Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Ann Coulter :: Townhall.com Columnist
Jerry Falwell -- Say Hello to Ronald Reagan!
by Ann Coulter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


No man in the last century better illustrated Jesus' warning that "All men will hate you because of me" than the Rev. Jerry Falwell, who left this world on Tuesday. Separately, no man better illustrates my warning that it doesn't pay to be nice to liberals.

Falwell was a perfected Christian. He exuded Christian love for all men, hating sin while loving sinners. This is as opposed to liberals, who just love sinners. Like Christ ministering to prostitutes, Falwell regularly left the safe confines of his church to show up in such benighted venues as CNN.

He was such a good Christian that back when we used to be on TV together during Clinton's impeachment, I sometimes wanted to say to him, "Step aside, reverend -- let the mean girl handle this one." (Why, that guy probably prayed for Clinton!)

For putting Christ above everything -- even the opportunity to make a humiliating joke about Clinton -- Falwell is known as "controversial." Nothing is ever as "controversial" as yammering about Scripture as if, you know, it's the word of God or something.

From the news coverage of Falwell's death, I began to suspect his first name was "Whether You Agree With Him or Not."

Even Falwell's fans, such as evangelist Billy Graham and former President Bush, kept throwing in the "We didn't always agree" disclaimer. Did Betty Friedan or Molly Ivins get this many "I didn't always agree with" qualifiers on their deaths? And when I die, if you didn't always agree with me, would you mind keeping it to yourself?

Let me be the first to say: I ALWAYS agreed with the Rev. Falwell.

Actually, there was one small item I think Falwell got wrong regarding his statement after 9/11 that "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians -- who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle -- the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.'"

First of all, I disagreed with that statement because Falwell neglected to specifically include Teddy Kennedy and "the Reverend" Barry Lynn.

Second, Falwell later stressed that he blamed the terrorists most of all, but I think that clarification was unnecessary. The necessary clarification was to note that God was at least protecting America enough not to allow the terrorists to strike when a Democrat was in the White House.

(If you still think it isn't Christ whom liberals hate, remember: They hate Falwell even more than they hate me.)

I note that in Falwell's list of Americans he blamed for ejecting God from public life, only the gays got a qualifier. Falwell referred to gays and lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle.

No Christian minister is going to preach that homosexuality is godly behavior, but Falwell didn't add any limiting qualifications to his condemnation of feminists, the ACLU or People for the American Way.

There have always been gay people -- even in the prelapsarian '50s that Jerry Falwell and I would like to return to, when God protected America from everything but ourselves. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ann Coulter is a columnist and author of Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault On America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Ann Coulter and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Ron on Jesus
I support your right to express yourself and I am curious to hear what you think I misunderstood. I believe "Turn the other cheek" denotes nonresistance, pacifism or nonviolence.

The full phrase taken from the Sermon on the Mount in the Christian New Testament. In Jesus' Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says:
"You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you." (Matthew 5:38-42, NIV)

A parallel version is offered in the Sermon on the Plain in the Gospel of Luke:
"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you." (Luke 6:27-31. NIV)

So we have a conflict on our hands! Jesus' words are above, Ann Coulter believes we should torture people and suspend Habeas Corpus, Jerry Falwell fought for segregation, and Pat Robertson believes we should assassinate those with whom he disagrees.

Jesus said "turn the other cheek", but what he really meant was something else? Is there an interpretation where Jesus said we should insult one another? Hurt people? Please, take it away Ron...

big mick & others
thanks to the big mick for all his contemplation here. Selecting this cut:

big mick: "The obvious flip side that comes to mind is the idea that Jesus was THE MOST MORAL person who ever lived and it certainly (from a human point of view) didn't attract good fortune to him!"

The story of Jesus as it's come through the generations, has surely been co-opted, compromised, exploited, bastardized and prostituted. For example, we've had centuries of bloody plunder committed in His name, leading us even up to just a few decades ago where Nazis, or in the US, the KKK condoned terrorism and murder in the name of Jesus, with their cherry-picked interpretation of some sort of faith in His name. Many even put Bush and Cheney and their neo-con brain trust in this group, firmly in bed with the evangelical voting bloc delivered by Ted Haggard and intent on waging war against this loosely-defined "enemy" with poetic pre-test-marketed "words that work" used where the evidence and explanation should explain why we are fighting those that did not attack us, but may look like them.

Despite this, much of Jesus' message still comes through, with many more moral, decent Christians in every city and town in the US, worshipping and following His path in a way that doesn't impinge on anyone else's person, rights or property and indeed, reaches out to help those in need with charity, understanding and forgiveness. This is Jesus' message as I understand it, as but one man who has been invited to share, looking historically at all of the accounts and "gospels", though conflicting in many areas, also summarily agreeing in many as well.

Number one, Jesus was a devout anti-war, anti-aggression, anti-violent pacifist who, when asked what to do if a bad person struck him, said he would turn the other cheek. This is hard to absorb, as it has been for ages throughout civilization where we've been told on the one hand that we have to fight and kill for everything we hold dear by governments, kings and even popes, but on the other hand that God is Love and we should not raise our fists in anger, we should help the lesser among us, reject violence and turn the other cheek.

Also foremost in the Story of Jesus, agreed upon in every version told, is that Jesus' teachings did attract bad fortune - that he was beset by authorities who tried and tortured him, ultimately finding him guilty of poisoning the minds of the masses with his preaching of peace, acceptance and pacifism. This is exactly the most fundamental lesson of the Story of Jesus who was crucified on a cross to make clear his point - that he never compromised his beliefs, that he never fought back or even spoke ill of his tormentors - he willingly suffered and died to make us all aware - that one should "turn the other cheek", rather then be turned into a sinner because of the actions of another.

This message, clear as crystal, survives today as Jesus' words and deliberate actions, surely the most obvious and important thing to be taken away from His story. And people have responded to this message, spreading Jesus' teachings far and wide, preserving it for thousands of years, making His story the greatest focus of art, philosophy and religious doctrine in all of history, the content of the first book ever printed and remains the driving force behind Western civilization to this day, studied and worshiped daily.

But this has left the West in a quandary. The message of devout pacifism is directly at odds with anyone that wishes to amass wealth, to conquer one's enemies, to punish criminals, to function as our civilization always has before - ruling by might. Jesus may have been perfect, but surely we cannot be, or we'd be run roughshod over by barbarian hordes in no time! We need to defend our borders, protect our women and children, and maintain our status as the wealthiest nation on Earth.

Alas, true Christianity, or Christ-like behavior is not possible in this world. Christ and his devout followers all took a vow of poverty, renouncing material wealth, seeking only prayer, enlightenment and pursuit of the divine. Today, that would be closer to a Hare Krishna then anything else. So Americans have to forge a new version of Christ, making his teachings not literal instructions of how we should live, but more of an "ideal" that we should "lean towards" or "keep in mind" as we pursue material wealth and create the world's biggest and most expensive arsenal to obliterate anyone who would even think of competing with us.

This is where the rubber hits the road, brothers and sisters. I am not suggesting we lay down and allow those of other lands to overtake us. Just the opposite, I believe natural defense mechanisms are coded into every human being, animal and organism on the planet. Survival is as basic as life itself, and what a wonder it is to see how the many creatures of Earth have evolved (yes, evolved) and adapted to eke out their own place in their environment, developing natural poisons, camouflages or instincts to protect themselves from attackers.

This is a very personal choice, but I believe in defending oneself. I might turn the other cheek, but I would also take a few steps back. Would I take revenge? I would avoid it. But If I felt further threatened (based on solid evidence), I would take steps to protect myself and my fellow man. This is, for me, as an individual and follower of the lessons of Jesus, a personal choice and my attempt to be as Christ-like as possible while remaining true to my brethren who may look to me for security and support as I do them. This means not building up the biggest arsenal, but encouraging all sides to disarm equally and leading by example. This means not going after possible threats, but using resources to anticipate and prevent actual threats. If this brand of self-defense diverges from Christlike perfection, I accept the consequences, as do I forgive any soldier who puts the safety of his own before himself in good faith - but so critical is it that these warriors not be used as pawns in the power struggles of the elite that utmost scrutiny and forbearance must be applied to the causes of war. For one bad chess move can doom us all. Thus, I see Ehren Watada as the bravest officer in this war so far, looking to put the war itself on trial.

Specifically in terms of 9-11, I would not have attacked Iraq at all, and not gone into Afghanistan with a military force any bigger then necessary to apprehend Osama for trial in America, simultaneously building two massive covert international undercover frameworks, exercising as much patience, diligence and detective work as would be needed to infiltrate actual terror cells and compete with them, forcing their hand with maximum cooperation from and as little impact as possible on host nations while fortifying security at home.

What of Jesus then? Was he a fool? Was he a pantywaist? Absolutely not - Jesus was a martyr, using his death for the greatest purpose imaginable. To teach morality to the people for posterity. His words were recorded, his actions noted. He stood up against the untenable policies of a society corrupted by the confluence of interconnected groups whose spheres of influence overlapped government, religion, commerce, the military, and the masses. As the story goes, Jesus saw a society of people of different ethnicities, religions, nationalities and allegiances and preached of a better way for people to live, in concert and harmony with one another, in peace and brotherhood. The claims he was the Son of God, the virgin birth, and prophesies caused quite a controversy. But his words and their meanings are preserved and are clear to me - we should know what Jesus Would Do. He was a non violent protester of aggression, and protester of the same corruption and collusion we see today - he was a voice for the underrepresented, the indigent and helpless, encouraging those with means to renounce greed and love of money to help others. This is my opinion based on writings we've all seen and read, you may form your own conclusions, but everything I've seen that diverts from these simple teachings always seems to serve justification for greed and or violence.

Glaring examples include Ayn Rand and Rush Limbaugh, who speak to the "divinity" of those who pursue wealth and who "bask in God's glory" when they are blessed by riches. This is in opposition to a simple read of Christ's life as lived and words as spoken. Hard work is always commended, but it seems to me that the exponential level of wealth attained by Earls, Lords, Counts, aristocrats, robber barons or even many corporate CEOs inordinately results from moral transgressions like enslavement, colonialism, exploitation, cronyism, graft, collusion or outright theft. That wealth was amassed this way is irrefutable - it's much of the same big, old money in the same families today, still using as much leverage as can be exerted to discourage economic mobility and retain power, using tokens of charity to buy their way to self-perceived redemption. But perhaps the worst offender is Ann Coulter who aligns herself with Christians but makes a living denouncing people with negative attacks and peppery language, looks not for common ground between Americans or even Christians, but seeks to rabblerouse for war without end against an enemy without a definition. A Crusader maybe, but how is this Christ-like?

Morality is basic and universal beyond even Jesus. The overwhelming majority of orderly societies function because morality is present in it's people, whether Christian, Buddhist, Muslim or even athiest. The Golden Rule not only trumps everything else, it embraces everything else, transcending even religion to deliver morality through pure logic. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. I don't want to be killed, so I cannot kill others. I wouldn't want to be cheated so I shouldn't cheat. I wouldn't want another country to tell me who my leader must be. I wouldn't want another country going after our oil. Wrestle with this all you want. Mars is the God of War, not Jesus.

Bispy Quee, if you are truly interested in hearing my lifelong religious discoveries, I can post it elsewhere.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.