Recently, I posted a piece “Jihad This!” in which I stated that the time for political
correctness had long since passed and that, at least so far as I was concerned, America’s
entire Muslim population was suspect. For one thing, large numbers of them continued
to wire funds to terrorist organizations even after 9/11, and instead of speaking out
against their fellow Islamics or placing a reward on Osama bin Laden’s head, they
bellyache about racial profiling.
Frankly, I expected that a lot of people were going to take me to task for
denouncing millions of our fellow Americans. That didn’t happen. In fact, only one
person, a Muslim living in England, took strong objection to the piece.
In the following exchanges, I believe he represents what we would regard as the
moderate wing of his religion. As usual, I represent only myself.
Michael opened with the following: “Your article was extremely ignorant,
incorrect and inflammatory. It is clear that you are pleased to use atrocities being
committed today by some wayward individuals to attack Islam itself. It is a great pity
that men such as yourself should be given such a platform to express their prejudice and
spread misinformation. Muhammad never converted anyone to Islam by the sword. This
is not my opinion, but is established fact. Islam being the newest and most influential of
the great world religions, is also the most accurately documented in history, so there is
simply no basis for what you are saying.
“People like you would fan the dangerous flames that are threatening to engulf the
world at the moment, without regard for truth or the consequences of your lies.
“What a shame that you have such a platform. What a shame. One wonders how
many more there are like you, seeking to engulf the world in your ignorance. No wonder
the world is in such a perilous situation.”
Burt: “Michael, please get a grip. The world is not in peril because of my words,
whether or not you like them, but because of the disgusting misdeeds of your co-
religionists. But you obviously prefer to direct your righteous indignation at me instead
of at the people who are committing cold-blooded murder in the name of Allah.”
Michael: “How do you know that I have not already directed my ‘righteous
indignation’ at my erring co-religionists? I’ll have you know that six or seven years ago,
before September 11th, I spoke directly to one of the leaders of Hamas during a live BBC
radio phone-in. I told him that he and his group were committing grave crimes in the
name of Islam. He said they had the right to defend themselves. I told him that Islam
laid out clear rules of engagement which Hamas and other similar groups broke, and I
listed those rules on the air. I told him that I sympathized with the suffering of his
people, but I believed that what he was doing was wrong and, as a Muslim, he did not
represent me. He had no answer to any of that.”
Burt: “You sympathized with his suffering?! What suffering that hasn’t been
brought on by the leaders of the PLO and the other terrorist organizations? Were you
perhaps sympathizing with his having to exist in a world contaminated by the existence
of 5,000,000 Jews in Israel?”
Michael: “So why don’t you get a grip? Instead of playing dangerous games
with your lies and misinformation, why don’t you try to work to address the real causes
of these problems, and I’m not talking about the Middle East.”
Burt: “So far you haven’t been talking about anything except what a bad man I
am for writing what most Americans are merely thinking. If not the Middle East, what
did you have in mind? Perhaps the Islamic killings that have taken place in Russia,
Spain, the Philippines, Indonesia, Africa, France, Holland, New York City?”
Michael: “Whatever the cause, the inequalities that exist between those two
peoples who inhabit the same land (Jews and Muslims) have led to suffering on all sides.
Palestinians are living in (sometimes extreme) poverty and have to watch the luxurious
living of the Jews. This leads to suicide attacks which means Israelis can’t enjoy their
high standard of living with peace of mind. I think this is acknowledged by people of all
persuasions.”
Burt: “So jealousy is your idea of a rational motive for mindless butchery? If
poverty is the issue, why don’t the oil-rich Arabs help their brethren? How is it that
Arafat died a multi-millionaire and his widow lives like a queen in Paris? Why didn’t the
Arab nations welcome in the Palestinians instead of allowing them to rot in Gaza in
“sometimes extreme” poverty for the past six decades? Why is it that when Israel gained
statehood in 1948, the Arab nations immediately confiscated the land and property of its
Jewish citizens, and sent them packing?” Continued... |