Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Bruce Bartlett :: Townhall.com Columnist
Conservatives for Hillary?
by Bruce Bartlett
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


It is in this context that one must evaluate Sen. Clinton’s position. Given the views of the Democratic base and the enormous unpopularity of the Iraq War, it is a real act of courage for her to steadfastly refuse to say her vote for the war was wrong. Of course, like all Democrats and most Americans she opposes the war today and favors a rapid pull-out.

That is why the easy thing for Sen. Clinton to do would be to just thrown in the towel, admit her vote was wrong, and move on. And that’s why it is an act of courage for her to refuse to do so. If conservatives weren’t so blinded by their hatred for her, this would be obvious.

On economics, it is reasonable to assume that Sen. Clinton’s policies would not be altogether different from Bill Clinton’s. This is not a bad thing. On trade, his record was outstanding and on the budget was far better than George W. Bush’s. While Clinton raised taxes in 1993, it should be remembered that he cut them in 1997, including a cut in the capital gains tax. On regulatory policy, Clinton was no worse than the current administration and probably better on net.

Democrats know all this, which is why our most liberal pundits, like Bob Kuttner, are attacking Sen. Clinton for being a clone of her husband on economics and attacking her support for “Rubinomics,” named after former Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin. Its essential elements are a commitment to deficit reduction and globalization—which are both anathema to the Democratic Party’s liberal base. It wants a hard-line against imports to save jobs and an expansive fiscal policy to pay for a wide range of new social programs.

At some point, politically sophisticated conservatives will have to recognize that no Republican can win in 2008 and that their only choice is to support the most conservative Democrat for the nomination. Call me crazy, but I think that person is Hillary Clinton.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bruce Bartlett is a former senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis of Dallas, Texas. Bartlett is a prolific author, having published over 900 articles in national publications, and prominent magazines and published four books, including Reaganomics: Supply-Side Economics in Action.

Be the first to read Bruce Bartlett's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Conservatives for Hillary?
I hate to say it, but I think Bruce is spot-on. We are dead in the water on so many issues. Iraq is only one. There's the question of ineptitude in the response to Katrina, which still dogs Louisiana (this year's gubernatorial election may highlight the equal ineptitude of Democrats in that state, but the nationwide image of a floundering administration was what first cost this administration the confidence of the people.

There are gasoline prices through the roof. The Republicans are, for better or worse, identified by most people as the party with ties to the oil industry (never mind that Occidental Petroleum has for decades been identified with leftist causes or that Citgo is owned by the socialist government of Venezuela). The average voter does not want to hear, and can't understand, sophisticated economic arguments showing that government intervention in prices is counterproductive. What the average voter wants to hear is a promise to "do something," a kind of promise at which Democrats excel.

There is a discrepancy between government reports on unemployment and what people are seeing. The government says that unemployment is down at its lowest levels since the late 60's. But the average voter sees that every time a job is advertised, it is either filled by the time he responds or there is a line of hundreds of people hoping to get that one job. He sees that employers are in a strong enough position that they can screen applicants out for any flaw in the background--a conviction twenty years ago or a three-month gap in employment. When the labor market is actually tight, employers will hire anyone who appears able to do the job. The sense of voters is that the government--hence the Republicans--is playing with the numbers, and therefore Republicans cannot be trusted.

The Democratic near-monopoly on mass media continues. Every Democratic mistake is minimized or even concealed; every Republican misttake is trumpeted. People have to get their information somewhere, and most of those "somewheres" are thoroughly in the pocket of the Democratic Party.

Charlie Schumer is dragging out the investigation of the fired US attorneys in such a way that, a couple of weeks before the election, he can produce what at least looks like a "smoking gun" to make the Republicans appear like crooks. Other Democrats will be doing the same with hearings on how we got into Iraq.

We're sunk next year unless the Democrats commit a major misstep, one so flagrant that the media can't hide it or explain it away, or there is a major break in the Iraq war. This will be worse than 1974.

conservatives vote for Hillary?
Are you high? I'd sooner vote for Al Sharpton or Ted Kennedy than that psychotic self-serving shrew. She gets in the white house it will be time to nuke DC.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.