Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
Brent Bozell :: Townhall.com Columnist
The New Gay Times
by Brent Bozell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the 'Ricci' decision hurt Sonia Sotomayor in the confirmation process?


There was the expected wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left when New York's state Court of Appeals ruled against installing so-called "gay marriage" by judicial fiat, as they had in the People's Republic of Massachusetts. The New York Times, as expected, was stunned that the judges could find a "rational basis" for traditional marriage, and that judges would defer to elected legislators.

This outrage was plastered at the top of the Times with two "news" stories. One was a front-page editorial (they call it a "news analysis") by Patrick Healy, who focused on the "gay-rights advocates" and their disappointment. "Nowhere did gay marriage seem more like a natural fit than New York," he complained, where "a history of spirited progressivism" should have made the victory of the marriage-manglers inevitable.

Inside the Times, the slant continued, with two large photographs of gay activists protesting and consoling one another, arm in arm, about the court decision. Why not a photo of a traditional marriage supporter celebrating the ruling? Because it seems to be in every national-media rulebook that the "gay marriage" story must be accompanied by gay activists protesting, kissing, cheering or "marrying." Only one side matters.

This Gray Lady slant to the libertine left is no surprise. After all, former-Times ombudsman Daniel Okrent stunned insiders with a column two years ago that publicly admitted the Times was a liberal newspaper, and on social issues, like gays, guns and abortion, "if you think The Times plays it down the middle on any of them, you've been reading the paper with your eyes closed."

But the Times isn't just rooting for the homosexual revolution on the outside and inside of the newspaper. It has actively spread the gay gospel by funding the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and adorning its conventions with recruitment booths. The Times also is a proud corporate sponsor of New York's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center, a gay-activist hub, which boasts of being the birthplace of both the radical ACT UP and the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.

This month, The New York Times has taken another dramatic corporate step toward taking sides in America's culture clash. The newspaper is a "global sponsor" of the seventh "Gay Games," taking place in Chicago from July 15-22.

Yes, you read that correctly. The Gay Games. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Shame.
America would be a much better place if, rather than celebrating and attempting to normalize bad behavior, we would instill in oursevles and our children a healthy sense of shame.

There is nothing wrong with feeling shameful about having done something bad.

There is something very wrong with people who, rather than trying to correct bad bahavior, want to preach it from the rooftops, teach it in our schools and broadcast it during the "family hour" on network television.

Society benefits from husbands and wives staying together and raising their children. Those who promote promiscuous sexual behavior, regardless of the sexes of the actors in said behavior, do so to society's detriment.

Don't believe the lie. The acceptance and promotion of bad behavior degrades humanity.

So what?
I'm not sure what the big deal is. So a bunch of gay people want to have "Gay Games". Why shouldn't a newspaper advertise there? From what I've read, as an advertising demographic, gay people tend to have a large amount of disposable income, and based on their shunning by many "traditional" businesses, I'm willing to bet that a business that advertises there has a good chance of making a good return on its investment.

Last I heard, gay folks aren't asking for any "special rights", just the rights to do the same things as straight people do. There are some crackpots, to be sure, but I'm not going to judge all gay people by their idiots just like I'm not going to judge all Christians by David Duke. As far as "making a mockery of traditional marriage", it seems to me that we straight people are doing a great job at that -- seen the divorce rates lately?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.