming garbage has been around sine the 1890s. It is brought out and repackaged every 20 years are so. I remember in the 1970s we were all going to freeze to death by a new ice age.

The fact is the weather prognosticators can’t tell you precisely what the weather will be tomorrow. The computer modeling used to prove we are warming does not take into account such things as cloud cover and precipitation.

The whole global warming scare is another means by the democrats and the United Nations to raise taxes. Even if the world is getting warmer, science has show climate fluctuations throughout history.

I had no idea Reagan had anything to do with the global warming boondoggle. I guess it is another example of unintended consequences.

Another great Democrat ......
....from the sixties was Governor Lester Maddox of Georgia. Gotta love those liberals. This was the Democrat that ran blacks out of his business with the business end of an ax. Gotta love those liberals...tho they do have bad memories....must be the mush they feed their brains.

5 stars Burt!!
What a great way to start off a week. Once the trolls wake up I'm sure they will have a lot to whine about.

Keep it up Burt.


Why do the blacks support the Commies?
Why do the blacks support the Commiecrats? Because they have been told year after year by their “leaders” to support the socialists. You see, like all of these liberal organizations, once their goals began to be realized the civil rights movement morphed into just another socialist/communist front group. The civil rights act was passed in 1964 so MLK’s work changed in 1965 as he moved into socialism and anti-war protest.

You can see that with Martin Luther King’s conversion with his “Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence” speech in 1967, his I’ve been to the mountain top speech in 1968 in support of the unions,

You can see it in the marches he led. An anti Vietnam march in Chicago in 1967 and in 1968 King announced that the Poor People's Campaign that would culminate in a March on Washington demanding a $12 billion Economic Bill of Rights.

So history shows that the leadership of the black movements under the auspices of MLK, which were all of the reputable ones at the time, was moving into socialism and communism away from “civil rights”. The other black organizations of the time were already there and were much more radicalized. It has been shown that those organizations were direct funded by the KGB.

Thus you have your answer as to why most blacks vote for Commiecrats, and it doesn’t have a lot to do with the so-called Nixon strategy. That is easily debunked just by looking at the Goldwater campaign. The South was already moving out of the Demoncrap umbrella before liberal Nixon came along.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/04/304/

http://www.lib.lsu.edu/hum/mlk/srs216.html

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksil ence.htm

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkivebeentothemou ntaintop.htm

Didn't Gwynneth Paltrow
also move to England?

G.I. Joe
Yeah, I have seen the 1890s stuff but it is pretty low key. I didn't mention it because it didn't start getting a hard look until the 40s.

Yeah, Reagan was trying to squash it. His mistake was that in the 80s he still had faith in the U.N.