Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Saturday, October 28, 2006
Ben Shapiro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Fireside reading
by Ben Shapiro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


As the temperatures cool off and autumn turns to winter, there are more and more opportunities to curl up with a good book in front of a fireplace. Here are the most recently published political books I’ve been reading in rainy Cambridge – at least when I’m not being forced at hemp-point to read aloud from Lenin’s Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism:

 

Bankrupt, David Limbaugh: Limbaugh’s Bankrupt is the finest summary of recent liberal outrages. He covers everything from the Democrats’ attempts to undermine the war on terror to their insistence that the federal judiciary remain a political tool of liberal utopianism. Every conservative needs to read this book before even considering sitting out Election Day.

Godless, Ann Coulter: Coulter’s latest book is perhaps her best. All the liberal ire surrounding her characterization of the Jersey Girls was an attempt to obscure Godless’ central thesis: liberalism is a cult-like religion reliant on flimsy slogans, bad science, and ridiculous airs of moral superiority. One of Coulter’s main points – that liberals consistently trot out victims as spokespeople to shield their arguments from attack – is fresher now than when she wrote it (see Fox, Michael J.).

Unhinged, Michelle Malkin: The American left isn’t merely wrong – it’s gone mad, Malkin argues persuasively in her newest book. Leftists claim that they’re the political viewpoint of peace and equanimity, but Malkin hilariously documents the leftist moonbattery that has plagued America since the election of George W. Bush.

The Politics of Disaster, Marvin Olasky: Olasky’s Politics is a well-reasoned analysis of just what went wrong in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Olasky reminds us why religion and the private sector are vital elements in any response to future disaster.

The Beast of the East River,Nathan Tabor: Tabor’s Beast is a heated and well-researched volume on the burgeoning usurpation of American sovereignty by the United Nations. Is the goal of the U.N. world government? Tabor argues that it is, and does so with gusto.

Musclehead Revolution,Kevin McCullough: The Musclehead Revolution, McCullough explains, is a movement of commonsensical, traditional values, freedom oriented Americans tired of watching their country torn apart by the forces of immorality. MR is an excellent primer for those entering the stormy world of politics and a useful reminder for those involved in its day-to-day battles. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ben Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United States and Canada and author of Project President: Bad Hair and Botox on the Road to the White House.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ben Shapiro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
RedWhite&Blue
I agree with everythign you said.

EVERYONE who uses either the "...but in 311 AD the Christians..." or the "In DoesntApplyToChristiansicus Chapter 3:19 God says to kill the Cannanites in a specific historical context that hasn't existed in 3000 years" counter-argument (such that it is) is disingenious.

If those things the person is citing are truely troubling to them then Islam must trouble them 1000000 times more so because anything that is "bad" about Biblical or Historical Christianity is also manifested by Islam by design and Islam is designed specifically to promote all of those things that are evil and violent.

But since Islam doesn't appear to bother them then neither do the examples they provide.

Its the most dishonest of rhetorical tricks.

JohnCitizen
I always find it amusing how people like you who fear Christianity have to reach all the way back to 1066 AD to find an example of violence. I also find it funny that you forget that the Crusades were fought against an enemy that had aggressively conquered Christian lands for hundreds of years and were still advancing. And that most people at the time could not read the Bible and didn't know what it teaches. Since the Bible was restored to the people in the Protestant Reformation and subsequent Catholic reforms, the world has seen less and less of these things from Christians. Which means the Bible wasn't the problem, it was that people were ignorant of it and not observing its principles.

But most of all it's funny how people like you who dredge up these centuries-old abberations, you place them in the context of contemporary morality. In which context no society at that time satisfies modern standards. In fact, studied in light of other nations at the time, Christianity has an impressive record. So let's live in the present, shall we?

Certitude cuts both ways. Communists were certain their radical social experiment would work, no matter if they had to kill millions of people to impliment it. Liberals are certain their radical social experiment will work, no matter if they have to allow millions of babies to be killed to impliment it. You see, it's not whether a person is certain or not, it's whether he/she is right about what he/she is sure of. For example, it's not wrong to be certain that if you jump off a 200 foot cliff you'll probably die. But if you're certain that jumping off a 200 foot cliff will be fun and not result in any injuries, that's a dangerous certainty because it's wrong.

I think at some level you realize this, because you seem pretty certain about every statement you make. So I suppose you would agree that certainty is not a problem in and of itself. The problem is, libs like you are certain that Christianity is evil and don't realize a Christian culture layed the foundation of a nation in which you enjoy a relatively fantastic amount of personal liberty and opportunity. So you seek to destroy Christian cultural expression, not understanding how far into the toilet you will drag this beautiful nation.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.