Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 30, 2007
Armstrong Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Virginia Tech Massacre
by Armstrong Williams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


After the massacre at Virginia Tech last week I spent several days thinking about what makes a person turn into such a monster. I wondered how a human being – even one with as troubled a past as Seung-Hui Cho – could do such horrendous things. But after days of contemplation and pray, I realized that since the beginning of time evil has roamed our land. There will always be dangerous people out there. So the question arises: What do we do about it?

Sadly the administration at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia did nothing. Like just about every other college in America, the leaders of Virginia Tech were obsessed with the image of their school. Prestige and reputation ruled every decision. Honors, enrollment, and money would continue to flow in if everything else was kept quiet. This is not a conspiracy theory or wild rant. This is the cold hard truth. Virginia Tech officials knew about Cho’s behavior prior to the horrendous killings yet refused to act.

English Literature professor Nikki Giovanni had Cho in her class and saw his meanness and anger and demanded that if he were not removed from her class, she would resign. Lucinda Roy, then the department chair-person, removed Cho from the class and taught him one on one. Roy recalled Cho exhibited an obvious rage, and was secretly taking photographs of other students while holding the camera under his desk. Besides this, his writings were so disturbing that she went to the police and university administrators for help. Yet the administration did nothing.

This was not the first time the administration heard complaints about Cho. In November 2005 local and campus police were notified by a student complaining that Cho was stalking her. The university's Office of Judicial Affairs handled the complaint and obviously (the outcome of that situation is confidential) things remained the same. Because a month later another woman student complained to campus authorities about unwanted messages she was receiving from Cho, the campus police spoke to him and then released him on the agreement that he meet with Access Services, an independent mental health facility in Blacksburg. Furthermore, Cho’s roommates reported him to campus police as being suicidal and displaying “crazy” behavior. Again, nothing was done.

The Virginia Tech administration needed to remove Cho from campus long ago, yet they failed to act. They were more concerned with the image of their school than the safety of their students. Which school is next because their administration refuses to secure the campus because it may not look good or may cost them a few dollars? Whose children are in danger now because school officials are more concerned with their public relations department than their police department? Virginia Tech is not the only school to sweep crimes and complaints under the rug. Colleges all over the country continually downplay the violence that occurs on their campuses. Whether they underreport, misreport, or do not report the crimes, their official crime logs are usually unreliable and invalid. This makes it difficult for parents to know what their children are potentially getting into. Without objective and transparent crime reporting on college campuses, nobody will ever know what schools are safe and which ones are not. Until proper legislation is passed and school officials begin to take crime and violence on their campuses seriously, we will see more and more incidents like last week’s massacre.

Atlanta lawyer Amanda Farahany was hired several years ago by a student at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia who was allegedly raped on campus but could not get the police to prosecute because the school would not cooperate and turn over incident reports and other findings. Farahany discovered firsthand while representing this student that statistics provided in the campus crime log didn't match the school's crime reports. “We know that one in four college women are a victim of sexual assault. When universities are reporting zero rapes on campus, we know that just isn't possible,” Farahany said, citing several surveys, including a 1991 study of 7,000 college students by researchers Mary Koss and Mary Harvey. The point is that we have some work to do.

Besides improved legislation, more transparency by school administrations, and better campus security, we need teachers and students to do their part as well. And I mean physically. During Cho’s killing spree, there had to have been moments when one or many could have charged Cho and stopped the shooting. Students and teachers (and really, all of us) need to defend themselves and protect the lives of those around them during future massacres like these. During the 9/11 attacks we saw heroic acts by men and woman in the air and in New York and Washington, DC. I just wish we had seen more of that in Virginia last week. And I expect next time we will. In fact I think we should demand it of each other.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Armstrong Williams is a widely-syndicated columnist, CEO of the Graham Williams Group, and hosts the Armstrong Williams Show. He is the author of Beyond Blame.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Armstrong Williams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
it can be avoid!
A mute or being diagnosed as autistic like Cho could be still very intelligent which was ignoring by the main stream reports. Apart from no clue what mute or autism are or how they would have affected Cho. I also agree with "overlooked is the fact that in many cultures, including Korean, kids with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are regarded as an embarrassment. The family is dishonored to have a child like this." So far his elementary, middle school years are fine, success too, in the fact he was admitted to V. tech, a first ranking university. Making friends or understanding people may not be the family's first priority, but making good money or survive economically in the actual world would be the goal of sending Cho to a higher education. So his family thinks he is able to do that because of he tasked his studies well. It is by largely omitting his emotional development. He is probably mature to his chronological age. The fact is when he is 21 in 2005, he fantasy in girls like every body else. The University is defiantly ignored his disability. Parents has done nothing wrong to send him to school, being a saver place than sending him on the street, but definably lack of financial support to his speech therapy etc. The teasing that we all went through would have been devastating to him as a nearly mute person. “Without the ability to understand feelings or the intentions of others, he would have been doing something wrong, but not intentionally. Left untreated for years, he would have mistaken the rare kindly attempts of others to reach out to him as hostile. He probably would have seen the playful banter of others and misunderstood it as bullying.”

His twisted writing or his final words about his action, reflects to some extend of the modern world, for example, divorce family, step father, mother relationship or materialism of this current expending society etc. What is wrong proposing to girls with Sheasepear's phase which the new generation rarely use but him? Is he also a victim of this Gun culture or his family is? He could “saw himself as a hero, because he can see the world is not right, defending the other victims of what he saw as bullying.” The society owes him or his family his own live, as well as the other 32 precious lives.

If his intention to get the girls attention is not stalking or his writing had only reflected his true observation to his understanding world, what happened being treated with mentally ill. His parents, the public schools and the college would all have responses. It is quite true that the mental health "professionals" did not recognize it or know what to do with him. It needs other kind the social work from the society to help. Put these all to your own shoes, what his English Literature professor Nikki Giovanni do when she saw a mute, or nearly mute student but removed him out from her class, and what Lucinda Roy, the department chair-person, removed Cho from the class and went to the police and university administrators about him. The university's Office of Judicial Affairs handled the complaint and obviously, because two woman students complained to campus authorities about unwanted messages they received from Cho, the campus police spoke to him and then released him on the agreement that he meet with Access Services, an independent mental health facility in Blacksburg. Suicidal being reported by his roommate may be his first reaction to the stalking reports. Then none the right helps were on the way.

Cho and Autism
Everyone is ignoring the reports that Cho was diagnosed as autistic. I know that most people have no clue what autism is or how it would have affected Cho. Also overlooked is the fact that in many cultures, including Korean,kids with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are regarded as an embarrassment. The family is dishonored to have a child like this. So Cho would have likely been rejected by his own family since he was a yr or two old. He would not have ever developed the simple ability to make friends or even to understand the emotions or intentions of others. His emotional development would have been much younger than his chronological age. Throughout his childhood, even when they came to the U.S., the schools would have also ignored his disability. Even parents who understand their rights have to fight for the most basic of services such as speach therapy. The teasing that we all went through would have been devastating to him. Without the ability to understand feelings or the intentions of others, he would have been suspicious of their actions. Left untreated for years, he would have mistaken the rare kindly attempts of others to reach out to him as hostile. He probably would have seen the playful banter of others and misunderstood it as bullying.
With the emotional maturity of a 9 yr old and thaving experienced rejection from his family, he had nobody to turn to for guidance. From his twisted perspective, he saw everyone else as evil. He certainly seems to have seen himself as a victim. He probably also saw himself as a hero, defending the other victims of what he saw as bullying. Thats right!! He saw himself as a hero. I'm not saying that ny of this makes it okay. But I am 100% certain, that this tragedy started many years ago. Cho was both the last victim and the first victim of evil. It started when he was stricken with ASD as are 1 of every 150 kids.
We can never make every campus completely safe. Nor can we ever expect to keep guns from every person who would misuse them. Measures have already been taken to strike a balance between security and freedom. While fools argue about whether those measures go too far or not far enough, another neccessity is being ignored. That is treating mental health. His parents ignored it. The public schools ignored it. The college ignored it. And even the mental health "professionals" did not recognize it or know what to do. It should be obvious where we are lacking.

Jay Serna
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.