Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login | What's Hot
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, August 28, 2001
Bill Murchison :: Townhall.com Columnist
A little heresy on Social Security
by Bill Murchison
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


And on the Seventh Day, God created Social Security. That must have been the way of it -- contrary accounts (including that in Genesis) notwithstanding. A program designed for the partial relief of temporary economic distress currently stands at the center of everything. All roads lead to the Social Security system. In Social Security We Trust. Not to mention the latest piece of Washington wisdom: The Bush tax cuts threaten Social Security. Our Social Security-addicted political system requires intervention of a kind that simply isn't in sight. Economists understand that the Bush tax cut no more threatens Social Security than Byron Nelson threatens Tiger Woods. Not a penny of the $153 billion surplus (according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest estimate), were it left intact and unmolested, would fund future Social Security payments. The money would be used to reduce the federal deficit. That's because the Social Security "trust fund" is a bigger myth than the invulnerability of the dot-coms. There ain't no such "fund." The money for future Social Security checks will come from future Social Security taxes. Why worry then about that $9 billion the CBO says the new budget will subtract "from Social Security"? Because of prior Republican and Democratic agreement not to touch a fund that doesn't exist. Why such agreement? Because Social Security -- in political terms -- is Holy and Sacred and everything else you can think of. There we go -- "in political terms." Politics -- a matter of counting votes and seeing who comes out ahead -- stands in the way of reasonable conversation about ways to provide for the future. Obstacles of this sort make born heretics want to stick out their tongues. Here comes one of those tongues. Sorry. 1. Compulsory taxation to smooth out hard times wasn't a nice idea in 1935, when Social Security was enacted, and is no nicer now. Sweetly, through Social Security, the federal government says to us all: "You boobs, we know you can't look after yourselves; give us that money so we can do the job," which is the kind of declaration Mr. Jefferson never contemplated the national government's making to supposedly free-born citizens. Wiser Supreme Courts than the intimidated New Deal court that upheld Social Security (Steward Machine Co. v. Davis, Helvering v. Davis) would have smacked it down as unconstitutional. 2. The habit of state coercion, once formed, is hard to break. Why shouldn't individual prisoners -- er, clients -- of the system enjoy the right to invest part of their tax money in private accounts, as has been widely and convincingly proposed? Because the government can't allow choice in these matters. That way lies freedom. 3. The habit of coercion slops over into other departments of life. Surpluses, on an assumption popular in Washington, D. C., belong to the U.S. government and not to the taxpayers whose taxes created them. Rightly -- not to say bravely -- President Bush proposed the return of a goodly share of the surplus to said taxpayers. You might have supposed, from the reaction of various editorialists and officeholders, that he had called for flying the Confederate battle flag over the Capitol. The tax cut was duly enacted -- with tangential Democratic support -- but now the simple act of handing back unneeded taxpayer money has become an occasion for sneering: See, we told you this would undermine Social Security. Which, of course, it won't, but that's politics. Shows you what happens when the art of daily living, and of furthering that art through prudent planning, becomes entangled in the calculations of vote-seekers. Something like the coming Social Security debacle happens. There's no easy way out at this stage. But better and better, sweeter and sweeter, the whole idea of private accounts is sounding.
Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bill Murchison is a senior columns writer for The Dallas Morning News and author of There's More to Life Than Politics.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Bill Murchison's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate ©Creators Syndicate

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(0 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
 *
State:
 *
Zip:
 *
Phone:
       
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.