Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
Ann Coulter :: Townhall.com Columnist
What I did on my Summer vacation
by Ann Coulter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Dear Readers: I hope you're enjoying your summer so far. How I wish I could join you at the beach, by the pool, or out at the ranch clearing brush. Unfortunately my summer has been spent promoting my new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism."

If you've ever wondered what it would be like to be on tour promoting a book -- and, honestly, who hasn't? -- it's like being on a long, low-budget vacation with all of the good parts taken out. Except, of course, that I occasionally get to meet wonderful people like you who read my books, which makes it more than worthwhile.

Being on a book tour also means answering questions such as the following, which were left out of a Baltimore Sun article due to length. I hope you enjoy my responses, and look for me in fine bookstores everywhere this summer.


Q: The last time we spoke, you told me you're routinely misquoted by newspaper reporters. What are a couple of the more egregious examples? Why does this happen?

A: It happens so much, I don't even keep track of it anymore. The last one I remember was when I said "cutting the tax rate on capital gains seems to have increased tax receipts for fiscal 2006, just as supply-side economics predicted it would." It came out in the paper as, "I worship Adolf Hitler and share all of his goals, especially the 'final solution' to the 'Jewish problem.'"

I have no idea how it happens, given the strict objectivity and rigid nonpartisanship of the American media.

Q: The mainstream press is in economic trouble. Any comments on how they're reacting?

A: They are reacting with the same hysterical leftism that drove readers away in the first place.

Q: Bill Keller said The New York Times published the Swift banking story because of the public's right to know. Do you think he thinks that? Why did he publish it? What is the job description of a metro daily newspaper editor?

A: I don't like it when people ask me if I meant what I said or wrote, so I'll take him at his word and assume that he really means what he said: that anyone who reads The New York Times, including our enemies, is entitled to information about secret government programs being used to track terrorists, which means he's either (a) a complete moron or (b) a traitor.

An editor's job is to edit, which should not be confused with "to release sensitive information that can help the enemy during a war."

Q: Why is abortion sacrosanct to the left? Why have Democrats chosen this as their hill to die on? Why is evolution so important to liberals?

A: Because they basically want to depopulate the world of human beings, hence their love of abortion and their commitment to a belief system that does not distinguish men from lower beasts.

Q: Have you encountered anyone on the left who has read "Godless" carefully and was willing to debate its points with you? How'd it go? Have any critics addressed the content rationally? If so, what did you think? If not, do you find it amusing?

A: Only one: Michael Eric Dyson. The rest just want to talk about why my skirts are so short and why I'm "mean." It's almost as if my critics are avoiding the issues I write about in the book.

Q: Does Hillary Clinton have a good chance in 2008? What are her strengths and weaknesses? What did her reaction to your "Jersey girls" comments tell you about her as a potential candidate?

A: Good chance of what? Coming out of the closet? I'd say that's about even money.

Her strength is her first name; her weakness is her last.

Q: Any comments on ...

A: Joe Biden: See my remarks on Neil Kinnock.

David Gregory: The man with no principles, no credibility and no last name.

Kofi Annan: That guy? Isn't he on the ground fighting with Hezbollah?

Katie Couric: The affable Eva Braun of evening TV.

Tony Snow: Cool guy.

Tom DeLay: How does Tom "soon to be acquitted and re-elected" DeLay grab you?

Rush Limbaugh: First runner-up for Mount Rushmore.

Joe Wilson: You mean Valerie Plame's clueless hubby? Whatever happened to that moron?

Dan Rather: Reports of his contrition are greatly exaggerated.

Cynthia McKinney: One of the most intelligent Democrats in the country.

Q: Any other wild, hippie-esque practices we should know about?

A: You mean other than the fact that I live in a filthy van with a dog, a gentleman I refer to as "my old man" and our daughter "Diversity Seagull," and we make our living weaving hemp baskets? No, not really.

Q: How would your career be different if you looked like Molly Ivins?

A: I'd be a lot uglier.

Q: Now that the "Slander/Treason/Godless" trilogy is finished, what's your next big project?

A: Finishing this interview. What are you, writing a book or something?

COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Ann Coulter is a columnist and author of Guilty: Liberal Victims and Their Assault On America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Ann Coulter and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Ann
Looking forward to reading "Godless" a second time through when I hit the beach for vacation in less than three weeks.

Don't keep the faith, share it!

Just finished reading Godless. I can't believe the only liberal response was with respect to the 9/11 widows. True to form, they try to distract when they can't offer a decent rebuttal. Keep up the good work. Somebody has to point out the liberal agenda before the masses get brainwashed.

She's the best!
Ann Coulter is the best by far! Intelligent, accurate, informing, consistent, and hysterically funny! We love you Ann. Can't wait for the next one.

Cutter and All
Wanted to say thanks for complimenting my patience with WWJD??, but that patience is running out.

I have spent hours pouring over court cases and FISA law explaining in excruciating detail on how Bush did not follow FISA, but did not break the law either. WWJD does not seem to able to understand how that is possible, so I have had to go into judicial review, separation of powers, and using federal court precedent in the application of law.
Fun stuff.

This has brought up little tidbits like being told to “read the law!” when I explained that US citizens are not exempt from warrantless wiretaps under FISA. WWJD insisted they were not under the definition of “foreign agent” and posted an excerpt from FISA. I posted the full text of the definition, and literally the next line after the text he/she posted disputed her claim. Whee!

Couple that with a steady barrage of innuendo (an insinuation that Bush is using the NSA to spy on his political enemies), debunked Michael Moore myths (Bush allowed the Bin Laden Families to leave before the airports opened after 9/11), un-provable opinions stated as fact (Bush is clueless), and Democratic Party campaign sound-bites (“Culture of Corruption”) has made it quite a different debate than I thought it would be when I agreed to it. It’s been frustrating to say the least.

We haven’t even fully gotten into Iraq. Just thinking about it makes my head hurt.

But, under the theory that it would be more fun to read than it is to write, here is the link for anyone interested:

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=110433&forum_id=4

To Ann's Critics
To our beloved 5th grade teacher, Presbyterian minister and/or other Moon Bat participants at the Town Hall BLOG for Ann – in Honor of our 5th Grade Teacher I submit to you my premise, facts/research and opinion/editorial as to why you all get apoplectic every time Ann takes a breath.

PREMISE(S): Femininism is a liberal manipulation tool and exists solely to promote leftist ideals. Feminism does not exist to actually advance the role and societal standing of woman but only to empower poltical elitists who place aquisition of power above all else.

FACTS/RESEARCH: To the astute you will notice most info is from anncoulter.org and wikipedia.org. Don’t be childish and try to slam me because of my sources, either factually rebuke this information or shut-up and move on.

Academic and Scholastic Success
“… Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.” This is a level of academic and scholastic success that very few people, man or woman, ever achieve. I would guess that Ann is in at least the top five percent in terms education and academic achievement.

Professional Success
Legal Profession
“Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates. Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates” How many attorneys in the US have that kind of resume????

Literary Profession
Five books written, five New York Times bestsellers: 1. Godless: The Church of Liberalism, 2. How to Talk to a Liberal, 3. Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, 4. Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, 5. High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton How many authors have written 5 NYT best sellers? How many authors can say that every book they have written and published become a NYT best seller? Coulter's weekly syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate is printed in more than 100 newspapers nationwide, and linked to by many web sites including Frontpagemag.com , Townhall.com, WorldnetDaily.com, JewishWorldReview.com etc.

Television/Film Success
Former legal correspondent on MSNBC. Movie credits 1. Feeding the Beast, 2. FahrenHYPE 9/11, 3. Is It True what They Say About Ann?, 4. The Greatest American, a four-part interactive television event for the Discovery Channel hosted by Matt Lauer. Ann is a frequent guest on TV shows such as The Today Show, The Tonight Show, Hannity and Colmes, The O'Reilly Factor, The Daily Show, American Morning, Crossfire, Real Time, Politically Incorrect, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's the fifth estate, Wolf Blitzer Reports, At Large With Geraldo Rivera, Scarborough Country, HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher and Good Morning America.

Political Success.
There isn’t enough disk space on Townhall.com servers to comprehensively review and detail the breadth and impact Ann’s political influence on American politics. The fact that every one of her columns generates 70+ posts on townhall.com is proof enough. Ann was leading the charge against Harriet Meyers and for a true judicial conservative and what happened – Meyers withdrew and Alito was nominated and confirmed. Ann is leading the charge for border security and true immigration reform and what is happening – GOP immigration policy is aligning with what Ann has being advocating all along. How many political pundits can claim that one of the two major political parties changed direction and aligned with their views/philosophy?

OPINION/EDITORIAL
In terms of educational success, professional success, financial success and cultural and political influence Ann is everything feminists having been idealizing for the last 40 years. Ann is her own woman and has achieved everything on her own as opposed to say the feminist icon serving as a Senator for New York State.

Ann causes much anxiety and insecurity for liberal women because Ann is the real-life manifestation of everything they wish they could be (well almost all - Ann is heterosexual and very beautiful and these aren’t liberal, feminine ideals.) In Ann’s case feminism and liberalism are at odds therefore Ann’s existence proves the point that feminism exists solely to promote liberalism; ideologically a feminist can’t be a conservative. Another mitigating factor is Ann’s unapologetic faith and statements as a Christian. Judeo-Christian belief is incompatible with feminist philosophy. Apparently religious freedom and independent religious thought aren’t feminist ideals either.

I have heard said that Bill Clinton’s presidency proved that feminism is a sham, Ann’s existence proves the same point, diametrically so.

EpsilonDao - don't throw pearls to pigs
“I have spent hours … WWJD does not seem to able to understand.” DJWW’s intent here is not to learn, reason, understand etc but to influence and distract.

You’re dealing with an entity (probably not a single person) that is emotionally bound to positions which are not true and that entity is trying to fit logic and reason to the lies that it advocates.

Correction to post "To Ann's Critics"
So many facts and accomplishments to list for Ann, to little time!!!

Correction to the paragraph "Legal Profession" in my previous post “To Ann's Critics." The corrected paragraph:

“Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates. After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.”

This information is verbatium from anncoulter.org and matches the information reported at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter, http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/archive.shtml., http://us.imdb.com/name/nm1326010/bio,
http://www.amuniversal.com/ups/features/ann_coulter/bio.htm,
http://www.cblpi.org/programs/bio.cfm?ID=15&Type=Speaker and
http://www.humanevents.com/about-editors.php just name a few, factual resources.

Another Ann tidbit for the moon bats
Go to www.time.com and search on "Ann Coulter" and see what you get??? A minimum of 52 hits and that awesome photo of Ann gracing the cover of Time; what an absolutely, stunningly beautiful woman. Apply all the make-up, lighting, botox, cosmetic surgery and photo editing in the world and Hillary still wouldn’t be half as attractive as the bottom side of Ann’s left foot!

I can now sympathize just a little for the liberal moon bat Ann haters. It must be depressing to see Ann so thoroughly dominate a liberal stalwart like Time magazine.

Cutter - Spot On Again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonbat

EpsilonDao -- Wordy Writers Just Deflect

The answer to your quandary is in your explanation. I followed one minor thread; from my original post to WWJD's ultimate interpretation, then wrote my conclusion. I posted it in "Liberals: Born to Run" under the name, "Woo Woo Jape Dew" in honor of WWJD.

They are deconstructing. It's not about intellectual honesty, nor for that mater do their arguments have any moral bearing. WWJD posted six points for US to follow, NOT them. Even in THEIR explanation, of THEIR points, THEY broke them – THEIR points. They wrote much but communicated little.

Should you however, wish to continue "educating" WWJD, I would suggest you follow the logic one uses to "swallow an elephant."

Unbelievable
I have read all of Ann's stuff (I'm sure her shopping list contains more wit and insight than anything Franken or Moore has ever spoken or published).

It did amaze me that concerning her book, "Godless" - a book that literally contains 100s of negative (although accurate) statements about liberals - the only liberal complaint was to a couple sentences!

Keep going Ann, and never mind Rush...we will put you on Rushmore - legs and all!

Ann
You and your sycophants are too busy rallying around your half-ass witticisms and the shallowness of appearances to realize that society is evolving and this is your last stand. I'm sorry your love for Hillary will stay unrequited despite your fantasy about her sexual orientation. Oh, and that was so funny when Adam Carolla hung up on you. Oh, and another thing, you came off as such an ass on Beliefnet.com....what a great interview.

Love ya babe.

AnnHader

This morning I happened to muse about President George W. Bush's enemies and how they are cogent testimony as to the content of his character. In other words, when I look at who his detractors are I'm convinced all the more of his nobleness and equanimity.

That duly noted. A person like you can do more to reinforce our support for Ann Coulter (Author extraordinaire) than 1,000 "sycophants'" praises. Keep spewing... your bile speaks volumes.

Gotta luv that liberal deep-thought
AnnHader

You actually posted a comment citing Adam Carolla (a high school drop-out) as a source of inspiration for you?!?! Why do I not find it hard to believe that within two sentences you are also babbling about the sexual orientation of Ann, Hillary and a fantasy? Do you also turn to Howard Stern for life’s answers? I bet Dr Ruth is the epitome of deep thought and self actualization for you.

Hint: when you use the phrase “half-@#$ witticisms” to counter opposing political and ideological philosophy, you are the dimwit.

I made a posting discussing how Ann is such a threat to feminism and its underlying liberal intent hence the insane, personal attacks against Ann by her opponents. Thanks for also making the same point regarding underachieving, boorish, impotent slobs.


I'm not a they!
"They are deconstructing. It's not about intellectual honesty, nor for that mater do their arguments have any moral bearing."

I am deconstructing, I am deliberately pointing out media manipulation, spelled out for anyone that cares to read my post. The above column seeems to be a "best of" but the previous article, for anyone that would like to see, is an example of how Ann exploited a list of tragedies committed by one entity, describing each successive tragedy with ratcheting drama, cresecendoing towards the present to build ire in her more rabid reader.

Yet, as you can plainly see, her opening premise was something unrelated, and her closing "call to action" had still another theme. We have been treated by Miss Coulter to three disparate elements, the first being the "slime" where a tiny portion of an interview or speech was excised and ridiculed, and her closing assertion was a venomous condemnation of every single Democrat. Think what you will. But if you want to speak of intellectual honesty, explain in full honesty why this writer is your inspiration. And before wagging the 'moral bearing' finger, explain why you think it is acceptable to name call and insult people in a public arena? Is this how we should interact and teach those younger then us to be?

"Should you however, wish to continue "educating" WWJD, I would suggest you follow the logic one uses to "swallow an elephant.""

Very poetic. You ARE educating me.

Reaganite: You want me to grade that??
Your overflowing enthusiasm for Ann as folk hero garners you #1 fan status, good going. But your editorial was disjointed, with the aim stated promising you were going to demonstrate:

"Femininism is a liberal manipulation tool and exists solely to promote leftist ideals... [it] does not exist to actually advance the role and societal standing of woman but only to empower poltical elitists who place aquisition of power above all else."

In the body of your piece I saw no research or citations that document a single example of any liberals manipulating anything, nor proof of any empowerment of any political elitists. You instead listed Ann Coulters' acccomplishments, almost in resume format.

This would necessitate an introductory premise more like "Ann Coulter is the most dynamic woman in media today and I can prove it".

If Ann's great achievements somehow at odds with Feminism, you needed to state how the two ideas are related. For example, cite her views or a few quotes on Feminism espusing her sentiments.

If Ann's example is supposed to "advance the role and societal standing of woman", you left out how that has been measured or noted.

Your conclusion however, brashly generalizes how ALL liberals or feminists are jealous of Ann. I respect your right to state so, as it is clear how longingly you worship your idol, but such an absolute is impossible to prove and easy to disprove (see AnnHader above as an example). Maybe you should use "some" liberals there...

Just So No To Double Speak
Wow DJWW you really are consumed with jealousy and envy regarding Ann. Thanks for proving my point. DJWW, figuratively speaking, take a hike. I tired of you when you refused to accept the elementary challenge I issued to you a couple of A.C columns ago. I try to avoid circular arguments conducted in an alternate universe with those who have no sense of reality and no recollection of what they have said/stated previously.

You should start a dialogue with AnnHader. Maybe you two (or 3, or 4 etc) could put together a series on the “Applying the Wit and Wisdom of Adam Carolla to Life’s Questions” for your 5th grade class. Move over Confucius!!

Cutter and EpsilonDao - your advice pls
Wise Consul I submit to you a quandary and seek you advice on how to proceed.

DJWW has surfaced for air and now and seeks to reestablish dialogue with me. This after DJWW ignored and/or obfuscated prior challenges I and many others have issued to DJWW. Does the Wise Consul advise that I spend the most precious resource on earth (one’s time) engaging DJWW yet again?

PS – one must endure much indigestion, heart burn, flatulence, food poisoning and ingest many parasites in order to eat a whole elephant, and, it doesn’t taste as good as chicken.

Wisdom Warrants Judicious Discretion

Reaganite:

One swallows an elephant, "One bite at a time."

Wascally Wordsmiths' Joyfully Disparaging remarks are circuitous, convoluted and copious in scope. Writes much, communicates little. Verbiage takes the place of content and lends itself to obfuscation.

My advice... One point at a time and no more, think of it as a duel... and aim well.

To reaganite: Just so no?
I think you misread my last post to you - it had no criticisms of Ann positive or negative, it merely pointed out that the body of your essay didn't support your stated premise or conclusion.

Liberal/Conservative arguments aside, I think we all need to pay attention to the basic structure of forming a written argument, whether reading or writing one. If we allow and excuse poorly formed arguments, we lose vital understanding at the heart of issues and are more and more susceptible to manipulations, both from the left and the right.

I hope that as the elections near we can be more mindful of this because the more we stray from sound argument building, the more vulnerable we are to be influenced by a writer's will rather then the available facts and research at the heart of an issue.

I understand you feel that I am somehow "consumed with jealousy and envy regarding Ann", I was wondering which of my statements demonstrated this to you because I cannot make the correlation. Is this idea a product of your will or based on something I said?

If you just do not like what I'm saying, feel free to ignore my posts. This should be obvious!

NRAlifer

One thing worse that comes to mind, for me at least, is to not have the ability to freely express ourselves on the blogs.

That duly noted, when posts are longer than the original column, one might reasonably conclude the offending blogger is just a "wee" bit full of them self. I actually printed 8 pages from a single post -- posted by a self-proclaimed tree hugger -- to one of Ann’s earlier columns. As infuriating as, long winded, verbose, circuitous posts may be, thank God we all have the freedom to express ourselves in this great land, The United States of America.

Besides, if you don’t take them (blogogargantuous) too seriously (or at least, no where near as seriously as they take themselves) they can actually prove to be quite entertaining. Just a thought…
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.