Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Amy Menefee :: Townhall.com Columnist
Americans on Health Care: The Bad, the Ugly and … the Good?
by Amy Menefee
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


As Americans reflect on their blessings this Thanksgiving, will they count the U.S. health care system among them?

Politicians, the media, and probably most people would say no. But if we alter the question, directing it toward the individual and away from the system, the answer changes drastically.

A startling majority of Americans – 77 percent – said the quality of their own health care was “excellent” or “good” in a recent study.

The Council for Excellence in Government, in coordination with the Institute of Medicine, Accenture and Gallup, conducted the study to find out what real Americans think about health care. “The American Public on Health Care: The Missing Perspective” was released in October.

The “missing perspective,” indeed.

Though we hear of nothing but a “broken” system in need of an overhaul, a lot of people seem to favor that overhaul for the benefit of others.

Another survey, in March 2008 by the Harvard School of Public Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, revealed a combined 82 percent rating their own medical care “excellent” or “good,” for those who had received care in the past year.

What politician can claim approval ratings in the high 70s to lower 80s?

That doesn’t mean the vast majority of people love the structure of the U.S. system. But it does highlight something missing in our dialogue: Americans are saying they’re receiving good health care. Elected officials focused on reform should find out why. The aspects of care that people like are the ones we should keep if we’re going to have an overhaul.

Unfortunately, “The Missing Perspective” didn’t report why people felt positively about their care. It could have been people’s doctors, nurses, access to care, recovery from disease – we don’t know. That data point was overshadowed by an emphasis on survey respondents’ concerns and desires for the future, as expected for an election-focused release.

So let’s take a look at what the people want.

They favor portable health insurance policies. A full 78 percent said they want to be able to take their coverage with them from job to job. With one in four Americans changing jobs every year, this is necessary to modernize insurance and health care delivery.

Americans want price transparency and competition in the health sector. They said they wanted to see performance ratings for doctors and hospitals as well as openly published prices for health services – both tools that would allow the patient to compare and choose. We have these for other service industries, including hotels and restaurants. The Internet makes it quick and easy for people to report and rate their experiences, or to compare costs before selecting a provider.

A majority – 71 percent – also said they want competition in the insurance market. Specifically, they want to be able to buy coverage across state lines. Ballooning numbers of coverage mandates have driven up the cost of care and trapped consumers, who are required to purchase policies in their own states. The latest statistics from eHealth, Inc., which operates eHealthInsurance.com, show average monthly premiums in 2007 for individual insurance plans ranging from $83 in North Dakota to $388 for New York residents. That’s a difference of $3,660 per year.

As one might guess, the study showed most Americans are enthusiastic about covering the uninsured, and many agree with getting the government involved in that process. But that enthusiasm vanished when higher taxes were mentioned.

A resounding 57 percent said no, they would not be “willing to pay more in taxes to cover the uninsured.” That finding jibed with a September survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health, where a total of 57 percent said it was “most important” or “very important” that a new “health care proposal not raise taxes.”

The Council for Excellence in Government took note of a bias against government control.

“It’s noteworthy that one proposal for expanding coverage for the uninsured – allowing anyone to buy Medicare coverage at group rates, regardless of age – gets significantly less strong agreement than any other policy prescription surveyed,” the CEG study said. “This is consistent with Gallup poll results over many years which show that the public has a preference for maintaining a system based on private insurance rather than a government-run health care system.”

The American people are demanding competition and patient control of their health care. They want private insurance options, and they don’t want tax hikes. The new Congress must listen. And before embarking on a massive overhaul, elected officials also must learn what people like about their care, instead of insisting that everything is broken.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Amy Menefee is Director of Communications for Americans for Prosperity.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Amy Menefee's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I wonder
if the 43% that favor a tax hike to pay for health care coverage how many of them actually pay any taxes. In what income brackets did the 57% that opposed tax increases fall into?

God Bless and Protect - American Warrior
The American Warrior is someone who is walking the hero's path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness for Duty, Honor and Country.

The American Warrior is someone who frightens many people because they live in denial of reality, the American Warrior reminds those people that violence exists in the world.

The American Warrior has the capacity for violence towards those who threaten America and the American way of life.

The American Warrior is a constant reminder that there are terrorists in the land and those that wish to destroy America are already here on American soil.

The American Warrior on September 11, 2001, rushed towards the danger instead of fleeing from it, intent on defending and helping those American citizens in danger. Many American Warriors gave their lives that day and many more were willing to give the ultimate sacrifice for America and its citizens.

Most Americans are glad that they were not on the planes that crashed into the WTC and the Pentagon - the American Warrior wished they had been on those planes because they might have made a difference.

American Warriors were on United Airlines Flight 93 and defended unto death America and its citizens with the cry "lets roll".

The American Warrior waits for the day that they have lived for and trained for their entire life - to defend until death, America and its citizens.

"There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edmund Burke

This Thanksgiving, I salute the American Warrior, both living and dead. Men and women who serve in the Armed Forces, Police Forces, Fire Departments and ordinary civilians who rush forward to our defense instead of running from danger.

The American Warrior - God Bless and Protect You!

Why Is Medical Care So High?
Lawsuits, greedy doctors & government controls.

Great System
Our health care is wonderful. If diagnosed with a problem it can be normally corrected quickly. The problems, Lawsuits cause doctors to request unnecessary and expensive test, government sponsored programs that pay so little that doctors can't cover their cost so they charge us more to make up the difference. Finally the government screwed up social security, do we need to let them give our health care the old college try?

I wonder too
if those yawping for 'universal' health care realize that such regulation will inevitably result in their own care being rationed out or even denied strictly on the basis of cost, and eventually simply on the perceived quality of life-age being a defining factor. I rather suspect that like many immature people, they have a false sense of their own invulnerability to the reality of what they'd impose on us all in order to feel secure in their own minds.


Costs are high
not just because of "greed". Canada and England established their health care in the 50's when we did not have the technology and medications available today. Now,to cover costs, they cannot finance their systems without rationing care and setting compensation for health care workers.

My husband has had excellent healthcare allowing him to survive 3 heart attacks, beginning in his 30's, along with bypass surgery 31 years ago plus angioplasty numerous times. He is now 70. Under a single payer system, he would not be alive today and even now, should we have such a system, he would not be eligible for further care.

Facts and logic do not get in the way...
In reality, facts and logic do not get in the way of liberal politicians! I wonder if they would recognize a fact or logic if it bit them in the behind! Ha!

HAPPY THANKSGIVING - everyone!

I wonder
I wonder! ME TOO! But the liberal politicians surely will not let these facts get in their way!

Ignorance reigns
The US does ration health care ... 47 million are uninsured and go without care. Americans have given up control of their own care and turned it over to corporations that deny and ration care to pay employees to figure out how to deny care, increase profits and pay executive enormous sums. "Conservatives" deny the reality of what's known as "adverse selection" that absolutely assures the failure of privatized health insurance ... google "Market Failures: Health Insurance". On a major reason why there are extremes of wealth, google "Wealth Happens" "path dependence".

Health care is expensive.
I do not understand why people expect health care to be cheap. We desire the best and brightest to be our doctors and shouldn't they be well compensated? Are nurses, assistants and technicians overpaid? Don't we like going to see our doctors and have our tests done at modern state of the art facilities (without waiting for months)? What would we want to give up to reduce the cost of health care. I am sure there are things that can be done to make the business side of health care less expensive, but how much cheaper? If anything, more government involvement can only add to the cost. The government does not do anything cheap. Even the military, which is the best in the world, is neither efficient nor cheap.

Bob in Co.
You are quoteing a statistic that isn't so and has been debunked before. First, 47 million are not uninsured when you factor out those who do not pay health premiums or those who elected to drop paid health insurance so they can gain public coverage (medicaid or a state equivalent). Studies I've seen then indicate that perhaps 15% are truely uninsured. But to further cloud the issue, in my state NO ONE can be denied hospital care because they are uninsured or poor. In fact, one of our hospitals has a sliding scale for HCAP which provides "steps" 4 times the federal poverty level for individuals and family units up to 8 persons. Federal poverty level of 10,400 for a single person is 41,600 for financial assistance, for a family of 8 FPL is 35,600 but you can have an income of 142,400 and qualify for assistance...trust me some folks take advantage of this system and I would guess in your state it would be the same...but the key points are 1) if your income is below FPL its free, 2)it does not give you access to "daily" health care professionals. You have to be hospitalized...and thats what people want, a full time, taxpayer funded PCP available on call..My feelings on that are simple...go out and work for it.

The easy way to do it

The way to reduce Health Care costs is simple. Just eliminate all insurance companies, their buildings, computers, and employees, and get rid of all Government paper-pushers in the health care system.

Give every qualified doctor, hospital, and pharmacy a special computer program, and a blank checkbook so they can write a check each evening for all the services they provided that day.

Make it a Capital Crime to mess with the computer program, and for any lawyer who even talks to a patient, and carry out that punishment within 30 days.

If the doctor makes a mistake, so what, you are most likely there because you made a mistake. If the doctor commits a crime, that’s the problem for the government to punish, not a lawyer who promises a check for the patient.

If you don't trust your doctor, buy your own insurance policy, that will pay if the doctor makes a mistake. He's human, and you are there most likely because you made a mistake.

Just hire a bunch of auditors to randomly check and made sure they aren’t stealing any more than is being stolen today. And on and on.

And I bet the cost would be cut in half.

Cost
The bottom line is that American health care consumes 17% of our total economic output, and the rest of the world consumes less than 10%. We are paying $2.3 trillion for health care, which has increased 5X as much as income for the middle class over the last 7 years. We are paying too much for too little. It would be easy to claim that our system is better, yet in most cases we do not live as long as others with far less health care costs, and we find that much of the cost is back loaded to the last few years of peoples lives - when quality is poorest. Just as business cannot remain competitive in a world economy given our current corporate tax rate, the cost of health care also makes the US uncompetitive in a global economy. An extra 8% off the top cannot be sustained, save through the continued loss of manufacturing over seas.

And this is what that the author does not add into our direct cost of health care.

Define the problem correctly
10% of Americans consume 90% of healthcare in this country. Private insurance companies do everything legal and nearly-legal to keep that 10% off of their plans; or, if they are on their plans, to deny them the care they need to maintain life and health. What to do? That 10% of Americans run through all of their money, then become part of the 50% of all individuals declaring bankruptcy.

Any solution to the health care crisis existing in America today has to provide for that 10% of Americans. (Or are we content to label them useless eaters and attend their funeral?)

The Republican solution makes it easier for private health insurance companies to dump the sick onto the public system. The Democratic solution includes the provision that all individuals in a plan pay the same cost ... no more charging those with diabetes higher premiums for health insurance than those who are healthy.

OH, and by the way, 45 million American citizens do not have health insurance today; and, if they get health insurance next month, any diseases they are diagnosed with will be labelled by the health insurance company as "pre-existing condition" and coverage for the treatment of same DENIED.

Do we really want to maintain a system of the best health care .... for those with money? And nothing for those without money?

GeorgiaGal
Hate to burst your bubble, but NOBODY in this country is denied care who needs it. Rationing happens only to the extent that Medicare or Medicaid or private insurance doesn't pay for every little thing. Doesn't that set red flags waving at all-if Gov't 'healthcare' won't cover everything now for the 'poor' and the aged, and is a confusing labyrinth of regulations, stipulations and qualifications besides, why would you assume that would change just because it's forced on the rest of us? Hello? Further, most of those who aren't insured are either between jobs, haven't been employed long enough to sign on to the company plan, or simply do not feel they need insurance.

Clearly you, like other liberal Democrats, prefer the Government force us *all* to submit to YOUR idea of charity and assistance: By God, you are GOING to have health insurance for your own good and you are GOING to pay because SOME people are not insured and we just can't have that! Where is the freedom to choose in this instance that you libs are otherwise so het up about? How's about YOU pool YOUR money along with that of your like-minded fellows and pay for the non-insured's healthcare YOURSELVES? What a concept-this wouldn't be any different from the way insurance companies work now and is just as voluntary as having insurance, but hey, you can pat yourself on the back for being so 'compassionate'!


AliveInHim, You MISSED THE POINT
You state,
"NOBODY in this country is denied care who needs it."
That is 'SICK CARE,' NOT HEALTH CARE, and is the MOST EXPENSIVE.

Just as with your automobile GOOD PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE is the key to good service at a much reduced overall cost, from more miles per gallon to longer tire life.

Health care offers the same, as it benefits ALL AMERICA, from business to the private sector.

The FREE-MARKET balance sheet DOESN'T belong in the HEALTH CARE of AMERICA.



Liberals' Rules
- If it's worth fighting for, it's worth fighting dirty for.

- Don't lie, cheat or steal...unnecessarily.

- There is always one more son of a gun than you counted on.

- An honest answer can get you into a lot of trouble.

- The facts, although interesting, are irrelevant.

- Chicken Little only has to be right once.

- "NO" is only an interim response.

- You can't kill a bad idea.

- If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you ever tried.

- The truth is a variable.

- A porcupine with his quills down in just another fat rodent.

- You can agree with any concept or notional future option, in principle, but fight implementation every step of the way.

- A promise is not a guarantee.

- If you can't counter the argument, leave the meeting.


Lower medical costs
People do not seem to understand either that if you use alternative medicine that most times it is less expensive than conventional medicine, but it is not covered by insurance.

I believe that the insurance companies are in the pocket of the drug companies as they do not want you to use natural medicines that can cure your illnesses. They want to keep you addicted to their drugs which in most times are worse than being sick.

We need to change the fda too as they do not really protect us anyway. Look at the drugs they have approved, they add to your health problems more than help. Also look at the way they go after natural medicine, it is a shame that people look to them to protect us yet they are not. You can go the fda website and look up what they say about using supplements.

We need to change our attitudes about health care and get back to basics.

Do you realize that you can give your kids a teaspoon of honey and it will be better for them than cough syrup? Only do not give it to kids under a year old. Honey does a good job of soothing your throat even when it is sore.

My point is we need to get back to that way of medicine as we are slowly being poisoned.

It would bring down the cost as it does not cost much to go buy honey or supplements.

penny

Sloppy language ==> bad thinking
I'm exasperated at the continual breast-beating over our health care "system." To me, this language implies that the way we do health care in the U.S. is based on someone's plan and the "someone" did a bad job.

Well, I'm by no means an across-the-board libertarian, but referring to health care as a "system" makes no more sense to me than would, for example, talking about how we get toothpaste from our "toothpaste supply system." In fact, toothpaste supply is a **market** and health care is, too.

The language is important, because the current stress on "the broken system" seems to have infantilized Americans into the notion that their health is the government's responsibility. That way lies madness -- along with dysfunction and enormous waste, as has been pointed out by Thomas Sowell and Richard Epstein.

It seems to me the most sensible thing we could do as a matter of public policy would be to end the business expense deduction for health insurance. People willing to look ahead would, thus, shop for their own insurance, and nobody would feel bound to a job for the sake of retaining insurance. (Perhaps premiums paid for health insurance should then be deductible against gross income starting with the first dollar.)

Oh, and repeal EMTALA!




Congress health care experts???
We have superior health care provided in the U.S. We have state of the art medical equipment with advanced technology. We also are blessed with phenomenal specialists (physicians) in America.
I agree with Amy that the Democratic congress need to heed and listen to the American people and what they want and need as far as coverage and having options not taking them away. This is vitally important especially since they are pushing to overhaul(nationalize) our health care system.
I just read an article from an Internet site called "The Hill" and the journalist wrote how the Democratic congress is wanting to cut 15 billion dollars from these subsidiaries(private insurances) that Medicare reimburses them because it is too costly and they feel it is excessive. The could cause the private insurances to abandon Medicare recipients which are 10 million seniors. Who is giving congress the authority to do these dastardly acts???

Let's be honest
Healthcare and insurance is expensive because:
- people expect insurance to pay for everything, even a routine office visit
- states mandates different things that must be covered under insurance policies instead of leaving choice to the consumer
- Employer-provided insurance means no shopping around for the best policy by individuals
- lawsuits have created six-figure malpractice insurance premiums for doctors
- insurance cannot be bought across state lines

I wish I were able to shop for my own high-deductible policy that covered major medical expenses and not things I don't want/need and get the tax benefit my employer receives. I can guarantee you I would shop for the best covered to fit my needs.

And when the time comes and I need expensive procedures, I certainly want to be able to pay for it with my own money and insurance and not wait for months on a government doctor like in Canada or the UK.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.