Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, December 26, 2008
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Hollywood's Best and Worst
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


December can be such a refreshing month for television, especially the warmhearted Christmas specials that make the holiday about giving, not mall-emptying materialism. This year, for example, NBC aired a new Muppet special where they helped Santa Claus make children's wishes come true. There's a reason why "A Charlie Brown Christmas" never gets old, and "Miracle on 34th Street" remains timeless in its black-and-white glory: They champion the good, and the holy, and the pure innocence of Christmas.

And it's worlds apart in tone from today's usual TV fare. Switch the channel, and you'll find a young man coming back to life in the middle of his own autopsy.

That grotesque scene unraveled in December on the new CBS series "Eleventh Hour," which featured two college-aged men who are assumed dead, but find themselves revived in the autopsy room. The one who's not sliced wide open starts yelling at the medical examiner as his friend's heart beats away. No matter. Both soon die "again." The plot is too strange (and lame) to explain.

These two extremes on television are good examples of the best and worst of entertainment in 2008. Here are some other offerings.

Best: The movie "Juno" had all the irony and quippiness of your average art-house film about high-schoolers. But beneath that jokey exterior were real flesh-and-blood characters who struggled with an unanticipated teenage pregnancy by making the mature (if painful) decision to carry the child to term -- and then give the child to a woman who yearns deeply for a child to adopt. It was warm, funny, uplifting and realistic -- and it was a surprising hit and Oscar nominee.

Worst: The Fox show "Moment of Truth," which offered contestants half-million-dollar prizes if they would submit themselves to a lie detector as the host asked embarrassing questions certain to break up marriages and ruin families. Take contestant Lauren Cleri, who admitted in front of 8.6 million TV watchers (and her husband Frank) to committing adultery. She later lost the $100,000 she had won by answering yes to the question, "Do you believe that you're a good person?" At least she knew she was lying. Fox exploited the whole sordid wreckage for ratings points. Calling something "a new low for reality TV" might seem impossible, but this Fox spectacle fit the bill.

Best: Ben Stein riled up the secular elites with his documentary "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," which revealed the dogmatic -- even fanatical -- views of God-spurning scientists who insist that no one who questions Charles Darwin's theories of evolution should be allowed to teach a science class. One professor lamented that the film would "appeal strongly to the religious, the paranoid, the conspiracy theorists and the ignorant -- which means they're going to draw in about 90 percent of the American market."

Worst: The moral backwardness of the Showtime series "Dexter," whose allegedly heroic title character is a serial killer working as a blood-spatter specialist for the Miami police. (He only kills and slices up bad guys, the producers insist.) The TV writers' strike spurred CBS to put this scummy show on broadcast television, multiplying its disgusting reach by a factor of eight. CBS hoped to make a profit with a show celebrating human butchery with an ironic wink. Thankfully it bombed, and was cancelled.

Worst: Fox's "Family Guy" making fun of Jesus Christ as a slacker who works in a record store to get away from the God the Father, allegedly an almighty pain in the rear as he tries to quit smoking. Jesus appears to the masses, quickly loses his morality as he acquires fame and fortune on TV, and is found dead drunk by the cops. He's so pathetic he needs to be bailed out from jail by the dumbest character in the animated universe. The atheist Seth MacFarlane spurns his critics as the ones who are morally obtuse, saying it's "like getting hate mail from Hitler."

Best: Advertisers who really practice corporate responsibility by placing their commercials on healthier television fare, and seeking to avoid subsidizing the vilest corners of the boob tube. Coca-Cola led the list of the Parents Television Council's 10 best advertisers, which also included big names like Clorox, Hershey, Century 21, Whirlpool, State Farm and Hewlett-Packard. At the top of the Worst Advertisers list was General Motors, which adds to the reasons why a GM bailout would be objectionable.

On to 2009, and as Hollywood's political contributions helped remove any Republican leadership in Washington, the level of raunch, like the economy, may get much worse before it gets better.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Hollywood Liberal Creeps
I love the libs in Hollywood. They make Frost/Nixon about a man they loathed, Richard Nixon. They use the film to attack another President they despise, George W. Bush. Then the lib film critics and liberal lapdogs in the Hollywood press rave about the film. It will probably win some Oscars which the liberal creeps who made it, like Ron Howard, will use as an opportunity to bash Nixon and Bush again. However if it wasn't for Nixon, they wouldn't be there winning their award in the first place. I really loathe these elitist liberal creeps.
By the way, is anyone surprised the way the liberal film critics are slobbering over "Milk" and its loathesome star, Sean Penn?

liberals as creative people
I guess that means we should rank al franken, michael moore, susan sarrandon, george clooney, and many other hollyweird lice as modern day ranaissancemen along the likes of gallileo, rembrandt and micheangelo

re: cactushead
Engage in hyperbole often?

I don't think I ever made quite the leap you're suggesting, and I don't know much about the political leanings of Gallileo, Rembrandt, or Michelangelo. I'm a big Dali fan, and I have no idea about his political proclivities either, although I'm betting that he wasn't a free market capitalist.

As for those you mention, I wouldn't consider Franken or Moore all that talented; Clooney is a pretty good actor (although he was a horrible Batman) and seems pretty talented at directing as well. Sarandon I would label as OK.

Is every creative person left-of-center? No, of course not. But it does seem definitely to be the rule rather than the exception. I have my own theories on why that is, but the facts are what they are.

re: cactushead
Engage in hyperbole often?

I don't think I ever made quite the leap you're suggesting, and I don't know much about the political leanings of Gallileo, Rembrandt, or Michelangelo. I'm a big Dali fan, and I have no idea about his political proclivities either, although I'm betting that he wasn't a free market capitalist.

As for those you mention, I wouldn't consider Franken or Moore all that talented; Clooney is a pretty good actor (although he was a horrible Batman) and seems pretty talented at directing as well. Sarandon I would label as OK.

Is every creative person left-of-center? No, of course not. But it does seem definitely to be the rule rather than the exception. I have my own theories on why that is, but the facts are what they are.

liberals as creative people
I guess that means we should rank al franken, michael moore, susan sarrandon, george clooney, and many other hollyweird lice as modern day ranaissancemen along the likes of gallileo, rembrandt and micheangelo

liberals as creative people
I guess that means we should rank al franken, michael moore, susan sarrandon, george clooney, and many other hollyweird lice as modern day ranaissancemen along the likes of gallileo, rembrandt and micheangelo

re: Jeffersonian
Huh? In my experience, the most creative people are almost always liberal.

Hollywood Lost...
We, the People, - you know, the little people that have bought tickets to movies and concerts and live talk shows - have had it! The fallen 'stars' that decided to give up their craft as actors, musicians, comedians and talk show hosts, to enter politics, you lose. You’re politicians now. So, run for something, already!
There are a few shows on Television that are worth watching. 'Biggest Loser' and 'Extreme Home Makeover'. Why? Because they are shows about hope, courage, overcoming huge odds, taking responsibility for their own lives. These shows help people change their lives for the better. They don’t teach people to depend and/or prey on others for their own success. They teach people to find the strengths that that never knew they had.
'Saturday Night Live' used to be funny…now it isn’t. Westerns and Cosby and Perry Mason and Ironsides, Mash, Magnum, P.I. and Laugh-In were great! Why? Because they were entertaining, suspenseful, funny AND they had a plot!
We don’t want to watch you – or your children – have sex, go to rehab, live your dysfunctional lives, share your sick thoughts, or hear your personal ‘agendas’. We, the People care as much about your opinions as you do about ours.
You once had a gift. It brought us laughter and pleasure…a release from everyday life. That ‘gift’ died in most of you long ago. You leaned on the walls of decency and respect until you knocked them all over. Now, you stand there naked and disrespected and can’t figure out why.
‘Movie Stars’ of years past had class…something you won’t find much of today. They had talent. They had…fans. Not ‘followers’ or ‘worshipers’, but fans.
One of the saddest days of my life? The day that Robert Redford stopped acting and started preaching about his political opinions and everything ‘green’. He WAS one of the greatest actors of our time. Now, he’s just another ‘politician’ that has abandoned his craft. A very sad day indeed.

Liberals are not creative.

One of the reasons for explicit sex, language and images in today's Hollywood productions is the writers lack of creativity.

The movies of the 40's or 50's could project a serious love affair, outrage, compassion, joy, hate, or whatever with a few well choosen words and an actor with the skills to convey the emotion.

Today's Hollywood is not about the craft, Its about money.

the real cactushead
These mind-numb robots watch the junk on television and get their news from the networks and CNN,so their knowledge of the world is skewed to what the left wants them to know.Thus,we have an jive-talking empty suit for a president-elect.


rowly
but hollyweird knows who their audience is and that's the product they produce.

It has been said that most tv programs aim to hit those with the equivilent of a 6th grade education.

If that is the case it's far easier to understand why these folks can sit for endless hours in front of the boob tube.

But on the other hand far better for these hapless souls to sit in front of the tv than roving the streets looking for trouble.

The problem remains that for many of those addicted to the trash hollyweird produces probably aren't doing much with their lives.

The real problem is they tend to vote almost exclusively for the dims and that is a problem

Semper Libertas
Frankly,my dear I don't give a dam what you watch. You are not my child. If you want filth,order it. Don't send it to my house when I did not ask for it.

Turn off the boob-tube, everyone!
Hit the liberals where it hurts -- in their sleazy pocketbooks!

Really, it's that simple. Turn off the telly and let the libs know you're tired of the hackneyed, bigoted, anti-values junk that they pass as entertainment. Me? I watch Fox News Channel -- "O'Reilly," "Hannity," et al -- and thus I sleep with good conscience. As far as "lib TV" goes -- no way! I never, ever watch the trash! (Haven't seen an Academy Awards show in ages, for example!)

re: Victoria, Rowly
Just whom do you think should be deciding what I watch on TV?

re: Victoria, Rowly
Just whom do you think should be deciding what I watch on TV?

Victoria
You write, “My selections are not the problem. YOURS ARE.”

I say, I don’t care. Not one bit. You have to live in the real world. You cannot make it over in your own image. Utopia does not exist and never has.

Your attitude is typical of today’s conservatives. Even something as innocent as my movie choice is perceived as a danger that must be controlled. Your attitude shows lack of confidence in your family’s parenting skills. And you confirm my belief that there is very little difference between left and right. Both want to control us. Both hate liberty and will find any lame excuse to rid us of it.

My, my! We are shooting Bozell
who is a messenger and does this sort of thing for a living. Why don't we attack other critics?

Anyway, why is it that those who will admit that music, drama, and art can be uplifing will not also say that it can be demeaning and degrading?

Sure, we can (and do) not watch, but that doesn't mean that we have to allow easy access to stuff that unsupervised children can see. If there are no lines, then why not live snuff films and porn? Partial-birth abortions?

Some of the most pernicious things on TV are the ads - take your own informal running survey and you will see how many commercials show inept fathers and men. (Never mind the ones where men are portrayed as jerks.) The men invented the washing machines and the detergents, but can't wash clothes? Show me ONE ad where the man shows a woman how to do something.

My Solution
I have not subscribed to cable in years. I can count on one hand the number of movies I've seen this year. Doing this on a nationwide scale will bring permanent change to the entertainment industry.

Fifty years from now people will be saying,"Did they really pay Actor/Actress X that much for a movie?" Future generations will be amazed that there was a multibillion publishing industry that chronicled dullards that looked good on celluloid.

The entertainment industry seems to follow a pattern by making movies like "National Treasure", "The Dark Knight" and "Lord of the Rings"; that is, movies lots of people want to see. They then follow with a slew of movies that cater to Michael Moore's fan base. They're doing it to themselves. Be patient.

Dexter criticism is biased
You're doing what liberals do when they bash movies with a conservative theme. Good writing and acting should be acknowledged.

lCaligula
Sorry about the mispelling of your handle.

Cagula
How many children or grandchildren do you have in your house? Truth,now. Can you possibly do that?

Juno
I would agree with most of Bozell's observations. However there was a story line in Juno I found depressing. It seemed like every male from the erstwhile boyfriend to the soon to be adoptive father of Juno's baby (who put the moves on Juno while adoptive Mom-to-be was out shopping) was a buffoon or a total moron. The ending, where Juno went through with the adoption even though the intended parent's marriage had broken up seemed (to me at least) to convey the idea that fathers weren't really necessary, and a waste of time anyways.

jackazz from florida
and scarface is said to be along with wwf and jerry springer the favorite programs of young blacks.

What's your point?

The worst....
... are the news broadcasts.

Worthless infotainment.


What about Dirty Harry?
Wasn't that the right's favorite movie of the 1970s, ushering in decades of law and order criminal policy?
How is that movie's premise different than Dexter?
What amnesia...

Victoria
The last thing we need is a government that is secular and prone to PC dogma raising ANYONE'S children. Once they get the all kids of irresponsible parents then they will want MINE. Besides, it's just not the government's job to parent anyone even if it has the same values I do.

Solutions
TIVO-We've had one for almost a decade now and next to the AC it's my favorite electronic device.

SCREEN IT WESITE- Excellent nonbias detailed information about the content of movies. They just tell you what's in it and you determine if it's objectionable or not. Just the facts, Ma'am.

NET FLIX- Like an older TV show? No good movies at the theater? They probably have something to suit you and it's easy and inexpensive to use.

SEASON TICKETS TO LIVE THEATER- There are classics running at our local theater. Most of the shows are child friendly at the Hale Centre Theatre in Gilbert, AZ. Comparable costs to going to a movie and buying snacks. They have 3:00 Sat. matinees and Fri. and Sat. evening shows.

BOOKS- Read aloud some classic literature. We do it all the time and the kids love it.


#$%Z&!!!
Victoria: "The sewage that comes out of the tv set corrupts young minds of children whose parents are too busy or not responsible..."

Rowly: "It should not be necessary for parents and grandparents to be forced to guard our children from unsavory shows that comes into our homes unsolisted."

No, you are parents, so BE parents! Despite what Billary says, it is not the village's job!

I love it: parents who are "too busy." Then don't be parents!!!!

People, just turn the damned box off. Try reading a book or going to a museum or just thinking. I know you are So-Cons, so that latter one may be difficult, but stop trying to hoist your reponsibilities onto us. Thank you!

Jason- we change and change and change
the channel, until there are no channels left to change to.

Every time a show becomes successful, the Leftie Mafia and PC Police descend and ruin the scripts with a lot of unwatchable nonsense.

Finally, we turn off our TVs and blog, and then we hear the networks whine about how nobody's watching.

Yet, family friendly shows like America's Got Talent get huge ratings, and the networks don't pay attention. Instead of giving us what we want, they give us Rosie O'Donnell hosting a variety show, which tanks on the first night.

Why? because people are fed up with all the Leftie garbage, and although they would love to see a variety show, there is no way that the would watch that (fill in the blank) host anything.

No, the networks and Madison Ave have been taken over by the radical Left, while conservatives sit on their hands and do nothing about it.

HOLLYWOOD SICKNESS WELL EARNED
It is very clear that Hollywood has succumbed to the "Shock Theatre" school of thought and has no visable intelligence to create anything new to replace it.

As long as this sickness and disease persists, the minds of our children will be at the mercy of these cretins.

READ A BOOK

ROWDY BOOTS

'raunch' on TV vs Fairness Doctrine
Does anyone sense irony in the observation (a valid one) that Hollywood $$ have 'cleansed' DC of Republicans who would criticize the crap on TV vs the Democrats' interest in reimposing the Fairness Doctrine?


Sorry all
It look like I am going to have a double posting again. TH please fix this.

MickeyG
You owe me no thanks. It is our entire nation who owe thanks to you and others who have served in combat. Unfortunately not only have we not shown appropriate gratitude, but sometimes it seems as if some actually prefer to denigrate combat vets instead. As I say, in the 70s the anti-war clowns in Hollywood did not seem to be able to separate their disapproval for the war from their treatment of veterans. It is OK to hate war in general and to hate a particular war. Just do not take your dislike of the war out on those who fought in them. After all how many combat vets actually liked being in a war? I met many combat vets when I was in, but not a one who ever said he enjoyed the experience. Most would not even discuss it. I agree completely that people who have not served should not judge those who have.

13Bravo is the Army code for Field Artillery (if I recall correctly the Army’s infantry MOS is 11Bravo, but I could be wrong). I was lucky in that no one started a war when I was in. All I did was 3 years active duty and 5 in the reserves. The finest humans I ever met was during that time.

Someday I’ll pass on some marine jokes I know (I actually heard some of them from a marine); you and GunnyG just have to promise not to take them personally.
Have a Happy New Year.

Does Bozell...
have anything better to do than to watch this stuff? As bad as pop culture is, his solution for it is worse - government regulation of content.

Victoria
Your post is correct in every way. It should not be necessary for parents and grandparents to be forced to guard our children from unsavory shows that comes into our homes unsolisted.

Years ago,they started pushing the envelope. If something suggestive passes,it will get worse the next episode. Even some commercials are x-rated. It has gone too far and is robbing our children of their innocence .

Change The Channel??
IT DOES NO GOOD.

The sewage that comes out of the tv set corrupts young minds of children whose parents are too busy or not responsible. Those children go to school with my grandchildren, or live next door to them, or come into contact with them in some way. When my granddaughter was in kindergarten, there were THREE instances of little boys making "pests" of themselves towards her, let's just say. IN KINDERGARTEN, for Pete's sake.

So, to Jason and others who say, "Just change the channel", Here's MY ADVICE to you. WAKE UP. We're losing the country. This country that used to have a moral compass and is slipping into an amoral abyss from which we may never recover. Is this really what you want to hand to your children and grandchildren? Or anybody's children and grandchildren, ever? Can you really be so empty inside?

My selections are not the problem.

YOURS ARE.

BOYCOTT
I don't watch certain channels and I don't go to movies.

Sean Penn and Matt Damon and all the morons in tinseltown would be in bread lines if it were up to me.

Penn is a hugo chavez pal.

Let hollywood rot in hell.

13-Bravo,
Thank you for the kind words. I'm not sure about the Army MOS system, but I seem to recall that 13-Bravo is an Infantry MOS,so thank you for your service. Those who have never served in the military or combat should keep their mouths shut about military matters thy know nothing about!!! Semper Fi.

What is worse.
I don't know whats worse, All the reality TV that's on right know or the stupid posts by some of the writers on this thread who have enough energy spit their crap on this sight but can't figure out how to change the channel. BTW I must revoke the man cards of the people here who have endorsed the movies OKLAHOMA and The Sound of Music as family friendly. Where I'm from that's code for GAY!!!

Jim
Is the term "Cornville" one of your little (downright miniscule, in fact) jokes? Perhaps this is a swipe at the rural heartland.
How about you? Do you live in one of few civilized areas of CA or do you live in LA (bizarre central) or San Fran (the only city in the U.S. that makes LA look normal)?

Are any of your relatives in or near Richmond, IN?

Believe me the next time I read something that you write that I disagree with I will challenge you on it. I have the fullest confidence that you or I will write something that will bring about a debate.

I know that you prefer a good debate (I prefer this term over fight) so be patient. There is nothing wrong with occasionally agreeing with people. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Sick people
We should all be honest about the garbage on TV-it is corrupting this nation-pure and simple. The squirreds who write the advertising are just as bad. We need choices on cable-each customer pick what they want coming into their house and we could shut down filth like MTV etc. etc.
You parents with young kids had better wake up-what would we all give for the good old days.
You liberals that like this stuff-keep your kids away from me.

Where do you live in Cornville?

13-Bravo Location: IN
Reply # 53
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 6:37 PM EST

It is nice to be agreeing with your posts on this column (I think you are the same Jim with whom I had a spirited debate a few days ago.
===========
Yes.

I have brothers, sisters, in-laws, and cousins by the dozens, all over that state.

When are we going to be fighting again?

Oh I meant to say when are going to be agreeing again?


Semper Libertas
Moonlight is very similar to Twilight, though the main characters are in their mid to late twenties.

There was a lot of political intrigue going on behind the scenes, between Joel Silver, Warner Brothers and CBS, that contributed to the cancellation of Moonlight, as well as very high production values, which made it expensive.

But if the show had been properly marketed to the Twilight fans, it would have had a big following, to the right "Demo."

CBS had already decided to cancel the show, and did not promote it at all. Meanwhile, a particular executive really wanted to put Swingtown on the air, and took Moonlight off in order to make room for her pet project.

I recommend that you download episodes of Moonlight from Amazon, which are available for less than $2 per episode. The DVDs will be available next month.

re: Mountain Rose
The problem is that even if a show gets good "ratings" in terms of the total number of people watching, if those people don't actually buy things, advertisers won't sponsor the show. I'm not familiar with the specific show you mention, but I suspect that's the case. I have read similar problems exist with regard to WWE wrestling -- it gets great ratings, but the people watching don't buy much so advertising sales are poor.

Roy- you may be right, but
I can point to the year 1992 as the demarcation when Hollywood stopped making movies that I wanted to see.

I can look at my video collection, and the era that starts with Star Wars was something of a golden era for movies, in which great action films were made: movies like Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Untouchables, The Hunt for Red October, Silverado, Romancing the Stone, Blade Runner, Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, Beverly Hills Cop, 48 Hours, Witness and Glory. There were also some great comedies made during that era: Big, Working Girl, Down and Out In Beverly Hills, Roger Rabbit, Parenthood, The In Laws, and Trading Places.

Although there were a few good films that came out after Bill Clinton took office, there were not as many, and most films seemed like politicized attempts at making the Clintons look good, like The American President, or Air Force One.

There seemed to be no reason to go to the movies until Lord of the Rings came out, which was so popular, it proved that people had been staying away from the theaters because there was nothing worth seeing. Then Disney came out with the Pirates of the Caribbean series and the National Treasure series, and it was even more clear what the public wanted to see.

However, that didn't stop the Lefties from continuing to try and jam their propaganda down the throats of the American people. I am amazed how people can release flop after flop and still are able to raise money for another turkey!

2008 has been a watershed year, where Hollywood seemed to have gotten the message that America wants movies with heros, and have released a pile of superhero movies that have made a fortune at the Box Office. Time will only tell if this means they have learned their lesson, or if they are only trying to reload the coffers in order to make more propaganda films.

re: Mountain Rose
The problem is that even if a show gets good "ratings" in terms of the total number of people watching, if those people don't actually buy things, advertisers won't sponsor the show. I'm not familiar with the specific show you mention, but I suspect that's the case. I have read similar problems exist with regard to WWE wrestling -- it gets great ratings, but the people watching don't buy much so advertising sales are poor.

Hi Jim
It is nice to be agreeing with your posts on this column (I think you are the same Jim with whom I had a spirited debate a few days ago. If not please disregard this). I’ve been having the same problems as you concerning posting for the last few days.
Hope you had a Merry Christmas and wish you a Happy New Year.

One of the worst Leftie propaganda shows
currently on TV is called Cold Case. I like a reality show called The Cold Case Files, so when I saw that there was a show that appeared to be a dramatized version of that show, I was eager to see it.

What I found was a show that made episode turn out to be a Leftie propaganda piece. All of the victims in the show turn out to have been done in by intolerant conservatives or intolerant religious people.

This is such a big lie, it makes me sick. To begin with, it is well known that most criminals are Democrats. Secondly, Christians do not go around killing people because they disapprove of somebody's immoral lifestyle.

There are a lot of shows that sneak in Leftie ideas, but Cold Case is Leftie from stem to stern.

war movies
oh come on-there's been some decent war movies in the last 20 years which depict american gi's in a good light.heartbreak ridge and saving private ryan come to mind immediately although i'm sure there are others.

Madison Avenue has been guilty
for decades of negatively enfluencing the popular culture. As Brent says, there are companies that demonstrate that they can choose the shows they support carefully, and still be successful.

But other companies demonstrate that not everyone in the business world are social conservatives.

In the early 1970s, CBS caved into pressure to the advertisers, who wanted to appeal to a hipper, city-dwelling audience. In the space of a year, popular shows like The Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, Mayberry RFD, and Hee Haw were all cancelled to make room for slightly left-leaning shows like MASH, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, All In The Family, and The Bob Newhart Show.

This became known in TV circles as "The Rural Purge," and Pat Buttram (Mr. Haney on Green Acres) was quoted as saying: "It was the year CBS killed everything with a tree in it."

This kind of thing still goes on today, when popular shows that don't attract a young enough "demo" will be casually tossed aside. For example, Moonlight, which won the People's Choice Award for Most Popular New Drama, was cancelled and replaced with Swingtown, a show about 1970s wife-swappers. Moonlight dealt with issues like honor, loyalty, friendship, fidelity, and the battle of good against evil, while Swingtown was about suburban immorality.

After promoting Swingtown heavily, CBS was forced to cancel it due to very poor ratings, as well as a campaign against it by the Parents Television Council. This show was replaced by another experiment called the Ex-List, which was not as seedy as Swingtown, but equally unpopular. Moonlight, in the meantime, continues to have an active fan club, and has found a home on the Sci-Fi channel.

Ratings
Ratings should warn us of what a movie or TV show contains. They do not do a very good job.It is in the eye of the beholder what is considered unacceptable.

If I know a show has undesirable content for me,I will not watch it,for obvious reasons.

What bothers me more is watching a show and the writers throw in some comment about politics,the environment,etc.that has nothing to do with the show itself.

Contradiction @11:33 am
Having watched the Family Guy once I never again viewed it. Interestingly you seem to believe that one should not object to “entertainment” fare that insults a religion. Do you hold this same belief concerning anything that is disrespectful to Obama or that shows the civil rights movement in a less than positive light? How about if JFK were to be show as an incompetent dolt who almost got us into WW3 or FDR as a socialist who undermined U.S. democracy?
By the way, for those of you who keep issuing the same refrain that if we do not like what we see that we should turn the channel; I do just that. I do however retain the right to criticize what I do not like. Kinda stinks when the 1st Amendment is used by those you disagree with doesn't it?

What to do about it
It's always nice when a columnists expresses disdain for some of what is on TV these days, but something more is really needed to solve the problem. Bozell here, for example, gave us some fine observations on what is bad on TV, but he only
us two lame suggestions on what to do about the problem.

1) Boycott irresponsible corporate
sponsors, and
2) Vote Republican.

Does anyone imagine either of these suggestions will amount to a hill of beans?

Also, although it was very good that Bozell also directed his attention on corporate sponsors, his discussion
on poor TV broadcasts did not include
addressing the content of some of the worst commercials. Ih he had,
his discussion of corporate responsibility would definitely have have been more sophisticated, because a very many corporations, including some on Bozell's Best category, make commercials with irresponsibly
negative content.


MickeyG @9:09 am
Thank you for your service and your sacrifices. I was only a child in the 70s and I was thoroughly disgusted by the way Hollywood portrayed our honorable veterans. Those who would never fight were only too happy to show combat veterans as crazed criminals. God bless you sir.

Scrap Iron @8:04 am
I love Burn Notice and stopped watching the Discovery Channel for the very reason you raise. The sad thing is that I start to enjoy a show only to have the show start pushing such nonsense. Nowadays the attempt to force political/social beliefs down our throats has caused me to gag.

the hollyweird products
actually it seems that most of the crap they produce not only has a very short shelf life but is viewed by fewer and fewer people.

But many are correct when they say they stay away from the trash produced. But if some are dumb enough to be pulled into the movies or watch this stuff on tv they have no one to blame but themselves.

But I have noticed that the worst of the crap is never reviewed prior to it opening in the theaters and is released in huge numbers of theaters hoping to cash in before word of mouth gets around and the audience virtually vanishes

In Defense of "America-Hating" Liberals
I read Brent Bozell's columns here frequently. Oddly enough, I've agreed with what he's had to say for the most part (regarding how awful movies and television have become). I see like so many others, he and other people who visit this site are under the impression that liberals hate the U.S.A. Did this idea begin with Reagan in the 1980's or Bush in the 2000's? Liberals DO NOT, I REPEAT, DO NOT hate America. We love our country (and it is our country as much as it is conservatives'). We simlply have different views than you folks do. And we do find it offensive and disgusting when we're accusing of hating America. (Would you put us in the same group as Al Quaeda and the Taliban, because those terrorists would kill any of you as quickly as they would kill any of us).
I've noticed that Brent Bozell truly despises Showtime's "Dexter", which I will admit can get too graphically violent. However, he misses the point of the show, which is that Dexter's adopted father saw his proclivities and urges as a boy and channeled them. I grant you that he could have probably gotten the boy counseling or put him elsewhere where he could have been helped more. But no one is perfect. His adoptive father, Harry, simply saw this as an opportunity to have Dexter get rid of hardened, violent criminals.
Incidentally, if you don't like the show, DON'T WATCH IT!

words that are obscene in one place

the real cactushead Location: AZ
Reply # 41
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 2:44 PM EST
Subject: svpallava
they actually need a new rating system.
=========

And they need to enforce it before the crap is filmed.

I would like someone to tell me a story where a word, or words that are considered obscene by most people are the only words that can be used to make that point. How about tone of voice, facial expression, body language, etc. Oh I forgot, I’m talking about the garbage generation, with very little talent.

Of course some words that are obscene in one place, can be a Lovey word in another private place.

The eye can see and the heart can love what the word cannot describe.

A great wit is a terrible thing to waste. Well that is half right. A half wit is the best thing to waste.

The greatest music spot in all the movies, even including Music Man and Sound of Music, was Jeanette MacDonald singing “The Holy City” in the movie San Francisco. I bet you don’t remember that. A most beautiful song, my mother used to sing it as a solo, and I sometimes played it as a trumpet solo.


Hmmm...
Mr. Bozell is certainly entitled to his own opinion about what's good and what's bad. So long as he doesn't try to force others to watch (or not) his preferences.

I find it funny that people get so bent out of shape about movies and TV. All you have to do is turn the channel or turn the TV off; movies are even easier: just don't go to the movies.

Standards and mores change over time. There are always going to be a group of nay-sayers pointing backward to some supposed golden age, while only looking at the present with a raised nose and derision. Fine, again, so long as you don't interfere with my ability to watch those things (like, for example, Family Guy or Southpark) that I find entertaining.


YES, re Dexter

My wife and I bemoaned this series as shockingly morally relativistic. So, it's OK that this guy savagely murders presumably "bad" people? Last time I checked, vigilantism was against the law. The WORST part about this show is that the creators take special, special pains to cast this monster as somehow deserving of understanding and sympathy. They even gave this effer a nice girl fried. He ought to fry...

svpallava
they actually need a new rating system. They can start labeling the crap they produce with additions such as will bore you death.

Insults the intelligence a 3 year old.

Attempts to be p/c to make some victim group feel better about themselves.

Is guaranteed to show how much they hate america

Is a total rewrite of history but will allow libs to have a new take on the past, totally incorrect but one they can accept as truth


Real Cactushead
"of course they cater to the lowest continue denominator..."

Would that include folks who can't type "lowest common denominator?"

IMHO, we on the Right...
... have been far too willing to let Fox TV and Fox News off the hook just because we like the politics of the latter. Both are sewage, and both have speeded the decline of TV entertainment, as well as news.
FOX TV was garbage from the start, way back with brutalizing shows like COPS. Now, it offers a venue for loathsome fascist garbage like 24, and with each season tries to reach ever lower. George Orwell wrote in 1984 that a vision of the future was a boot stamping on a human face eternally. Today, he'd add that it would be a reality show on Fox.

An aside
I've heard people claim they've seen original version of "Star Wars" double-digit numbers of times, but I had (and still do) a hard time figuring out how they could do that. I found it an "enjoy once" film when new (1977) in theatre, but not really for repeats (I did see part of it also as an inflight movie on an Air-India flight--and quickly fled to another section, where an old Bollywood film "Uran Khatola" was being shown).

For MickeyG, renny, cactushead, ...
A tidbit about the "ratings system" (vs its predecessor "Production Code", and the reason why films got so pricey (and their concessions even pricier):

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId= 76860

Snippet: "In 1969, the year after the Production Code was abolished and the Ratings Scheme installed, more than 60 percent of the movie-going audience disappeared, many never to return again. The 44 million weekly ticket buyers who came to the theaters in 1965 dwindled to an all-time low of just 17.5 million. To this day, movie attendance has never returned to the 44 million weekly ticket-buying attendance, even with the U.S. population increasing by 100 million people since 1968."

IMO, no accident that such films as "Oklahoma", "Ben Hur", "Sound Of Music" which can be seen-and-enjoyed repeatedly were all made PRIOR to the "ratings system".

Cultural Pollution and Changing Channels
Liberals (and their fellow-travelers) always advise us that if you don't like what you see on TV, just change the channel. This is like saying "If you don't like what you see, bury your head in the sand ('cause if you can't see it, it can't hurt you. Kumbaya."

Remember TV channels are like diapers


Cepat2 Location: CA
Reply # 27
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 12:06 PM EST

It's easy, inexpensive, and thorough. Just use the channel change button or purchase a theater ticket for a film you will enjoy.
==============

It's funny ya know. When conservatives complain about the smut and filth on the airwaves that inundate our children at all hours, liberals are always quick to stand up and tell us that we should just change the channel.

But when it comes to anything to do with conservative opinion like Rush, Fox News, et al, rather than following their own advice and simply changing the channel, they want to legislate it out of existence. The Founders would be rolling in their graves.

Remember TV channels are like diapers - they should be changed often and for the same reason.

sj doc
Are you really in medical school? Might I suggest that you pursue pathology as a specialty? That way you won't have to pretend to care about the religious patients who might unwittingly put themselves under your care in another area of medicine.

Please TH, fix it

Those are not dups, they are triplets, the others have not yet arrived.

No beauty, no talent

MickeyG Location: CO
Reply # 20
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 9:09 AM EST
Scrap Iron,
I know how you feel, I have not gone to a movie theater since 1990.
=========

I got you beat, try 1980. The only type of movie I will ever see are Oklahoma, Music Man, Sound of Music, etc.

You will never see a remake of any of those because today there are no pretty women, no one with singing talent (they just know the sewer sounds of the garbage generation).

It takes talent and beauty to make a movie, and none exist today. The females all have the “Whore Hairdo.” That is, it looks they just got out of bed, or are ready to hop in bed with anyone.


Scary scientific study


Scrap Iron Location: TX
Reply # 16
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 8:04 AM EST

Bad show(s) every Discovery channel program hyping the global climate change nonsense.
==========

Hey watch it Iron man. I just read a scientific study that shows the amount of sunlight changes by 2 minutes each day. Sometimes up sometimes down. Scarey.

Hollywood wants social change
Hollywood is often NOT about the money, as Ken92 suggested. Look at the greatest movie money makers. Not one of the top 35 highest grossing movies is R-rated, yet Hollywood puts out dozens of R-rated films every year.

Of the top 35, all are clear-cut stories of good vs. evil. Yet Hollywood puts out dozens of movies every year where the good and evil are often swapped and the lines muddied.

Scary scientific study

Scrap Iron Location: TX
Reply # 16
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 8:04 AM EST

Bad show(s) every Discovery channel program hyping the global climate change nonsense.
==========

Hey watch it Iron man. I just read a scientific study that shows the amount of sunlight changes by 2 minutes each day. Sometimes up sometimes down. Scarey.

No beauty, no talent

MickeyG Location: CO
Reply # 20
Date: Dec 26, 2008 - 9:09 AM EST
Scrap Iron,
I know how you feel, I have not gone to a movie theater since 1990.
=========

I got you beat, try 1980. The only type of movie I will ever see are Oklahoma, Music Man, Sound of Music, etc.

You will never see a remake of any of those because today there are no pretty women, no one with singing talent (they just know the sewer sounds of the garbage generation).

It takes talent and beauty to make a movie, and none exist today. The females all have the “Whore Hairdo.” That is, it looks they just got out of bed, or are ready to hop in bed with anyone.

Just use the Click
It's easy, inexpensive, and thorough. Just use the channel change button or purchase a theater ticket for a film you will enjoy.

CLICK is a very persuasive method of indicating you values and ideals. It also directs advertisers and investors in films in the right direction.

If you don't like what you see or hear simply CLICK and take your precious time and purchasing dollars elsewhere. You will feel better and enjoy your entertainment experience much more.

This has been our family's practice for more than two years now and it works very well.

When in doubt...CLICK.


Oh Bah Hum-Bug!
I maintain only the stupid are attracted to the stupid. It's not that they're so disgusting to me as it is such a lame, lazy and pointless plot or story-line that causes me that disgust. Whenever one views any production, one must go in with a suspension-of-dis-belief attitude, or one can't possibly enjoy the event. However, the crap flushed down the toilets of hollyweird and splashed upon movie or t.v. screens is so blatantly anti-intellect, so poorly conceived, executed and presented that it fosters not a willingness to suspend dis-belief, but rather an overwhelming sense of incredulity.
I shoulda' been a weatherman. I could be wrong more than half the time and still make a good living.

What Tedium
Family Guy sets out the bait and the obtuse blowhards represented by "Townhall" rise to it.

The cycle of life continues.

Hollywood will be more irrelevant if
it keeps giving awards to movies no one has seen and no one wants to see.

Already, movies not in release like Benjamin Button (nearly 3 hours of expert makeup and digitalization with the second-hand Clark Gable of the moment, Brad Bitt, I mean, Pitt) and Doubt, a backhanded swipe at religion, Catholicism in particular, adapted from a stage play that was more subtle have received dozens of nominations.

Last year included Then There Will Be Blood, which wouldn't even sell in DVD release and Juno, which warmed hearts that think a foul-mouth kid who gets pregnant by a boy she doesn't know and regularly belittles her parents and any other adult (how cute) was actually viewed by one of my college students as an anti-teen movie, because Lindsey said Juno's predicament was adolescent narcissism a la the media's idea of teens: all Juno was missing was being a drug dealer and winning American Idol as a country/western singer. Oh, and, snagging Brad Pitt.

Redacted, The Kingdom, Valley of Elah, Lions for Lambs, Rendition, Grace is Gone, et. al. anti-wasr movies all earnd $5 each and didn't last a week in most venues, despite names like Redford, Streep, Witherspoon, and Cruise attached to them.

Movie attendance dropped 7% last year and has been on a downward spiral for decades. Theatres respond by raising prices on everything, AGAIN.

50 years ago in NJ, the Parkway was 25 cents for the toll, the movies were 25 cents for two films, two cartoons, previews, and newsreel; and gasoline as 20 cents a gallon.

Now the *cheap* movie is $7 and popcorn is even more. If the film industry doesn't want to go the way of the American auto makers, it should listen up.

What is learning, what is entertainment

A teenager is made to sit in a hard chair in a drafty room, next to people he doesn’t like, watching a scratchy picture on a small screen, and the teacher’s union will tell you he is learning, learning, learning.

Later that same day, that same person is sitting in a comfortable upholstered chair in an air-conditioned room, eating pop-corn and drinking a coke, sitting next to his girlfriend, watching a technically perfect picture on a huge screen, and we are told he is learning nothing, he is being entertained.

Why is it a surprise that a person who sees hours of the trash and filth shown on TV, in computer games, and in movie theaters, has their style of life changed? And don’t say your child saw those same films and programs and killed no one. Millions of people saw a commercial for a new car last night, and only a very, very few bought the car.

Repeated and constant exposure to computer games, TV programs, and movies can and does influence a life. Can Hollywood be proud of what they teach?

TV THAT YOU WILL NEVER SEE

.....You will never see a series or documentary that shows an abortion, especially in the third trimester ....the outrage from the pro-abortion crowd would be deafening ...this is one abomination that they want to keep hidden from the public ...so the bottom must be the level just above televised executions .....COLOSSUS

Scrap Iron,
I know how you feel, I have not gone to a movie theater since 1990. As a USMC Viet-Nam combat veteran, I really hated the way Hollywood portrayed the American military. I do not and will not support or spend money on any thing coming from the movie industry!!!

hollyweird and liberals
of course they cater to the lowest continue denominator in intellectual terms.

After the past couple of generations have been indoctritnated by the liberal and leftist teachers union they fully accept the waste that flows from hollyweird as worthy entertainment or passible reality.

But no one is forced to watch what hollyweird produces not is anyone forced to vote for the candidates and issues supported by the hollyweird elite.

If you don't like the amount of money that leftists send to support losers like franken, get involved in his campaign and offset the work and money of others

You win with better arguments for your candidate, and by getting out the vote to support him. Sitting idly by while soros and his minions dominate only guarantees more candidates he approves of

Good and bad
Good show- Burn Notice usa network

Bad show(s) every Discovery channel program hyping the global climate change nonsense.

I haven't been to see a movie (in the theater) in over 5 years. The longer a new release take to get to DVD, the better it is. THEN I'll rent it.

Support thr Fair Tax

The race to the bottom
Pornography and heroin are examples of substances where the user requires increasing doses to maintain the same level of arousal.

So it is with the entertainment industry. In order to attract/retain viewers, producers must develop ever more extreme programs, each more shocking and titillating than the last.

I've heard some people ask where the bottom is? Well, the answer is that there is no bottom. The entertainment industry will continue to push the envelope as long as there's another dollar in profits to be had.

I'm not in favor of censorship, so I don't know what can be done. I guess nothing. I guess we'll continue to live with our cesspool culture until the bottom falls out.

My Best and Worst of 2008
The best TV of 2008? Almost anything on the Animal Planet, Discovery, History, Military and Turner Classic Movie channels.
The worst TV (and radio) of 2008: Those bleeping infomercials. I've never understood why we are bombarded with these things --- at one point in the day (5 AM), I counted 70 "Paid Program" shows on my cable system. Such wondrous fare as "Is Colon Detox Hype" and a show brought to us by Kodak are stupid at best and revolting at worst. The only really bad thing Pres. Reagan ever did was to permit this atrocity
As for the shows you mention --- I don't watch network TV. I watch either syndicated shows ("House" and "M*A*S*H" plus "Columbo," the original "Star Trek" and "Perry Mason"), old movies or programs that enlighten my mind. I also watch FOX news.

Raunch will be in Congress
We don't need to worry about raunch in Hollywood. At the last count, Mr. Raunch, aka Al Franken, is ahead in Minnesota and will go to the Senate almost certainly, regardless of outcome. With Al there, we will have government raunch, not just Hollywoods, to contend with.

No need to revive college students in morgues or any other of Hollywood's many lame plots. All they will have to do is televise the results of the Obama Free Choice Act. We can watch baby brains get sucked out on live TV, can watch aborted babies die in dirty linen closets, etc.

Maximillian
You are on the right track. The NYT and much of the MSM, both print and TV, are feeling the bite as people just don't patronize them at the rate they used to. They are losing money and influence. As collectivism increases here, we will move more and more into the economic/social mold of Europe. Class mobility will decrease. Neighborhood and social status will assume more importance. There is no social advancement when you are on the dole, as a huge percentage of Europeans are.

Dexter
I have no idea why anyone likes this show or this character. It's repulsive.

I was Hindanow
I got the video tape. It's called "Santa Clause is Coming to Town". How much ya give me?

Children's Christmas TV Specials
Does anyone besides me remember a puppet show that was broadcast on TV in the early '70s? It was about Santa Claus as a baby, a foundling adopted by a family of toy-making elves, the Kringles, and later on, as a young man. It was charming and I don't know if it was ever broadcast again.

I'm sorry,
but as someone who likes satire, it is very difficult to find something funny in the angry responses to this column. Mr. Bozell describes unquestionably disgusting programming and some here want to celebrate and magnify THAT filth, while reviling the guy who merely points it out.

Now I know why they are called "the lost". May God have mercy on their souls.

This article is absolutely correct
The greatest threats to America are Family Guy and Dexter. If we could kill those shows and the people who produce them, then America would face no problems whatsoever.
Get a life, people!

Great article!
The filth put out by Hollywood dirties the culture and our society. It coarsens us, and it numbs us to increasing filth that harms the soul.

How obsurd...
TV & movies are corrupting America and the world! These are the cries we've heard for 50+ years from our fellow voyeurs. If a show offends you, turn it off. If you feel offended and want to boycott the sponsors, you are free to do so. Just get off my back and stop telling me what is true, false or funny. Do not presume to judge me.

You Forgot One Thing...
And the thing is: Do you know the word? Not the word of the Bible, no less, but everybody's heard - about the bird!

Ba-ba-ba-bird-bird-bird-bird is the word!
Ba-ba-ba-bird-bird-bird-bird is the word!
Pa-pa-pa-oo-ma-mow-mow-pa-pa-oo-mow-ma-mow!
Pa-pa-pa-oo-ma-mow-mow-pa-pa-oo-mow-ma-mow!
Pa-pa-pa-oo-ma-mow-mow-pa-pa-oo-mow-ma-mow!

Merry Christmas, Everyone.

-"Your bird intelligence is no match for my PEOPLE intelligence!"
-Peter Griffin, from "Family Guy"

Bozell's right, change the channel
Do not do business with the left. Sometimes, everyone is fooled into believing a closet-leftist company is reasonable. That's inevitable. I shopped at Costco for years before I found out the company is run by socialist loons. Once a Conservative knows that an enterprise, show, or actor contributes to the anti-American left, then they have no right to complain about politics so long as they continue their support.

On a side note. Bozell is wrong about his prized movie picks. Charlie Brown and Miracle on 34th Street have frequent and absurd polemics against commercialism. It's enough to make me question whether the entertainment industry was ever worth patronizing.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.