Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Amanda Carpenter :: Townhall.com Columnist
Hillary Still Wins Cash Game
by Amanda Carpenter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) dominated second quarter presidential fundraising, but he is still outgunned in campaign cash by Sen. Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.)

Obama raised $33.1 million over the last three months and Clinton raised $27 million, according Federal Election Commission reports that were due June 15.

Overall, Clinton has more money, though. She reported having $45.2 million in cash on hand. Obama has $36.3 million in the bank. The main difference between the two leading Democrats’ finances is that more of Obama’s money can be invested into the primary, while a large chunk of Clinton’s cash is earmarked for the general election.

Of the $36.3 million Obama has on hand, he can spend $34.7 million on his primary campaign--$1 million more than Clinton can spend on hers.

Should she win the Democratic nomination for President, however, Clinton already has $12 million tucked away to spend in the general election. Obama only has $1.7 million set aside for the general election.

Primary candidates may only accept donations up to $2,300 per contributor. Any amount over $2,300 from a single contributor up to $4,600 must be put away for the general election should the candidate win their party’s nomination for President. Obama’s campaign has made a strategic decision to concentrate on raising primary cash from a large pool of donors in small amounts. Clinton, on the other hand, has sought donations for the maximum value of $4,600 from wealthy donors to fund both her primary and general election campaigns.

Obama’s campaign manager, David Plouffe, has estimated that the Obama campaign could ask 90 percent of their donors to give again because so many have not given the maximum amount.

Unlike Clinton, Obama will not accept any campaign donations from lobbyists or political actions committees.

“I've got 250,000 people who have donated to our campaign,” Obama said at a campaign stop in Iowa. “We've got people who have been giving $5 and $10 and $25 because we don't take PAC money and we don't take federal lobbyists' money.”

Clinton does take lobbyist money. One firm, DLP Piper US, LLP, was especially fruitful. Their employees donated $176,320 to Clinton’s campaign in the second quarter. Recently, DLA Piper won a controversial bid to lobby the U.S. government on behalf of the Turkish government. One of the firm’s senior counsels, former House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D.-Mo.) who twice ran for President, endorsed Clinton for President earlier this month. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Amanda Carpenter is the author of “The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Clinton,” published in October 2006.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Amanda Carpernter. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
History suggests Bush is a drag
When the incumbent outgoing President is highly unpopular with the public (as Bush is now), it puts a real drag on any candidate from his party trying to succeed him. Very rarely has a candidate ever won the Presidency under such conditions.

Examples:

In 1952, Truman was unpopular and Stevenson lost.

In 1968, Lyndon Johnson was unpopular and Humphrey lost.

In fact, the last time a candidate was able to win the Presidency despite the unpopularity of his party's incumbent President, was in 1876 (when Grant was the incumbent). But that election, of Hayes, was razor close and scandalous anyway (multiple recounts), ultimately decided by a political deal.

So if Republicans are hoping that any Republican can win the Presidency despite Bush's unpopularity, they would have to go back to 1876 for a precedent--and it's a flawed precedent.

Truthteller, you may need to know
what its like to work with kids who know, without equivocation, that there is no system, council, think tank, etc... that can help them. These kids know the window dressing, the United Way execs in the limos, the child protective service workers who explain that parents are "entitled to happiness" too, even if hurts them. They know that "the village" charged to care for them is in business for its own sake, and they they had better find a way to work around it.

They know Hillary World. So do I. If you want facts- work in the system you cheer for.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.