Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login | What's Hot
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 01, 2002
Armstrong Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
The changes in welfare reform
by Armstrong Williams
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



While some extra money can help the downtrodden, it cannot raise their children. This profound revelation is at the heart of the administration's proposal to tweak the welfare system by increasing the work requirements and funneling federal resources into state-run programs geared toward strengthening family values. These suggested amendments come on the heels of a new three-year study called "Growing up in Poverty: New Lives for Poor families?" which was published by researchers at Berkley, Columbia, Stanford and Yale universities. The study indicates that welfare recipients continue to have trouble paying bills and parenting. The last significant changes to the welfare system came in 1996, when Congress mandated that recipients work at least 30 hours a week and limited the amount of time someone could remain on the dole. Previously, the welfare system functioned as a bottomless entitlement program that dispensed money to the unemployed like some government-subsidized tranquilizer. The 1996 reforms won bipartisan support and uniform praise for instilling a sense of urgency for getting people off welfare, a system that did little more than reinforce failure. According to this recent study, however, cutting welfare rolls alone does little to confront the problems that sustain poverty. That's why the Bush administration has suggested retooling the welfare laws, with an eye toward those children trapped in the cycle of poverty and despair. Specifically, the administration is proposing to allocate $200 million a year in federal subsidies earmarked for state-run programs designed to bolster stable marriages. Additional resources would be used to empower charities and religious organizations to provide positive role models or even the expectation of success in poor neighborhoods. In short, the administration hopes to reform the welfare system by strengthening the family unit and thus affixing value, hope and meaning to a child's existence. The proposed changes are bound up in the broader concept of "compassionate conservatism," a term coined by political theorist Marvin Olasky and later popularized by the president. A brief recap: After Olansky spent much of 1999 inspecting charities and anti-poverty policy programs across the country, he conceptualized a compelling vision for reinventing the social welfare system. The gist of Olansky's vision: The government has traditionally sought to ameliorate poverty by funneling billions of dollars into public education, assisted housing and crime prevention. But "economic redistribution by itself," maintains Olansky, "cannot fight poverty effectively because it does not affect the attitudes that frequently undergird poverty." What Olansky is saying is that poverty is also a matter of brutal social conditioning: A little boy watches his mother sell drugs, or his brother join a gang. He watches his teachers succumb to frustration. All around him, he sees hope twisting inward. His own passions become stifled beneath this negative landscape that crushes all expectation of other possibilities. This rousing point forms the embryo of the proposed changes in the welfare system. And while the 1996 reforms helped cut the welfare roll and stimulate independence amongst America's underprivileged, the administration understands that there is still much work to be done. By helping families and charitable social organizations to flourish, the government can stimulate direction, inspiration and independence amongst America's underprivileged. In short, they can empower those organizations and institutions (e.g., family, church, etc.) most apt to nurture the expectation of other possibilities. Then - and only then - will the situation truly improve.
Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Armstrong Williams is a widely-syndicated columnist, CEO of the Graham Williams Group, and hosts the Armstrong Williams Show. He is the author of Beyond Blame.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Armstrong Williams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(0 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
 *
State:
 *
Zip:
 *
Phone:
       
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.