Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 28, 2008
Burt Prelutsky :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Tarnished Silver Screen
by Burt Prelutsky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Some years ago, I was a movie reviewer. I started out at UCLA, reviewing for the Daily Bruin, and then moved on to be the first critic for Los Angeles magazine. All told, I stuck it out for about a dozen years.

I was always struck by the fact that my readers would insist that I never liked movies, even after I’d just written a rave about, say, “The Apartment” or “Some Like It Hot.” The fact of the matter is that pans are simply more memorable than raves. For instance, I have friends who still recall after 40 years that in summing up “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang,” a god-awful Dick Van Dyke vehicle, I wrote that it started off with a bang, but ended up chitty.

I finally had my fill when every other movie seemed to be a bad comedy starring Jerry Lewis or some piece of tripe directed by a 25-year-old shmoe who figured that all he had to do was stick the camera behind a fern to be mistaken for the next Hitchcock or Billy Wilder.

What I didn’t realize at the time was that, all in all, I had had it pretty good. But it took seeing a rash of movies recently to drive that point home. At least back then, the inflated egos of the director and the star didn’t make it inevitable that every movie would run well over two hours.

As a rule, I don’t go out to see more than 10 or 12 movies a year, whereas in my reviewing days I’d easily see that many in a month. This past year was fairly typical until, like all the other members of the WGA, I received a slew of DVDs from the studios looking to garner writing awards.

Now, understand they’re not sending us the usual assembly line dreck that they’ve been letting loose since last January. These are their treasures, the movies that are likely to be Oscar contenders, God help us.

To be fair, I had seen some decent movies in theaters. I had seen “American Gangster,” which was okay, although it is not close to being in a class with “The Godfather,” as the ads would have had us believe. I did enjoy “Lars and the Real Girl,” although I can understand why some people didn’t. I thought it was funny, and I thought “Enchanted” was charming. From what I’ve seen, movies that are funny or charming are in dismally short supply.

This brings us to the DVDs. To begin with, the only one I totally enjoyed was “Juno,” which I found to be funny and charming. I’d be perfectly happy if it made a clean sweep of the Oscars, although, speaking as a betting man, I suspect it won’t win any.

I’m not sure if the French film, “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly,” was really any good. It might be that my expectations of a movie about a stroke victim who’s lost the ability to speak were so low that the mere fact I could hang on to the end made it seem better than it was.

I thought “No Country for Old Men” was simply god-awful. Because the Coen brothers, who manage to give new meaning to self-indulgent, have concocted a movie that is extremely violent and totally pointless, the critics have labeled it a modern masterpiece. Movie critics, nearly without exception, are as gullible as the O.J. jury.

These same critics also gave multiple thumbs-up to “There Will Be Blood.” This is another very long, violent movie that also makes no sense at all. My idea of Hell is having to sit through this and “No Country for Old Men” on a double bill. Everyone is talking up Daniel Day-Lewis, the star of “There Will Be Blood,” for an Academy Award. I find that a little odd because throughout the entire movie he sounds exactly like John Huston in “Chinatown.” Maybe the point of this homage was that whether a man’s insatiable greed is for water or oil, he will inevitably wind up with the exact same voice.

Another problem I had with the movie is that it’s extremely dark. I don’t mean its subject matter, I mean its lack of illumination. It’s one thing when the action, such as it is, takes place below ground level, but even after the villain is very rich and living in a mansion, it appears that he can’t afford anything but 20 watt bulbs.

Frankly, I wasn’t expecting much from “Sweeney Todd,” not being a fan of director Tim Burton or star Johnny Depp. What I did expect -- especially in a musical -- is that I’d be able to understand the dialogue and the lyrics. The truth is, after wasting 20 minutes trying to figure out what the heck Depp and Helena Bonham Carter were saying and singing, I simply threw in the towel. My wife, who stuck it through to the end, reports that every five minutes or so somebody got his throat cut.

For what it’s worth, two friends of mine who have been active in motion pictures, claimed the reason I couldn’t figure out what was being said was because the sound mixing was so bad. That doesn’t surprise me. Tim Burton is so concerned about the way his movies look that he pays scant attention to anything else. However, I think that this time around he had a hand in the hair styling, as both Mr. Depp and Ms. Carter wore theirs the same odd way that Mr. Burton wears his.

That brings us to “The Kite Runner,” which, unlike most of the others, had something to say about actual human beings. The only drawback was that it had a tedious second act and, so, it seemed to take a terribly long time saying it.

Some years ago, my wife, who goes to many more movies than I do, observed that scenes taking place in public restrooms had become commonplace. That struck me as highly unlikely, but I soon discovered that she was right. At one point, in fact, I saw four or five movies in a row and each one of them had a conversation or a fist fight taking place in a men’s room. I don’t know in what parallel universe these movie makers dwell, but not only have I never seen a fist fight in a bathroom, but I’ve rarely heard two words spoken in such places.

For my part, what I’ve been noticing is that a fair number of movies have adopted the rape of males as a plot device. Whereas I don’t recall its ever being employed during the first 25 years or so that I was seeing movies, I have now come across it in “Deliverance,” “Prince of Tides,” “The Shawshank Redemption,” “Mystic River” and now “The Kite Runner.” That doesn’t include “Brokeback Mountain,” where sodomy was the order of the day, but at least it was consensual.

To tell you the truth, I find myself longing for the good old days when every movie didn’t last close to three hours and a guy could be humiliated and still keep his pants on.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I'm with you Burt...
I saw "There Will Be Blood" today, and "No Country For Old Men" last week. The first is based on an Upton Sinclair (early 20th century "muckraker" and communist) novel, "Oil", and the 2nd on a book by the same name which I haven't read. Regarding "Blood", I don't know if the book has no discernible denouement, but irrespective of whoever is responsible for this oversight, it is a conceited, pretentious cheap trick.

Your observations on the 1st movie are spot on as well, although I was happy not to have been beaten over the head with socialist ideology. You have to grant that. Actually, socialists will inevitably conclude that, of course, all capitalists (in fact, all non-liberals), are as deeply flawed as Day's character. Otherwise, they wouldn't be capitalists, would they? Us normal people recognize that (or conservatives, or republicans, etc.) the occasional power-mad megalomaniac is also successful in business. However, that's still preferable to having them end up in the bureaucracy. At least in business, they have to actually produce something their fellow beings are willing to pay for in order to succeed. In this case, oil.

Oops! It's too early in the morning...
I meant to say:

The first is based on an Upton Sinclair (early 20th century "muckraker" and communist) novel, "Oil", and the 2nd on a book by the same name which I haven't read. Regarding "No Country...", I don't know if the book has no discernible denouement, but irrespective of whoever is responsible for this oversight, it is a conceited, pretentious cheap trick.

Your observations on the 1st movie are spot on as well, although I was happy not to have been beaten over the head with socialist ideology. You have to grant that. Actually, socialists will inevitably conclude that, of course, all capitalists (in fact, all non-liberals), are as deeply flawed as Day's character. Otherwise, they wouldn't be capitalists(or conservatives, or republicans, etc.), would they? Us normal people recognize that the occasional power-mad megalomaniac is also successful in business. However, that's still preferable to having them end up in the bureaucracy. At least in business, they have to actually produce something their fellow beings are willing to pay for in order to succeed. In this case, oil.

Another good column Bert. Now
I will know what movies to rent from Netflix and which ones to scrap. Like you, we do not waste much time or money in theatres, preferring the less expensive route of renting and watching movies at home.

Tonight we watched an older release, The Family Stone. It was simply awful. It was supposed to be a comedy, but in truth it wasn't with the exception of a few laughs inserted between plenty of excrutiatingly poor script writing and lame story lines. It was billed as a great Christmas date movie but after seeing it I would think it would end up ruining the date and Christmas both.

Burt
If you are monitoring today check as to why TH has posted the same column that was done a few weeks ago.

I prefer "old" movies...
...but I like reading some books better. I can create my own settings and imagine how the characters would look.
***
BTW, Burt, I haven't had a chance to purchase your new book. But I will.
*****
This article has been posted before, but I've enjoyed reading it again. :)

Five!

The Writer Answers a Good Question
Vic--It's my fault. I inadvertently submitted it on Friday, not having checked it off earlier in the week. When I logged on an hour ago and saw that I had goofed, I sent a replacement piece. But I haven't heard back and obviously the new piece hasn't yet been posted. But judging by Ragtopcaddy and Not Ashamed to Be Right's comments, not everybody read the piece last week, so perhaps it's not that big a deal.

Regards, Burt Prelutsky

Raqtopcaddy
Forgive me for my ignorance but why use a word like denouement when "outcome" would be less pretentious. I don't believe normal people use the word denouement in regular conversation so why use it here, unless you're trying to brag on your use of words no one uses. I notice this more and more, even in Sports Illustrated, where the writers seem to throw in words no one would use in normal conversation, I guess to impress us great unwashed out here in flyover country.

Thanks for the response Burt.
True, it does give additional people the chance to see an excelent column.

Yeah,Ragtop Caddy...
...can't you just keep it in the "Me Tarzan,you Jane" kind of dialogue? Us peons don't understand that "Denouement" stuff.

Missed this one first time around
Probably slept late that morning or got hung up on another thread, but enjoyed the re-submission.

I can hardly be dragged to the movies, by love nor money, nowadays. The ticket price is hardly ever worth it and $14 popcorn and $5 bottled water doesn't help. I got totally fed up with the liberal, socialist tripe, constant attacks and belittling of my beliefs and morals during the mid-90's.

As an aspiring, cynical old poop, I seem to spend most of the movie watching and waiting for the hidden message, the anti-American, leftist agenda of the screenwriter or director, usually idiotic in my opinion. Unlike TV, where I can simply change channels or turn it off, I'm compelled to sit it out hoping to get my money's worth and always disgusted with myself for wasting my time and cash.

I did see National Treasure II recently, but only after extended cajoling by my wife and then enjoying the first of this new "franchise" on television. It was enjoyable - clean and fun and I was able to suspend my usual cynicism for a few hours.

Hollywood never gets the fact that wholesome entertainment makes gobs of money, whereas their stupid message movies make squat. We want to suspend reality for a time, not be reminded of it, or worse - their alternate reality.

And I damn sure don't force any far left loony to take my hard earned cash. Mikey Moore, Charlise Theron, Sean Penn, Saranden & Robbins, Meathead, even Jamie Lee Curtis can make their living off their fellow travelers. I will make an exception for Johnny Depp, my favorite pirate of the modern era.

Paraphrasing Laura Ingraham , they should "Shut up and act!!!"

Burt
Join us anytime! New column OR old column.

And I'll take that bet, by the way. One betting man to another.

Feel strongly young Ellen Page will win for best actress. On screen (there might be four or five scenes she's not in) from opening credits until closing credits, she's a lock for major stardom.

I'd love to see the film win all four categories as you would. But besides best actress, I think best screenplay is the next best shot.




Oliver
Does anyone else notice..
according to Hollywood and Madison Ave.. we all have a "gay" member in our immediate family...we races all hang out together...the only truly wretched are wasp men...that is why I very seldom watch any new releases or commercial t.v..

I saw The Family Stone in the theater at Christmas time, and it did ruin Christmas...for that day. There was a gay member in the immediate family, the mother attacks her houseguest at the table because she makes a comment about gay men (so much for liberal tolerance) and her college professor husband defends her attack as justified (wow, that's a stretch!). The houseguest is there as the fiancee of one brother but ends up sleeping with the other brother, and the family accepts this behavior as the way to pick a husband. Talk about disgusting. This is Hollyweird's idea of the modern American family. Of course, not in any universe that I live in. I sure wish I could get those two hours of my life back AND MY MONEY! No more Keaton movies for me.

Bathroom scenes
I admit I did enjoy Bond choking the bad guy to death in the bathroom in Casino Royale-the bad guy looked like an Islamic terrorist in bad '70's clothing. However, watching the Russian mob try to kill a naked Viggo Mortensen in a sauna in the movie Eastern Promises was weird. And talking about hypocrites, I saw a picture the other day of Viggo kissing Cindy she-monster's hand because he's all about peace. Notice the roles he takes: Satan in The Prophecy movie, Aragon in Lord of the Rings, former hit man in History of Violence, hit man in Eastern Promises. FOr someone so opposed to violence, he sure makes a lot of money making violent films. Do you think he catches the irony?

uwcharlie...
"Denouement" is the proper term for the "outcome" of a story. I teach English, and even when I taught 8th grade, "denouement" is the word we used. Using the correct term doesn't make one pretentious. The English language has the richest vocabulary in the world. People used to read and as a result, had wide vocabularies. We shouldn't "dumb down." Maybe you folks should read more.

Bert is right


Burt is so right about the level of indulgence in the current movies, which is why I have assembled a collection of VCR and DVD's to watch at home on the small screen.

Much of the writing even on grade B movies from the past exceeds the "Oscar winning" tripe.

I would rather watch "1776" than "JFK (by Stone)".

What - No complaints about raped women?
How many rape scenes have I had to sit through, while the men in the audience seem to have no problem at all, and yet now that it's happening to men in the movies, we're all supposed to be upset?

Sorry, Rape is Horrid, and I don't want to see it on screen - PERIOD! Not a man, not a woman, NOT A CHILD! NEVER!

I would encourage ALL movie reviewers to rail against ALL rape scenes - NOT just the ones that make THEM feel uncomfortable. Being a man is no excuse for being upset only by seeing a Man being raped.

I am a woman, and Believe me, I am upset by ANY rape scene. Just because it happens to women and children more than it happens to men in real life, does not make it acceptable to portray in movies. There are ways to insinuate the outcome, without actually having to force us all to watch it. That is the sign of a good movie director, which NONE seem to exist, anymore.

I haven't seen a praiseworthy movie in decades that wasn't aimed at children (Home alone, Shrek, etc). I think the original Die Hard movie, or Pretty Woman was the last one I saw that I'd recommend to anyone.

Note how both were made without raping anyone, and BOTH were box office Smashes, that had NO Liberal slant on history, or political agenda. They were just good movies.

Where are those directors, actors, writers now?

No more award shows either
I also don't watch award shows, Oscar, Golden Globes, etc. because I don't want to hear the inevitable socialist anti-American claptrap. I stick to movies by Jet Li and Jason Stratham (War was ok), Live Free and Die Hard was great, Shoot 'em up was pointless (I wanted to see Clive again) but at least no "message" (Giamatti said during the 'making of' that he liked the script when he saw it had a character who was a "lactation whore". Said he just liked saying "lactation whore". Besides his awful overacting in the movie (where he asks without irony "Is that guy really that good or are we that bad?"), the interview with the writer/director, who was all upbeat about his five year journey to bring his masterpiece to the screen, was jarring. He's smiling and joking, but his script is a horror. I ask again, in which universe do these people live?

Movies
Most (probably all, now) are a waste of money. I maybe go once a year. Didn't anyone know that you can get your money back. If a movie has really bad language and/or sex, I get up, go the manager and ask for my money back. I have done it several times. You sign a little form explaining and there you go. Back to your sane universe with your wallet intact. Try it, you'll feel so much better about yourself and you told them exactly what you thought, not just talking amongst yourselves, which is what most people do. I asked for my money back when I saw a play at a college. It was stupid, vulgar and the subject matter was crap. I said I didn't like the language and they said well it says "adult language" on the advertisement. My response: "That is not adult, that is sophomoric". Money back and I didn't have to endure tripe and have my sensibilities tortured.

10 or 12 movies a year!
You must have a lot more time to waste than I do.

Don't get me started on the film industry. Most, if not all, of the imagination has gone out of Hollywood.

Take out the violance, sex and cursing and the actors wouldn't know what to do with themselves.

I enjoyed Forest Gump, Oh, and Castaway. I guess that is a solid endorsement of Tom Hanks.

Live Free or Die Hard was awful.
It was chuck full of the reasons I hate going to the movies anymore.

The Hero was in a foul mood all through it. He did not want to be the good guy, he was forced to be. The secondary hero/sidekick was also dragged kicking and screaming into doing the right thing, not because he wanted to, but because he was forced to. How do you root for guys that are this reluctant to do the right thing.

The BAD guys were all US Citizens/White Men (how shocking!), and or Government employees, and the big fight scene was between the reluctant Hero, and the a US Air Force Pilot!

Just who were you rooting for?

And don't get me started on the ridiculous - and ALL TOO COMMON - tactic of the fierce woman combatant. Just how many 118 lb woman are there in Hollywood who can beat up 20 men without so much as mussing their hair, anyway? This is all so far fetched, and sending all the wrong messages to girls.

No girl can beat up a man in a fair fight, and constantly beating the drum that they not only can beat up one man, but many at a time, is just encouraging girls to delude themselves, and risk getting into fights they can't win. Not helping!

oliver p shagnasty
HAHA! Yeah, the wife and I really enjoyed "Six Feet under" under every other scene was something on the gaybos!

Hollyword knew how to make movies once but it's all rehashed SHITE now.

BTW, a famous McLame quote.

I believe my party has gone astray. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and
their philosophy." - John McCain

Check my blog for THREE solid gut punches into the flabby gut of the leftists.



BURT
The word "ART" is short for artificial.At one time in the American movie industry; they saw their mission, as taking the patron to some place, they would like to go.Today you don't go anywhere ,when you go to the movies,but to a place you just left.In that"ART" now imitates "LIFE", is it still "ART"?UMMM.There was a time, when I attended the MOVIES at least once per week.Now I watch RUSSIAN TV.

my 2 cents
Living up here in Maine we don't get to see too many good flicks but here is my opinion anyway.

Best last year - that George Clooney flick - Michael Clayton, or whatever his name was. Don't care for Clooney's politics but he is a fine actor when he wants to be. The movie didn't do too well at the box office I understand so Clooney will make Ocean's 14 and 15 to help finance his next good flick.

No Country for Old Men - Very weird very violent and very forgettable. But the guy who played the psychotic killer was remarkable.

Amazing Grace - Not Oscar material but I drove over 150 miles roundtrip to see it twice and then it came to the local theater so I saw it a few more times and now I have the DVD. A Masterpiece. If you can listen to the song being played on babpipes and then drums and then tubae (plural of tuba?) and not tear up you shouldn't be reading this.

There Will Be Blood - not interested. If you don't care about the characters why go and from what I've seen here and there there is not really anyone to care about. Daniel Day Lews from all accounts gives an Oscar worthy performance but so what?

American Gangster - Well done and all but it's basically about a guy who makes his way up the ladder by killing people and makes his (considerable) fortune by marketing a particularly potent strain of heroin from South Vietnam and having it shipped to the states by putting it in the bodies of dead American soldiers. For me it's kind of hard to like a guy like that, even if he does look like Denzel Washington.

(Wish I'd said this first Dept.) The Academy Awards are Hollywood's annual salute to itself. I read that somewhere about 10 years ago and I have not heard a better description since then, not even close.

When you put it that way...
KM, your analysis of Live Free or Die Hard is well-taken. However, I saw this movie as the ongoing development of Willis' character, i.e. what does being a hero get you? The movie mentions his marriage at the time of the original Die Hard movie. At the end though, there is a positive note about being a hero when he tells Justin Long, you are that guy. Justin takes a journey from being a computer nerd who is not concerned with the consequences of his casual anti-Americanism to realizing the consequences and then doing something about it. I saw the fight with the Air Force pilot as symbolic of how we fight ourselves rather than the bad guys who are terrorists. The fact that this terrorist is a white guy and an American just says that domestic terrorism exists, and we must be vigilant no matter where it comes from.
Finally, I like Bruce Willis in the Die Hard character, and I like Justin Long. He's a very appealing young actor (he was great in Dodgeball!). And I enjoyed watching Bruce waste the "Asian kung-fu chick". I enjoy any movie where a terrorist gets what's coming to them, no matter their gender or nationality.

2 more cents
Juno - Not interested. I have an 18 year old cousin who is a single mom and the father has basically disappeared from the scene. There was a (once upon a) time when sex was supposed to be reserved for marriage, but then came the enlightenment of the 60s and the pill which (supposedly) removed the responsibility of the act from the equation, which has resulted (I know this is oversimplification) in much enlightenment and stuff.

We have come so far from the evil old days in which people preached abstinence because the Bible says it is the right way that we have reached the stage where people who have the colossal nerve to counsel abstinence until marriage are vilified.

It's called progress

I should add that
About a month ago I got into a rather pleasant cyberspace argument for about a week with some folks over a Diane West column. They objected to her column in which she said among other things that Led Zeppelin was not art.

LZ's defenders immediately jumped to the rescue of their aging heroes, and I defended Ms. West, going to the measure of e-mailing her to identify myself and she wrote back thanking me while expressing some surprise at the reaction of outraged LZ fans. (I recently saw a video of Alison Krause and Robert Plant - pathetic.)

At some point I was called a grumpy old man. I responded with the comeback that I am old and I am a man but I am not grumpy. I am that rarest of species - a Certified Old Fart. And proud of it - it is an honor only acquired by years of careful, devoted depravity and study. There are not many of us but WE ARE OUT HERE.

If there are any out there who recall that argument I would ask you if the names Mark O'Connor, Bela Fleck, Chris Thile, Sam Bush, Tony Rice or Jerry Douglas mean anything to you?

oh my
Let down by Hollywood. Dang! What a blow. Ahh for the good old days. It’s a shame they’re gone and a bigger shame that they never existed in the first place. But as we all know, perception trumps reality and isn’t that what Hollywood has been about all along?

Parsifallian tests
I used to work in a movie theatre when I was going to college and saw a lot of first-run movies. I can tell you today's movies are junk compared to the ones that used to be made 40-50 years ago. When they weren't allowed to have nudity, gore, and vulgar language (especially the f-bomb), directors had to produce movies that actually had at least a modicum of artistic merit. Now, it seems, all that is needed is to shock our sensibilities.

The “Boondock Saints” is one of those movies that was not released – it escaped! There is no plot. I suffered through one hour of it waiting for something to get started. It never did. “I f***’n killed your f***’n cat, and if you f***’n can f***’n tell me the f***’n name of your f***’n cat, I’m f***’n going to f***’n take this f***’n gun and f***’n blow my f***’n brains f***’n out!” is an example of the dialog. Whoever got paid to write such trash was grossly overpaid.

Then there is “The Departed”, a poor man’s Godfather if there ever was one (no offense to poor people). Like "Parsifal", the opera that starts at 8:30 and three hours later, you look at your watch and it's only 8:45, there is a point at which you think this story will never end, and indeed it doesn't. I can't spoil the ending because it never really ends – you are left hanging, and it turns out to be a 135-minute Parsifallian test of your endurance. Also, to follow it, you have to be REALLY good at how cell phones work.

It should get the Academy Award for Masochism – the award for the film that inflicts the most amount of suffering on its audience.

My advice: don’t watch them ... even if they’re f***’n free.

Burt. You're digging a hole for yourself
Be careful, my friend. Hollywood has a long memory. Keep writing this stuff and you'll "NEVER WORK IN THIS TOWN AGAIN."


True Stories
I always like movies base on true stories. The best one i've seen in the last 5 years was entitled Eight Below. The story of 8 sled dogs that survived one of the harshest winters ever recorded in the history of Antartica. Hardly any movies ever bring me to tears but this one did. Amazing Grace was one becuase I love hearing that song on the bagpipes. Hollywood can still make a good movie every now and then but those are few and far between.

Burt
Did they post the correct article? I've read this one before from you on TH.

Or Burt
Am I going crazy?

Shells, MotleyCrue, sheepdog
Good morning, y'all!

Shells, you are not going crazy! Burt explained what happened in a post to Vic at 1:59 AM. ;-)

KM
You think that most men sit comfortably through rape scenes involving women in movies? Hardly. I have discussed this very issue with my male friends numerous times. Usually we are all agreed in asking, "Why did they have to put that scene in there? It was so hard to watch."

Watching men get raped might be a little more uncomfortable for men, for the simple reason that we can relate to the character more than we can a woman. But that hardly means watching women get raped is not disturbing.

I for one hate rape scenes in movies. Did you see Prince of Tides? There is a scene where escaped convicts break into a family home and rape everyone. Mom and children alike. It is so brutal and disturbing that to this day I can not flip past that movie fast enough. I am certain there are men who enjoy watching rape scenes, but I can tell you they are the ultra sick minority.

uwcharlie
Though my knee jerk reaction is to agree with you on the use of big words, I find I can't.

I am a writer, and I try never to be excessively wordy when I write. It can-as you say-come off as elitist and arrogant. But frankly I think that the young people of today could stand to pick up a little more knowledge with regards to language.

My wife got me hooked on a show called Gilmore Girls, and one constant with all the kids on that show, is the fact that they are all extremely well read and well spoken. I find in reality that young kids are rarely so cerebral.
Even the adults seem to lace the F word into every other sentence when outside of work or formal situations. But you are correct, in that many writers are far more concerned about impressing us with their vocabulary than the are with the content of their work.

kudos
To Burt for coming back to let us know that he still reads the comments. To Oliver P Shagnasty- best name I've seen in a while. What does the "P" stand for? As far as Hollywood, I love the classics but can also turn off my brain for the current crop of "shoot 'em up plus car chases" type that is so prevalent. Since I have only been to a movie theater about four times in eight years, I have missed a LOT of good movies. A movie has to be very exciting for the missus and I to stay awake after the kids are in bed. I thought "The Departed" was great; I loved Markie Mark's character-knew some dudes in Boston just like that.

Jerry Lewis, in Strasbourg, France


Well Burt, you wouldn’t even hint about anything even slightly bad about Jerry Lewis, if you were in France.

In the 1980’s we visited Strasbourg, France several times, and one (most every) year we went to Strasbourg's new shopping mall (one of the nicest in Europe) and used the restroom at McDonald's. That has become an euphemism, “I need to use the McDonald's.” They make billions of dollars each year selling food to people who just stopped by to use the “McDonalds.”

On the edge of downtown Strasbourg, where several canals come together, there are several pretty sights, including half-timbered buildings, locks and dams on the canals, and beautiful flowers and trees on nearby streets. Truly one of the beautiful views in an European city.

Jerry Lewis Productions added to the crowds by having a film crew at work. For some reason, the French people think Jerry is the greatest actor in the world, but for some reason I only partly agree.

With the rest of the crowd, we stood around for a few minutes to see if he would appear, then left to continue visiting this most fascinating city.

The next day we found ourselves in the same area, and found the same director’s chair with the same name. After a few minutes, we asked an English speaking member of the crew, when Jerry is going to appear. He said, “He’s not even in town, but the people love him so much, we leave this chair here to draw the crowds.”


sedonaman [10:43 AM]
"When they weren't allowed to have nudity, gore, and vulgar language (especially the f-bomb), directors had to produce movies that actually had at least a modicum of artistic merit. Now, it seems, all that is needed is to shock our sensibilities."

Well said, sir. Couldn't agree more.

How many times have my wife and I had to produce an explanation to our (nearly-teenaged) kids along these lines: "Yes, guys, that was a cool movie and it was a lot of fun to watch. But we're not going to buy it because Hollywood just had to go and ... " [insert one or more of: undressed women, blasphemous and/or obscene language, overt gore, etc., etc. ... none of which is generally necessary to advance the plot or develop the characters].

Hollywood, if you're listening ... get a life.

oliver p shagnasty
Very close to the truth, so the question is why do they feel the need to keep shoving it down our throats? He!l they even do it on TV. Same with the anti American line? Seems to me they have done very well showing their lack of love or care for the country, so why keep making them? They would rather be kissing terrorist arse, so, I think they know they make real Americans sick. Could they be getting a kick back from whomever makes Peptol Bismol (SP?) maybe?
P.S. Did every one hear that Ted the swimmer endorsed Obam and not Billary? AHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!

sophie whateveritistoday scribbles:
If you can't keep up with the times, maybe you should move out of the way!

We were here before you socialist, get over yourself 8-P

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!


Head of the Prelutsky household, Yvonne.

Burt, I thought the column sounded familiar, but then I thought maybe I was just remembering what you said at your book signing, for your latest

The Secret of their Success
Interviews with Legends & Luminaries

last Saturday afternoon.

The room was filled with people who looked faintly familiar, but with their age, and the age of my brain, I wasn't sure who I was seeing.

Gary Owens introduced you, and he did look a little familiar. (A secret.) As he was walking down the street to his car, I gave him a copy of my latest (they are all late) book Travel/Personal Snippets. He loved the covers (yes two front covers), but I don't know how many of the 1,500 one paragraph stories (in alphabetic order) he will read.

I don't know if you can call my book a best seller or not, but I have given away almost all that I had printed. (It's not for sale, Burt doesn't want the competition.)

I had complimented a nice lady on her beautiful colorful dress, then later found she was the Head of the Prelutsky household, Yvonne. A sweet lady, in case you have never talked to her.




Why use/need obscene words


I would like someone to tell me a story where a word, or words that are considered obscene by most people are the only words that can be used to make that point.

How about tone of voice, facial expression, body language, etc. Oh I forgot, I’m talking about the current garbage generation, with very little talent.

Why else would they have so called Reality TV. It takes talent to be a writer, and actor, a director, and on and on, while Reality TV takes a camera attached to a tripod, and an idiot in front of the camera. That matches much of this generation's audience exactly.

sophie whateveritistoday scribbles:
(insert cursing here)I love that stuff!

LOL the queen of her own mind must have another name picked out. Is your last name Doofus, by any chance?

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!

sophie whateveritistoday scribbles:
There are no real republicans running for POTUS (except Ron Paul)...
and:
Why don't you start a third party?

1-Not my job to educate you but, RP is no republican, he is a Libertarian.

2-See above, there are already three parties.

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!

The Writer is Back Briefly
Jim--Thanks for the kind words about my new book and my not so new wife. I have talked to her, by the way.

Regards, Burt

johnTaylor, et al:
“...none of which is generally necessary to advance the plot or develop the characters.”

Exactly my sentiments.

“Hollywood, if you're listening ... get a life.”

Hollywood’s response is, “We make the pictures that people want to see.” The problem with this is that few know in advance about the “undressed women, blasphemous and/or obscene language, overt gore, etc., etc.”, the ratings notwithstanding. Ratings have been deflated (or inflated, depending on your point of view). A good example is “Adventures in Babysitting”, rated PG-13. Would you let your 13-year-old kid see it if you knew one of the lines spoken by the babysitter (Elizabeth Shue) was, “Don’t f*** with the babysitter!” ? (I donated it to the local library, but first changed the rating on the cover to “R”.)

Suggestion: Most people don’t know it, but if you don’t like a picture, you can demand your money back, as long as you haven’t seen more than about 25% or so of it. Above all, remember, ***EVERY TICKET SOLD IS A VOTE FOR MORE OF THE SAME*** s**t.

Burt
Not bad for an old column! You're around 50 posts and counting.

Maybe TH could also run your piece in the slick, new Townhall Magazine .

That would make your column what?

A Triple Feature!

Lazy Burt
Town Hall ran this same column, word for word, last week. What gives? Is Burt Prelutsky part of the Writers' strike? Or is he just lazy? At any rate, I vigorously defend today's Hollywood and indie filmmakers -- without apology. See my comments posted beneath the previous version of this piece.

Tell Burt to get more pep in his step. He's getting senile.

Good ReRun Burt
We do need a short break from the steady diet of Politics.

Fiction movies is a good safe topic that few will become emotional over.

Now something like this would provoke controversy;
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/19/mexican-state-whines- about-influx-of-mexican-workers/

And don't forget the blatant deception
inherent in every movie trailer advertised on TV!

"Smokin' Aces" was the most blatant deception I have ever witnessed. The trailers on TV made it seem like a comedy, action movie. WHAT A LIE!!!

It was a gay fantasy, with childish violence sequences from the first moment to the end. The entire mess was a disgusting piece of crap that will go down in history as the worst movie ever made!

AND NOT ONE FUNNY scene in the entire thing! We were disgusted, and no longer trust any trailer advertised on TV. What a rip off!

If people knew what anti-American, gay porn, child abuse, and rape movies that Hollywood was making before they saw them, I'd bet the vast majority would never pay the money. I know we've pretty much stopped going, because it's always such a rip off, and NOTHING resembling the trailers.

If Hollywood was so sure the public wanted what they were making, why the deception? Portray the movies as they really are, then, if they're so sure we all want to see gay porn, child abuse, graphic rape scenes, and vicious gore, and violence. Not likely.

This is indoctrination, and numbing us to the evil they wish to force on us, so the hell on earth they're trying to get us to accept will be swallowed more easily. They want all the criminals set free, and they want all the 3rd world invaders to live amongst us, so they can live in their mansions, behind their gates and guards, and tell themselves they are oh so forgiving, and loving, while the rest of us have to deal with the mess they created.

They love to tell us it's only a movie, and can't influence anyone, but if that's true, why all the product placement ads within all their movies? Did they tell the advertisers that their movies would not influence anyone, too? Can't be both ways.

garbage man scribbles:
Tell Burt to get more pep in his step. He's getting senile.

It may be you going senile, as Burt explained in an earlier post his mistake. But then after all you do idolize smut town so I am not surprised.

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!

Burt,
Thanks again for the column. Th idea brought forth by Killer for a movie to take you to a place you wanted to be. South Pacific? i hadn't noticed it was missing until that post. Just one more thing likened to the frog in boiling water. You don't notice, until it is too late.

"A Good Year"
While I enjoyed Johnny Depp in the POTC trilogy, generally I don't care for boy actors who will look 19 until they turn 50, eg, Matt Damon.

I like movies where the men look like men.

Biggest disappointment of last few years: Russell Crowe (the greatest actor of our generation in my denouement; BTW, you can use words like this and mispronounce them and no one notices; I'm sufficiently obnoxious to say "de NOW ment" from time to time) threw his career away with his phone-toss episode as "Cinderella Man" was coming out. 3:10 to Yuma is crap, but Crowe is great in it.

But if you enjoy a romantic comedy (sans Rock and Doris), check out "A Good Year" (2006). Crowe has the most expressive face of any male actor working today.

KM
Do you ever wonder why an entertainer will take sides, comment on controversial issues and thereby alienate a major portion of their fans?

Can't they see how much more entertaining they are when people are unaware of their political ideals?

If I had money invested in their movies I would be trying to duct tape their mouth closed!

There are a few of the big mouth actors I can't even enjoy watching on TV now.
NO WAY would I ever pay to see them.

Boy, garage man,
you sure must feel dumb now, huh?

Chopper John, get thee to an art house
Actually, I don't feel nearly as dumb as the ignoramuses posting here who see nothing but "smut" and "gore" in cinema, and who assum the purpose of film is to inspire audience copycat behavior. It seems these bozos can't put a single scene in context. If someone can't tell the difference between the filmmaking styles of Ridley Scott and Tony Scott, or between Steven Spielberg and Steven Soderburgh, that's not anyone's problem but theirs. Ignorance is optional.

I see a new movie a week. Only time and family obligations prevent me from seeing two or three. You don't like that? Too bad.

garageman writes:
Ignorance is optional.

Seems so here on TH.

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
If we can not have HOME SECURITY first, the rest just won’t matter!
YES I am still writing Fred’s name in the box!
NO MORE HOLDING OUR NOSE AND PULLING THAT LEVER!!
VOTE FOR A REAL REPUBLICAN!! NO MORE RINO’s!!!

garageman
Ridley Scott is a favorite of mine; to this day, I find the original Alien to be the best horror/Sci-Fi movie of all times.

But you must admit that there are some film makers who try to be disturbing, simply because they lack creativity. Did you see Leaving LasVegas? That was praised by critics as some kind of masterpiece. I found it to be morbidly depressing on every level.

Unless a movie is telling a true story, like say Schindlers List, I dont understand the need to intentionally depress an audience. Most of us go to the movies to be entertained, and dare I say it? Uplifted. Now a silly comedy can do that, as easily as a masterful epic.

All in all, I would say most films are designed to do just that: entertain. Fortunately, only a few are what I would call pure garbage.

don't hate someone because...
uwcharlie's attitude toward use of "unfamiliar" words is unfortunate for him and for the nation if it is widespread.

To paraphrase an old shampoo commercial with Roula Impossible-Russian-name, "Don't hate me because I have a large vocabulary"...

English has an enormously rich vocabulary which makes it wonderfully nuanced. Every English speaker should take pride in this and encourage expansion of one's speaking vocabulary, not the reverse.

Instead of the paranoid fantasy that someone with a good vocabulary is "talking down" to anyone, imagine the more likely case that he is simply someone who enjoys using just the right word.

It's like playing tennis. If you play with someone at your own level, you never progress. If you manage to hang out with slightly better players, you improve your own game.

Whatever level of formal education we have achieved, the schools have not done a good job if they haven't conveyed the joy of learning and that it should be a lifelong project.

On another topic, the movie conventions people outlined above were entertaining. I would add that when Hollywood portrays a transexual character with a man becoming a woman, the end product is usually played by a knockout actress who was born female. 99% of women don't look that good, let alone men made over into women. Conversely, the rarer case of a woman crossing over to be a man is not portrayed by George Clooney...or any man.

To kindel
Gotch ya.

Movie Screeners Agree
I read your column and had to laugh when you mentioned the requisite bathroom scene in today's movies. So true, so true! In 2007 my friends and I attended 74 free movie screenings and have a list of the things we know we'll see from these screenwriters/directors who actually must be reincarnated 13-year-olds. The bathroom scene is always there as well as the indiscriminate sex and bad language! I rarely, if ever, agree with the list of movies chosen for the Academy Awards. And, contrary to what Hollywood believes, the majority of people in our free screenings seem to agree with us!! I also identify with killer on the idea that instead of giving us movies to inspire or take us to places we'd love to be, lives we'd love to lead, most new films extol "realism"--but different from any real life I've experienced or wish to experience. So give me the old movies too!! Except I also notice that some DVD releases of older movies I really enjoyed now contain language and scenes never in the original releases. So they're even trying to ruin the old ones.

garageman, why do you
bother to post before reading the previous ones?
That way you don't repeat a question which was completely answered earlier. Oh I get it, you just needed a reason to spew some of that garbage of yours towards the author.

Best The 2nd Time Around!
Dear Mr. Prelutsky:

The truth cannot be too oft repeated! I scrolled down looking to find my old comment!! Oh, well.

What we DO need is more insightful commentary on Hollywood. Hollywood, after all, is the "heart & soul" (God help us!) of the popular culture. From it springs much of the inspiration for the pollution of our child's "hearts & souls". Precious little comes forth from elsewhere, despite the huge cavalcade of Hollywood-oriented blather. They all seem to revel in the mind-numbing misfocus on actors and movies coming and going. Rarely to you find any with the courage and initiative (and personal experience) to point out what it all means to us in the Heartland.

And it means a lot. What the Denizens say and do is spoken of to high-heaven and often lauded... no matter how low they or their works sink. Their films are talked of as "art"... no matter how perverse their content, message or (importantly!) the means of their making with increasing numbers of child actors. Their personal lives are presented with an aura of glamor or sob-sister tragedy... no matter how their decadence, irresponsibility or exploitiveness toward themselves and/or their families have so contributed. Yet, all this is presented as iconic to the American way of life.

Thank you for your efforts to help us understand the cinema from an all-points perspective. If Hollywood cannot be held forth any longer for the good it was once capable of (and so rarely is now), at least there are a few sources that can speak with authority on why we should be concerned and what we can tell our kids they should not see and not emulate. We need more good examples for them, certainly. Identifying the bad is helpful, too.

Best wishes

rent some good Italian films
Get away from Hollywood movies that are full of violence, have no substance and little story-telling - rent an Italian movie. Ok, so they have sub-titles but you get used to them after a few minutes. Best of my picks are:
Malena
Cinema Paradiso
Ciao Professore
Il Postino
Vita 'e bella (Life is beautiful)
Meditteraneo

Although my all time favorite film is Irish:
Waking Ned Devine

also a good recent English film: Kinky Boots (same folks who did Calendar Girls)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.