Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Armstrong Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama Energy Plan Not Ready for Looming Iran-Israel Nuclear Showdown
by Armstrong Williams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


President Obama has talked the talk on our nation’s energy independence, identifying it at the top of his big three immediate fixes. But in recent days, a series of pivotal developments in the Middle East show that Obama is painfully ignorant of what this country needs and what we need now. I refer to oil interruption that may be triggered by a pre-emptive move by either Tehran or Jerusalem over Iran’s fast-paced nuclear program.

Edwin Black, in his recent book The Plan--How to Rescue Society When the Oil Stops--or Before, sat down with me recently outlining the looming crisis and a plan to save the country which can be immobilized within weeks by an oil interruption. But no one in government has paid attention other than nail-biting oil crisis monitors at the Department of Energy.

Here’s what happened in recent days to change the game and make us closer to a cataclysmic confrontation with dire consequences for American oil that the Obama administration is completely unprepared for.

First, on February 2, Iran successfully launched a satellite into space. Tehran plans more satellites this year, creating a space presence easily weaponized that worries American military planners.

Second, days ago, the International Atomic Energy Agency conceded it has underestimated Iran’s nuclear stockpile by about one-third. Iran now wields 2,227 pounds of nuclear material. Its stockpile includes approximately 700 kilograms of the Uranium 235 isotope needed to make at least one bomb.

Third, Iran has accelerated enrichment with thousands of new, highly advanced centrifuges. They want 6,000 centrifuges to speed the enrichment of weapons grade material. More than 5,400 centrifuges are now spinning, including 164 new homegrown IR-2 and IR-3 models. The new Iranian centrifuges are faster than imported P-2 devices. Washington circles are now convinced that Iran, regardless of protesting too much, is in fact racing toward a deliverable nuclear weapon. As for the CIA’s much-questioned 2008 National Intelligence Estimate that concluded Iran was not pursuing nuclear weaponry, that dubious document has now been discarded as flawed.

Fourth, Benjamin Netanyahu has just become Prime Minister of Israel. He promises action before Iran can achieve its nuclear threat. Israel’s Military Intelligence Maj.Gen. Amos Yadlin this week confirmed that Iran has now crossed the technology threshold needed to weaponize. The situation is hair-triggered as Israel and Iran both contemplate pre-emptive action. Therefore, during the past three weeks, the military endgame has become drastically closer.

Hillary Clinton’s recent “listening tour” to the Mideast was a great “photo op and a noble beginning with lots of mixed messages, but did nothing to decelerate the Iran nuke crisis.

Yes, Israel continues a massive game of global equipment sabotage, assassinations of Iranian scientists, and diplomacy. But it is not working and Israel is wondering how long it can wait. Days? Weeks? Months?

Remember, Tehran’s nuclear partner is Moscow. Russia has provided almost all of the nuclear material for the Bushehr nuclear reactor, along with thousands of technicians. President Vladimir Putin decided to deliver the final phases of the S-300 advanced air defense system which can track scores of Israeli airborne intruders simultaneously and knock them down. The S-300 will not be fully operational for several months. A nervous and narrow window exists for Israel’s forces to act. Sensing this, Moscow just quietly agreed to pause missile deliveries to Iran fearing it would only accelerate an Israeli attack.

President Ahmadinejad incessantly promises to counter or preempt any Israeli move by shutting the Strait of Hormuz, and destroying the indispensable Ras Tanura gulf oil terminal and the Saudi oil facility at Abqaiq. Tehran can easily achieve this by missile or bomber. According to author Black, any of these three moves would immediately stop 40 percent of all sea borne oil, 18 percent of global oil, and some 20 percent of America’s daily needs.

Low gas prices are irrelevant to an oil interruption. If it stops, it stops—at any price. Pump prices would become astronomical. Russia and Saudi Arabia would love to see pump prices zoom to more than $15 per gallon. That would make economic recovery completely impossible. No one could even afford the gas to look for work. America would be forced to go to war.

Actually, America has dangerously increased its oil vulnerability because of oil’s precipitous drop to about $35 per barrel. Canada, supplying about ten percent of our 20 million barrel daily use, requires $70 per barrel of oil to produce. At $35, much of Canada’s fast expansion has been shut down. America’s strategic petroleum reserve carries only two months worth of unrefined oil. According to The Plan, a protracted interruption would throw us into a Mad Max scenario.

Yet the Obama administration has developed no contingency plan. What must it do? To survive, America must retrofit much of its 250 million gas guzzling vehicles along with a surge of alt fuels. We have the compressed natural gas (CNG), hydrogen, electric, biofuel, non-agrifuel ethanol, methanol and other alt fuel technology right here right now.

We can compel Detroit to convert and retrofit now. We must lift EPA sanctions against converting vehicles off oil. Take some of those billions, Mr. President, and help this country survive both its economic and petro political vulnerability. In other words, get a plan.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Armstrong Williams is a widely-syndicated columnist, CEO of the Graham Williams Group, and hosts the Armstrong Williams Show. He is the author of Beyond Blame.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Armstrong Williams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
THE OBAMANATION IS
There is no international intelligence in the Obama administration, the world can not even laugh at their unprofessional action. The Obamanation ineptness, incompotency, and the disrespect of allies have left the international community dismayed and totally confused.

Not a Crisis
Why do we care what happens over in that part of the world? Iranian nukes should be little more than a regional problem. If we would stop twiddling our thumbs trying to find immediate solutions and shooting down everything that takes time, we'd be able to wash our hands of this mess. Why are we still insisting on regulating nuclear power to 4 times the cost of other nations? With nuclear power, we can get off the foreign oil kick for good and easily live off of our own domestic oil where needed, like pharmaceuticals and plastics.

Between electric cars (like the excellent ones built by Tesla Motors) and going back and getting nuclear powered aircraft and spacecraft developed, we can pretty much eliminate any use of oil for fuel purposes. Any disruption over an Iran-Israel conflict will be irrelevant to us.

Most importantly, we need to stop trying to bully people into our way of thinking. Iran doesn't hate America or Israel for "our freedom", but because we've spent decades trying to dismantle their economy and are constantly trying to prop up dictators of our choice in Tehran.

Iran-Israel is a regional problem, not an American one. We shouldn't care one way or another. Israel is a grown up, they can take care of themselves.

0'blunder's plan will NEVER be ready
until at least after 2013/01/20.

Sorry Justin, It Is Too Late....
Israel will likely attack Iran within the next 6 months. This is due to "online" date of the Russian S-300 Air Defense System. If Israel doesn't attack before this system is placed in operation, it might not be possible for Israel to attack at all.

The odds of Iran hitting Tel Aviv with a nuke drastically increase after this air defense system is operational. In the event Iran makes a nuclear attack on Israel, Israel will retaliate with its nukes.

Both Russia and the US could be drawn into this war quickly. The same could be true with Pakistan and India. Ditto for the rest of the world.

It is getting interesting (and I write that sadly).

Sen Vitter and
Rep Shaddeg (sp) had a great idea about energy production increasing jobs in this country instead of overseas. They were on Hannity and are apparently introducing a bill that will cost us nothing but create energy jobs. What a novel idea! Produce jobs here in the US and help us to become energy independent. Isn't that what they were all saying last year when gas was over $4/gallon? Let's hold them to their promises or boot them out!

Justin
I wish I could agree with you, but we don't live in a vacuum. A smart administration would secure our borders, get out of the economy, and develop any and all sources of energy. Once we are secure in those areas, we can worry about the other stuff.

The lack of a good foundation under obama's house will be his downfall.

J-10
That's sort of what I meant. We aren't exactly securing ourselves with 800 overseas bases and threatening everyone that happens to think a little differently than we do. It would be a lot easier to deal with Iran if we lifted our trade embargo and quit shaking our sword in their direction. They'd just sound like raving lunatics without their Great Satan to blame everything on. Nothing would make that regime more illigitimate than America not acting the way they think we do.

Clueless
Barack’s so called energy plan is very misguided and out of touch, just like people who make believe the world outside of our borders doesn’t involve us or effect us….tell that to all the family members who lost loved ones on 911, or the families of soldiers who have fought the GWOT.

Gray Ghost
Maybe, but if America doesn't make a move, Russia won't either. Again, regional problem. Russia has just as much as we do to lose and neither of us are going to risk our nations' well being over Iran and its single nuclear weapon or Israel's retaliation. It'll be VERY short.

We have over 9,000 nuclear warheads. Apart from Russia, no one else can cause America any trouble. China has 20 and none of them can get past our missile defenses as they're too slow. No one else is dangerous at all.

Iran trying to hit Israel with a nuclear weapon is suicide for Iran and I seriously doubt anyone else would try anything. Israel is not a nation that pulls its punches.

If we remain level headed and stay out of it, even if Iran wipes out Tel Aviv and Israel wipes out, well, all of Iran, we won't have much to worry about apart from an increase in oil prices.

Ken
There's a huge difference between retaliating against Al Qaeda and going on a holy crusade in Iraq. You probably can't find ANYONE rational that disagreed with invading Afghanistan to get at Al Qaeda. Where we have the problem is the nation building and our short attention span being directed at Iraq.

9/11 was an ugly situation. All we can do is punish the ever lovin' Hell out of the perpetrators and set up our foreign policy so it won't happen again. Unfortunately, Bush failed to do either one and it doesn't look like Obama plans on doing that.

at the crossroads
I'm sick of debating who did what when and why.
I think the possibility of voting the idiots out of office is but a pipe dream.
With 52% of our population displaying the emotions and common sense of a bunch of 6 year old cry babies, we will have to hit bottom before we can take up the real business of rebuilding America in the image of the founders. If it takes a depression to make them grow up, so be it. If a it takes a revolution, so be it. The only truth is, All the wrong things are being done to keep America secure.

Justin
I agree the US messed up in Iran.

Actually Carter messed up by getting the Shah kicked out of power. The mullahs have no gratitude toward the US for us putting them in power.

The mullahs need an external enemy to excuse their repression of the Iranians. We get elected, and are an easy target for several reasons.

First, Hollywood and the music industry make the US look like a bunch of debouched sinners. As such, we /should/ be an easy target for those who are strengthened by their faith in the "one true god", if only their faith is strong enough. And, incidently, the wealth of the US would then be in the hands of people who are much more deserving of it, them.

Second, Hollywood and many other entertainers, along with many of our very own politicians, are actively attempting to weaken the US. The mullahs recognize that they have allies in the US, and are trying to act.

Well, there's several others, but I'm headed for lunch shortly.

Justin
It must be nice living in that little world of make believe that you live in. Here in the real world we cannot ignore the threats that exist from these radical countries. We are dealing with people who cannot be reasoned with and by just making nice they will see that as a sign of weakness. It is already evident that the people of this country have no commitment. Sad but true people like you will just hide their heads in the sand while we get taken over. These people would like nothing more that to reproduce 9/11 on a much larger scale. They have no regard for human life, they think that suicide bombing is an honor. Do you really think that we can talk to them and they will change their minds. The only thing that they understand is that we are a powerful country and we had better stay that way. As far as Israel is concerned do you really think that without the US backing they can survive. Obama has already shown a great deal of disrespect to the Brits, our allies, and is on a quest to cozy up to Iran. This President doesn't have a clue what he is doing and we are in for some real trouble in the future. These people hate us and want to kill us. They are taught that practically from birth. Giving Iran nuclear power is like giving a two year old a gun and some hand granades to play with and expecting that nothing bad will happen.

Uh, Justin?
We did not "go on a holy crusade against Iraq". Go back to original sources instead of using the "interpreted" sources.

Charles
Get off the blame Hollywood kick. they are entertainers and as such, they produce en mass what we decide to consume. if we the people weren't mass consuming it, they wouldn't make so much of the stuff you don't like. every free market person knows that.

this article was pretty bad. he spend 15 paragraphs fear mongering and only two brief, non-detailed paragraphs on the energy solutions, which he doesn't mention will take YEARS to produce results. contrary to his opinion, Detroit can't retrofit 250 million vehicles overnight. that involves changing the entire fuel system in an automobile. is the gov't gonna pay for that? that would be social welfare, right? but, i guess i'd rather have them pay to retrofit my Hummer than make sure a poor kid in a poor neighborhood has a good school to go to...

See this is my point here...
When the Democrats/Liberals make any decision, no matter what it may be, for instance the decision to go to war, then all is great. However, when a Republican makes a decision, well then not all is so great.

Clinton did not get the worlds permission to go into Kosovo and we are STILL THERE, but hey that’s okay.

FDR went after the Germans before the Japanese, but hey, that is okay.

The decision to go into Iraq, I believe was the right decision; having said that, at that point once engaged in war, we should support our troops when they are deployed into harm’s way.

Justin: Review Iran's Relationship...
with Pakistan, Syria, and Russia. If Irans hits Israel and Israel wipes Iran off the face of the earth, what will Pakistan, Syria, and Russia do?

Plus we do have treaties with Israel. While I am not sure of the details of these treaties, again can the US afford to let Pakistan and/or Syria attack a weakened Israel (let alone Russia attacking Israel)?

You also said:

"Iran trying to hit Israel with a nuclear weapon is suicide for Iran and I seriously doubt anyone else would try anything. Israel is not a nation that pulls its punches."

Perhaps if the leaders of Iran were sane, rational people you would have a point. But Iran's leaders are NOT sane and rational. Plus, we do not know what secret agreements that Iran and Russia have made in the event of Iran "being wiped off the face of the earth".

If Israel only destroys Iran's nuclear program, and not the rest of Iran, there is a better than even chance that Russia (and other nations) will do no more than bluster.

Perhaps the best senario from our point of view is if Israel takes out Iran's nuclear program. I feel like then, as you said, the US can "ride" out the jump in oil prices. But it will be tough.

Ken
Yes we are all grieving for the soldiers that continue to fight and die in Kosovo. And of late the death count has increased 10 fold from zero to ten times that amount. I can see your point.

odd column and comments
More focus on alternative fuels could be a positive move. And, of course it is one that Obama is focusing on more than McCain would have had he won. But that makes this a very strange column.

The best thing we could do to prevent the kind of oil crunch that Armstrong describes is to prevent the kind of attack in either direction (although it looks like Israel is more likely to attack than Iran). Obama is certainly working harder in that direction than one would expect from McCain or Bush.

Why are commentors not objecting to Armstrong's suggestion that Washington start dictating pie in the sky restrictions on Detroit? Is it just that he is doing it in a column attacking Obama?

I see your point...
Your are the type of person who is standing and clapping at the coffins of the soldiers that come home.


Justin
The primary danger with a nuclear Iran, aside from economic collapse due to atronomically expensive oil, is a nuclear attack on the US. Once Iran can perfect their weapons, there is nothing stopping them from packing one into a shipping container and shipping it right into the heart of an American city. And MAD doesn't apply to people who aren't afraid to die. Amadenijad seems just crazy enough to not care if his entire country is turned to radioactive glass if he can strike at the great Satan in the name of Islam.

It's in everybody's best interests (except the Mullahs) that Iran's nuclear capability goes away.

Almost had me
I was in agreement with this article right up to the very end when Mr. Armstrong dropped the "Alt" bomb. No Mr. Armstrong, the immediate answer to being held hostage to foreign oil is to tap our own vast reserves. What it the hell is so difficult about that to understand.

Said differently, how many corn plants and how much acreage does it take to replace 20% of our energy needs? At what price to the consumer in the loss of food stuffs and other products made from this staple. Get real, get going and drill for our own oil now!

Ken
Huh? You aren't exactly the brightest bulb around are you? How would pointing out that soldiers nopt dying makes for a different and better situation than soldiers dying indicate that I am clapping for soldiers deaths?

People do not criticize Clinton for an intervention in which many Kosovar lives were saved and no American lives were lost. They do criticize Bush for an intervention in which many Iraqis died and thousands of Americans as well in creating an unstable situation.

What kind of idiot thinks those things are comparable?

Clueless
If I hear alternate fuels one more time I'm going to scream. The rest of the world is drilling cheap and will export to us from right off our coast. What kind of morons don't understand this? The ones that will subsidize the dim cronies on climate change/wind/solar/natural gas scam. And when the climate blows all that pollution from Asia what a hoot its going to be to hear dims explain it. Its Bush's fault, uh-uh Kyoto!

Lon
The real dilemma here is one who has not been in or near the reality of what they claim to know so much about.

There is a difference in being there and one who only reads the MSM news reports or what they get from the likes of the liberal TV and Radio spots. Were there cheers of jubilation in Kosovo or the other Balkan states when there was finally peace and no more genocide? Of course, were there cheers in the theatre of operations concerning both OIF and OEF? Yes, however, there is a distinct difference being that the those cheers that you seen on the MSM and since the GWOT began are those of the terrorist killing our service men and women.

None of you or those who claim to support the troops really believed we were going to be where we are at today in regards to the peace (and winning) there in Iraq? Your liberal Congressional Representatives and media types all threw in the towel, saying it is a loss.

If you say you support the soldiers and not your president, how can you support one and not the other? You cannot have it both ways. I have served under both Democrat and Republican Presidents; let me be clear on one thing... There is a huge difference in their leadership styles; which has an adverse effect on readiness.

When was the last time a Democrat, who ran for and won the Presidency made certain there was funding (and I mean real funding) for the soldiers to train and be ready? Not in our lifetime, I will always live by the words of President Reagan “Peace through Strength.”

Ken
I disagree with you. I don't think that everyone who is against Obama is therefore against the troops. The president and the soldiers are doing different things, have different jobs, and do them as distinct beings. The idea that one cannot support one and oppose the other is ridiculous.

But how is the absurdity that one cannot support the soldiers without supporting the president supposed to justify the idea that one cannot oppose Bush's invasion of Iraq without opposing Clinton's bombing of Serbia over Kosovo? It is hard to imagine two military operations that were more different.

Iraq was a huge tactical blunder from the US perspective. We took a country that was a counterbalance to Iran and turned it into a friend to Iran. We have traumatized a country leading to the deaths of 100's of thousands and dislocating in the millions. And we have yet to deal with any of the long term issues that will eventually have to be settled, but are waiting for us to leave before they are even started.

It is very easy to criticize the man who created such a situation by not caring to understand what he was doing, without criticizing the soldiers who have done the best possible in a situation they shouldn't have been sent into.

Obama Energy Plan
As a Chemical Engineer for over 35 years, I strongly disagree with your conclusion that alternative energy sources are readily available and able to be implemented. Sources you referenced (hydrogen, biofuels, electric, ethanol, methanol) all depend upon a reliable supply of oil and natural gas. These are all driven by these energy sources and that requirement cannot be displaced. Sure there are coal conversion technologies out there, but the economics are not viable on a large scale unless we are willing to pay significantly more for our luxuries. Didn't see anything in your article about nuclear energy. This could displace some coal usage for the massive electrical energy required for our comforts. Lets get serious about our discussions with respect to alternative energy, not just create an opinion that the solution is easy, if people just think outside the box. If it was viable and economic, we would have been doing it. Thinking we can displace oil and natural gas on a "large scale" is just fantasy thinking.

REALITY CHECK - THE GREEN DREAM

.....If you take oil, gas, coal and nuclear off the table ...all the other sources of energy would take decades to deliver a fraction of what we already have with fossil fuels and nuclear ...

..... Enough of these science fiction dreams ...the weaning process from fossil fuels will take decades, maybe centuries ...using more nuclear would be a good start .....COLOSSUS

Lon
The president is the mission. When it comes to foreign policy, he is the tip of the spear. All foreign policy goes through the president.

During wartime you put your differences aside, circle the wagons, and support the troops and the president in the mission.

I didn’t vote for President Clinton, but I supported the Balkans campaign.

I didn’t vote for President Barack, I don’t agree with his information operational campaign that we aren’t winning the GWOT. I do agree his decision to increase the troops and feel he should be doing so even more.

No, you don’t have to agree with the president on all facets of domestic or foreign policy. However, when it comes to our country at war, you circle the wagons around the president. You do not give the enemy any reason to make them feel embolden.

What do you think happens when the media, congressional representatives, protesters are ripping the president and the mission? The troop’s attitude is what the hell is the point in what we’re doing. Their esprit de corps goes south.

Guess we have to leave it at we just disagree. Have a nice day.

Armstrong ! Armstrong! Armstrong!
You are letting the public see just how Liberal you are and how much you love your President in spite of what you advocate in this article or on your radio show. Alternative Energy is just a buzz word Liberals use to say "I Love Me Some Barack Obama".
I know you claim to be a Republican, and I am not sure if you are a true RINO like Arlen Spector yet.I didn't graduate from Harvard so what would I know,but here is a "CONSERVATIVE" idea that I would like for you to consider. In the ineterst of National Security and the American People, tell your Pharoah, Obama, to stop listening to the Environmentalist America Haters, and to let the Oil Companies,Coal Companies, and Nuclear Companies go. Crisis solved! Catastrophe avoided. And about the prospect of war and Iran, tell your Lord and Savior, Obama, to stop talking and act, and the world will be a better place for all Liberals.

AMOS YADIN, OSIRIQ & NUCLEAR IRAN
Gen. Amos Yadin, mentioned in Armstrong's fine article, was the first of 7 Israeli air force pilots to attack Saddam Hussein's Osirik nuclear plant back in 1981. He flew an F-16 jet bearing the number 107. 107 was the STS number of the Columbia Space Shuttle when it disintegrated over Palestine, Texas with Ilan Ramon aboard, an Israeli air force pilot who was the 7th to hit the Osirik plant. The Columbia was destroyed on February 1, 2003, the 24th anniversary of the return of the Ayatollah Khomeine to Tehran-the starting date of the Iranian Revolution. The Columbia tragedy has Iran and Israel writen all over it.

The destruction of Columbia was an unmistakable sign calling for the obliteration of the mullah regime. A conventional Osiriq like strike on Iran's multiple nuclear sites would achieve very little in stopping their weaponization program, and be a catastrophe of the highest magnitude as it would trigger a major war in the Middle East. We wasted our time taming and stabilizing Iraq while the mullahs went nuclear, a huge mistake as a nuclear armed Iran is far more menacing to U.S. strategic interests than civil war in Iraq (see my essay on The Death of Ronald Reagan).

There is only one way and one way only for Israel to eliminate the threat of a nuclear armed Iran: the nuclear devastation of the country.

Click ApolloSpeaks and read my works: The Sign of Columbia: the Coming Destruction of Fascist Iran, and the Rise of Nuclear Iran (on page 3 of my blog).



Iran and Oil
Armstrong you piece is on the money and a warning to all of us. There is no safe or sure solution as we have let the international community, U.N., control this issue and waste precious time when we never had any to waste. Now we are arriving at the rock and the hard place. So far, Israel is being jacked around by the Clinton, Kerry and the dope from Maine team for no purpose except to waste more time.
The end game is going to be Israel, provoked by Hamas rockets (Iran's proxie) attacking Gaza and continuing to the home country, Iran, with a devastating strike. Which will set off all of the Islamist in Western Europe as well as those in Lebanon and Syria. We will have to take the side of Israel while the U.N. will scream bloody murder under the control of the 57 Islamic countries which are in charge of that body.
Will this trigger a big war? I don't think so, but it will let everyone know where we all stand.
Hopefully Israel will go right ahead and move on Lebanon and Syria and take all of the land from the river Egypt to the river Euphrates. Let all of the Arabs and Persians go to other Arab and Persian countries and take up residence, just as the Jews had to do when they were kicked out following the new Israel.
Then we can start anew with new borders
It might not be perfect or clean - but I do not think it is any worse than the last 60 years.

al@bellaproducts.com

READY FOR WHAT?
Mr. Williams, what is Obama ready for........
hugging the terrorists?

This BUBBLE BRAIN isn't ready for anything above giving talks!
Am I wrong?

Elvis

While oil demand and prices are down
Seems a real good time to accelerate filling the national petrolieum reserves.

Obama farse
What a bunch of inept idiots we have in the White House. The reason we cannot ignore Iran-Israel issue is if the nukes are in the hands of Islamic extremists, Justin, how safe do you think you will really be?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.