Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Austin Nimocks :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Long Count
by Austin Nimocks
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


On the whole, there shouldn’t have been a surer thing than the defeat of Proposition 8 in the California elections last month.

The activists pressing for the approval of same-sex “marriage” had all the heavyweights on their side of the issue:  major corporations, big money, the media, the Hollywood elites, the California Teachers’ Association and the university big-wigs, the governor and the attorney general, and a fair portion of the legislature.  Even the state’s high court climbed into the ring, ignoring past election results to legalize same-sex ceremonies in a controversial decision last spring.

Going into November, activists promoting the same-sex agenda were giving defenders of marriage a public pounding that even boxing legend Jack Dempsey might have found impressive.

And yet …the activists lost.  What’s more, they’re still losing—giving up round after round in the crucial post-election bout for public sympathy.  And curiously, they’re losing for the same reason the powerful Dempsey lost his heavyweight title fight in 1927.

Boxing fans had waited a year for the rematch between the brutal “Manassa Mauler” and the nimble “Fighting Marine” Gene Tunney, who had won an upset victory against the legendary, savage Dempsey not by knockout, but on points.  Now, Dempsey wanted his title back—and in no time, the rematch found Tunney lying dazed and face down on the mat.

And that might have been it…except for what became known as “the long count.”

New rules required boxers to retire to a neutral corner once their opponents were down.  Only then could a referee start the 10-second count.  But Dempsey was famous for looming over a fallen opponent, waiting to pummel him if he dared get to his knees.  And that’s what he did now, despite the ref’s warning.

Long seconds ticked by before Dempsey stormed to his corner…and by then, Tunney had regained his senses.  Staggering to his feet on the ninth second of the ten-count, he came back to beat Dempsey again.

There’s a lesson there for activists who are, if anything, less willing than Dempsey to go to a neutral corner and await the judges’ decision.  Faced with election results they don’t like—and stung by the upset victory of their opponents—they’ve come out swinging, filing no less than six lawsuits to have the election results nullified and attacking their foes outside the courtroom, too.

By doing so, they’re putting themselves and their cause down for the count in the eyes of a growing number of their fellow citizens.  As more and more stories of retaliation and vicious persecution crowd the evening news and morning paper, you can almost hear people counting off reasons to look twice at those who’ve portrayed their cause as a monument to “tolerance”:

One … blacklisting.  The activists have laid hold of a list of those who donated to Proposition 8’s defense, and they’re using those lists to intimidate, ostracize, and bully individual citizens and business owners.  Some establishments have been effectively closed down by protesters, while a number of employers have succumbed to outrageous pressure to fire workers who merely exercised their God-given rights to speak freely and support the proposition.

Two … denigrating Christians and the Bible.  In defending a recent error-ridden Newsweek cover story on “The Religious Case for Gay Marriage,” editor Jon Meacham joined many same-sex “marriage” activists in contriving to prove that, by denouncing homosexual behavior, the Bible is actually endorsing it—although the Bible is not to be trusted, anyway, he says, since “to argue that something is so because it is in the Bible is more than intellectually bankrupt—it is unserious, and unworthy of the great Judeo-Christian tradition.”  (In other words, taking the Bible seriously is a disgrace to those who take the Bible seriously.)

Three … church attacks.  Across California and around the country, Mormon temples, Catholic churches, and evangelical congregations have been picketed, mobbed, invaded, damaged, and desecrated.  In many places, church members have been verbally and physically assaulted. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Austin R. Nimocks is senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund (www.telladf.org), a legal alliance employing a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Austin Nimocks' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Lack of Civil RIghts
How many times does this have to be asked Anderson?

1) We don’t have the right to marry! Again please do not refute it by saying we can marry someone of the opposite sex! That is no more valid than saying your right to marriage would be equal if you had to marry someone of the SAME sex! A person cannot be required to change a core part of what makes them who they are in order to have a right granted to them.
2) There are still many places where a person can be fired solely because they are gay.
3) In many states a same sex partner can be refused visitation or the right to made medical decision for their life partner.
4) We are taxed unfairly in most states and at the Federal level when it comes to things like medical insurance for our partner, inheritance and many other categories.

Again, these name but a few. I’ve responded to this before but you never want to acknowledge it.

It is pointless to keep answering this same question from you Anderson!

anderson #47
Hate crimes are crimes committed against people which are motivated primarily ‘because’ the person belongs to a particular disliked group or minority. In other words it does not include crimes in which the primary motivation was robbery, drugs or whatever. So, sure more heterosexuals are victims each year but that alone does not qualify them as a hate crime.

Using your own FBI statistics here is another link:

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2007/table_01.htm

Now there is no denying that according to these statistics that race and religion are higher on the list. Sexual orientation is third on that list, which means it is still a problem. And guess what? Race and religion are already covered on Federal Hate Crimes legislation!! One thing I don’t like is that Federal Hate crimes kicks in only when the victim is participating in a ‘federally protected’ activity. As the following link shows there is legislation to try and change that to be included whether or not a ‘federally protected activity’ is involved!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_ States

So again since race and religion are already included in Federal Hate Crimes, why not sexual orientation? Even according to your own FBI statistics, hate crimes against LGBT is third on their list!!

And the following ink shows that many hate crimes may not even get reported to the FBI as a hate crime, so who knows what the numbers would look like if it was truly all inclusive?

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,001.htm

Many people do not report crimes committed against them fearing reprisals and such. In other words many go unreported.

The point is that race and religion are covered already with a needed change that it should be covered regardless of whether the victim was participating in a ‘federally protected’ activity at the time. Sexual orientation should also be covered!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.