Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 27, 2008
Bob Barr :: Townhall.com Columnist
Republicans Accuse Democrats of “Socialism,” but Republican Bailouts-Without-End are as Big Government as it Gets
by Bob Barr
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Then the administration suggested a new $40 billion homeowners program. The federal government is going to start guaranteeing individual mortgages. A lender who makes a bad loan will be assured of repayment so long as he cuts the interest rate or principal. A homeowner who should never have bought the house will get bailed-out by responsible homeowners and renters.

But the administration isn’t finished. On Friday, October 24, the Treasury Department announced that it was going to buy ownership stakes in major insurance companies. After all, the insurers are in trouble too. So The Hartford, MetLife, and Prudential already are in line for a government hand-out.

Now the Financial Services Roundtable has asked the Treasury Department to buy into securities dealers, auto manufacturers, and even U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies. After all, they “play a vital role in the U.S. economy,” explained the Roundtable. By that criterion, what industry or company doesn’t qualify for a bail-out?

Is Sen. Obama “socialist?” Yes, he wants to “spread the wealth,” as he puts it. But that’s what the Republicans have been doing for the last eight years. We already have "big government," "socialism," or whatever else you want to call it—and it was Republicans who gave it to us.

Even if he was elected, Sen. McCain would continue to this drive to bigger and bigger government: He has proposed that the federal government spend $300 billion to buy every bad mortgage in America. But, he isn’t going to win.

The real alternative this election is Bob Barr and the Libertarian Party. Only a vote for Bob Barr will tell Washington that there are Americans who don’t want socialism, whether from the Democrats or the Republicans. Only Bob Barr represents real change in Washington.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bob Barr is the 2008 Libertarian nominee for President of the United States.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Bob Barr's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
If Republicans are So Scared of Obama...
then THEY can sacrifice their principles (what remains of them) and THEY can ALL vote for Barr, which would just as effectively keep Obama out of the White House.

Really now. If you are so certain that Barr will be the cause of an Obama victory, then why aren't you all defecting to Barr en masse...? Hmmm?

Because that is your pathetic little manipulative threat to get what you want at the expense of our nation. That's why.

Rowly - Excellent
--
Okay. Now point to "society" in *our* nation and define it on concrete terms, together with the designation of authoritative and commanding individuals who determine what "society" desires, how its purposes are discerned, and how it commands all of its membership.


At its most precise consideration, "society" is best typified under the "broad grouping" category, with those "common traditions, institutions, and collective activities and interests" not being - by a long shot - unanimous.

Nor should they be. I'm not a spokesman for "diversity," but if you're going to have communities in which people of otherwise passionately inimical predispositions can live together in peace, the *only* laws that can be described as needful are those limited explicitly to the protection of individuals' rights to their lives, their liberties, and their property.

The so-called "negative rights."

These laws do *not* include prescriptions for supposedly "moral" conduct which in no genuine sense serve to deter actions that violently or fraudulently trespass against other individuals' rights.


And you're posting on the equivalent of a bulletin board, Rowly, for *EVERYONE* to read and comment upon.

Standard etiquette: if you want to keep it between yourself and one other poster exclusively, take it to e-mail.


As for whether I'm "fair" - or just a helluva lot smarter, better-read, and more convincing than you'll ever be in your most fantastical daydreams - just what the hell d'you expect from life?

A free pass now and forever?

--
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.