Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 09, 2006
Armstrong Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
The World We Leave Behind
by Armstrong Williams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



What is happening to the world we live in today? It is mind boggling as to what is going on globally, within respected corporations, religious institutions, organizations and the three branches of our government. The world is plagued by conflict, poverty, human suffering and injustices that violate the basic values of humanity. Are we witnessing the last hours of civilization? If we no longer allow morality and the sense of fundamental concern for humanity guide our decisions, then the kind of world we leave behind is facing a moral Armageddon.

Mark Foley, Florida Congressman was exposed as a child sex predator, Charles Carl Roberts, a truck driver armed with three guns, two knives and 600 rounds of ammunition stormed a school in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, lined at least 11 girls against a blackboard and shot 10 girls “execution style,” before turning the gun on himself. Duane Morrison, the gunman from Bailey, Colorado killed a student at a high school, methodically selecting six girls as hostages, apparently favoring blondes---and sexually assaulting them. Three young children were found dead in East St. Louis hours after a woman was charged with killing the pregnant mother and her fetus in a gruesome attack which her womb was cut open. The list goes on.

The Bible tells us, “A corrupt tree brings forth evil fruit.” So we dare not forget that beyond our outward politics, there is a backbone, there is a moral character that underlies the legacy that we leave our children. Without a sense of moral striving, we are, as individuals, condemned to formless lives. It is morality that provides an absolute point of reference with which to discern between right and wrong. From this morality springs a set of rules for living together. Without this foundation we can see only a daily basis, one merely living from whim to whim, moving neither toward nor away from anything. Therefore the great mediator of any community is human morality.

I know there are pedophiles, murderers, liars, and cheats out there who scoff at the phrase “moral absolutes.” They believe all things are relative. They reason that if there is no universally accepted system of morals, if one man’s sin is another’s virtue, then any kind of behavior is acceptable and nothing is wrong. And so they place themselves—their own wants and desires---at the center of the universe. I often fear that America is embracing this sort of decadence. With our notions of psychology and science, I worry that we have become so sophisticated that we disregard the simple concept of good and evil; that we disregard the notion of moral absolutes.

The remarkable thing about stories of good and evil is that everyone can identify who or what is good and who or what is evil. We can change these stories so that the characters are human beings and not gods or demons, and they will not lose any of their impact. Their message will still be the same. This proves that morality and virtue are not unalterably connected to religion. They are however bound to certain moral absolutes.

Is it merely coincidence that it is against the law to murder someone in Argentina and also in Korea? Or that theft is a punishable offense in both Saudi Arabia and Canada? Is it just an accident that people the world over agree on more things than they disagree?

It can’t be that simple. The preponderance of the evidence seems to say that there are certain things that are right for all people and other things that are wrong. Murder, rape, pedophilia, man/boy society, and cheating on your spouse are wrong. We don’t need the Bible, Torah or Koran to figure that out.

Today, we live in a country that is obsessed with its economic prosperity. We are comfortable enough to spare ourselves the rigors of moral striving. Same-sex marriages, eroding family values, ambushing innocent children in class rooms, elected officials with a fetish for underage kids, absentee fathers—these things cause concern but little more.

We proceed with the knowledge that American life will go on. We are confident that we are the greatest empire in the history of empires. This belief in the inevitability of our way of life breeds certain carelessness to the truly important stuff of life. This is the decadence that precedes the fall.

We need to continue passing the torch of moral excellence to our children so that, down the road, they may realize something greater than violence, sexual promiscuity, making celebrities out of a former Governor who had secret and openly gay liaisons while married, and disintegrating family values. For the true measure of our success is the world we leave for our children.

If we strive for the high ground of moral excellence, we will have improved the only corner of the universe that we can be certain of improving. And that is ourselves. If we do this, our morality will overflow from our own lives and trickle into the lives of others. And then, in quiet moments when we’re alone, we will suddenly realize that knowing the good, we have done it; knowing the righteous, we have served it, knowing the truth, we have embodied it.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Armstrong Williams is a widely-syndicated columnist, CEO of the Graham Williams Group, and hosts the Armstrong Williams Show. He is the author of Beyond Blame.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Armstrong Williams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Excellent rebuttal
Milo, your rebuttal to JohnCitizen's arguments were outstanding. Mr. Armstrong, you article was absolutely inspiring. Thank you for telling us how it is....no sugar coating, simple, straight up and truthful.

I too would like to comment on JohnCitizen and others who have argued the question of morality. Some have said that it cannot be legislated. That assertion's logic walks on *very* thin ice.

Our founders believed in the reality of natural law which nations can ignore only at their peril. They believed that the American republic could not survive if it lacked sufficient virtue and morality in the people and such could not be maintained absent religious support. The 1st Amendment was designed to (1) avoid the establishment of a national religion like the Church of England and (2) proscribe the forcing of conscience, but it was not designed to inhibit governmental encouragement of religion for that was viewed as the most effective institutional force to instill morality and virtue within the populace. The appropriate degree of separation between church and state, was originally thought to be a state issue, not a federal one.

Without a virtuous and moral people who are willing to self-govern themselves, it would become necessary to apply more external force through the law to maintain peace, order and safety. In other words, when public and private virtue/morality are high in the populace, the sphere of moral-persuasion/liberty can be large relative to the sphere of legal-mandate/force. But the relative sizes must reverse when virtue and morality are generally low. A belief in God and our ultimate moral accountability to Him, tends to make people better self-governors, and the vast majority of the people have to be good self-governors in order for a country to preserve its liberty and avoid drowning in a sea of law. When religious institutions are weakened, and the people lose their moral bearings, barbarism lurks in the offing. And all of the foregoing indicate why, the ACLU’s and other’s attempts to excise all vestiges of religion from the public square, are so dangerous to the future of our country. Of course in so many words they will deny any sort of hostility towards religion, but their extremist legal body language screams out to the contrary.

There has been too much separation of government from virtue and morality. States should start demanding that their 10th Amendment rights be restored regarding their ability to democratically make the various trade-off decisions surrounding this topic. Religious people of all parties need to re-inject their core moral beliefs into the political arena. We need to let the candidates know that we will only cast our votes in favor of virtuous and moral people who are willing to vote their moral consciences even in the face of ridicule. The general political mood needs to be shifted back to our roots where religion was prized and respected rather than ridiculed.

The federal courts are forcing things upon us, but they could not proceed so effectively without our consent and even complicity. While it is true that our federal courts are not democratically controlled, they are democratically influenced. If they sense wide-spread moral and political revulsion for what they do, they will likely back off. But if the silent majority stays perpetually silent, then like a child, the courts will continually probe and test the outer bounds of publicly acceptable propriety – continually pushing until they are finally stopped. I know this drum is beaten every day, but every religious person has both a moral and political duty to become politically active. In our own words and from the bottom of our hearts, we need to write our elected officials and express our views.




Re: JohnCitizen's ad hominem post...
K, let's knock this out:

(1) "The world has seen Christian certitude before and it’s not a pretty picture: papal infallibility when the Pope had armies, the Inquisition (intolerance at home) and the Crusades (intolerance abroad)."

The Inquisition/Crusades argument has long been an anti-Christian mainstay -- too long. It speaks rather well of Christianity that its haters (at least, the less creative ones) consistently have to go back almost 1000 years (and counting) to dig up dirt. They'll be calling all Germans Nazis 500 years from now.

(2) "Our brave, innocent young men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan are fighting for a better world, but a leader ignorant of history and cultures can easily cause the opposite. The stupidity of World War I and of Wilson, Lloyd George and Clemenceau caused terrible consequences for another 70 years after the end of that war."

... Cuz if *you* had been in charge, by golly, it would have been paradise on Earth!

(3) "Afghanistan is the right war, certainly a just war and the whole world agreed and was on our side,"

What does the validity of an action have to do with the number of entities who acknowledge its rightness? Why should we automatically expect all those other UN nations to accede to the morality that says that we're right to invade Afghanistan?

(4) "... and if we would have concentrated our efforts there we probably would have wiped out Bin Laden and those responsible for 9-11 by now."

You mean, put our *entire* military into Afghanistan? Like, have every soldier and every commander totally focused on Afghanistan? Dude, that is an *awesome* idea! Why would anyone think that we can be effective in multiple places at once, which has *never* happened before, especially in World War II.

(5) "Iraq is the wrong war even if hopefully we win it, and Iran will be another, but larger wrong war."

Unless, by invading Iraq and (if necessary) attacking Iran, we severely cripple state support of Al Qaeda types. Then, they're not the wrong wars.

(6) "The leader of Iran comes off as a whacko, however, the Iranians and the rest of the world view George Bush in the same way, so there is a common starting point."

Right, because obviously the rest of the world have their heads on straight. Especially the French government, the Russian government, the North Korean government, the Chinese government, the Cuban government, the Venezuelan government, the Sudanese government, etc. And that whole Oil For Food thing *really* showed how other nations are great moral barometers for George Bush to respect, and how they have no selfish interests of their own that conflict with the successful achievement of American interests.

(... skipping some rhetoric...)

(7) "But if past is prelude, then Bush’s diplomacy with Iran will be perfunctory and manipulated (as it was with Iraq), and probably God has already spoken to our President and told him to go to war after the November 2006 elections (as he did with Iraq in 2002-2003)."

Man, I *like* having a president who objectively assesses chances for reform by a nation that calls for a repeat of a genocidal event that they claim never happened in the first place (cf. The Holocaust). The Islamofascist mindset tends to be pretty committed to some very specific end results.

(8) "When Bush finally increases the level of hatred against the United States to where it engulfs Pakistan, then we face nuclear terror, and Biblical Armageddon becomes real, a self-fulfilling prophecy."

Bush increases "the level of hatred against the United States" in much the same way a cop increases a criminal's level of hatred of the police force. But never mind that, I guess -- we're the superpower and we've gotta be taken down to make it fair for everyone else, yeah?

(9) "Back at home, Christian certitude is present in Bush’s politics of division and hate. Nonbelievers of Bush’s Christian values and policies are viewed with contempt, instead of as fellow citizens in a pluralistic democracy."

Not at all! Hugo Chavez made that clear when he urged the good American citizenry to rise up against SatanBush. So you see, much is well in the court of international opinion.

(10) "Civility has gone out of our civilization..."

The first sensible and unassailable remark that you've written.

(11) "... and this type of Christian Right hate is now completely out of the closet with Ann Coulter’s latest book, which has been repudiated by few if any on the right who claim to practice the Christian message of love. The Foley-Hastert scandal further shows the actual evil of their 'perfect' practice of Christian good."

Perfect is *your* word, not ours. Christianity is in fact founded on the tragic realization that humanity is *not* perfect, and contrary to leftist tenets (which ride on the belief that man is essentially perfectible, and maybe we would be by now if it weren't for all these evil institutions, dammit), we never *will* be.

(12) "'Good and evil' is a concept common in religion, morality and ethics. Obviously the whole world needs more good and less evil. But is there a practical definition that everyone can agree on and that lends itself to objective measurement. How about: GOOD is something that makes the many human lives better and no or few lives worse, while EVIL is something that makes many lives worse, and no or few lives better. Some obvious good in this world: Habitat for Humanity, St Jude’s Children Hospital, etc."

Those definitions sound OK, I guess. Not great, but not offensive, either. Hiroshima and Nagaski would be neither good nor evil under those rules, so I can't say that you're not off on the wrong foot. Of course, the definitions have nothing to say about what course of action one party should take when some other party disregards the definitions (out of hatred, or self-interest, or whatever).

(13) "Measuring George Bush’s actions by this definition with objective facts, our good Christian President does mostly evil: from Iraq to Katrina mismanagement and incompetence to “no child left behind” (children in extreme poverty up 20% since Bush took office) to the $3 trillion dollar tax giveaway to the rich."

Iraq: How does it "make no or few lives better"? Terrorists are engaged in the Middle East, rather than here in America. I think that it's good for a LOT of Americans that there hasn't yet been a repeat of 9/11. Also, many millions of Iraqi civilians came out to vote in spite of death threats (some of which were actually carried out) from Michael Moore's militant Muslim "minutemen." Clearly, they viewed the situation in positive terms.

Katrina: Funny, I thought intent was everything to a leftist. Now, though, if someone is well-intentioned but performs inadequately, he's "evil," even if other (leftist) parties are more culpable than he.

20% poverty increase: Whether this is real or not (it's not), it has nothing to do with NCLB, which is an educational program, not an economic program. (Silly leftist, sneaky associative tricks are for other leftists.)

Tax giveaway to the rich: Can we please NOT beat that stupid drum? For the million-sixth time, lower taxes for everyone does not equal cosmic economic injustice in favor of the affluent. "The rich" represent an extremely small percentage of the population, yet they pay a share of annual taxes far, far in excess of that percentage. Get over your class envy.

I'm sleepy and bored, now, so I'm going to go to bed.


-- Milo
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.