Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Bill Steigerwald :: Townhall.com Columnist
It's About Time Big Oil Started Defending Itself
by Bill Steigerwald
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


As any recent television viewer can attest, the American Petroleum Institute - the main lobbying group for the oil industry - has launched a huge ad campaign designed to tell Big Oil's side of the $4-a-gallon gasoline story.

Aimed at one audience -- voters -- the multimedia, multimillion-dollar propaganda blitz is a necessary antidote to the misinformation and false charges we constantly hear about Big Oil from Big Media and our duly elected demagogues.

We've all heard about the alleged sins of Big Oil, the handy media-made pejorative for the world's largest oil and gasoline manufacturers:

It controls/manipulates the world energy market. Its six "supermajors" -- multinationals like ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, Chevron -- are exceptionally evil and rapacious corporations that are responsible for skyrocketing oil and gasoline prices.

They are uniquely and grossly profitable. They deserve to have their "excess" profits taxed and their robber-baron bosses scolded - if not publicly waterboarded -- by Congress.

A few weeks ago, when the Senate Judiciary Committee grilled five U.S. oil executives, some senators treated them like captured war criminals. Demagogues like Dick Durbin scolded them for their high salaries, threatened them with windfall profit taxes and suggested brainless, environmentally correct ways for them to reinvest their companies' oil revenues.

The Big Oilmen defended themselves ably, mainly because they actually knew what they were talking about.

The oil execs warned, correctly, that government intervention will only make things worse - not that Sen. Durbin and his fellow grandstanders gave a care. And they called on Congress, futilely, to allow more drilling and exploration for domestic oil on the vast swaths of federal land in Alaska and off America's shores that by law are off-limits to oil and gas development.

Many Americans have heard by now the truth that oil companies pay far more dollars in taxes each year than they earn in profits. And that the oil industry's average net profit margin -- 8.3 percent last year -- is lower than Big Tobacco and Big Beverage (19.1 percent), Big Pharma (18.4 percent) and Big Banking, Big Insurance and Big Media.

But during their show trial, the execs delivered some other pertinent factsin their defense:

* U.S. companies, while huge, are actually relatively small players in a gigantic global oil market. They can compete directly for only 7 percent of available reserves while large government-owned companies like Petroleos de Venezuela own and control 75 percent of world supply.

* As Stephen Simon of ExxonMobil humbly pointed out, his hated behemoth -- America's largest oil and gas corporation -- accounts for only 3 percent of global oil production and 6 percent of global refining capacity. It has only 1 percent of global petroleum reserves - 14th in the world.

Big Oil can take care of itself in Washington - and it always has. It has bought and paid for all the lobbyists and political patrons it needs. Big Oil is not perfect. And it doesn't deserve a dime in government subsidies or special tax breaks.

But with worldwide oil demand up, oil harder to get at and oil prices at $130-plus a barrel and maybe climbing, America needs Big Oil now more than ever -- no matter what environmentalists and liberal senators feel or think.

So instead of pandering to voters' ignorance, maybe Washington politicians should try to do something useful for once -- like helping Big Oil discover, extract and deliver the energy all earthlings still need to make their lives better.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bill Steigerwald, born and raised in Pittsburgh, is a former L.A. Times copy editor and free-lancer who also worked as a docudrama researcher for CBS-TV in Hollywood before becoming a reporter for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a columnist Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Bill Steigerwald recently retired from daily newspaper journalism..
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

News Articles On This Topic
 

Cam--Wrat--MarkinVA--streetcars
I may be one of the few people on this list who actually rode the Red Cars when I was quite young.

They were uncomfortable, bumpy, un-heated, and un-air-conditioned.

They couldn't travel over 40 MPH,and usually less than that.

They operated on city streets in many areas, taking up one or more lanes, and they often could not even travel at "normal" speed when cars were in their lanes.

The coup de grace was the fact that rail lines provided poor coverage, almost never going where you actually wanted to go, so you wound up walking considerable distances in hot, cold, or wet weather. Or standing in the rain or hot sun to get a transfer bus.

All these problems were obvious to a little child. And the newer subways don't attract much ridership for some of the same reasons--specifically, coverage. If L.A. were to build enough lines to provide reasonably complete coverage, the cost would be SEVERAL HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS. Not Millions, Billions. Does anyone know of a mass transit system that reaches break-even without large taxpayer subsidies?

MyOpine--Thanks for the laundry list
My, my, my! Robert must be a busy boy! He makes Thomas Jefferson look like a monomaniac.

I find this amusing.

I have some other "interesting" information from a thread he trolled a few weeks ago.

Can you post a throwaway e-mail I could use to contact you?

& Wobbie is now an expert on fuel?
Wobbie tells us he is a Captain in the U.S. Navy, an active duty combat pilot flying daily patrols over Iraq,

And he does not know Ordinance Color Codes.
And he can't describe a Division Gunnery Efficiency Pennant.
And he can't describe a Division Engineering Efficiency Pennant.
And he can't tell you what it signals when a ship hoists a single red dovetail pennant.
And he can't tell you the ransom paid by a Carrier for returning a downed pilot.
And he claims to be one of the men who held the "Halp us Jon Cary" sign.
And he claims to be a Border Patrol pilot.
And he claims to be an Airline Captain.
And he claims to be a Navy test pilot.
And he claims to be a civilian test pilot.
And he claims to be an FAA Flight Examiner.
And he claims to be a Republican and also a delegate to the Democrat convention.
And he claims to be a College Professor making psychiatric evaluations of our posts here at TH.
And wally discovered Wobbie does not know how to fly an airplane.
And he claims to be an advisor to our Admirals.
And he claims to be a Mid East Consultant.
And he claims to have been a Vice Cop.
And he claims the Russians were so impressed they let him take their latest military craft for a spin at an Air Show.
And I can't get Wobbie to tell me if that Russian airplane has a slot for quarters like the plane he flies in front of Wal*Mart.

Re: Oil Profits in Percentages
Wacky;

No, investors (including oil companies deciding where to invest their capital) look at the percentage returns. If demagogic news magazines (for example) pay a higher percentage return than does (say) feeding the poor, the money will flow toward that higher return. Large total profits, if they require even larger proportionate bases of investment, will not be an adequate reward to win future investment. The claim (above) that Exxon is not projecting any increase in its production, in spite of record high prices for the oil, likely reflects a judgment by Exxon that their money can be better invested elsewhere.

Percentages
can be misleading if your figures aren't correctly cited.

You need to post the complete totals of the profits obtained by the various companies for us to make a proper analysis. 10% of 1 million is, of course, larger than 100% of 100.

Want to do something about it?
IF Our Government gave the OK to start drilling & building refineries today;;;
Speculaters who are part of our problem would be aware OPEC might sharply drop prices trying to make oil exploration in Alaska less profitable.
(They did this once.)
Oil prices would quickly fall in relation to speculators pulling out.

Don't just complain. Do something about it!
http://capwiz.com/sicminc/issues/alert/?alertid=11472501&ty pe=CO

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Drilling ANWAR?
Possible danger to environment? (NONE!)
Possible danger to wildlife? (Mud Sumps.)
Animal rights activists should insist Mud Sumps be fenced by 8' chain link until after drilling is completed and the sumps dry up.

Drilling offshore is a plus for environment & wildlife both.

Feh on Europe!!!
I don't CARE what the Eurotrash do and even LESS about what they think especially about us! They would ALL be living in bombed out ghettos today if not for us. Other than French Nuclear Power they have very few good ideas outside of the Porsche, Ferrari and Aston-Martin test tracks. I forgot to include the Holland & Holland test ranges.

-Ray
NRA Life Member

attention
Big fast food burger joints have just announced that they are doubling the cost of a burger in 1 day.

Will you pay it? YES!!!!

Fast food says,,, speculators have driven up the costs of hamburger, lettuce, tomatoes, bread, etc... thus our prices increase.

Speculators point to the USA congress BAN on raising supply in hamburger, lettuce, tomatoes, bread, etc... thus thier bet.

Congress explains thier ban on hamburgers as "they are not healthy for you anyway". Very similar to the GREEN ENVIRONMENTAL attack on fossil fuels, and the belief in human caused global warming.

Congress further says,,, you have been voting politicians into office against hamburgers for over 30 years,,,(like oil) and most of the stupid citizens out there believe in global warming and hamburgers are bad for you...
So live with it...
Let them eat cake

anna
suggests that EXXON and oil companies in general limit production to keep prices high.

HMMMMM,,,,

Hey anna,,,, lets start our own oil company, you get the lease on mineral rights in ANWR, the continental shelf, gulf of mexico, BEKKEN fields, and shale oil.
I will get investors in our company (once you get the lease rights from congress)..
Considering a monkey could break even in these areas at $40 bucks a barrel, I won't have any trouble raising $5 billion in a week with prices at $130 a barrel....

This way you and I can stick it to EXXON and become rich at the same time.

PS,,, when you find out congress will not let you/me or anybody else get the oil... pull your nogin out of your netherregions and smell the burnt toast baby. Sad,,, you will feel about like EXXON does today.
Kinda ironic,,, no?

james
milk is a commodoty that is traded on the market just like OIL... so it has a minimum price the GOVT. picks up at,,, SO WHAT.

Speculators just take that into consideration and price accordingly.

ALL our commodoties have speculation... OIL is the only commodoty where speculators are guaranteed no more SUPPLY.
They thus bid accordingly.

Following liberal MOONBAT regulations on global warming and being green,,, make oil speculators RICH... guaranteed.

NOW,,, don't ya feel better about limiting our OIL supply?

Who's to blame?
I know we have more than our share of psuedo intellectuals bloviating about who is to blame for oil prices, food prices, blah, blah, blah; but the fact remains that we, the American public, has saddled ourselves with 535 incompetents in Washington. Don't blame Bush or anyone else, because he can't do a thing without the approval of Congress. These guys are responsible for all of the problems that this country faces.

If you listened to the Senate Hearings last week, it would be hard to miss the fact that Senator Durbin doesn't have what it takes to be a leader of the country. The rest of tthem are no different. Vote encumbents out of office and replace them with term-limited, competent people. The current batch does not have the courage to do what is best for America. Special interests control them all.

Wrat and Mark
Again, do the research. The oil, auto, and tire industries bought out the freemarket, tax paying LA streetcar system and ran it in the ground. If transit were just going to fade away, why did they need to buy it? Decades later, LA had to spend billions to build a new transit system that's subsidized. Is that a good thing?

Larger vehicles are statistically no safer than smaller cars. People in other countries seem to manage without huge cars. By exactly what rationale do Americans deserve 5 times the world per capita gas consumption? Frankly, your posts reveal the spoiled brat element of the "Drill Now" movement. Some people refer to this belief as greed.

You are aware that the dollar has declined as a currency? That's due to Fed action resulting from our deficit. The price of gas in Europe has not increased anywhere near as much as it has in the US.

Jsut a question
How many companies have requested permits for building a new refinery in the US in the last 30years?

Answer = http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/electric ity/Oil_and_Gas/articles.cfm?ID=11829

How many oil companies have closed refineries in the US in the last few years?

http://www.10news.com/news/3470407/detail.html

If Bush could not get an energy policy through a Republican House and Senate then he really is the buffoon that they say he is.

Sorry,
...'big oil' didn't destroy public transportation in the 50s.
The increasingly wealthy American public didn't WANT to ride public transportation anymore. They had their own cars, and could drive where they wanted when they wanted, and not have to rely on schedules or anything else.
That was just more of the kind of freedom most Americans love.
Public transportation was dying before local governments took over. Now, without subsidization it would not exist as it is.
(What amount of 'public trans' is privately owned?)
Cafe standards mandates mean smaller, more dangerous vehicles. If you want to risk your family by driving a motorized skateboard, go ahead. Don't expect me to do so.
Lower taxes have NOTHING to do with higher gas prices. How foolish a claim.

I guess the huge mass transit systems
in NY City, LA, Boston, Chicago, Philly and elsewhere are all an illusion? Bite me Cam.

I LIKE my Jeep. It's got the old 4.0 liter bulletproof 6 cylinder engine and runs like a tank. Best buy I ever made. I'll be driving through snow and rain (again) when the Prius driving twits are calling AAA.

-Ray
NRA Life Member

pgc
How about looking in the mirror at the person who commutes alone in a Hummer, Escalade, Expedition, or Suburban? The column made no mention that the US has the worst gas efficiency in the world. If congress is to blame, it's for not increasing CAFE standards.

If it feels good do it. If it doesn't work out, blame someone else.

Also no mention that it's the Bush tax cuts/budget deficit/exchange rate that's mostly to blame for the increase in gas costs.

If it feels good, do it. If it doesn't work out, blame someone else.


M Sederoff - Doug is right. It's been pretty well documented that oil, auto, and tire industries conspired to buy up street car systems and run them in the ground. That took us from a truly free market ground transportation system to the subsidized roadway system.

Scooter
Using milk as an example of speculation is totally wrong. I have worked on dairy farms. The govt will buy every drop a dairy produces at an artificially inflated price (ever heard of gubbermint cheese?) If the free market determined the price of milk, farmers would be shootng their cows because they couldn't afford to feed them

The villain
It is so much more satisfying to vilify Big Oil than to look in the mirror at the person who allowed our politicians to stop production with endless regulations. But, we Americans like to vilify others and to promote creeping fascism. FYI, fascism (as distinguished from socialism) has no problem allowing the illusion of private ownership of businesses and other property so long as government controls every important policy and procedure. http://www.poorgrandchildren.com



Idiots
I was in DC two weeks ago lobbying for small businesses and was discussing with a representative energy prices and approving drilling in ANWR. He used the excuse that it would take 10 years for the oil to hit the market. I was about to tell him that he'd been in the House for ten years now, but figured it would only get me tossed out of his office.

He is ignorant of the effect on futures prices and the jobs that would result from exploration there, the US, and the Gulf of Mexico. I used to be surprised at their ecomomic ignorance, but no more.

Correcting Ignorance
The oil companies are long overdue to defend themselves. Every time I see a "hearing" on tv with Congressional people who are really just staging their platforms instead of actually trying to get to the crux of the problem, I just want to scream. DEFEND YOURSELVES!!! Say something, do something, do not let these braggarts and big mouths get away with this type of indefensible attack. These same Congressional people are the cause, they are the problem, and they are preventing the solution to our problems. Investigation after investigation and not a doggone thing is ever done except that the democrats continue to spread their misinformation, distortions, and delaying tactics. We need energy, it is our governments job to protect our interests...which is our economy as well as our National Security. That is not being done presently. The democrats solution to everything is investigate and then tax. Pure and simple, do nothing but point fingers of blame...it is absulutely amazing that anyone with any sense would actually even bring up taxing windfall profits when energy is at record high costs. Instead of hampering our energy companies, and hindering them, leave them alone to develop more oil, liquid coal, nuclear, etc. Clear the way from ridiculous regulations and let them explore, develop all energy...in other words Congress get out of the way. Big oil defend yourselves and let us all be on our way to energy freedom...let Congress know that is our first priority and that they can no longer stall, delay, deny drilling, expoloration etc. When oil and energy companies start to defend themselves we will be on our way to energy freedom......txpoljldy

Doug
Did big oil "distroy" (sic) public transportation, or did consumers decide they would rather get to work in 10 minutes by driving their cars than to take 40 minutes riding a bus?

If big oil money defeated anyone they didn't like, how did Jimmy Carter get elected?

Before you go spouting off your so called facts, you might try a little proof.

Envirnmentalists
Could I please get one, or all of you, to pay for my gasolne purchases ? Thanks in advance!

Big Oil has dirty hands
Did big oil help distroy public transpotation in the USA back in 1950's? Did big oil's money currupt the politiacl system by using their great wealth to defeat anyone they didn't like?

We are now vulnerable to mid-east funded terrorism because our economy and security depends on only one thing -Big Oil!

YES---And DEMAND DRILLING NOW
Well, yes it is about time..like 15 years too late for Big Oil to tell the American People who the real culprits are..in plain English..it is the Liberal Demogods in Congress denying our mandate (the people) to DRILL NOW DAM IT ! Instead the Oil Industry cowers to them..and does not use billions to tell the American Public who is to blame point blank and what they can/should do about it now. Well? will they? I hope they are listening if for no other reason..at least their stockholders should they not care about the country itself. GO!!

For Yvonne - 2
Something else of interest, in the period between the 1897 Act and the 1920 Act there was concern that the rapid establishment of oil claims would squeeze out the federal govt, making it difficult to ensure availability of oil for the military, so the govt set aside certain federal lands for exclusive use of the US in oil production, known as the "Naval Petroleum Reserve". In 1998 The US began allowing private companies to have access to this resource, based on the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976.

For Yvonne
Ownership of oil resource in the US is dictated by who owns the land and the mineral rights: namely, private individuals, states, and the federal govt. Federal ownership is broken down into Federal Lands, Indian Lands (held in trust) and outer continental shelf (generally from 3 miles off the coast to the 200 mile exclusive economic zone boundary).

Use of Federal resource is based on the General Mining Act of 1872, which established the system of making "claims" and being allowed to extract minerals at will. This was amended by the Oil Placer Act of 1897 to specifically include oil. The claim system was seen as not advantageous to the US, and was replaced by a leasing system in the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, with payment of royalties. The final major change was the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953. These are administered by the Bureau of Land Management and Minerals Management Service. Basic system is if allowed by Congress, a tract of land is leased for 10 years to allow for exploration, and if successful, production with royalties paid on production.

The Cyclist
Sir, or madam, or Ms., or whatever. Are you Lance Armstrong? Maybe Babe Ruth reincarnate? You have hit every one of your posts literally, and of course, figuratively out of the park, as they say. Well done, person.

The Green World
Truly committed environmentalists, meaning the ones who already have their cake, are quite content to see gas prices double or triple again. This they believe is the necessary trip point to get us away from fossil fuels. Never think that environmental elitists are wringing their hands over prices at the pump. For them, this is good news. Crippling the economy for them is worth the results of an imagined greener world. It is easy to be idealistic when your needs have already been met.

Yes ?
They did vote to build it. The oil company wanted to build it. Do you think they voted to have one built, and then shopped around for a company to build it? No! Do you think a company would want to invest the money building it just to have it just sit there unused? No! Where did they plan on getting the crude if the oil companies are not going to supply it?

The environmental fruit loops want to stop it. That is what they do. They drive up the costs so high with their stupid litigations the oil companies give up.

Do you think the oil companies were working to open Anwr because they didn't want to pump any oil? Do you think they would be willing to invest billions drilling and building a pipeline all the way to the midwest for a measely 6 months supply? Do you think they are planning to pipe it all the way to the midwest so they can ship it overseas?

Some of the insane things people try to say are simply amazing. Think about it!




People
in Kansas just voted to build a new refinery.


http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/WhyExx onWontProduceMore.aspx

I don't think it is wrong to point out that Exxon is choosing to hold back production.

Exxon management flashed a chart that showed the company's worldwide oil production staying flat through 2012.

Yet even with crude oil prices near all-time highs, Exxon isn't planning on producing any more oil four years from now than it did last year.

That means the company's oil output won't even keep pace with its own projections of worldwide oil demand growth of 1.3% a year.

Big oil companies can continually miss their targets OR TARGET NO GROWTH and still shine on Wall Street due to the peculiar nature of commodity businesses. Less supply of a commodity means higher prices. Higher oil prices mean more profits for the oil companies.


There are a lot of things driving up the price of oil. Weak dollar. Manipulating supply. I don't think things are going to get any better.






Start Drilling Now (part 2)
We also need to make it possible for the companies to build refineries. They can do that without subsdidies. Nuclear power plants can be built with private money.

The whole energy farce is a huge farce, from top to bottom, brought to you by the Dems and a few Republican scoundrels. Like McCain and company.

The whole thing is insanity. The oil companies are not at fault. They are victims of Congress just like the rest of us. We need to send Maxine and Nancy home to bake cookies for the kiddies while we get some sane adults to run Congress.

Start drilling now (part 1)
We would not have to wait for the oil to start flowing from the wells. The prices would drop immediately. OPEC would lower their prices and start pumping out more. The speculators would stop speculating the price up. The only thing we would have to worry about is the Dems driving the price back up with ever higher taxes, but that is something they want to, and intend to do anyway. That includes McCain. He is just another liberal Dem hiding behind an R.

This whole oil shortage fiasco is going to bring down the economies of the entire world. In Spain half the gas stations do not have gas to sell. People all over the world are starving. The Dems are not just hurting our nation with their idiotcy they are hurting the entire world. If we could tap our own oil our balance of trade and deficet would improve over night. Our $$$ would rebound. Our industries would rebound. The rest of the world would have more fuel available for their use. Fewer people would be starving.

The AGW is a crock promoted by the U.N. in their quest for taxation and world wide control. CO2 as a pollutant is a complete lie. Polar bears in crisis is another lie.

Our U.S. oil companies would be producing our own oil if they were allowed to. They can't. Congress has tied their hands. Anything Congress does other than selling them the oil leases they need will make the crisis much worse. The oil companies do not need subsdidies. They would do just fine on their own if Congress would open the oil areas for lease.


It's not only the US economy stupid!
US So you think that it is amazing that oil prices are higher in a wobbly economy. Let's see there are a few other little countries that are just happening to be in a growth spurt; India and China - what's a few billion people? There is also a little bit of uncertainties about the stability of the Middle East with Iran's Wacky president threatening to wipe Israel off the map every other week. Every time this Idiot opens his mouth he sends jitters down the market. Finally there is the ever increasing pressure from the environmental wackos that keeps us from accessing our own reserves. So overall these events all together contribute to increasing the demand of oil while simultaneously lowering its supply – the perfect storm. Based on lesson 1 of Economics 101 this results in bringing up the price. Oh I almost forgot, since the pricing of oil is given in USD and that this currency is losing ground that makes the price of oil in USD even higher.
So the Dems conclusion is that it must be the fault of Big Oil why else would the price of gasoline be so high? The amount of intelligence of some of these politicians is amazingly close to retardation. Let's tax the Oil Cos more so that they have less reason to drill for more oil therefore lowering the supply even further hence pushing the prices even higher, so logical it hurts!

Konop
Do you live in a vacuum?

ITFP, Exxon is way down the list of oil producers. Try asking why Saudi Arabia does not produce more oil? How about asking why Exxon and other domestic energy companies are being prevented by Congress from producing more oil?
Then figure out why stupid Exxon doesn't produce more gasoline when they can get today's high prices for it.
Finally ask how you can produce more gasoline without REFINING capacity to make it?

Why Exxon won’t produce more oil

Bush and Congress gave money to the oil companies in the energy bill with an opposite interest of solving the energy crisis. And now they are wondering why they took the money and did nothing!

By BusinessWeek

Reports of slackening demand sent oil down another 2.5% on Thursday to $101.84 per barrel. Crude prices have declined 7.6% since the beginning of the week. Not long ago, that would have been an astonishing plunge that shook the trading establishment. These days? Nah, that’s just the ho-hum volatility in the oil market. But how is it that crude can still trade above $100 a barrel, three times what it sold for at the start of the decade, despite a very wobbly economy?

read more

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/why-exxon-wont-pro duce-more-oil

Socialize big oil?
Milton Friedman once quipped that if you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara desert, in 10 years there would be a shortage of sand.
If you want a shortage, have the government fix the price lower than what it costs to produce.
As Ronnie Regan noted: The role of government can be describe by the following three sentences:
If it makes money, tax it. If it continues to make money, regulate. When it stops making money, subsidize it. Isn't this what they are trying to do to big oil?

Consumers Pay Taxes
Go ahead congress and charge a Windfall Profits Tax on the oil companies. The oil company then has a choice to either absorb the cost themselves or pass it along to the end users, all of us. What would you do? If they choose to not pass it on to the end users then they will stop all US production and make the situation even worse. Which would you prefer, higher prices and gasoline or really high prices and no gasoline?

To impose a WPT during a time of an oil crisis and borderline recession is the same as using gasoline to try and put out a fire. Oops, the problem just got a whole lot worse! How did that happen?

Speculation
Determines the price of all commodities.. not just oil.

Why has'nt milk doubled in price in last year like oil? They speculate on it ,,,

ANSWER,,, When milk prices go up FARMERS have the FREEDOM to produce more milk.

Speculators know this and don't bet the price up,,, they will lose thier money.

OIL is different,,, Speculators are free to bid the price up and NOBODY CAN produce more OIL.
Our congress beholden to environmental whackjobs ensures this.

2 years ago AMERICA went green... GLOBAL WARMING.
Speculators are no longer under the threat of the USA drilling domestically, (we could).

Join the speculators,,, if this nation is as stupid as the democrats appear to be,, then save yourself by betting on OIL too....

People with $ bet that the USA will just pay the price and not produce more OIL.
They were right then,,, and they are right now.

For Yvonne
This will be coming at things through the back door, but it might be the easiest way to follow the history of the influence of some of the environmentalists. You can Google the Wilderness Society, and then go to the Wikipedia link to get a quick overview. Or, if you want to focus on recent activities, use Google’s advance search and try Wilderness Society / Abuse of Trust. Keep in mind that WS will paint oil companies and especially the Bush administration as the ultimate bad guys, but if you remain objective you can see how all the WS good intentions (and they are good in the sense of keeping things pristine) have helped bring us to where we are today. They would argue that their cause is justified. That remains to be seen. Some of us tend to think that drilling on a tiny percentage of the land in Alaska might not translate into wholesale destruction of ecosystems and the environment.

In short, you will see that the current administration is cursed if they do something and cursed if they don’t. As for the shallow minds who think that people like Dick Cheney are lining their pockets with oil revenues, they perhaps might want to reconsider what he gave up to take the job of VP which by comparison offered him pocket change. But those who delight in conspiracies will forever look for people to blame. That is just a way of life.

Good luck in your research. I clicked on your name and see that you are serious in your efforts to sort out what is going on.

What a novel concept
If we could get only congress (as Nipsy Russell once said, if the opposite of 'pro' is 'con' then the opposite of 'progress' must be 'congress') to think about what they do....

1) supply and demand: drill more, increase supply - prices go down. Restrict production, supply goes down and prices go up!!!

2) tax: the more you tax something gthe less of it you get, so tax oil more. Hmmmm, that's logic.

How many of our congressmen could pass econimics 101???

It should be mandatory that they read MiIlton Friedman before assuming office!!!


Questions I would like answered?
Is there really a program that drills for oil in the US and than caps the hole? Can the oil companies drill in the US? Are they only limited to not drill off shore,Alaska, and on government land? Why were those laws passed and in what year? How did the environmentalists get so powerful? my email is yvonnewittig@gmail.com, I would appreciate answers or at least some place I could go to get that information?

Stand up!
I wrote a letter to Rex Tillerson asking him to stand up to those damn fools the next time they drag him and his colleagues in for a public hazing. If I were them I would have called Maxine Waters a fool right then and there when she suggested 'socializing' all their companies. I would have exposed her for the communist/socialist she and the bulk of the Dems are.
Some of the Dems are ignorant of the facts while otehr know them all too well but choose to lie instead. This is all to Orwellian.

That's the Ticket
The Dems in Congress will solve the current high gas prices by establishing a windfall profits tax. Now there is an absolute stroke of genius. I had no idea that these progressive legislators were such well-educated economists. I wonder at what % net profit they will begin assessing this excess profits tax. They havn't yet stated what they consider excess profits. I have often wondered what they might consider as excess taxation.

I do believe that the oil companies probably can get along nicely without any special tax breaks, except those breaks that might provide incentives for drilling or expanding refining facilities.

Has Congress given any thought to investigating what is REALLY going on in the speculative, crude futures' markets? Have they attempted to identify just who was involved in bidding-up crude by $11 in a single day? Oops, probably not, they may indeed find that many of their friends (i.e. G. Soros, et al) are involved.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.