Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, February 27, 2009
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Commercial For Adultery?
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Everyone who enjoys NFL football games knows they're going to be sitting through an avalanche of those awkward ads for erectile-dysfunction drugs, and ads soaked in sex and violence selling new movies or prime-time TV shows. Despite this barrage, the NFL has managed to show some standards, believe it or not.

They refused a Super Bowl commercial from the website AshleyMadison.com because of its unusual product, a dating service for married people who want to commit adultery -- or as they strangely describe it, they enable "married dating." Their slogan is "Life's short. Have an affair."

But this Home Wreckers Incorporated found a way around the NFL, such as airing local ads during the Super Bowl on NBC-affiliated KPRC in Houston. CEO Noel Biderman boasted in a press release that he ran his new female-targeted commercial because "In Texas, men love their football, and women love to cheat!" He also claimed Texas is his company's fastest growing market with over 200,000 members signed up in the last two years.

The commercial is blunt. A husband is cartoonishly ignoring and mistreating his wife at a restaurant on their anniversary. A female announcer says: "Have you ever found yourself on a really bad blind date? Now imagine that date lasting the rest of your life. Isn't it time for AshleyMadison.com?"

Despite the ad's message, this is not really an enterprise for unhappy wives. As a female San Francisco sex columnist reported as she tried out the website, Biderman "had told me when I interviewed him that a woman didn't even need a photo or any personal info in her profile to get 20 potential affair buddies arriving on her digital doorstep. I guess I should have believed him. Within minutes of logging in, I had a stream of instant messages from men in the Bay Area."

Ashley Madison's entire business model is shameless denial. Check out the Frequently Asked Questions page on their website. When they ask themselves if they encourage infidelity, they brazenly lie: "No, Ashley Madison does not encourage anyone to stray ... Providing a service like ours does not make someone more likely to stray any more than increasing the availability of glassware contributes to alcoholism."

This answer begins about an inch below their omnipresent slogan "Life's short, have an affair."

Three Texas chapters of the Parents Television Council and their 90,000 members lobbied TV stations in the state to refuse these scummy ads, arguing that broadcasters are granted a license in the public interest, and promoting adultery is not in the public interest. There are children watching, and it's not only the children who might object. There are millions of adults without young children in their house who are not OK with advertising for adultery enablers.

Biderman responded by making a TV ad mocking the PTC. They suggested a double standard because the PTC hadn't protested an ad by Activision, the makers of the video game "Guitar Hero," featuring sports stars who've recently landed in the headlines on steroids and marijuana offenses.

The commercial showed four star athletes playing rock stars with the video game, ripping off the Tom Cruise rocking-in-his-underwear scene from the movie "Risky Business." In their parody, as each star entered the commercial, Ashley Madison mocked them with balloons of copy: baseball star Alex Rodriguez ("Steroid User"), Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps ("Drug User"), basketball star Kobe Bryant ("Accused Rapist") and skateboarding legend Tony Hawk ("4 Kids, Three Different Wives"). There's something really odd when Ashley Madison, the marriage-trashing company, mocks Hawk for having three wives.

Then Ashley Madison imposed this text over the rock scene: "the PTC thinks we're corrupting kids ... at least we're not targeting them."

This outfit's defense is as shameless as its product is noxious. To suggest its product is acceptable because there exists another product or ad out there that is offensive is illogical, and they know it. Activision is selling a video game, not illicit sex. It's dishonest to suggest Ashley Madison ads don't "target" children. Yes, the customers they're trying to solicit are adults, but no one should believe their ads don't target children for suffering when adultery leads to domestic violence or divorce.

The PTC responded by warning all broadcast TV networks away from accepting Ashley Madison's advertising. Biderman and his foul-smelling agency are certainly not stupid enough to think youngsters in Texas weren't watching the Super Bowl. This was the most watched Super Bowl ever, at 151.6 million viewers across America. Anyone wanting to make a scandalous wave on Super Bowl Sunday is going out of their way to try to drench a lot of children.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
And Here Comes The Red Meat...
What you fail to disclose is that it's not illegal for a TV broadcaster to run such an ad promoting adultery. The only restrictions are for content involving any of the seven dirty words you can't say on television, any graphic depiction of the sexual organs of either male or female humans, or excessive graphic violence that may make people sick to their stomachs.

Promoting adultery may be immoral to most of the Judeo-Christian religions, but it's not illegal. I don't particularly care for adultery myself, so that's why I don't engage in it. I have nothing to gain from it. But what reason is that to stop a businessfrom promoting adultery? You may spout as many bible verses as you want, but you are simply a sore loser who doesn't like to lose even when you know you have. I know because the Super Bowl was last month, and who remembers the Super Bowl even after a month?

wow
nothing like promoting adultery huh? Wasn't there something called the 10 commandments, or did people forget that? It's like morals are a thing of the past. Yes, life's short, but the afterlife is long!

One Flesh
Many married couples, today, are already committing adultery. I'm talking about those who have divorced and then remarried another. Although it’s permissible to divorce (for fornication only), it is never permissible to remarry as long as your original spouse is still living, even if the divorce was for the Biblical reason of fornication. Therefore, anyone who has divorced has two options...just two. They are to remain single or be reconciled to their original spouse.

“And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband:” 1 Corinthians 7: 10, 11.

There is only one exception for divorce...just one; fornication. There is only one exception for remarriage...just one; the death of ones spouse. A man and a woman becomes “one flesh” with each other upon marriage in the eyes of God. How do you separate “one flesh?” You can’t, not even by divorce. Only God can separate “one flesh,” and He does that by dissolving it through the death of the spouse.

”For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.” Romans 7: 2, 3.

Gary Gordon

Interesting website.

I wish this enterprise well. I hope the website makes a ton of money and does its part to stimulate the economy.

Yes, I hope e-harmony well also. Both its straight and gay divisions.

Decay

Rome died from within.

The Islamic Barbarians at our gates are grinning from ear to hairy ear.

China is wondering who will buy the cheap toys,light bulbs, toilets and water coolers.

Between the OBAMANATION and this filth, the final curtain of a great civilization is a mere generation away.

Classic Will...
Interesting that Will will support anything that opposes Judeo-Christian morality. Anything, including two spouses betraying each other. Way to go Will. Your immorality and indecency go way beyond your homo-fascism. You're disgusting.

I hope and pray this "business" meets an appropriate end. How DARE they have the arrogance to actually encourage such vile behavior. The legitimization of beastiality, pedophilia and necrophilia seems to be just around the corner. The only thing not tolerated will be those who express a moral outrage against such garbage. (If you think I'm nuts, read some of the latest official positions by the APA, including their statements on child eroticism.)

Only vile, immoral, perverts who have no regard for class or respect would start up a business like this, and only like-minded people would wish such a venture well. As for me, I hope they crash along with all the banks and car companies collapsing right now. They may not. Sin sells. But sometimes what comes around does indeed go around, too.

Hey Proud Reagan Conservative...
...we survived Jimmy Carter, arguably the worst president in our nation's history.

Pure evil.
This agency's trying to get people to hurt other people, and they dance around it in a twisted display of denial requiring award-winning mental gymnastics. They don't care if they destroy families, children, lives. They're pure, raw bastards and deserve to fall squarely on their faces for encouraging such destructive behavior. If and when that happens, I will vigorously celebrate in the face of their failure.

Shameless, yet common...
This type of behavior is becoming more and more prevalent as America continues to distance itself from the Christian values in which we founded this nation. We are certainly doomed to fall as a country if we keep going down this path of immorality, infidelity, and shameless self-serving behaviors. What happened to being happily married and raising a family?
God help us all.

Interesting business model
How do these scumbags propose to avoid being dragged into court for every divorce they help create? Their not going to have a release on file from the unwitting victim-partner. The legal fees are are going to more than eat ever dime they could possibly make.

I doubt we'll be annoyed by this for long.

"Life is short" indeed...
And when the people at AshelyMadison.com come to the ends of theirs, they can look back on the contributions they made to broken homes, destroyed spouses and devastated kids. All for money.

RK hits the mark
In most states alienation of affections is still a divorce standby. It is a civil crime and puts you at the mercy of mericless divorce attorneys. Good luck with that one!

This seems to be adultery for the criminally lazy, or at best, a cyber-p*mp.

TO “None” Feb 27, 2009 – 6:03 AM EST
When I first read the book of Revelation I wondered how someone like Will (who otherwise would abhor government intrusion into their privacy) would accept the mark of the beast. But now I can see the “progress” that the world is making; all they will say is, “I’ll do anything if the Christians are against it.”

Military Man Grimes V. Obama
Here is another courageous active military man willing to stand for the US Constitution and the rule of law.... The case is building against Obama ... he is destined to fall ...

Dr. Taitz,
My consent form is attached. Thank you for allowing me to be a part of this lawsuit. I was dismayed from the beginning at the attitude of Barack Obama towards us who wear the uniform. He accused me and my brothers and sisters in arms of "air raiding villages and terrorizing civilians" in Iraq.

I have commented many times that he (Barack Obama) would not be able to pass the background check to be a Naval Officer or a Police Officer. Additionally he does not support HR 218 which allows me t be able to protect myself and my family. I could go on and on. For the last 25 yearsI have painstakingly presented numerous documents over my police and Navy careers. If he a US citizen, presenting his birth certificate should be no problem. I believe that knowing that the person at the top of the military and law enforcement chains of command is eligible to hold the office is a reasonable request.

Very Respectfully,

Clint Grimes

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it!

http://defendourfreedoms.us/


folks
Some great comments here, of course the 1st thought most had was the other spouse and the children involved. Not to mention disease, and possibly putting your life on the line meeting strange men.

Will "Interesting website.

I wish this enterprise well. I hope the website makes a ton of money and does its part to stimulate the economy.'

There really isnt anything to say to you that the rest here havent already said.

new ed fl
You got it,and it will get worse. This nation as a whole is on a down hill slide.Read 2 Thes2 KJV. God will send a stronge delusion that people believe a lie. They sure are fooled by Obama and they fell for him,hook,line and sinker!

7Sticks:
Interesting points you make, but you are wrong about what broadcasters are prohibited from broadcasting. It is illegal for broadcasters to run ads for tobacco products of any kind, much less promoting their use. And tobacco use is legal, as you claim, incorrectly, adultery to be. Most states have laws prohibiting adultery. They may not be enforced very often, but they are still on the books.

Further, everyone, even those who don't subscribe to Judeo-Christian morality, should live by the standard of "the fact that you can do something doesn't mean that you should."

Nice try, though.

Isaiah 5:20 and John Adams
Consider the words of the prophet Isaiah.

Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,

Read the entire chapter at: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=29&chapter=5& version=31

The death of civilizations has always come from corruption within -- like a virus that weakens a patient and allows opportunistic invaders, like invading armies, to kill.

Those who change evil for good and who advocate immorality are as guilty of the destruction of their society as those who start wildfires are guilty of the destruction wrought by the flames.

As John Adams said, "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." As our culture changes evil for good and darkness for light so too we exchange the liberty of free citizens for the enforced mandates of socialism.

Bozell's advertisement for the site
It is a slimy business. But the satirical commercial suggests that they believe they get the best bang for their advertising buck from the PTC. I had never heard of them before. I suspect that I am not alone in this. And I suppose at some level I would as soon have people using dating sites for affairs do so on sites like that rather than with dishonest profiles on sites for singles. But then dishonest people are still likely to use the sites for singles.

Sgt Relic
I thought no-fault pretty well did away with any other consideration? Just wondering how it might still be used? Thanks!

Lon
Any married person using a dating site is already being dishonest to his/her spouse, why should the shape of the forum matter?

More Liberals Practicing
Their CHERISHED Liberal Values, Lying, Cheating, Cowardice, Adultery, Promiscuity, Intoxication, Addiction and Murder.

Another nail in the coffin...
of our Republic, ??? Only if you support this cesspool of immorality. For a thoughtful and timely Christian movie, look up TIME CHANGER on TBN...We have traversed a long way from where our FAITH IN GOD would take us and where our founders saw this country going.

God Save America and Keep Her from this horrible promotion of immorality. This adultery website encourages and openly supports extremely wrong and hurtful actions by married partners. This is the careless selfishness of evil at work. If we think this does not harm all of us and everyone's children, we are wrong. Get right with God!!!

Animals All
Hey,

Why is anyone surprised? We've been teaching children for decades that we're nothing more than animals. Very few animals mate for life but, those that do appear to have a higher standard than science and society expects of humans.

They reap what they sow. Disease, crimes of passion (a.k.a., murder), destroyed families, valueless society, etc... So, watch for the animals. They're easy to spot. Just look for those who either have no problems with dishonesty and/or believe they are above accountability due to their superior intellect.

AliveinHim
I am not sure exactly what you are asking. I would prefer that married people, if they are going to use dating sites to meet people, use ones that are open to dating sites so that single people who use dating sites do not wind up meeting people who are actually married but pretending to be single.

You are right that if married people use the same sites but restrict their searches to people looking for married people it hardly matters whether they have their own sites or different ones. But since most actual sites forbid people from saying they are married, married people have little choice but to lie if they go on conventional sites.

gop
and just think the new de facto leader of the gop is a guy who's been married and divorced 3 times,has been on the dole,and gobbles oxycontin and viagra by the handful. quite a role model you all got there lol.

Is will one of the sodomite supporters

who try to justify their evil actions by saying, "the animals do it"?

Noel BIderman is a Conservative
This service is just the exercise of free-market capitalism, unfettered by the heavy hand of state regulation. He knows that we don't want the government to intrude into our private lives, that small businesses are the lifeblood of our capitalist system, and that if we're to come out of our economic troubles we need to reduce regulation and not increase it.

Bravo once again, Brent!


Pretty hard-hitting think piece, Mr. Bozell.

What everybody here on either side may forget, is:

There are never shortages of adult temptation. Temptation is ubiquitous (50 cent word meaning widespread and unceasing).

A crude website touting prostitution on Super Bowl Sundays is just another of Satan's Salmonella Trays.

Prostitution is really behind the offer. Nobody can have an affair without resorting to a prostitute. The female in this and every affair is a whore. The plainly ridiculous male responds to temptation. (Or somebody's sow of a wife does.)

What also escapes notice here, in this article-- is that a ubiquitous euphemism today in society, having a "relationship," --is no less than the whore sleeping with her boyfriend. Except she does it every night.

Prostitutes don't really do that. When an unmarried pair live together out of wedlock, and give us the BS about their "relationship" too many of us lend it actual respect. These dirty affairs once earned our daughters the scarlet letter.

So, Ashely Simms or whatever is only the newest curve in the road to hell. Another temptation for gullible men; another waste of his family's money and yet another prostitution ring.

I read
in the wall street journal that millionaires were holding back on spending money on their mistresses! http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/11/18/rich-cut-back-on-pa yments-to-mistresses/

Pretty crazy times we're living in.

Lon
I thought you were wondering about maintaining the integrity of a singles' site. It can't be done with 100% accuracy; after all, some people will lie to get what they want if its wanted badly enough.


I'm not naive enough to believe that simply disallowing such sites as the one in the article as advertisers on broadcast stations of any kind will solve the problem. Where there are people, there is sin, and where there is sin, there are also those who will gladly cater to it in order to profit from it. Banning them from TV adverts makes sense on many levels, but it won't solve the deeper problem.

My point was simply that regardless of the target audience, married persons ought not be using these sites anyway.

Now, off to engage in a little retail therapy! ;)

Welcome to the Obamanation
These are not prostitutes these are sluts with college education from the likes of the University of Texas, which promote indecency as part of its education experience. Playboy magazine, Time magazine and the USA Today have all recognized Texas as the place to party among all the country. Feminism and the freedom of choice have led women to seek married couples and the Obamanation tried during the Superbowl to bring back swining, as was favored during the Kennedy administration.

no right to advertise
The AshleyMadison "service" is plainly destructive and irresponsible. In our free market, such a business has a right to exist, but nothing requires KPRC Houston or any other media company to accept ads from such businesses. KPRC has clearly demonstrated that it values profit over persons.

I was shocked when I saw the ad during the Super Bowl, as was everyone else I talked to. I was further shocked when I didn't see it discussed in the national news afterward. Thanks for calling attention to it, Brent.

reply to roy:

Is Blgdojevich your idea of a role model? Oh-- a Democrat!

"Scuse me, roy. Maybe your buddy Blogoyjevjcsj could get himself a morning talk show on the radio (he's between jobs now.) He knows how to talk up a storm.

Mother of 4 @9:37am
Thank you. I wish I could remember, offhand, what John Adams had carved/sculpted on a mantle in the White House. As I recall, it was something about the character of the people who live there. He was a far better man than two or three (all the same party) who have lived there in recent years.

dread
blago's not the leader of the democratic party who tells everyone else that their morals are bad.

Why go to AshleyMadison.com?
Instead, join the sect of Mormons at Juniper Creek in Utah and build a harem! Bill Hendrickson of Home Plus does it!

Hey Bubba, come on down!
I meet all my best girls on this website - its a wife-saver....I mean Life-saver.....sorry!
B. Clinton

To roy in illinoy

Blogojavich is indeed a leader of your criminal element in Chi Town. He's also a walking talka-thon; as well as a Democrat grifter.

But leaders of your party--?

OK; I know you're led now by a cool cat, but HE in turn is led by his hard-stared wife, Lady Macbeth of the White House.

The Senate majority leader, as Cool Ann Coulter well said yestitty, is a mental retard and a brazen liar. Yet, I suppose you think of her as a role model for your kids. Go figure.

It is interesting...
...reading through these posts. Many, if not virtually all, the people supporting this advertising are the same group calling for same sex marriage.

These are the people crying for the opportunity to form lasting relationships with people they profess to love. They claim the same commitment to their partner as hetrosexuals, plead for the chance of a stable lifetime bond saying they can love their opposite with a trueness of heart.

The same people now rejoice to see adultery not only advertised but profitted from. Where is this commitment you say you have, shouldn't you wish to see all relationships held together regardless whether they are gay or hetro?

It is precisely this behaviour that keeps so many people regarding homosexuals as deviants. If you continue openly taking satisfaction from things like the promotion of adultery you will never be taken seriously in your arguements to allow gay marriage or social acceptance.

As to how this all relates to religion, I know of no case that can be made that decency and civility are strictly religious attributes. If a person cannot, or chooses not to see how adultery is indecent and uncivil speaks to their character as a person, religion aside.

Depends on the Method
It is perfectly acceptable for private individuals to group together and apply pressure to the station for accepting the advertisement. In the American system created by our Founders, there is nothing that indicates that they wished to foist upon the population a specific set of religious beliefs. Put the Bible away, that has no place in a political discussion.

AshelyMadison.com has all the rights in the world to advertise its service and KPRC has all the rights in the world to accept the advertisement in its broadcast. Christian groups have all the rights in the world to boycott KPRC. However, no groups have the right to demand government intervention into the process. The Christian groups do not have a right to pressure the FCC to dictate to KPRC what can and cannot be advertised.

There is only one thing that can be quoted here, it isn't the Bible, it is the Federal Constitution and the one for your State, nothing else. If neither of them mention the ability of Governing bodies to dictate the behaviors of AshelyMadison.com and KPRC (the Federal one certainly does not permit this), then all you can do is make your case. If KPRC refuses, then all you can do is refuse to use their services and inform advertisers you will do the same with theirs.

AliveinHim
Usually I disagree strongly with Bozell. Here it is certainly hard to get worked up in objection. The site is slimy. He is not calling for censorship, but voluntary action by local stations. I certainly don't see anything wrong with a station choosing not to air such an ad.

This is not the issue we are going to have any serious disagreement about. I do find it funny that I find out about all kinds of sleazy stuff from Bozell that I wouldn't be aware of without him. There is this site above. In another article he gave the site, although I forget what it was, for getting free porn on the web. So even when he is right he is somewhat counterproductive.

Unlike Will I can't extend my umbrage though to defense of adultery. Unlike in the homosexuality case there are committments to non-consenting adults that are being violated here. I don't want to see the law getting involved in these cases, but I don't want them to be confused for victimless cases either.

An interesting experience . . .
. . . I am divorced and have signed up with several online dating services. A man e-mailed me who sounded intelligent, articulate, and interesting. He asked me how long I had been single and I told him, then I asked him how long he had been divorced. His reply: "I am currently still married." I was flabbergasted. And this person described himself as being "religious."

When I told him point blank that I do not date married men, he seemed surprised, and thank goodness I never heard from him again. Then the very next day I saw that he was online again! And I'm sure he'll find someone who will say "yes."

Sad.

Sad.

Pot,Abortion,And Sodomy.
There is a growing holy war against marijuana users, abortion receivers, and gay lovers led by religious fanatics. They claim “Devils Weed” Is responsible for fetus murder and sodomy. But the holy warriors cannot stop abortions, gay lovers or pot smokers---they would rather go to hell than give up their freedom.

Lon
You say Bozell isn't calling for censorship, but you would have no problem if the station chose not to run this ad. If the station "chooses" not to run the ad, then it's censorship, carried out by the station (or it's corporate parent) and not the gov't, but censorship all the same.

I'm Ok with pot and sodomy....
After all, anybody who wants to legally control pot and sodomy (but not alcohol and adultery) is a hypocrite.

And, at any rate, gay sodomy is legal (U.S. Supreme Court, 2003, "Lawrence v. Texas")

As for abortion, that's a personal choice I wouldn't want to impose on somebody one way or the other (because of conflicts between individual & state, or woman and sperm donor, by default, the woman must solely decide what to do with her body, so we don't have extensive legal conflicts).

So, there you go. The woman's body is her domain, she decides it's ramifications.

dread
lol are you talking about pelosi or reid? i'm mainly talking about the hypocrisy of your leader. he rails against welfare and unemployment benefits when he drew it himself. he advocates long prison sentences for drug abusers yet claims his drug abuse is a " medical condition". he says clinton was a draft dodger yet he got out of it because of an anal cyst.he claims the breakdown of the american family is because of no fault divorce laws yet he was divorced 3 times. you can't see a pattern here?

keep your pants on, roy

You aren't being a good American. Republicans right now are hoping to find leadership. We aren't firing any GOP governors for committing graft like yours do; into a recorder microphone. What a loser!

The "leader" of our party isn't Rush Limbaugh, anyhow. Whom you apparently hate. He speaks into a microphone too, but we haven't elected him, and he isn't trying to sell a Senate seat. He's only doing something the Constitution allows-- using his freedom of speech.

That's why I say you're not a good American. Or else you wouldn't squawk because we have that freedom. Yeah, I know you'd like to censor Rush.

Well, good luck doin that. He's laughing at dummies like you. But we haven't elected him Leader of anything. Except his job. He leads the whole world of talk radio. Eat your heart out.






Allerlei
Melvin @ 4:33 pm--"There is a growing holy war against marijuana users, abortion receivers, and gay lovers led by religious fanatics. They claim “Devils Weed” Is responsible for fetus murder and sodomy. But the holy warriors cannot stop abortions, gay lovers or pot smokers---they would rather go to hell than give up their freedom."
Melvin, who makes the claim that marijuana is responsible for abortion and sodomy? I have never heard such a claim in the past thirty-six years.
Josh @5:36 pm--Yes, a woman has some authority over her own body. But, when she is carrying another person, with a different DNA, in her body, she does not have the right to end that person's life.

dread
lol no i rather like rush out there making a fool out of himself. didn't you see him warning other conservatives not to bash piyush jindal. you see dread, rush wants jindal to be the nominee in 2012. who would obama prefer to run against? either palin or jindal. and with rush leading the way thats just who he's going to get.

roy wanking off


Stop that mastrabating Roy! Don't be a swine.

What Limbaugh does is speak his mind; devil take the hindmost. He takes in GAZILLIONS doing it;

and guys like you are too jealous to care what he says. I haven't heard him since last year. But, if he's in favor of Jindal; THAT'S OK! Anybody's better than Obama. He'll be a one-term president, naturally. (You don't send a boy to do a man's job.)

Excuses, excuses...
Since I turned my energies to child protection some years ago, I've become familiar (to say the least!) with the standard fare from the corrupters and exploiters to justify their infamies. One of the most prevalent is, "Well, what about ***?", pointing out another of modern society's many outrages and attempting to claim that, just because you haven't addressed it as well, you're being hypocritical.

Naturally, the hypocrisy is solely their's. While I've been pointing out the recent film "Hounddog" as a landmark work of child porn and an exemplar of Hollywood's long trend to that point, often I would have to deal with someone who'd say, "Then what about 'Taxi Driver', 'Pretty Baby', 'Lolita', etc.?" My answer is the same answer I would give to the Ashley Madison apologists. "Those previous examples were, indeed, bad and wrong and should have been denounced when they happened. Because they weren't, it set the stage for this latest outrage. BUT IT IS NO EXCUSE."

How often I've made the simple point, "There can be no moral basis for the sexual exploitation of a child." Likewise, there can be no excuse for any form of enterprise that promotes infidelity or immoral conduct of any sort, whether directly aimed at children or not. Inevitably, the ones who suffer the most from this ARE the children; physically, mentally or both. And then, tragically, the consequences are passed on down the generations. It needs to stop with us.

dread
funny you should mention that. remember that little incident where he was caught with the viagra prescription not in his name coming back from the dominican republic? now i suppose he could have flown there to be the " master of his own domain" but he could do that at home right?

roy in illinoy

Whats's the worry? Lots of men take Viagra. I never have.

Do other peoples' private affairs give you a kick? Did the viagra cost you anything? my feelings in the matter are neutral. It's none of my business. I only wondered why you referred to this guy as the leader of the Republican party when he's not.

Do you arrive at stupid conclusions like that all the time? I'd worry about your Democrat party most, seeing some of those characters.

Barney Frank
Nancy Floozie
Harry Reid
Chris Dodd, dishonest
Charlie Rangel, on the take.

What a sleazy group. The other crook, Jefferson, who hides $90 grand in the freezer compartment. Bribes.

Are there any honest people in the Democrat party?

Uba-bama-bama-bama-ding-ding
**Barack Obama isn't planning on buying TurboTax®. Obama can turbocharge our taxes all by himself.

**President Obama's tax return should list Bill Ayers and Reverend Wright as dependents.

**President Obama plans to start printing income tax forms on Kleenex, so it will be easier for us to pay through the nose.

**President Obama has just announced that he has a new plan to simplify the tax code. From now on only the Republicans will have to have to pay any taxes.

**Q. Who should be listed as the most expensive dependent on your tax return?

A. President Obama.

**President Obama will make it a lot easier for most people to do their income taxes next year. No jobs, no income.

**Under Obama everyone in America will be working for the government. Democrats will be on the payrolls and Republicans will be on the tax rolls.

**In the interest of full disclosure, President Obama's should declare all of the fawning media coverage he's received so far as a gift on his tax return.

**Despite what some people are claiming, this country is just as free under the Obama presidency as it ever was . . . unless you happen to be a taxpayer.

**If President Obama listed free enterprise on his tax return, it would have to be listed as a liability. That's because he just writes it off.

**Today the IRS released new guidelines on how to avoid audits while Obama is the president. Number one - Don't list excessive deductions. Number two - File your return on time. Number three - Register to vote as a Democrat.

**Judging by his wild spending so far, President Obama has apparently decided that it is easier to trim the taxpayers than to trim federal spending.

**Don't think of it as paying more taxes. Think of it as giving Obama a big tip.

**Thanks to President Obama we will become a more honest people. Once we're all jobless there won't be any point in lying on our tax returns.

dread
man you are pretty dense. go to the july 6, 2006 smoking gun archives.do i have to bring up ted stevens, larry craig, mark foley, tom delay,jack abramoff ad infinitum.

Adultery
Despite what some may say, there is nothing about adultery that is not destructive of the family.
The Ashley Madison people may say that their ad was not aimed at children, but if it is shown on a program aimed at children, the ad is aimed at children. Boys (and maybe some girls) who see ads like this will be curious. Hopefully they will have been taught enough good things that they will ignore the message, but many will not.

Uba-tuba-booba-rooba!
*** Q. Why did Obama change his name from Barry Obama to Barack Obama?
A. He thought “Barry” sounded too American.

*** What do Miley Cyrus and Barack Obama have in common? They both attract young people with mindless verses

*** A teacher asked her 6th grade class how many of them were Obama fans. Not really knowing what an Obama fan is, but wanting to be liked by the teacher, all the kids raised their hands except for little Johnny. The teacher asked Little Johnny why he has decided to be different.

Little Johnny said, 'Because I'm not an Obama fan.'

The teacher asked, 'Why aren't you an Obama fan?'

Johnny said, 'Because I'm a Republican.'

The teacher asked him why he's a Republican.

Little Johnny answered, 'Well, my Mom's a Republican and my Dad's a Republican, so I'm a Republican.'

Annoyed by this answer, the teacher asked, 'If your mom was a moron and your dad was an idiot, what would that make you?'

With a big smile, Little Johnny replied, 'That would make me an Obama fan.


roy @ 8:33
All the Republican crooks and perverts you site their Republican colleagues forced out or received prosecution by a Republican Justice Department. The Democratic crooks and perverts dread sites are still serving and even revered among their Democratic brethren with Holder as AG, there is no chance prosecution will happen due to a severe lack of integrity.

Facts are facts.

OBA-HA-HA
**** Q. Why won't Obama release his real birth certificate?

A. He's deciding which of his names (Barack Barry Hussein Obama Soetoro) to put on it.

**** Q. Why won't Obama release his real birth certificate?

A. The ink isn't dry yet.


**** Q. Why won't Obama release his real birth certificate?

A. He accidently smoked it.

**** Q. Why won't Obama Messiah release his real birth certificate?

A. It got mixed in with his Rezko mortgage records and shredded.

**** A Christian, a Jew and Barack Obama are in a rowboat in the middle of the ocean. Barack Obama says, "This joke isn't going to work because there's no Muslim in this boat."

Impact
No commercial can force anyone to have an affair.

Nice try.

You're On Top
of the news, well in touch and on some important boards, please share this and let me know what all of you think about ObamaSpeak/Write:
This will take some thinking on the part of readers of this post, but give it a try. If you have questions, please ask for clarification.
It has taken me awhile - 45 years of studying Islam with Muslims, at grad level, 8x to Middle East since '04, world travel before and since including to Africa and Asia, more years dealing with international relations, national defense and politics at all levels+a few other things, but I have figured out finally ObamaSpeak/Write.
Muslim or not - I will not argue that point here - Obama is as he has spoken/written strongly influenced by Muslims, Black Separatists, Socialists, Communists, terrorists and other worthies.
Obama has a plan. He spoke/wrote about it in his 2 books, "campaign rhetoric" - his words, platform as a candidate, in the Obama/Biden Plan - whitehouse.gov - elsewhere and is putting it into effect as fast as he can before too many get it clear.
His plan is to bankrupt the U.S. fully, to the point we will welcome those who have the $$ - oil-holding, producing and other countries, like China. Then we will be in dhimmi.
You can figure it all out as I have by studying all he has done before, on and since 1/20/09. Forget all your beliefs, Western thinking and know a key tenet of Islam is to "seduce (fool) 'em until strong enough to take them over."

Pet Goat
I presume that you advocate commercials for smoking and hard liquor as well. After all, no one can force you to smoke or drink.

not unusual
In KC metro there's a law firm for "Men" that's telling them that a downturn in the economy is a good time to start divorce action--since they can get very miserly settlement agreements.

So to the unsuspecting wife: "honey, I want a divorce--and since we don't have a 401K anymore, and are underwater in the mortgage, I don't have to help you take care of the kids!"

These bottom feeders have figured out how to peddle their filth wherever we are--at home, at work, in the car, on the street...

army wife
just like old newt gingrich did when he served his wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital receiving cancer treatments.

A party to the divorce
Churches have been held responsible for allowing cheaters to become intimate within church groups. They're called as parties in the divorce. A friend of mine who is a youth pastor was once assessed a $1000 because two of his volunteers cheated with one another (supposedly without his knowledge) and the judge in the divorce case felt that he should have worked harder to keep them apart and/or told the absent spouses about this. That was in Georgia, but I'm told by local pastors that it could happen here.

So, yeah, this company could be party to the divorces they encourage. I'm sure their argument would be that they aren't actually advocating divorce or even adultery, just variety of acquaintance. It's not their fault that the people who uses their services make stupid decisions.

Of course, that's the argument the bars in my community used to make for allowing drunks to leave their premises and drive. When somebody was permanent brain damaged by an encounter with one bar's drunk customer, the resulting law suit convinced local bars that they really do have a responsibility for the actions of their customers.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.