Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Tuesday, November 05, 2002
Thoughts on politics and an election
by
Bill Murchison
0
Bill Murchison's Email
|
Bill Murchison
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (57 %)
No (23 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (20 %)
Fewer and fewer Americans expect the Democrats or the Republicans, either one, to Save the Republic. A New York Times/CBS Poll released on the Sunday before the election shows voters divided equally as to the parties' merits or lack of same. Democrats are seen as likelier to "make the right decisions about Social Security," the Republicans as likelier to "make sure U.S. military defenses are strong." Neither agglomeration is seen as hugely compelling when it comes to vision or presentation. Forty percent in the poll professed less enthusiasm about voting than in previous contests. Any surprise here? These bleak assessments of U.S. politics have been a feature of the autumn landscape since the Watergate era, more than a quarter of a century ago. As government grows bigger, expectations concerning its performance grow smaller. When all is said and done, politicians of every stripe seemingly reduce to ... politicians. The Wellstone debacle provides material for 10 Ph.D. dissertations on the subject and likely a few seminars. The late Democratic senator from Minnesota was a believer, never mind that his beliefs had about them the stale odor of tie-dyed jeans, retrieved from the closet for some "Remember the '60s" bash. Well, then Sen. Wellstone dies, catastrophically, and many in both parties ache -- such was his nearly unique force as a "conviction politician" (Margaret Thatcher's self-description) -- to pay him tribute. The senator's fellow Democrats oblige by turning his memorial tribute into a full-throated hooray-for-the Democrats, down-with-the-Republicans rally, prompting the innocent, of whom there may still be a few among us, to remark: See, it's not about us, it's about them and their obsession with winning elections and staying on top, whatever it takes. Another current pastime is deploring "negative advertising." We all deplore it. But negative advertising has been with us for a long time, one reason being that it helps by undermining opponents. "Dirt is dirtier than clean is clean," as one of John O'Hara's characters observes. What can be done -- anything? Earlier this year, Sen. John McCain consummated his longtime desire to pass a bill regulating thitherto-unregulated campaign contributions and thereby (he hoped) undercutting the power of money in elections. Well, here comes The New York Times, days before the election, to report that state parties, being constitutionally outside Congress' regulatory purview, are stepping up to do what the national parties can't do anymore. Rivers of money will continue to flow to candidates, just through different channels. Why? The underlying problem is power -- who has it, who wants it. Power, in Washington or Hollywood, or on Wall Street, means on-topness: me over you. That's some temptation. Who realistically can expect the wielders of that power -- politicians in this case -- to lay it down in a grand act of renunciation? Let's be grateful. We still outclass Talibanic Afghanistan, likewise Iraq and China and Saudi Arabia, whose rulers go out of their way never to consult popular opinion. At their worst -- and that worst can be pretty bad -- democratic politicians assiduously court the voters' favor, a thing unheard of in Riyadh and Beijing. The imperfection of the process should remind us of the imperfection of the remedies the process is supposed to supply. "These are the guys we expect to save our bacon and make the world safe for democracy?" The Law of Diminishing Expectations may rescue us in the end, assuming we grasp it securely. I can't be entirely sure, having just thought up said law. It says, roughly: Don't expect too much of men and women who make their living by constantly bragging on themselves, running down their opponents, and working the phones asking for money. Some of these folk are exemplary citizens; many are windbags and braggarts. A few are scoundrels. Politics in democratic societies, after all, is life. It reflects the people. We the people could do worse at election time than look in the mirror, saying, reflectively, hmmmm ...
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Bill Murchison is a senior columns writer for
The Dallas Morning News
and author of
There's More to Life Than Politics
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Bill Murchison's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate ©Creators Syndicate
News Articles On This Topic
Reid, Senate health care holdout signal progress
Report: US helped Yemen's strike against al-Qaida
Feds: Arrests in Africa link al-Qaida and drugs
Possible Senate opponent to Reid worth millions
Republican Snowe still courted on health care
Pregnant soldiers could face court-martial
Wrap-up bill clears Senate hurdle
Cash gifts, liquid lunch_the case for impeachment
Liberal MoveOn.org opposes Senate health care bill
US on watch for Iranian meddling in Iraq voting
Popular Articles By
Murchison
The Fort Hood Massacre
Can Washington Make You Buy Health Insurance?
A Bad Year for the Experts
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
Obama Dispassionately Reads Through Copenhagen Speech: "We Are Running Short Of Time"
posted at 05:24 PM
Is Anyone Surprised By This?
posted at 03:49 PM
Why Does AARP Support Obamacare?
posted at 03:07 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 1
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
O'Reilly :
Partying with the Preside...
Driessen :
Life in a box
Eileen McGann :
How Obamacare Will H...
Kudlow :
Without Bipartisan Support,...
Cooper :
Reading This Column While D...
Harsanyi :
All the President's Menda...
Klukowski :
High Court Rejects Chall...
Kennedy :
Gifts Under The Tree: Ther...
Blackwell :
Power Player of the Week...
Gainor :
Class Warfare: Government v...
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
SAM HANANEL : Unions frustrated with Senate health care bill
Today's Cartoons
Saturday, Dec. 19
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Gary Varvel
More