Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, September 18, 2006
Burt Prelutsky :: Townhall.com Columnist
Walls and fences
by Burt Prelutsky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


There’s an old saying that suggests that good fences make for good neighbors. I couldn’t agree more. Fences may not be the total answer, but they certainly help, if only because they let you know at what point you can stop mowing the grass.

Years ago, when I had a small role in the Dick Van Dyke movie, “Cold Turkey,” I had occasion to spend a week in Iowa. Once I got out of Des Moines and into the outlying communities, I was astonished to find fences and walls were virtually nonexistent. It made for a wide open feeling, but I was left wondering how Iowans determined if they were weeding their own yard or their neighbor’s. Maybe in the Midwest, they don’t worry about things like that.

I happen to be friends with my next door neighbor, but I’m glad we’re separated by a fence. I wouldn’t want to accidentally encroach on him and, much as I like him, I wouldn’t want him encroaching on me. In California, we worry about things like that.

There are people, we all know, who oppose the whole notion of fences and walls when it comes to America’s property line. Although these folks have barriers around their own homes, they vehemently object to our nation’s having them. These knuckleheads would call the cops if a stranger strolled into their backyard, but they think it’s fine and dandy for 12 or 13 million strangers to trespass in the United States.

Quite frankly, I don’t understand this double standard. You know darn well they’d resent it if somebody came on to their property and swiped their flowers or fruit, but they think it’s perfectly okay if this crowd enters the U.S. expecting to be provided with free medical attention, free schooling, drivers licenses, welfare, and voting privileges. Yes, these hypocrites will say, but the illegal aliens are willing to work. To which I say: So what? If you came home and found a strange family in your living room, would you let them move in just because they were willing to make your bed or wash your windows?

Barriers have gotten a bad name for one reason and one reason only, and that’s the Berlin Wall. Talk about erecting a wall along America’s southern border, and like Pavlovian dogs responding to the dinner bell, these nitwits immediately bring up the cursed Wall. The thing to keep in mind about walls and fences is that, like guns, they are neither good nor bad. It all depends on their purpose. The Great China Wall, for instance, was erected in order to keep the Huns out. The fence that the Israelis have built is to keep out suicide bombers. The Berlin Wall, on the other hand, was built in order to keep East Germans from getting away.

So I say we should build a wall that puts China’s to shame, a wall that would keep uninvited people out, but in no way would prevent the likes of Ted Kennedy, Harry Belafonte, Michael Moore, John Murtha, Jesse Jackson, Jimmy Carter, and the rest of the left-wing crew collectively known as Nature’s major blunders, from leaving.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
We want LEGAL immigrants
This is what is not understood by so many people. The United States has been home to many immigrants (initially, even the Native Americans immigrated across the Bering Land Bridge) and that has been one of our strengths. However, immigrants of old, like my grandfather, came to this country to become Americans. Sure, he still celebrated St. Lucia's Day and spoke Swedish at home to his wife and children, but his goal was to become an American. He spoke English in the workplace, paid his taxes and became a citizen so he could vote. He washed my father's mouth out with soap for speaking Swedish outside of the home and told his children often how lucky they were not to live in the old country.

I know a fair number of legal immigrants (I go to a church with a primary ministry of teaching English and citizenship to the foreign-born) and a few illegal immigrants. In most cases, the legal immigrants want to be Americans (a few have come to take advantage of our great university and will be returning to their home country when they've gotten their degrees). In every case, the illegal immigrants are not interested in becoming citizens. They came for work and are sending their money home and they don't see why they should have to pay taxes in a country where they can't vote. I say, send them back home and close the gates in their faces. Some of them could be friends under different circumstances, but they don't want to tell me where they live and work because I have called INS on others.

I have all the compassion in the world for those who are hungry and want to better their lives, but a country has the right to set its immigration standards and those born outside of the borders should have to follow those rules if they want to live inside of those borders. That includes entry into the country and applying for the proper documentation when they get here, as well as paying the same taxes as the rest of us.

Also, I am told by my pastor, whose daughter is an immigration lawyer, that the anchor baby concept no longer applies. A parent who entered this country illegally is just as subject to deportation if they've had a baby in this country as one who has not had a baby on US soil. The child may, in some cases, be taken into foster care, but more likely will be deported as well. The child can ask for US citizenship and entry when they turn 18, provided they have a valid US birth certificate, and they cannot be denied, since they were born on this soil. Legal immigrants are afforded greater ease in remaining legal residents if they've had a child in this country. However, if they violate the law or fail to file their proper paperwork, they may also be deported. Again, the child may apply for citizenship when they turn 18 and they cannot be denied.

The anchor baby concept was quite common in past generations. My mother's grandparents came to this country in the 1880s from Canada and homesteaded in the Dakotas. They never legally applied for citizenship, but they had children in this country and owned land here, so in the 1890's he registered as a voter and they became defacto citizens. This was common back in the old days. My Swedish grandfather took an oath of citizenship after he'd been in this country for a few years. My husband's Irish great-grandfather came down from Canada, bought land, started a family and ran for political office. Nobody seems to have questioned his citizenship. My pastor's grandparents came from Mexico during the same time period as these others, bought land, had children and, after a few years, the man took an oath of citizenship in order to vote. All done on a local level, informally, with the local officials deciding if you'd met the means standards for becoming a citizen.

Things were different back then. We had a lot of land and a need for immigrants to farm it. These people showed they wanted to be citizens and that they would be good citizens and stewards of their portion of America. The illegal immigrant today sneaks into this country and works without paying taxes (or the employer collects it and never sends it on), they break the laws by obtaining improper documentation, and they send as much money as they can spare home to the old country. They have no intention of becoming citizens and they teach their children born in this country that they are Mexicans (or whatever country) first and Americans only when it's convenient.

This is wrong. If someone wants to come to this country to improve their life, I'm all for it. I'll help them get through the application process and help them find housing and a LEGAL job when they get here. If they want to come here illegally, I say NO! The United States does not need more burdens. We need citizens who want to benefit the country, not more mouths to feed and we certainly don't need to be supporting 25 percent of the population of northern Mexico.

Oh, and by the way, I know several American-born teenagers who wouldn't mind babysitting children or cleaning houses to make money for college, so I don't think Oprah or whomever will find it hard to replace the illegal maid/nanny/whatever, although it may come as a shock to actually have to declare them on their taxes.

The problem with amnesty
Amnesty has been done already. And what did it get us? Did it staunch the flow of illegal immigrants across the border? The reason for this failure is obvious. Once you grant amnesty, the once illegals become legals and now qualify for all the benefits of being a citizen. They have more opportunities and begin to rise up out of the positions they once held. This of course creates a vacuum which brings us more illegals. Which leads us to Joe T's comments- ENOFORCEMENT. Existing laws should be enforced! Just because they aren't being enforced, doesn't mean we have to sit idly by and accept it.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.