Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Sagging stars go for sleazy 'Nip/Tuck'
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


So what do you do if you're an old and washed-up, or not-so-old, but increasingly forgotten actor anxious to regain the spotlight of celebrity? As a rule, you look to associate yourself with a project that might jump-start your career. It is nice to be asked to participate in a project popular with the public. You jump at the chance for a supporting role in a Steven Spielberg movie. It's even better when the show is the rage of Hollywood itself and generating the all-important "buzz" among Tinseltown's sycophantic critics. If you're desperate enough, you'll latch on to this project, no matter how distasteful it is.

I've seen it. I think of the visit to the home of the actress who was distraught by the filth permeating the world of television, yet two months later took a major supporting role in one of the filthiest series that year. I think of the numerous conversations I had with the comedian who was disgusted by the lack of civility in his industry, but then jumped at the opportunity when Howard Stern's shop called for an interview. I remember the lunch I had with the actress who spoke so eloquently about the need to restore family values to the world of entertainment, and three years later made a national splash by shooting a topless scene in a movie.

They were all serious and honest, but they were also on the downside of once-prominent careers, and ultimately, they were desperate enough to compromise their principles. If it can happen to them, it can happen to just about anyone. In fact, it does. This would explain the seemingly irresistible urge of aging celebrities to align themselves, through guest appearances, with FX's "Nip/Tuck."

The critics absolutely love this program. "'Nip/Tuck's' sheer energy -- its vigor for the vulgar, its delight in decadence, its zest for the zeitgeist -- won me over," raves "Entertainment Weekly." "'Nip/Tuck' remains gorgeously slick (Everything) comes together to form an eerily beautiful TV atmosphere, one that's as coolly futuristic as the show's plots," gushes The Boston Globe. "Dazzling consistently audacious a dizzying complexity," cheers Florida's Palm Beach Post. "Avant-garde pop art ... The show's popularity proves America doesn't have to be the repressed, genital devoid Disneyland for prude-year-olds," declares the Chicago Sun Times. And that's just a sampling.

What's this series delivered in its first three seasons to deserve these accolades?

There's the teenaged character who performs a circumcision on himself, and later engages in three-way sex with two female classmates, and in another episode has a lengthy affair with a middle-aged woman who turns out to be a transsexual who was is also having sex with her teenaged adopted son, who ultimately kills himself. There's another character who is shown having oral, anal and vaginal sex with a doll, imagining he was raping the porn star on whom the doll was based.

There's the morgue worker who saves his dead sister's head to assemble, along with assorted other female body parts, a Frankenstein-like monster with which to have sex. There is the rapist who rapes both women and men (the star gets it anally) and then slashes their faces.

There's the surgeon who, we learn, was born without proper male genitals, has a sister who, like he, is also deformed and was also the product of an incestuous relationship, and so he has an incestuous relationship with her. The main surgeons are more normal. If they're not visiting prostitutes for threesomes, these adults go to college parties to have college girls perform oral sex on them.

Star-dimmed Hollywood celebrities are lining up, eager to be part of this dizzying complexity. Alec Baldwin, Jill Clayburgh and Anne Heche have made guest appearances. Vanessa Redgrave has played the role of a grandmother who, among other things, has sex with one of the surgeons during her daughter's wedding and later smokes pot with her grandson. Joan Rivers has made appearances as a character requiring face-lifts, and last year appeared as herself, offering a testimonial (including a demonstration) for a semen-based facial cream.

This year even more has-beens will participate. Jacqueline Bisset, Brooke Shields and Rosie O'Donnell will be featured. Mario Lopez ("Saved by the Bell") will have a "Brokeback Mountain" shower-scene moment with one of the main characters. Kathleen Turner will play the role of a phone-sex operator who wants a voice lift. Catherine Deneuve's character will have her dead husband's ashes inserted into her breast implants. And 74-year-old Larry Hagman will play a character whose mid-stage prostate cancer has left him in need of larger testicles.

They've all made the industry trade papers now, and presumably are gloriously happy.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Where do we go from here?
"Art" imitating "life" imitating "art" imitating "life" et cetera....

Do we have so much time on our hands with nothing better to do that we would invite such thoughts and enactments into our homes, our lives, to be viewed by anyone knowing how to turn on the set?

Where is "Just Say No (Thank You!)" in all of this?

In the meanwhile, to have discussions such as this only gives more attention to this base excuse for entertainment, to celebrities who have too much influence on our youth as role models. (!) The sense of voyeurism seems to be insatiable--Jen & Brad, Tom & Katie, on and on, ad nauseam. Who cares what their private lives are about, anyway?! What would happen to if their lives were actually private and we only saw them in professional capacity? What is important to each of OUR private lives? This stuff? That's it?!

Living without television is not only possible, but quite nice--there are books to be read, movies of choice to own and enjoy, hobbies to pursue, relationships and conversations to appreciate, life's endless stream of possibilities. I do confess to missing PBS, Discover and the History Channel, but have found that even they are not as important as I used to think that they were, and I can rent/own/borrow from the library many of their offerings. And I am continually amazed at the role that this media plays in so many homes. What is being missed in real life?

Thank you for all of these insights. If there is truly a consensus of outrage, perhaps just saying no may free us up to do something more worthwhile with our time in this beautiful world, and draw attention to our not paying attention to it.

Liberal Licentious and Despotism
It's amusing to read the posts of liberals when ever criticisms of their beliefs or lifestyles comes up in discussions. Censorship is usually the first action brought up. But most censorship and severe repercussions of non accepted thought come from the left.

Pertaining to the subject at hand, "Nip Tuck," most comments from the right are mainly address at the incredulous appetite from moral weakling to such low class subjects. Of course, liberals want to shut up debate when it gets close to home. Classless beliefs do not like to be discussed by those mired in the cesspool of filth. Political correctness is just one glaring example of liberal censorship. The attempt to censor debate in the open.

The article in question written by Bozell does not mention censorship or sanctions against Nip Tuck or other media offerings. Just Bozell's personal opinion about the moral ineptness of hollywood and those that ply their trade. Again, it's the left that would be the first to censor those avenues of thought that they disagree with. Their argument against those that find the product put out by many in the media troubling, is then responded by their use of personal attacks. Just a little duplicity again shown by the left.

If you really want to see censorship and personal vendetta shown, visit a college campus or observe the epitaphs spewed by leftest actors against that which they disagree with.





Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.