Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Amanda Carpenter :: Townhall.com Columnist
Bipartisan Plea to Commute Sentence of Border Agents
by Amanda Carpenter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) and Sen. Dianna Feinstein (D.-Calif.) sent a letter to President Bush Wednesday asking him to commute the sentences of former U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean.

The agents were sentenced last year to 11 and 12 years in prison, respectively, for non-fatally wounding a Mexican national named Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila, who was smuggling 743 pounds of marijuana across the border. The agents fired shots at Davila after he refused to obey their commands to stop and was running away from them.

On July 18, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing, chaired by Feinstein instead in place of Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D.-Vt.), to examine the prosecution of the Ramos and Compean. In their letter to President Bush the next day, Feinstein and Leahy wrote, “That hearing confirmed the concerns raised by many members of the public: that this penalty levied on these Agents is excessive and that they deserve the immediate exercise of your Executive clemency powers.”

In the House, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R.-Calif.) and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R.-Calif.) are sponsoring a resolution to issue a congressional pardon for the Agents. Hunter, who is running for the GOP’s nomination for President, said the sentencing was “the most severe injustice [he has] ever seen for a Border Patrol Agent or any other uniformed officer.” Their resolution has 100 cosponsors.

In an interview with CNS News, Rohrabacher said Feinstein’s support for a commutation was a “turning point in the battle for justice for Ramos and Compean.”

“When Sen. Feinstein, being a Democrat and such a powerful member of the Senate, gets involved, it is a signal to other Democrats that this is not a partisan issue on the part of Republicans, and it isn't about illegal immigration,” Rohrabacher said. “It's about justice for these two men."

The letter Cornyn and Feinstein sent to President Bush on July 18 is below:

Dear President Bush:

On October 19th of last year, former Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean were sentenced to 11 years and 1 day, and 12 years, respectively, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas for the events surrounding their attempt to apprehend a drug trafficker who was delivering 743 pounds of marijuana valued at $1.2 million.

Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a fact-finding hearing on this case. That hearing confirmed the concerns raised by many members of the public: that this penalty levied on these Agents is excessive and that they deserve the immediate exercise of your Executive clemency powers.

We believe that this is a case of prosecutorial overreaching, and to allow Agents Ramos and Compean to serve over a decade in prison would represent a serious miscarriage of justice.

Apart from the legal issues pending on appeal, the hearing highlighted the many additional irregularities in this prosecution which warrant clemency, including:Aldrete-Davila, the star witness, was transporting an enormous quantity of drugs when Agents Ramos and Compean tried to apprehend him, Aldrete-Davila tried to flee from the border agents three times, got into a physical altercation with one of the agents and subsequently lied when first asked about the events;

Aldrete-Davila selectively provided information to prosecutors, and refused to reveal his drug source, and he even refused to provide the names of his friends who had considered forming a “hunting party” in Mexico to randomly shoot border patrol agents in revenge for his injuries. This was a direct breach of Aldrete-Davila’s immunity agreement and jeopardized the lives of front line border patrol agents.

Despite the fact that this incident occurred while Aldrete-Davila was transporting 743 pounds of marijuana, the prosecution gave him a border crossing pass that allowed him to enter the U.S. legally, without notifying U.S. authorities and without supervision;

There is evidence that while using this pass Aldrete-Davila entered the United States on 10 occasions in the eight months, and on at least one occasion he was wholly unsupervised;

There is evidence that during one of these crossings Aldrete-Davila entered the United States and again transported a large quantity of marijuana – perhaps as much as 750 pounds;

There is evidence that this second transportation of drugs occurred on the eve of his admission to a United States Military hospital for treatment that the prosecutor specially arranged. If true, this means he used his immunity to further harm the United States – yet nothing was done to revoke his immunity and prosecutors continued to treat him as a “victim”;

We know that the jury was barred from hearing any evidence about Aldrete-Davila’s second drug load and instead, the prosecutor was able to argue in closing statements that Aldrete-Davila had run from border agents just because he wanted to get home.

In addition, the prosecutors chose to charge the agents under 18 U.S.C. 924(c) despite the fact that such a charge carries a 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, despite the fact that an early evaluation of the case lead prosecutors to offer plea deals that would have produce much lower sentences, and despite the fact that Section 924(c) should be used as an enhancing charge against drug dealers and individuals who commit violent crimes;

The prosecutors brought 12 counts against Agents Ramos and Compean; there was not a need to add the 924(c) firearms offense.

These were Border Patrol Agents in good standing before this event, with no criminal records.

Finally, even U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton has conceded that concerns about the fairness of the sentence are legitimate.

Given these facts, we believe clemency is warranted for Agents Ramos and Compean. Agents Ramos and Compean have now been in prison for more than six months. Agent Ramos has been physically assaulted while serving his term and the Agents’ request to remain out of prison while their appeal was pending was denied by the Fifth Circuit. Both agents will remain incarcerated for many more months, even if their conviction is ultimately thrown out – unless action is taken quickly.

While this case has generated strong emotions on both sides, we do not believe that justice will be served by Agents Ramos and Compean spending over a decade in prison. We urge you to commute their prison sentences immediately.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Amanda Carpenter is the author of “The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Clinton,” published in October 2006.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Amanda Carpernter. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Impeach Bush
This whole case here is an inditment against Bush, his administration and this rouge prosecutor.

First we need to revoke immunity for this drug thug and nail his tail to the wall. He is not a citizen and has no rights at all.

Next this prosecutor needs to be removed from his position and arrested.

Bush then needs to be impeached for failing to protect our borders (which is one of the legit and primary functions of our government) and knowingly allow such thugs to come into this country as the dealer in this case and who knows how many others.

After Bush has been impeached from office and removed like the scum he is, lets deport his butt to Mexico so he can be with his buddies.

Bush is moving up to #4 on the worst ever presidents list. He still has a ways to go before edging up on #3 with LBJ... but I am sure he will try.

FYI FDR is way ahead by far at #1 worst followed by Carter at #2.

Prosecutorial overreach?
I think it was more like prosecutorial abuse. I believe Johnny Sutton should be fired. To make a deal with a known drug dealer, and to virtually hand him a "get out of jail free" card that allows him to roam back and forth across the US/Mexican border carrying as much as he wants in terms of illegal drugs -- well, that's a far cry from one little questionnable judgment. He is embarrassment as a US attorney, and he is a dangerous and evil man. This country DOES NOT need the likes of him.

Can Bush be this dumb?
He pardons that traitorous liar Libby while letting these border patrol agents rot in jail? Even his own selfish political interests seem to call for a pardon, or at least a commutation of sentence, here. And Feinstein has provided him with complete political cover. I guess he is as dumb as they say he is!

Dumb?
He made a "Let my people go!" speech the last time he visited Mexico demanding immigration reform to open the borders to "his" people. This guy is more than dumb. And I voted for this dunderhead twice.

"Truthteller" so called.
Liby did nothing wrong. He is not a traitor by any means. Val and her hubby and Bush are the only traitors I see. Val was NOT undercover and her husband is a political hack for the left. No law was broken and Liby's convicion has NOTHING to do with a supposed leak but rather him having a bad memory as a witness. It was basicly a matter of he said, she said... my word against yours and for a normal person that gets you no where in a court of law.

the dirty Border Patrol cops were guilty
of breaking the law. They made a "bad shoot" - shooting 15 times at an unarmed suspect in the act of running away, after first one cop first attempted to bludgeon the surrendering suspect with the butt of a shotgun. Then these "heroes" tried to cover up their crime, spending most of their efforts after shooting the suspect collecting all of their spent shell casings. Meanwhile the bad cops left the suspect to bleed in the brush, and didn't even attempt to arrest him, such that he was able to stand up and walk across the Mexican border. They did not file truthful reports of their actions. The "heroes" also enlisted several other officers, corrupting them, to cover their backsides and falsify the attempted arrest report.

Is there anything much worse for a law enforcement officer than to be found guilty of what I just described?

It doesn't matter - as far as the bad cops are concerned - how much of a scumbag the suspect is or was. These cops were dirty as heck. The conservative, law and order Republican prosecutor did his job, as he has done on thousands of other cases in his district in west Texas. Sutton has been one of our most effective US Attorneys on the border. And got his dirty cop suspects convicted in a fair and open trial.

This was not Nifong, whose case never even got to a trial, and who manipulated the media for publicity and to win a local election. The prosecutor of the BP officers is not elected, he had no votes to win, he has taken tremendous flak from idiots like the typical commentator on townhall.com, and he won convictions on most of the charges on which he indicted the defendants.

The jury of 12 of these cops' peers, all from good ole boy west Texas - not bedwetting San Francisco liberals - heard the evidence and convicted both of the defendants. The sentencing was established by Federal guidelines, i.e., by Congress. The choice to use the highest chargeable offense in the indictment is common, everyday practice ... a prosecutor doing anything less would be criticized as a hand-wringing liberal pansy. And these lawbreaking bad cops only needed to accept the much less onerous plea bargain offered by the prosecutor to have avoided the lengthy prison terms they each received when they demanded a trial. THEY gambled and lost, so stop your whining. Don't blame the prosecutor for doing his job - the job that we hired him to do.

Many of you people, and a few Congressmen looking for cheap theatrics are all dead wrong. Bad cops are everybody's enemy, and such bad cops have no business being part of our law enforcement team, on the border, or anywhere else. Bad cops hurt law enforcement for everybody, including all the hardworking, honest cops and Border Patrolmen just doing their jobs and obeying the law. The convicted bad cops' supervisors in the Border Patrol testified to that effect before the Senate this week.

Biggest Disappointment of Last 20 Years
I think it is reckless and unproductive to call the president of the US "dumb", "traitorous liar" etc. What does that accomplish? And the folks who call Bush the worst president in history, how do they know? Can then even name half of our presidents, or give a brief summary of each past administration. Hell no! So dump the hyperbole and invective.

That being said, Bush has been a huge disapointment to me. He squandered a GOP majority in Congress, and was the primary cause of the GOP losses in 2006. He is wrong on immigration. He has failed to control domestic spending. He has made more strategic errors in IraqAnd he should have pardoned Ramos and Compean months ago.

This case is insane! Prosecuting border agents instead of a drug-running illegal alien. I just

Irony
There is something in this country called the rule of law. We have spent billions setting up a justice system to determine guilt, innocence and/or punishment. These guys received a fair trial, right to confront their accusers, a jury of their peers and a right to appeal.

The people who are screaming most for the country to uphold the law are the very people who are asking politicians to usurp the judicial process in this case.

Dave - you're dead right
Many of the biggest whiners about illegal immigration, the ones who demand on these comment pages on townhall.com that the Border Patrol just start machine gunging anybody seen going over the border, apparently would prefer that America operate under a legal system like they used to have in the former "German Democratic Republic" (better known as East Germany) ... where the policy was to shoot first, and don't bother with questions later. Maybe some of these people would be more comfortable living in Putin's Russia, where his security people take care of dissenters, inconvenient reporters, and political opponents with a bullet, or a vial of polonium.

Fortunately, as you say, the USA is a nation that is ruled by law and not by self appointed cops/judges/jurors/executioners who obviously knew the law, and were charged with enforcing it, but broke it anyway.

JC Dean
JC

I agree with most points, especially prosecuting the drug runner. One thing I disagree with though, is deporting the pres. He LL, we cant even deport those who have broken the law and ain't a legal citizen. How in HE ll are you going to deport a legal citizen??? Just a question for ya JC.

Tap

PS: I think you meant "Rogue" prosecutor. A "rouge" prosecutor would be red.

athingortwo
It would be nice if rule of law were followed. Chertoff, who is my ultimate boss, sure as he ll ain't following his mandate, which is to make the country more secure. Failing to secure the border has left us less secure than we otherwise should and could be. If the law were actually enforced, many illegals would be "home" and we would be safer, not to mention spending less money taking care of the illegals taxing our systems in a most negative way.

Tap


Dave
"There is something in this country called the rule of law."

Rule of law means porsecuting the evil Mexican drug dealer, that packed a truck full of coacine and tried to drive that truck into these United States.
Why on earth has Bush given this evil doer immunity, multiple entry visas to America, and the right to sue the American goverment for millions, while all the time FAILING to prosecute this piece of excreta and poor excuse for a human being?

athingortwo
"Many of the biggest whiners about illegal immigration, the ones who demand on these comment pages on townhall.com that the Border Patrol just start machine gunging anybody seen going over the border"

Oh rubbish!
No one is demanding indiscriminately machine gunning illegals.
We are demanding that when evil machine gun totting Mexican drug dealers and gangs are cuaght red-handed at the border, trying to smuggle their evil poison onto this country, to destroy the lives of our kids in the inner cities, our agents be given the right to shoot back at these vermin, in order to stop them and to protect the lives of our agents.


SteveR
We didn't even know the identity of the drug smuggler until he admitted it after he was given immunity. We don't have admissible evidence sufficient to prosecute him.

Dave
"We didn't even know the identity of the drug smuggler until he admitted it after he was given immunity"

We do now. And he has the buck shots in his buttocks to prove it.
BTW, why would he be given immunity if he hadn't done anthing, and we didn't have any evidence against him?

"We don't have admissible evidence sufficient to prosecute him."

We do.
We just don't have the political will to prosecute him.
Bush's amnesty for Mexican criminals/do everything to frustrate our border agents/open borders policy continues unabated.

SteveR - our Border Patrol officers DO
have the right to shoot anybody who is armed and whom the officer reasonably believes to pose an immediate threat to life and limb, to him/herself or any other person.

Cops DON'T have the right to shoot unarmed, fleeing suspects in the butt, after they just attempted to bludgeon the surrendering suspect with a shotgun butt to the head. Nor do said cops have a right to cover up the evidence of what they knew to be their own crimes.

And au contraire (pardon my French!), but just read the threads on this subject on townhall.com, and even the statements of some of the Congressmen who were braying like mules for the cameras yesterday, and you'll read PLENTY of townhallers calling for the rules of engagement for Border Patrol to be changed allow them to shoot any border-crossing suspect at will, regardless of whether they're armed or not, even if they are fleeing the other way. YOU may not be calling for such a violation of our hard-won constitutional rights, but plenty of others are.

Of course I do not defend the original drug smuggling suspect for his crimes. He was breaking the law. But he was given immunity by the prosecutor - as typically happens in most successful criminal law prosecutions in America - in order to successfully prosecute the two bad cops. Two bad cops are far more dangerous to law and order than is any single unarmed marijuana-smuggling Mexican who would otherwise not have any reason to come to Texas and testify against the bad cops. A bad suspect never justifies the actions of a bad cop. Never.

Even Clint Eastwood's Dirty Harry fought against out of control rogue cops in his movies, to loud cheers from the audiences. So why use a drug smuggler's pitiful life and crimes to excuse political coddling of two rogue border cops who were proved to be breaking the law they were sworn to uphold?

athingortwo
I agree with everything you said about bad cops. The question is, are these two bad cops? I do NOT think that was proven at trial.

You state several things as facts which have not been clearly established, most importantly that the suspect was unarmed. How do you know this? How was it proven in court?

SteveR
The evidence we have was obtained only from him after he was given immunity. It's not admissible. The reason he was given immunity was so that he would testify against the BP officers.


Bush Sells out Americans

No ‘Promise’ on Border Agent Pardons: Bush

How Bush can pardon Libby and not pardon the boarder agents? This is one issue leaders from both parties agree that drug smugglers should be in jail not boarder agents. If our Country is attacked President Bush is fully to blame for his lack of enforcing our immigration laws and sending a message to boarder agents not to do their job!

NM-President Bush sharply challenged critics of his stalled immigration-overhaul efforts on Thursday, suggesting that failure to pass a guest-worker program could trigger a labor shortage in the United States.

At a town-hall style meeting, Bush also rebuffed a question about whether he would consider pardoning two Border Patrol agents in prison for the cover-up of the shooting of a drug trafficker in Texas.

“No, I won’t make you that promise,” Bush told a woman who asked about a possible pardon. Many Republicans in Congress have said the men should not have been convicted and have criticized the federal U.S. attorney for even prosecuting the agents.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/no-promise-on-border-agent-pardons-bush

Border Agents
If giving Bush (for whom I voted twice) and his friend the Federal Prosecutor a pass on their treatment of Mr. Ramos and Mr. Compean is equal to being conservative and law and order, then I am on the wrong boat.

Border Heroes
Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, veterans of military service and U. S. Border Patrol agents who put their lives on the line to protect us from criminal illegal alien drug smugglers, end up in federal prison for their efforts. Their families suffer horribly. Moreover, our nation suffers through an Orwellian miscarriage of justice that only emboldens criminals. Rod Serling could not have provided fare more bizarre.

Yet our Sovereign Supposed spares no effort nor price to make the borders of Iraq unassailable. Yet our Borders remain a sieve.

If our borders are not secure, how then can our nation be secure? It cannot and we are not.

Common Sense
tells me that, in a war, you do all you can to defend your border, you DO NOT keep it so open it's a sieve and prosecute (on orders from a foreign government) the Border Agents or the Deputy. Those of you who believe the propaganda had better do some research, this was a railroad job if there ever was one. I was skeptical about
the NAU but no more especially after Phyliss Schlafly and the Heritage Foundation both had reports on it. I voted twice for him and I am sick of the man, the mask is off as far as I'm concerned. My dau. in law lost two brothers to drugs, and we are supposed to believe this thug carrying a million $$ into this country is unarmed. Bush told the woman, Sutton is a "dear
friend" so what does the lives of two family men
who were doing what he refuses to do, protecting
our Border when a "dear friend" is involved, matter?

How?
I want someone to tell me how if two aagents come upon groups of 10, 20, 30, or more or illegals a quarter of a mile or so on American soil and try to stop them, how do they do it withhout the threat of deadly force? If they all run what do you do? Run one down? or just give up? What is the point of even having border agents ?

Amazing
I find it amazing that George Bush will commit nearly 200,000 troops and hundreds of billions of dollars fighting in Iraq and Afganistan yet refuses to take steps to secure the nation's bordres.

It's obvious that Johnny Sutton is a stooge. The question is "Who's stooge?" George Bush's? Alberto Gonzales' or the Mexican government's. This is too high profile a case for others (far higher up) not to be involved.

@ THRadio
The deport Bush part was obviously a bit of satire but the rest is true. I find it funny that you wish to attack me on based on my views of our disgraced President Bush and question my knoledge of History.

Bush is now in the top 5 of worst presidents ever and it is a position he has EARNED. My criteria is based on much much good has been done vs how much bad vs how many missed opportunities.

FDR wins hands down for worst ever because almost everything he did was bad and endangered the future of our republic to an extent that we still do not realize. In fact many of today's largest problems can be traced right back to FDR and his administration.

Bush has done a few good things, but done a LOT of horrible things and missed huge opportunities to really do some good in this country. Good things would be the tax breaks and Judge appointments. Bad would be spending, Amnesty, no child left behind, Iraq. And missed opportunities are so many but I list only a few... Iraq (yes its both), SS, Vouchers, Permant tax break and changing of the system, etc.

Obviously Bush will leave America in somewhat better shape than Clinton did in some areas but in others he has really hurt our Republic and our next President is going to have a rough time getting things back on track... though i worry that a Democrat will derail us even more now that Bush has set this path.

QUESTIONING NAU????
boosch explains it here (note "gov" suffix):

http://www.spp.gov

Believe it or not
I heard just yesterday that President Bush WILL be remembered as one of the best President's we ever had (some expert)! Sandy Burgler (Berger) gets away with stuffing Clinton papers up/down in and around his pants and socks and gets away with it. Libby is the sacrificial lamb. Now this mess - President Bush SHOULD pardon these 2 guys. Testimony was also given that this drug smuggler was in the process of turning when he was shot. He was hit in the side of his hip. Anyway, Bush needs to do this or quite simply, I won't vote Republican in the next election. I voted for Bush both times and I am REALLY re-thinking my politics!

Me thinks collusion
With the obvious dodging of President Bush to avoid pardoning these two Border Patrol agents and Bush's wholehearted support of Johnny Sutton and effusive statement that Sutton is a good friend, I can't help but think collusion.

I think Johnny Sutton's idea of justice and fairness belongs some place other than in the United States of America. Withholding key evidence in order to engineer a desired verdict (can we spell railroad?) is outrageous and classifying the withheld evidence "secret" is even more outrageous. What an abuse of authority.

I feel certain this is Bush's way of warning the Border Patrol not to mess with any of the illegal aliens coming across the border. So much for border security and the wasteful and costly war on illegal drugs.

Bush has great plans for a North American Union and the American people be damned. I don't know why "We the People...." are so silent about this. People are just beginning to stir and I hope and pray we will all wake up to what is really happening to our country before it is too late.

Truthteller
"Can Bush be this dumb?"

The answer is NO. Bush knows exactly what he is doing. That’s why the two border patrol agents will never see the light day. I’ll eat my hat if he takes any action at all to commute or pardon the agents. Bush is committed to dissolving our borders, and he will destroy anyone who gets in the way, including the GOP base. Bush instructed Sutton to make an example of these men and he did.

border agents
We can prosecute border agents for simply doing their jobs. Gee, no wonder our legal system is the laughingstock of the world. Clinton pardoned Puerto Rican terrorists, drug smugglers, his brother, money launderers, etc....These guys do the job they are trained to do, and get put in prison. I hope they get pardoned. If not, every border guard should throw up their hands and walk away from the job.

Down the tubes---
Our Presidents needs are over-riding any sense
of perception he may have had. His betrayal of the justice system we are trying to uphold and exercise faith in---is par none!!! What does he
have to gain? What could possible be more important that the good-will of those who loved
and believed in him? This man is deceived by the
powers of darkness that rule in the hearts of the
unbelievers. May God have mercy on us!!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.