Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Austin Bay :: Townhall.com Columnist
Cracking the Berlin Wall
by Austin Bay
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



On Nov. 9, 1989, large crowds of German citizens from both East and West Berlin approached the Berlin Wall. At several border crossing points, East Berliners began shouting at the armed communist guards, demanding they open the gates and shove aside barbed wire obstacles.

The confused guards yielded and disappeared. The gleeful crowds from the communist East and the free West mingled and mixed, occasionally waving at television cameras. Young men whacked at the wall's hideous concrete with pick axes and sledge hammers, then passed the tools to other eager hands.

Make no mistake. The Berlin Wall was a prison wall, an ugly urban segment of Soviet Russia's Iron Curtain barrier, but because it so definitively and obtrusively split one of the world's great cities into a vibrant west and a shabby, shackled east, it became the most potent symbol of the division of Germany, Europe and the Cold War world.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

The Kremlin couldn't spin the dramatic photographs and video of Nov. 9. The palpable joy overwhelmed the jailers and their propagandists, and even stunned to silence their usually vocal Marxist sympathizers in the West. Middle-aged fraus laughing at the wall's mounting rubble as teenagers danced beneath abandoned guard towers visibly and undeniably signaled the collapse of the Soviet Union's Eastern European empire.

In its first "post-wall" issue, the German magazine Der Spiegel described the breach of the Berlin Wall with a short headline: "Das Volk Siegt" (the people win, the nation is victorious).

That is certainly true. A majority of Germans locked in the Stalinist eastern sector never lost hope, at least not entirely. A majority of Germans in the NATO-protected west didn't lose hope, either -- nor, despite harsh repression, did Poles (Solidarity movement, 1980), Hungarians (revolt, 1956), Czechs and Slovaks (Prague Spring, 1968) and the other nations enslaved by communism.

Though watched by ubiquitous secret police and their informers, these nations maintained the will to persevere against tyranny and oppression. It was a daily struggle, and spirits flagged as Soviet premiers told the United States, "We will bury you."

Many in the West, including the U.S., believed that the communists had history on their side. The wry debate reply from the defeatist lefties favoring unilateral U.S. nuclear disarmament was "better Red than dead." For decades -- I repeat, decades -- this crowd had a media pulpit from which its self-proclaimed intelligentsia preached the moral equivalency of the U.S. and the Soviet Union, and at times dropped the all pretense and fingered the U.S. as the "fascist state" and global oppressor.

In the language of the defeatist left, the U.S. was the jailer, the warmonger, the threat to world peace.

The Berlin Wall's collapse exposed that Big Lie, as did the documented moral, political, economic and ecological wretchedness of the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, we still hear echoes of this "blame America" cant lacing al-Qaida propaganda and the lectures of hard-left reactionaries like Bill Ayers. The great anti-American lies of the Cold War are recast as the great anti-American lies of the War on Terror.

Breaching the wall in 1989 was bloodless, but the Cold War certainly wasn't. World War III did not break out along the intra-German border and produce a nuclear conflagration, but the Cold War's battles on the periphery (e.g., Greece, Korea, Vietnam, El Salvador, Angola, Afghanistan) were expensive, fatiguing and deadly.

Despite the risk and strain, America didn't quit -- at least, the majority of Americans didn't.

Nov. 9, 1989, was a victory for freedom, but it would not have been possible without America and American perseverance. America carried the burden of leadership; American soldiers bore the brunt of defending freedom. American leadership and active defense kept hope alive -- the hope that empowered Eastern Europe's oppressed.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Austin Bay Austin Bay is author of three novels. His third novel, The Wrong Side of Brightness, was published by Putnam/Jove in June 2003. He has also co-authored four non-fiction books, to include A Quick and Dirty Guide to War: Third Edition (with James Dunnigan, Morrow, 1996).
 
Be the first to read Austin Bay's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
And by the way...
I remember as a kid 50-60 years ago, the Chicago Tribune went through a phase of trying to shorten the spelling of common words -- ruff for rough, tuff for tough, enuff for enough, etc. I suppose their motive was to save costs on newsprint. In any case, after several years the experiment was deemed to have failed (readers just didn't like it) and they went back to conventional spelling.

lobosolo0333
Actually, as languages, English and German descend from the common ancestor language West Germanic and further back to Proto-Germanic; because of this, some English words are identical to their German lexical counterparts, either in the spelling (Hand, Sand, Finger) or in the pronunciation (Fish = Fisch, Mouse = Maus). This is not to say there's not a strong French influence stemming from the Norman Conquest, but there is no escaping the fact that English is essentially of Germanic origins.

Off Topic
Oops ... Having trouble posting ... Here is the first part:

akagi - "... (over 30% of English is actually French, far more than the amount of Japanese that is Chinese (18%). Some French say English is simply a dialect of French."

---

And I blame the French for much of our messed up spelling! As you said, the Norman-French ruled England for many years and French was the language of the nobility and the military. There was also a spelling "reform" movement by Latin enthusiasts (Latin was the language of the church and legal profession), and the Great Vowel Shift.

Ever notice that 'you' sounds a lot like 'vous' (French for you)? Notice the spelling of the vowel sound for both words. It also shows up in the word 'group' ... from the French 'groupe'. The Old English for wound, the injury, was indeed 'wund'. My guess is that since French dominated among the military officers, that they would naturally gravitate towards using the French 'ou' spelling for the sound. Remember, they didn't have dictionaries readily available and spellings weren't set in stone.

One of the old Norman-French spelling conventions prohibited a final 'v' so the 'e' was added to the end of words like have and give.

Previous “reformers” inserted an 's' into 'iland' to make 'island' and a 'b' into 'det' and 'dout' to make them 'debt' and 'doubt'. They had done so in an attempt to link them to Latin roots. In the case of iland, it wasn't even Latin, it was a Nordic word.

Off Topic
Could English use a little more spelling reform? Sure it could. I always use thru, tho, and altho. Others are starting to work themselves into the mainstream ... yu or u for you, ruff for rough, tuff for tough, enuff for enough, etc., but sensible reforms like these often send pedants into hysterics. In my college days, I carried an old pocket dictionary around with me to show my instructors that thru, tho, and altho were listed as acceptable alternative spellings.

almost is Traitorous

Akagi Location: GA
Reply # 2
Date: Nov 4, 2009 - 4:45 PM EST
Jim
No, that would be Gorbachev, by abandoning the Brezhnev Doctrine.
========

What a stupid ignorant fool you are.

Who do you think convinced Gorby to make that decision?

Since most of your comments, as well as the name you use, almost is Traitorous, it is no wonder you make that comment.

Have you ever made a comment that is in favor of the USA?


Berlin
I served as a soldier in Berlin in the 80s before the Wall came down. It was an amazing and unique place.

We could visit E. Berlin and I did often. Have no doubt that the E. Germans knew about Reagan and would give the Allied soldiers the thumbs up or other subtle hints of support. If one spoke German as I did, you might even get a couple of good things whispered to you.

Having served there, I consider myself to be a Berliner. I returned after the Wall came down. It has changed so much, but I still love Berlin!

Jim
No, that would be Gorbachev, by abandoning the Brezhnev Doctrine.

the Fall of the Wall
MEMO:
TO: Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany
FROM: Barack Obama, The Anointed One

Sorry I can’t make it for the 20th Anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Angie.
My heart just isn’t into that sort of hoopla. Of course, if you would be willing
to rebuild that edifice, then just maybe…
Power to the people!...BO

Reagan brought down the Wall

I have talked to hundreds of people in Europe, and everyone I asked, agreed that Pres Reagan was the one.
============
In Buna, Yugoslavia, we met a lady from England, who was an elected official with the Labor Party. She had recently visited a college in New York City, and said everyone there hated President Reagan, and he was going to be impeached.

I told her, “Going to a college in New York City to learn about the political health of the US, is like going to a Doctor for a physical exam, and he only looks at your armpits.” And I was being polite when I said “armpits.”

(This story was published as a “Letter to the Editor” in the Los Angeles Times.) (1985)

Yo, tj
I see that Rick is not only the premier authority on how & why the Cold War ended, he also devines that you watch too much Glen Beck.

It never ceases to amaze me how these jammy-wearing parents'-basement-dwelling noids profess to know so much about what Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, et al are saying, when they claim not to watch or listen to them. Or is it a case where they loudly criticize us for watching or listening, but imperiously exclude themselves from that admonishion? Doncha just luvit? LOL I knew they would come out of the woodwork and hyper-ventilate over the suggestion that Reagan was largely responsible for the end of the Cold War and the wall coming down. Rick, if you're reading this, try breathing slowly into a paper bag. I'm told it helps with the hyper-ventilation. LOL LOL LOL

Norm1066
Nope, I never wondered--William the Conqueror, the Norman King who in 1066 when he invaded England and unseated the English King of Harold the II (killed at Hastings) and thus starting 300 years of a French King sitting on the English Throne and why there is so much French in the English language (over 30% of English is actually French, far more than the amount of Japanese that is Chinese (18%). Some French say English is simply a dialect of French.

Who knows what would have happened if Haley's Comet hadn't shown up.

And why is Hastings and William the First so important to you?

Akagi
Sorry to hear that...but you took a look.
As I said, you're a smart guy so go easy on some of us not-so-smart guys in the future.
Ever wonder what norm1066 means?

Norm
"Unfotunately many people say they are Christians..."

I agree which takes us to the Gandhi quote of "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are not like your Christ."

As for your book, I'll pass. No need to get into inside baseball of other faiths. Not really all that interested what one conservative Chrisitian may think about the Bible or so-called proof of what it contains inside.

The review I saw doesn't give it very high marks.


visited East and West Berlin multiple ti


I visited East and West Berlin multiple times, both when the Wall was up and after it was down.

I talked to dozens of people, about their life, with and without.

To see some of my photos, including a blueprint of the Wall, go to

http://www.travel-tidbits.com/tidbits/005953.shtml

http://www.travel-tidbits.com/tidbits/005246.shtml


Multiculturalism and moral equivalence
The columnist wrote that "intelligentsia preached the moral equivalency". I observed that they teach moral equivalency as core curriculum in our schools (multiculturalism). This has sparked some pointed disagreement.

I can live with people's opinions differing, but there cannot be differences in facts. Multiculturalism IS taught in our public schools schools. If one wish to hang disagreement over whether multiculturalism teaches moral equivalence, I'd accept that ... that's an opinion.

I, however, believe it does (that's my opinion). But there are also facts behind it. The history of progressive education unfolds the intentional creation of social studies as an elementary school curriculum (replacing the historic subjects of history and geography) as a vehicle to promote multiculturalism before the developing child has an opportunity to develop a nationalist view. In the 1930s the promoters (and authors) of the new Social Studies subject had a much more open attitude towards promoting socialist ideology than they admit to today (this was from their own mouths). Time and time again, organizations such as Veterans groups, forced repeal of the new Social Studies textbooks. They have been recalled and re-written over and over again. Every decade, the objections diminish.

I was taught social studies in school, and I admit that I believed in the moral equivalence of the United States with every other country ... well into adulthood. But I became aware that I'd been fed a load of bs from public schools, and I resent them greatly for it. Schools should teach facts, not ideology. You wouldn't permit them to teach christianity, but they dish out healthy doses of other ideologies daily.

Akagi...glad you asked!
Hopefully you'll care. No it's not an abortion test. It"s one of many gauges so one can do a self evaluation. Unfotunately many people say they are Christians...but as they say; hanging out at a garage doesn't make you a mechanic.

Not to patronize you... you seem alot smarter than me, would you do me a favor and read "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" vol 1 and 2 and tell me where I'm going wrong?

Best regards,

Norm
""He that loves ME loves life, he taht hates ME loves death." Are ya pro "choice" Rick?"

And who cares what it says. What is this a test on abortion, plenty of Christians are indeed pro-choice and support for say executions can be seen as loving death too, recall that the Catholic Church opposes executions and how about those that support the war in Iraq, I believe the position of the church was that it could not be seen as a just war and thus the killing there by the US illegitimate.

Richard if you concluded the same for
doc, then we can meet on this one.

But, if I am the only singular, and unworldly person of expression here, then we don't meet anywhere.

Btw, I've been on another continent. I also sought out many acquiantences from as many nations as possible during 5 years of study.

I met a lot of people and learned a lot of their views. I am by no means an uninformed person.

doc
1) Nothing wrong with multiculturalism (I'd say that I have a BA and MA in Anthropology).

2) What examples can you cite that was taught in your school that you object to as an example of "multiculturalism?"

Quick Biblical test Rick
"He that loves ME loves life, he taht hates ME loves death." Are ya pro "choice" Rick?

Corndog
"I wonder if enough of us have the tenacity to persevere against obambi's ever increasing oppressive regime?"

Obama has lots of company, the US has been getting increasingly oppressive now for nearly 150 years now. Obama didn't bring you NCLB and warrantless searches and putting American citizens arrested on US soil into military prisons without charges, Bush did, Obama didn't launch Carnivore, that was Clinton. It was Bush 41 or Reagan and forced banks to turn over your account information to the government (for the war on drugs)not Obama, it was Bush or Clinton that forced Microsoft to turn over its encryption keys to the government so they could break your encrypted files and on and on and on. Obama isn't the tyrant, they all are.

Rick from MN
I went to public schools in the 1960s and my own texts were full of multiculturalism. If you and your kid were not taught multiculturalism you did not go to a public elementary school. If you did go to a public elementary school, you and your kids were taught multiculturalism. You may have slept through social studies, but it was in your texts (and taught).

As Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

tj, I source far more than you. Not one
of you here, not even these supposed columnists source their views as deeply as I do.

Don't bother arguing this with me.

The time I spend, which you cannot confirm, is my integrity, my honesty, my honor.

No citizen sources so many possibilities as I.

The CIA would be one of the rivals, and their budget and time allows them that privilege.

I disallow the staff of any pundit for sourcing, because that is second hand, and becomes hearsay because of that.

Sure, it might be correct, but hearsay because it was not sourced by the person who actually makes an assertion from that source.

Doc
Care to provide us with a text book that claims the USSR and the USA were morally the same? Saying the US did some pretty nasty things during the Cold War (and WWII as far as that goes), doesn't mean the US is the same as the USSR or Nazi Germany.

Tj
I am aware of his idiot communications director fawning on Mao, but who are these others that have done so? Well, there was Van Jones--but he is gone.

And she isn't a Czar

Rick
Your experience is certinly singular and maybe over a broad space of time but it is also clear limited to a very narrow area that does not include experience out in the real world.

norm1066
The faux Christian Norm telling others who and who aren't Christians--yes, you can be an Obama supporter and still be a Christian--there is a religious left in the US just as there is a religious right.

Of course I'm neither a Christian or an Obama supporter.

Rick . . .
Glenn Beck's research is fully documented. There are VIDEOS of these "czars" spouting their admiration for communist leaders as well as extolling the great philosophical "wisdom" of the communist "leaders" that they "seek advice from".
I would suggest that you broaden your horizons and seek the TRUTH, from multiple sourcesn not as it has been spoon-fed to you by the so-called "mainstream media".
You will find that the TRUTH will take you to unconfortable places but the quest will be worth it.
Best regards,

Liberals
Actually I'll never forgive him for signing the Third Communique in 1982. But not a liberal. Reagan also didn't on his own end the Cold War--the main actor that caused that was Gorbachev.

norm, Oh yes, I'm a Chrstian.
For 27 years I've been a professed Christian.

Jesus is my Lord and savior. PERIOD!

Obama is my president.

Period.

USSR and the USA
"preached the moral equivalency of the U.S. and the Soviet Union..."

In general no, but in some ways yes. The US supported various brutal regimes without question as long as they were also anti-Communist and in some cases opposed governments that had replaced rather brutal regimes. In some case US opposition had to do with entrenched economic interests than any true fear of communism--e.g. United Fruit, 1954.

"but the Cold War's battles on the periphery (e.g., Greece, Korea, Vietnam, El Salvador, Angola, Afghanistan) were expensive, fatiguing and deadly."

The US did indeed quit in Vietnam and as for Korea, in January of 1950 Secretary of State Acheson made it clear the US had no intention of protecting Korea giving Kim, Mao and Stalin the green light to invade--the US had already written off Taiwan in November of 1949). The US refused to sell Rhee heavy weapons like armor for the fear he would attack the DPRK, Mao and Stalin had no such reservations arming Kim. While yes Kim and his allies are to blame for the war, the US refusal to adequately arm the ROK so it could defend itself and the Acheson speech in 1950 allowed Kim to make the attempt--otherwise, he would have never have risked it nor would Mao and Stalin have approved of it.

Angola is another problematic case with the US rubbing elbows with some pretty dirty individuals such as Jonas Savimbi. And in El Salvador, the US-backed government employed death squads including the murder of innocent nuns. Not exactly a period the US can be proud of per se.

Sorry Rick...
I meant NO way to get from point A to B.

Rick in MN. Your logic is flawed
A) Christian
B) Obama supporter

Although it is possible to get from point B above to point A; there is now way you can get from point A to point B

doc - HOGWASH!
Not any of my schools, nor my kids schools taught or teach as you assert.

So, based on my experience which is singular but over a broad space of time, you are wrong.

Freedom
I had been a Christian almost a year when I met in Seattle a mother and son who had escaped Hungary durring that preempted revolution. He was a strong young man and had carried/assisted his mother across some river over there to get her out. They told me about it.

I wondered to myself if I could have been so strong. His mother (a beautiful Hungarian lady) doted on her Savior son. This was back before my decision to attend a Christian university...a long time before I took my stand against Communism (Secular Humanism) and for Life. As our "Declaration of Independence" champions personal freedom...beginning with the "right to life...".

It is one thing to take a position ideologically based upon philosophy. Quite another to have it humanized.

Freedom has so many personal facets. When the Berlin Wall went down it stirred my German roots in many ways. One of them was the glorious sense of nationalism. Unification once more! My first thought was: "Build a military! As fast as you can! It is the only way to protect your freedom!"

Right now here in Florida I have Cuban friends who consider themselves patriotic Americans. But their roots languish in an Island Prison under the heal of Secular Humanism (one label of which is Communism)they fled from. Although free...my friends are never quite free. FREEDOM! We are the birds who crave wings! And when the "personalized" bridge is built to other humans we can not rest until ALL are free.

They still teach this in our schools ...
Good quotation: "For decades -- I repeat, decades -- this crowd had a media pulpit from which its self-proclaimed intelligentsia preached the moral equivalency of the U.S. and the Soviet Union, and at times dropped the all pretense and fingered the U.S. as the 'fascist state' and global oppressor."

This is what multiculturalism is all about, and they still teach this lie daily to our children in public schools. The Berlin Wall has fallen. Why do we still permit the national public school curriculum to shovel this tripe to our kids? They do it because it's the ideology of the democratic party, and their goal for America ... and we let them.

tj,you watch too much Glenn Beck
Connecting lines are not used as proof of connection.

That is what Beck and you imply.

Draw a line from one contact, who may know another contact, who may know another and viola they are all connected from top to bottom.

Hogwash!


Sure I'm being hard nosed. I'm using untoward aggression to this. Your slightly passive aggressive yourself, as you present a forward semblance of calm, yet we both know the status quo of discourse here.

I offer regards to you too, without expectation.

There is not one connection between Van Jones and Obama to link the beliefs of Van Jones to Obama.

You can draw lines to the end of time and not find logic to defend the assertion.

Rick . . .
thank you for your comments. However, I must respectfully disagree with you. Look at obama's white house chief of staff, other "czars" and the now deposed van jones in their praise of mao zedong and other communists. If this does not show their affinity for communism what does?
I await your intelligent response.
Best regards,

The Kremlin wasn't going to spin
the breaking of the wall.

They let it happen with purpose.

Gorbachev saw to it.

Why you spout nonsensical misinformed history to fit your poor excuse for an article is obvious.

You're a nitwit.

tj - not one progressive anywhere
touts communism the way your projecting.

Btw you can not redefine progressives to fit your childish smear.

Furthermore you are ill-informed to lump communists and progressives together.

The problem with "progressives" . . .
is that they STILL make excuses for the wretched system that is communism. They STILL believe that communism would work IF only it were implemented properly (by THEM of course).
The human toll that communism exacted made the jewish holocaust look like a "minor footnote" in history. This by no means diminishes the horrors of the holocaust; I merely state that the attention given to the jewish holocaust is NOT extended to the much greater atrocity (and human holocaust) known as communism. progressives attempt to justify and make excuses for communism by stating that "mistakes were made". ALL OF US must make the communist holocaust as known (and as reprehensible) as the jewish holocaust.

Reagan
The Soviet system was doomed to collapse, communism doesn't work. The big influence came from Gorbeshev and the Afghan war. The Berlin wall came down, the very day the last tank crossed over the Oxus.

Timothy
Russia was communist, and the modern day Germany is socialist. I still haven't had anyone explain why they let the republicans make the US so beholden to communist China?

Great Article
Thanks Austin. Sometimes we need to be reminded who the real bad guys are. I'm always trying to point out the evils of socialism to my co-workers. I hope they're getting it. This article will help with my arguments.
Tim

Part II - again logic A = B, B = C, A=C
Yuh gotta think.

So, here you are spouting off that American military might is the cause for a sovereign nations populace to have the chutzpah to take to the streets and demonstrate. That without the show of American's military might, and shows of force around the world, these people wouldn't have had their own will to go out and protest for democracy.

An aside:
Isn't it ironic how so many here get bent when someone labels America a democracy?

Well now, here you have people who haven't had any access to the outside world, not one possible source to consume the world news and you think they've risen because of what America shows them.

You think they can disseminate world news to a nation for many Reagan years, where Reagan took our military might and used it for freedom? You think the news underground of E. Germany was so profoundly large that it disseminated all of our freedom loving military incursions around the globe, to those who eventually protested in 1989? Furthermore, you believe that the influnece of this premise was so strong, that it had more effect than the national pride which those people held for themselves?

Really? You believe that?

That's absurd!

You have to be so self centric, so slef absorbed, so out of synch with reality that you are mentally ill.

Of course I've established that already.

If As you think, Reagan is responsible
for ending the cold war, then how do you reconcile this irrational thought with your declaration that Obama should not Blame Bush?

You must actually think to consider this question. There is no preparted mantra, nor talking point for you to rehash and parrot. Once you consider exactly what this question means, and how the logic of if A = B and B = C, then A = C you can join me in a reasonable consideration of timeline facts and reactions to the actual events of 1989.

Try first to read this BBC report about 1989. It has a timeline.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/specialreports/1989.shtml

Why do I keep bringing up anything like this?

Well it's because I state with an emphatic belief that it is you people who are sycophants. Sycohphants for Reagan's idol. As a christian I add that you show classic idol worship.

Also, so many of you are wrapped up in Obama Deranged Syndrome it is beyond reason, beyond logic, beyond any normal human mental function, and therefore an illness.

Last, when this article left out the role of Gorbachev, it left out historical context. When this article proposed that American military might is the only reason for the people of Eastern Europe to have the strength to demonstrate in their streets, it took from those people their fundamental individuality as freedom loving people.


HOW?!

Again, when you can't think for yourself, and require me to explain every little detail, it boggles my mind.

So,

read part II

Liberals Hurt People
RE: "Liberals will never forgive Ronald Reagan for ending the cold war."

More than that, they won't even acknowledge that he ended it. The suggestion that Reagan was even remotely responsible drives them teeth-gnashing crazy.... and I love it.

Just watch the libs come on here with their revisionist blather that Reagan had nothing to do with ending the cold war, ie: "It would have happened anyway, etc., etc."

Great article Austin

I wonder if enough of us have the tenacity to persevere against obambi's ever increasing oppressive regime?

Cracking the Berlin Wall
Nice article.
I was in Berlin about 6 weeks before the Wall came down.
East Germany had already lost the will to rule and it was made most obvious by the fact that their border guards, the ones who used to shoot people trying to escape the workers paradise no longer carried Kalashnikovs. They only had pistols, even at Checkpoint Charlie.
Anyone who had spent as much time on the border as I have (in our Army)knew it was all over.
You could smell it in the DDR officials as well as the Army and the Vopos. They knew it was over.
The actual breaching of The Wall was just a formality, a nice one.
I shall never forget the welcome to East Germany sign that hung on the border fence I patrolled for so long. It was an inverted triangle with a skull and crossbones in the middle and one word on each edge of the triangle. ACHTUNG! MINEN! DDR
Lovely system, Communism. The state owned brewery in East Berlin couldn't make decent beer even with an all Germany workforce.
Good riddance.

Heres what we do know.

Liberals will never forgive Ronald Reagan for ending the cold war.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.