Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 09, 2007
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Numbers on Moral Decline
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Most American parents display an optimism about their children living in a richer, more technologically advanced world and as they grow, that they'll be healthier with a longer life expectancy. All that said, there's also a remarkable pessimism about the moral decline they are bequeathing to the next generation.

A new cultural-values survey of 2,000 American adults performed by the polling firm of Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates for the Culture and Media Institute reveals a strong majority, 74 percent, believes moral values in America are weaker than they were 20 years ago. Almost half, 48 percent, agree that values are much weaker than they were 20 years ago.

Why the pessimism? Is the answer right in front of them, in their own children, or their children's friends? Or is the answer more indirect, gleaned from staring at the popular culture? For most, a leading indicator of moral decline is the media. Clearly, Americans look into their television sets and get a high-definition dose of Hollywood's take on values. Sixty-eight percent of Americans in the survey said the media are having a detrimental effect on moral values in America.

Americans place heavier blame on the entertainment media, but they blame the news media as well, with its emphasis on sex, violence and ditzy head-shaving celebrities. Why do even supposedly serious news outlets devote hours of airtime to airheads like Paris Hilton, whose ticket to fame was her old-wealth surname and her talent on "private" sex tapes?

The agreement is remarkable across political and religious subsets. Not only do 73 percent believe the entertainment media has a negative effect on America's commitment to moral values, that's a sentiment shared by Republicans (86 percent) and Democrats (68 percent); conservatives (80 percent) and liberals (64 percent); even religious types identified as orthodox (82 percent) and mostly secular progressives (62 percent).

Many worry every time a popular show like NBC's "Heroes" threatens to show a mutilated corpse or someone getting the top of their skull sawed off. Many are saddened by grotesque Comedy Central attempts to mock God in 735 creative ways. On the new series by "comedienne" Sarah Silverman, the audience was treated to Silverman having a one-night stand with God. When she wakes up the next morning disgusted with the deity, she tells him she has to help a friend move, and ultimately knees him in the groin when he tries to extend the relationship. People ask: What have we done to deserve gratuitous programming like this?

The media are a major influence on shaping our cultural values, and America knows it. Almost two-thirds of the people surveyed (64 percent) agree the media are an important factor in the culture. It sometimes seems almost impossibly pervasive and immune to complaints as they cross every new frontier of excess.

But they're reasonable in knowing that the media is ultimately not the most important factor. Good parents can be a much more direct moral influence than the TV, multiplex or radio. Of those who were asked who is most responsible for moral decline among young people, 57 percent blamed parents and families first, and only 21 percent blamed the media first. Parents need to be a gatekeeper to children's entertainment, to guide them through its treacherous passages and not merely let them hitchhike along the road alone.

Parents also need to go beyond teaching morality to living morally. Sadly, this cultural survey shows that while Americans have a great consensus on the importance of classic virtues like truthfulness, thrift, industry and charity, they often fail to follow through. America is becoming more situational in its everyday ethics. One-fourth or one-third of survey recipients admitted they would cheat on restaurant checks, tax returns and would break laws they considered outdated or if no one got hurt.

America needs a people who do not merely talk about public virtues, but embrace them with passion and humility. Reversing America's moral decline isn't just about the media. It's a daily fight in millions of homes and in billions of daily ethical situations. How much progress could we make by just trying harder to live the virtues so many of us profess to hold dear?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
LadyRebel why
do you want Bozell to pipe down and go away? Because he doesn't agree with you? Why do you have a right to free speech and he doesn't? The assumption of liberals seems to be that only their side should get a say. Why don't you practice what you so adamantly preach and allow free speech for all.

SteveL
We may simply disagree on the pervasiveness of the impact of personal integrity, or lack of it. If you don't agree that you can't put integrity in boxes, and have it in some aspects of your life but not others, I'm probably not going to convince you.

Consider, though, that the point of sale is not the only important aspect of capitalism. It's what matters to the consumer; but the whole point of capitalism is that it benefits everyone, by functioning as a clearing-house for value. Owners who gamble away all their profits, or who heave them out the door to requite lawsuits or ex-spouses or addictions to narcotics or liquor, end up injuring employees, shareholders, and the business. That may not be your problem, but it is someone's. A mutuality of benefit has been undercut whenever this happens.

I do think we'd agree that it's not the government's job to intervene for the purpose of averting injuries to business, per se, when any old lack of integrity menaces it. The government's interest, arguably, is in business practices directly incident to business exchanges.

But that's why I say that capitalism doesn't speak to public immorality. Its efficiency doesn't cause public immorality, nor does capitalism need government to protect itself from public immorality. That, however, does NOT mean that society acting in its moral -- as opposed to economic -- capacity, can't decide government should address, for example, prostitution.

Prostitution, drug abuse, alcoholism, and gambling occur in every economic system. They are not "capitalism" -- they are simply exchanges of goods for services. Any such exchange can take place, even where government does not recognize the rights and interests of individuals in capital. It's that recognition of individual rights and interests that distinguishes capitalism.

Societal imposition of moral ideas can certainly coexist with capitalism. Government enforcement is haphazard and usually not terribly effective -- one-on-one intervention by private citizens through voluntary charity has the better effect of changing lives, rather than merely punishing law-breaking.

But it is not anti-capitalist for society to decide drugs and prostitution are bad. It may be anti-libertarian, but it is not anti-capitalist. Capitalism doesn't by any means require that ALL forms of voluntary exchange must be tolerated. It requires, instead, that the state -- which has police power -- must acknowledge and uphold the interests of individuals, and their rights over, capital.

(I'm giving you credit for knowing that "capital" doesn't mean "factories as the means of production," pace Karl Marx. Rather, it means whatever enables an individual to generate what is valuable to others. It may be an idea, it may be a special efficiency in production or distribution, it may be, as we often think of it, "seed money" to get projects started.)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.