Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Elizabeth Edwards Favors "Rage"
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


More rage from St. Elizabeth, this time against America: "A country made great by men and women who work with their hands now debases and ignores them, and celebrates instead the investment banker, the money changers, while holding a Bible (which would teach them otherwise) as a sword against gays and lesbians, against women, and even against science itself."

Then there is the hate and ugliness coming from some of her husband's presidential campaign staff.

"God is a sadistic bastard." Sen. Rick Santorum talks about sex "lest his lack of self-control be manifested by f---ing his desk on the Senate floor." In the Duke Lacrosse case, "Can't a few white boys sexually assault a black woman anymore without people getting all wound up about it?" These statements, among others, are the proud utterances of the erstwhile official Edwards for President blogger, Amanda Marcotte.

President Bush has a "wingnut Christofascist base." "When CNN invited Ann Coulter to comment on the 2004 presidential debates ... they had officially transformed into the C--- News Network." These were some of the offerings from the other official campaign blogger, Melissa McEwan.

How in the world did these vile women find positions as the official bloggers in the Edwards campaign? According to Men's Vogue magazine, they were hired by, you guessed it, St. Elizabeth. And even after their wretched bigotry triggered a national outcry, John Edwards refused to fire them.

But Elizabeth Edwards wasn't confronted on a single one of these statements during any of her media appearances. In the collective eyes of the press, conservatives, almost by definition, are ugly and hateful, and their raging deserves denouncement. Liberals, on the contrary, are permitted to rage, and when they froth at the mouth with the most hateful language imaginable, they're celebrated for that raging, even presented with "Rage" awards. Such are the standards of civil discourse in the land of liberalism.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Elizabeth Edwards
Gives creditability to her detractors when she goes on one of these "they're attacking my hubby, rants.

The reality is that when you stroll out in public begging for the Big Job, you open yourself to all manner of praise and criticism. If you are going to accept any praise sent your way, you need to roll with any criticism.

Edwards is a hypocrite for preaching his "two americas" sermon, and saying how the gap between the haves and the have nots has gotten two big, while raking in millions and millions of dollars and paying his para-legals and office workers little more than minimum wage.

Now that he has his 50 million dollar nest egg safely tucked away in tax shelters, he wants to make sure everybody else will have to start paying more income taxes and higher wages to decrease the disparity between the so called rich and poor.

It is interesting how all of the limosine liberals want future income taxed higher so as to decrease that so called wage gap, but don't want anybody to touch their own accumulated wealth.

If the Kennedys, Kerry's, Edwards, Striesands, etc. really felt the way they did about sharing with the common folk, why not start with spreading thier own accumulated wealth before they go after my measley wages.

Now, as to what the Ann Coulters, Bill Mahr, and Rosie o'dount's say, who the hell cares? (note that the democrats have far more of these attack "entertainers" than the republicans do.)

By focusing on these idiots, the candidates avoid discussing real issues, and their real liabilities.

Now, I'm suspecting that the reason Edwards chooses to attack Coulter's comments is that if she instead, attacked legitimate critics, her responses would show what a hypocrite her and her husband are.

Elizabeth Edwards
Gives creditability to her detractors when she goes on one of these "they're attacking my hubby, rants.

The reality is that when you stroll out in public begging for the Big Job, you open yourself to all manner of praise and criticism. If you are going to accept any praise sent your way, you need to roll with any criticism.

Edwards is a hypocrite for preaching his "two americas" sermon, and saying how the gap between the haves and the have nots has gotten two big, while raking in millions and millions of dollars and paying his para-legals and office workers little more than minimum wage.

Now that he has his 50 million dollar nest egg safely tucked away in tax shelters, he wants to make sure everybody else will have to start paying more income taxes and higher wages to decrease the disparity between the so called rich and poor.

It is interesting how all of the limosine liberals want future income taxed higher so as to decrease that so called wage gap, but don't want anybody to touch their own accumulated wealth.

If the Kennedys, Kerry's, Edwards, Striesands, etc. really felt the way they did about sharing with the common folk, why not start with spreading thier own accumulated wealth before they go after my measley wages.

Now, as to what the Ann Coulters, Bill Mahr, and Rosie o'dount's say, who the hell cares? (note that the democrats have far more of these attack "entertainers" than the republicans do.)

By focusing on these idiots, the candidates avoid discussing real issues, and their real liabilities.

Now, I'm suspecting that the reason Edwards chooses to attack Coulter's comments is that if she instead, attacked legitimate critics, her responses would show what a hypocrite her and her husband are.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.