Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 29, 2009
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Love Dies In a TV Bubble
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


On Memorial Day, it would have been nice if the top-rated show was PBS's concert paying patriotic tribute to our brave fighting men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country. Instead, this Memorial Day had a different, much less laudable spectacle top the ratings. The cable channel TLC beat every broadcast network with a new season debut of "Jon and Kate Plus 8," a "reality" program chronicling the eventful life of parents of a set of twins and a set of sextuplets.

The show itself was not some offensive parade of sex or gore. The spectacle here is the collapsing marriage of the "reality" show stars, Jon and Kate Gosselin, prodded along for weeks by all the tabloids and celebrity magazines. First, there were charges that Jon cheated on Kate with a teacher, and then came counter-charges that Kate cheated on Jon with their bodyguard. The question that didn't dominate: With a marriage on the rocks and eight young children in the balance, why not cancel the show and concentrate on real life?

Executives at TLC, part of the Discovery Communications family of channels, will not discuss the Gosselins' contracts or the status of their marriage. But in a corporate statement, they predictably touted how the audience loves the exploitation: "the show's ratings have grown consistently, as there has been interest in these real-life issues of this real-life family." And: "We will continue to air as the interest continues, and the family wants to do it."

Translation: Family unity or sanity be damned. We've got a hit on our hands.

This is not the way this show and this family first looked like on TV. It debuted in 2005 on the Discovery Health Network as a special, and then became a series. It was a program that appealed to families who looked at the extreme parenting challenge of loving and caring for six needy babies.

The back story was charming. Kate had fertility treatments, but refused to "selectively reduce" (yet another euphemism for abortion) any of six babies for the sake of convenience. Jon's employer, the lout, laid him off because he didn't want the insurance burden. Jon and Kate instantly were very sympathetic figures facing a very real, human challenge -- and serious hardship -- with pluck and devotion. The show caught on enough to be "promoted" to TLC. That led to spinoff books and speeches, where the Gosselins were more candid about their Christian faith than they were on TV.

But within two years, as the show became TLC's top attraction, the temptations of fame and materialism began seeping in. Companies from Whirlpool to The Gap were placing their products on the show, so much so that Nielsen ranked this series in the top 10 product-placing shows on cable TV. Both parents got their teeth whitened, and Jon got a free hair transplant. Soon they were showing up on "Oprah" and "Good Morning America." The last season of the show (which just ended a few months ago) began to focus less on "real" issues and more on taking the eight kids on special trips that average people never enjoy (like running the bases at a Philadelphia Phillies game).

That season ended with a clear marital conflict. Jon wanted an end to the show, and Kate did not. Jon clearly lost that battle. The highly rated new episode was a vague mess, with Jon and Kate avoiding each other and none of the marital troubles explained or resolved. But there was a new complication: nasty paparazzi stalking the family home.

Even worse, the parents are having no problem airing all their dirty laundry in the pages of People magazine, complete with pictures.

What about the children? How can they grow up unharmed in this kind of a fishbowl? But by the twisted rules of "reality" television, a collapsing marriage and screaming fits are a gold mine.

There are voices of sanity on this. Kevin Kreider, Kate's younger brother, appeared with his wife on CBS and accused TLC of exploiting the Gosselin children and treating them as commodities. They claim already to have seen signs of adverse effects and resentment among the children at the constant cameras zooming in on their every move. Every birthday party or outing for the children is organized by a production company with their eyes on the highest ratings. ?

But these relatives can't imagine Kate allowing a voluntary end to the show, so they advocated the passage of laws to protect children who appear on "reality" shows. This shouldn't require an act of Congress. If the loyal audience for this show really cares for this family, they should be demanding that TLC put an end to the show and the damaging circus it generated. 

Everyone involved disgusts on some level.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
I Bet My Family Is More Realistic...
Even when the reality programmers try to make a realistic depiction of a family life that doesn't seem as phony as the contrived family life you hear about on those 50s or 60s-era sitcoms, they still manage to make it contrived. They manipulate it. I can tell you very well that if some network tried to make a reality show revolving around my family, they would never be able to manipulate it because we are so far out of the loop that we would make the Bundys from "Married With Children" look like the Petries from "The Dick Van Dyke Show."

My mother was a white Protestant drug addict. My father was a Jewish ex-felon who spent time in prison for attempted armed robbery. And somehow, with all their infighting with each other, they managed to stay married to each other for 21 years "'till death did they part" (My mother died three years ago.) I couldn't make this stuff up if I wanted to, but there it was. And I have a feeling that most families go through crises that I had just mentioned, so I know that even when a reality show tries to depict a realistic family, they manage to make it even more contrived than a sitcom family. It's just like "Catcher in the Rye": Phonies and hypocrites try to manipulate our view of the world.

By the way, since you are a conservative, you wouldn't want PBS to succeed in having a top-rated show since that would prove that government-subsidized liberal-leaning programming can actually be justified.

Wow, sticks...
You explained a lot.

Plus ça change
Remember the Loud family, which PBS vivisected in the '70s? _Queen for a Day_? _Real People_? "Reality" programming has been around for decades. It's the cheapest form of titillation this side of pornography. It's easy to produce. Because too many people will readily sacrifice privacy, dignity, and wellbeing for notoriety and appliances, it's easy to cast. It's damnably popular. And it has no more to do with reality than did _My Mother the Car_.

This was a big hit on Memorial Day?
The real tragedy is that so many Americans found nothing better to do than watch this tripe on a day when we should be remembering those who perished for our freedoms. We went to Ft. Sam Houston National Cemetery and viewed the thousands of graves. We read the names, viewed the length of their lives, saw where they served and when. More than ever, we need to remember them now.

I never heard of the program
until they made the cover of People and National Enquirer and everyone everywhere was talking about them, just like Am. Idol, which I have never seen.

The production co. prob. loves the marriage on the rocks better than a positive image as ALL tv works to deconstruct marriage, show children as far superior to their parents (esp. their fathers), and promote immediate gratification above all choices.

The sooner the show fails the better the US will be.

Founding Fathers are weeping
First of all Mr. Bozell, if the Founding Fathers were to rise, they would be scandalized over all the hoopla, about so many million of Americans who have died for the very unique reason, that their wise counsels was soon ignored and Imperialism soon became once again a darling, but now for America of all places.

Just imagine for them to discover that a most hyenous civil war was fought on American soil, where bothers and cousins etc., killed each other simply because that old virus of Imperialism found its way back and ever since, America has turned itself militaristic to where now its military circles the globe, and if that is not Imperalism than what is?

What has ever happened to these wise words:
"Overgrown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty". By George Washington

What has ever happened to these wise words:
"No pecuniary consideration is more more urgent than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt; on none can delay be more injurious, or an economy of time more valuable". By George Washington. Yes the National debt, if all is counted in as some have stated, is up to 100 trillion dollars.

Yes, as America ever so steadely fell in love with Socialism/Commnism beginning over a century ago as Public Education was imposed on the American citizens by Father Federal Governement. Public Education is the factory of socialists/Communists. No wonder Obama is now the Commander in Chief. With the conservatives handing him an America nothing better than only God knows what?






Ugh!
"and accused TLC of exploiting the Gosselin children and treating them as commodities."

Of course! Why else whould something like this ever be shown on TV? On TV, everything is a commodity to be used as the producers, networks, etc wish. The crime here is that the parents willingly went into this farce to make money from their children. Perhaps it is poetic justice that their marriage seems to be dying because of these actions.

I must be living in a different (better) reality: I had never heard of this program before reading this column.

Sci-Fi
This seems to remind me of a futuristic sci-fi movie about an all-controlling government keeping the masses entertained.

What an uncomfortable show. It's not pleasant to think of the pain the parents are going through, and the pain the children will suffer in future years, all for our entertainment.

I know that TV and movie productions have strict guidelines on how much time a child can work on camera.

Too bad there isn't some agreed-upon guidelines for reality shows.

Upland William - better reality
I just heard about it yesterday.

I NEVER, EVER watch reality television. In fact, there are fewer and fewer shows that I watch at all.

About a year ago, I was at a business luncheon and I happened to be sitting next to one of the executives of AT&T. He was going on about the incredible advances in television equipment. I replied, “Yes, that is great. Now if you could just do something about the programming.” I went on to ask what was the point of spending thousands of dollars on a high definition, plasma television set when there was nothing on television worth watching.

My comments left the man speechless. He just looked at me with an expression that was somewhere between sad and clueless.

renny and Joel-De Oppresso Liber
Really good posts!
One other thing. I remember one of the very first times I happened on this show--they were talking about how Kate had actually conceived 7 children. They lost one--Jon and Kate said that they really realized how much they wanted these children at that point (at the point of loss). Yet. I wonder how many fertilized eggs were actually implanted and how many actually died? God's plans are way above man's. When we start playing around with His plans via the pill, condoms, etc. there are consequences. Especially with the evils of IVF. God simply cannot bless children that begin with the act of masturbation. That is not how He intended it to be. Sometimes not being able to have children is our cross to bear. Perhaps God had some special child(ren)that were to be adopted by these people. Jon and Kate and ALL supposedly "Christian" people who take God's creation into their own hands are in need of confession and accepting God's forgiveness for their actions. Then real blessings can be bestowed. There are ways to deal with infertility that are not sinful--IVF is not one of them.

Jon & Kate
need help from Nanny 911 or Supernanny. Those kids and their parents are out-of-control! No wonder so many have such a less than positive attitude about today's kids; just look at their parents.

Comedian Jimmy Kimmel
spotted the obvious a season or two ago when he played a clip of Jon and Kate sitting on their sofa, with Kate taking Jon to task about some aspect of the show.

Kimmel said, "Next season we'll be watching 'Jon Minus Nine'"

IVF and inevitability of conflict
As I recall she did not use IVF. I think I remember she used a drug to stimulate ovulation. I think you're thinking Octomom.

My kids have watched the show for several seasons so I've seen probably a dozen of them. The conflict in the marriage rooted in Kate's attitude was there from the beginning and it was the one issue I had to continually address with my daughters.

Early on people tuned in to watch how a large family functions and handles the challenges of every day life on a large scale. We watched them successfully handle running a very challenging household on a very tight budget. Those were all very positive things.

Now there is something else to watch-a marriage going down in flames. I told the girls I would watch that last episode and decide whether or not we would continue tuning in.

At one point Kate said her children are not allowed to use the word "Paparazzi" because it SOUNDED so creepy when they were telling their friends about being followed by them. WHAT!? The creepy part is that now that the marriage is crumbling the paparazzi are IN their lives. The woman has lost complete perspective. She went on about how her kids are happy, healthy, safe and loved, so that's all that matters. She is delusional.

I told the girls that we are done with the show.

everyone is in disagreement
about the method used. Some say she did IVF some say she didn't. I remember her saying they used IVF--also I remember the fact that she had 7 pregnancies but one died. They never did say in that episode how many eggs were transferred.

Shades of Octomom
What?! Refusing to selectively reduce, thereby giving birth to a litter of six, in addition to having twins already at home, is stressful on a marriage? It's not all anti-abortion lovey-dovey about how there's room at the table for everybody? I am shocked, shocked. I thought that having eight young children would be a daily (and nightly, very nightly) romp in the rose petals. Followed, of course, by homeschooling the whole gang, after which they can all join the Marines for God and country.

But, quick! Hide the truth. Take the show off the air. We must never let people find out about Nasty Old Reality.

I have not watched this show, as I have better things to do. But hooray for the decision to let people have a look at Multichildrenomia in its most lethal form.

Meanwhile...
... the Duggers just keep on breeding.


To truetolife
RE "God cannot bless children that begin with the act of masturbation": Really? The God I know is nicer than that. He likes all children. What does your God have to say about children conceived by rape or in a drunken one-night stand or incest, or those conceived outside of holy wedlock? Not worthy of blessing?

I wonder if you may have heard of a book---it's also been a movie and on TV---called "Tess of the d'Urbervilles". Set about 1880, it tells of a girl (Tess) who is impregnated by the local overpowering rich guy. Then, of course, after he finds out there's a baby, he doesn't want to know Tess any more, and her family and neighbors aren't too keen either. Then the baby gets mortally sick and when Tess knows it's going to die she takes it to her minister and begs for it to be baptized so it can go to heaven. The minister refuses: no sin-gotten babies allowed in heaven, so Baby is out of luck.

As the infant is fixing to die, a desperate Tess, fearing that her child will go to hell (this isn't in all TV versions but it's definitely in the book) baptizes the baby herself. I guess at this point the human race splits into two halves. One half says the baby didn't deserve blessing and that Tess is compounding the sin by usurping an ecclesiastic office. The other half wants to hug both Tess and the baby and give them comfort---and a blessing. I like to think that God is with the second group.

To Homeschool Mom in AZ
I know that you and I disagree about many things, but I would like to give you credit for watching television WITH your children and discussing with them issues of concern. Too many parents dump the kids in front of the TV and don't stay on the job.

Forty years ago when I taught high school English I handed out a class set of a brand-new book (County-owned; County curriculum) to my students and assigned the first chapter for tomorrow. Tomorrow came; one boy brought me the book in pieces in a paper sack as his father had torn it to shreds. When Parents' Night came, of course, that father didn't attend, but many parents did and I deliberately mentioned the book in question so I could field any discomfort. Here is what one mother said: "My husband and I had heard of this book and we were a little concerned. So we decided to read it too and discuss it with Bill." See the difference? (PS Bill was a lovely boy who went on to become a teacher of disabled children. Guess how he got to be so nice?) We can't filter all the bad stuff out of life; what we can do is remain on the job as parents and process reality with them.

lilly
you were very quick to take my comment out of context and judge it. I continued to say that, after confession and forgiveness, TRUE blessing can come forth. Of course God loves all children. HE continues to be the creator whether we abuse science or not. IF we choose to abuse the "gift" of life, we will suffer consequences for that sin. Humans think they're so smart and that they can circumvent God's plans. We make our plans. God laughs.

lilly
regarding your book. Look at Catholic teaching regarding that baby and baptism. That baby's mother had already provided the Baptism of Desire. No minister can undo God's doing.

Kate
I watched the show once. Kate was constantly putting Jon down, at one point she was screaming. Just then one of the children raised her voice. Kate said, "in this family we don't yell" and Jon just rolled his eyes.

Home School Mom you stated "......Early on people tuned in to watch how a large family functions and handles the challenges of every day life on a large scale. We watched them successfully handle running a very challenging household on a very tight budget. Those were all very positive things."

They got a large salary for allowing their family to be filmed, they were given clothes, appliances etc as advertisment and then Extreme Home Makeover completly redid their home.

How does this show 'sticking to a budget'?

Two failed parents
We've seen every episode of this show from the beginning and my wife and I have watched this family disintegrate. Kate clearly suffers from the curse of loving the life of a celebrity, but she had no idea what that life really means. She saw only the exposure and the money. Jon's failure is that he did not or could not say to Kate: "Look, this whole TV show thing is tearing up our family. We're out of it--now."

Both Jon and Kate profess their concern with their children. The longer the show and the spectacle go on, the less I can believe that they're honest. Jon and Kate are very fallible people, like all of us, and greed has sucked them into a mess that will probably end their existence as a family.

Since I need to get in an ideological shot here, just note, everyone, that the network and the shows' producers are acting in the best capitalist fashion. They've got a money maker and they're going to ride it--and this family--right into the ground.

WHY ARE YOU WASTING OUR TIME WITH THIS?
BRENT,

Anyone who cares about what happens to these miscreants are usually people with no direction, and no goals in life.

The "Reality" shows are all staged as any idiot can see. The only reality is the fact that the American People are being dumbed down to watch anything. Even the news is more real this this, and that is a stretch.

ROWDY BOOTS

Gestell, Please!
So the breakup of the Gosselin's marriage is due to the evils of capitalism!

Hey, my wife is upset right now that I am typing on the computer instead of doing the yard work. What do you think my chances are of blaming it on those wicked capitalists that run our country?

Gestell
Sorry for the double post. My computer blinked.

No, the Gosselin's problems are not due to the capitalist network and the capitalist producers.

The Gosselin's problems are the Gosselin's fault.

My observation
I think Jon and Kate Gosselin both want what is best for their children. I am not a regular viewer of the show, but my teenage daughter is. She and I discussed it and it is her impression that Kate is worried that they won't be able to give their children a comfortable lifestyle without the royalties the TV show brings their way. Jon is less worried about the economic challenges. He wants their privacy back. She's willing to sacrifice that for the economic advantages.

Now, it's easy to say that Kate is just being greedy, but let's face it -- how many of us could stretch a single income to cover the needs of eight children? We're stretched just covering the costs associated with two. I can't imagine what the costs associated with six more are like. What some people might label greed others might recognize as realism. How else are they going to get that sort of money? Are the kids benefitted by Jon working two jobs and Kate also working. As a nurse (which was her profession before the six were born), she'd be putting in 12-hour days. Is that a good thing? Is it better than the glare of the spotlight?

I don't know. I'm glad I don't know. On the other hand, I have friends who insist I'm wrong for working outside the home and not staying home with my kids when I think they're darned lucky their husbands aren't construction workers who make good money when they work, but can't count on a steady paycheck.

Where you're standing changes your perspective and my observation is that unless you're trying to pay the bills associated with having eight children, you really don't know all the reasons for choosing to stay on a reality TV series.

I'm not saying Jon's wrong either. I like my private life and would choose with him were it my choice to make. Then again, I don't have eight kids to feed.

Paula-Watch fist comment second
If you watched the show more than once you would have seen how in the early episdodes she was NOT getting paid handsomely.

There was the episode where she showed us how she grocery shopped for a family of ten on $150 per week with the coupons, meal planning, and receipts to prove it. She also fed them a very healthy diet with a lot of organic foods-not something that usually comes cheap.

There was the episode where she planned Christmas for a family of 10 on $1000. She budgeted $100 per person and each kid got a nice selection of gifts.

Early on there was very careful planning so each child got a day away with Mom and Dad over the course of a year because they could not afford to take everyone together.

We watched the episode where she showed how she did 9 loads of laundry a day with 1 washer and dryer. The only help she had was a neighbor who volunteered to fold laundry a couple of times a week.

What the show was like then compared to now is DIFFERENT because it has INCREASED in popularity OVER TIME.

lilly-Please read the ENTIRE post
You and others posting here really shouldn't comment a show you have not seen.

No they don't homeschool and they don't plan to.

Is your issue with the Marine Corps itself? Are you suggesting that homeschoolers join the Marine Corps at a higher rate than the general population? Do you think a large family increases the statistical probability of military service?

The Marines I know (none are homeschoolers or were homeschooled) and those I've read about, Nate Fick's book One Bullet Away and Evan Wrights's Generation Kill, and the Letters from Home Collection by the National Endowment for the Arts, do not seem to back up your argument. Whatever argument that may be.

You can clearly see at the end of my post we are no longer watching the show because there is nothing edifying anymore. I am no longer going to sit and watch it and tell my kids what a mess it is episode after episode.

I also grew up in a crazy family situation and it was hard enough to deal with the chaos privately. I cannot in good conscience watch it and feed the ratings that might in some way contribute to perpetuating the craziness for the Gosselin kids.

I have no problem with a parent deciding there are books they do not want their child reading at a particular time or at all. I do have a problem with a parent tearing up a book that he does not own, or if he does he must replace it at his own expense.

But then again I homeschool my children because I'm not the sort to dump my child in an institution expecting it to cater to my particular worldview, educational priorities, or methodology. I feel for parents who were denied that right before the mid 80s.

aurorawatcher
I live in the Phoenix area so I know MANY MANY people in the construction business that has just sunk here.

6 of them have a mom at home with more than 2 kids. You cannot blame the cost of a large family for Kate's choices.

Most of my friends with various jobs have 4-7 kids in the family all spaced about 18 to 24 months apart. All of them live on one income and almost all of those incomes are very average.

We have also watched Kids by the Dozen, another documentary show of families with 12 or more children. The same is generally true of them.

I have one friend that has raised a family of 5 kids on less than $40,000. They have no debt.

Several evangelicals I know also have no debt of any kind. They're really into the Crown Financial Services teachings by Larry Burkett.

Who REALLY cares about this crud?
Voyeurs---- all that watch.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.