Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Bruce Bartlett :: Townhall.com Columnist
Conservatives for Hillary?
by Bruce Bartlett
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



As each day passes, it becomes increasingly clear that the Democrats will win the White House next year. It’s not quite 1932, but it’s getting close to a sure thing. All the energy is on their side, they are raising more money from more contributors, and there is little if any enthusiasm for any of the Republican candidates—even among Republicans.

Of course, one can never rule out the ability of the Democrats to seize defeat from the jaws of victory. But sometimes the trend in one party’s direction is so strong that even the grossest incompetence can’t keep it from winning. I think 2008 is shaping up as that kind of year for the Democrats.

If I am right, conservatives are going to have to make an important decision at some point. Do they go down with the sinking Republican ship or do they try and have some meaningful influence on the next president by becoming involved in the Democratic race?

I’m sure that the first reaction of most conservatives will be to say that any involvement in the Democratic Party is unthinkable. Many view it as the party of treason and socialism. They could no more involve themselves in Democratic politics than a God-fearing Christian would consider working with Satan just because it looked like he was going to win.

For those of you who feel this way, stop reading. There is nothing more in this column for you. But for those conservatives who don’t see the 2008 election as a race between good and evil, but merely a contest between rivals within the same league, I think there is a good case for participating in the Democratic nominating process.

Here’s why. Although all the Democratic candidates are more liberal than all of the Republicans, they are not all equally liberal. Among the Democrats, some are more to the right and others more to the left. It is a grave mistake to assume, as most conservatives do, that they are all equally bad and that it makes no difference whatsoever which one is elected.

To right-wingers willing to look beneath what probably sounds to them like the same identical views of the Democratic candidates, it is pretty clear that Hillary Clinton is the most conservative. John Edwards is the most liberal and Barack Obama is somewhere in between.

The hard-core right-wingers who kept reading past the point I told them to stop probably all think I’ve lost my mind by now. But remember, I am talking about the politics within the Democratic Party, not the nation as a whole. Moreover, at this stage of the nominating process, all of the candidates in both parties are appealing mainly to their bases. These are well to the left of the country among Democrats and well to the right among Republicans. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bruce Bartlett is a former senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis of Dallas, Texas. Bartlett is a prolific author, having published over 900 articles in national publications, and prominent magazines and published four books, including Reaganomics: Supply-Side Economics in Action.

Be the first to read Bruce Bartlett's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Conservatives for Hillary?
I hate to say it, but I think Bruce is spot-on. We are dead in the water on so many issues. Iraq is only one. There's the question of ineptitude in the response to Katrina, which still dogs Louisiana (this year's gubernatorial election may highlight the equal ineptitude of Democrats in that state, but the nationwide image of a floundering administration was what first cost this administration the confidence of the people.

There are gasoline prices through the roof. The Republicans are, for better or worse, identified by most people as the party with ties to the oil industry (never mind that Occidental Petroleum has for decades been identified with leftist causes or that Citgo is owned by the socialist government of Venezuela). The average voter does not want to hear, and can't understand, sophisticated economic arguments showing that government intervention in prices is counterproductive. What the average voter wants to hear is a promise to "do something," a kind of promise at which Democrats excel.

There is a discrepancy between government reports on unemployment and what people are seeing. The government says that unemployment is down at its lowest levels since the late 60's. But the average voter sees that every time a job is advertised, it is either filled by the time he responds or there is a line of hundreds of people hoping to get that one job. He sees that employers are in a strong enough position that they can screen applicants out for any flaw in the background--a conviction twenty years ago or a three-month gap in employment. When the labor market is actually tight, employers will hire anyone who appears able to do the job. The sense of voters is that the government--hence the Republicans--is playing with the numbers, and therefore Republicans cannot be trusted.

The Democratic near-monopoly on mass media continues. Every Democratic mistake is minimized or even concealed; every Republican misttake is trumpeted. People have to get their information somewhere, and most of those "somewheres" are thoroughly in the pocket of the Democratic Party.

Charlie Schumer is dragging out the investigation of the fired US attorneys in such a way that, a couple of weeks before the election, he can produce what at least looks like a "smoking gun" to make the Republicans appear like crooks. Other Democrats will be doing the same with hearings on how we got into Iraq.

We're sunk next year unless the Democrats commit a major misstep, one so flagrant that the media can't hide it or explain it away, or there is a major break in the Iraq war. This will be worse than 1974.

conservatives vote for Hillary?
Are you high? I'd sooner vote for Al Sharpton or Ted Kennedy than that psychotic self-serving shrew. She gets in the white house it will be time to nuke DC.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.