Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, June 25, 2007
Amanda Carpenter :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama Tries to Strip Illegal Worker Checks
by Amanda Carpenter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What would you rather watch?

Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) is sponsoring an amendment to the Senate’s immigration bill to strip language that would require employers to verify the social security numbers of their workers unless there is “suspicion of unlawful employment.”

The third year senator, hoping to secure his party’s nomination for President, believes requiring employers to verify legal status is an “unnecessary” hurdle. Senators Max Baucus (D.-Mont.) and Chuck Grassley (R.-Iowa) are co-sponsoring the amendment.

Under the system already in place, the Social Security Administration has the ability to flag suspicious Social Security numbers that are filed on W-2 tax forms, which is why Obama believes employers should not be forced to verify their workers’ social security numbers.

The Senate’s bill, as it is currently written, would require employers to verify the legal status of their employees within three years.

Obama’s congressional website said this amendment would “make it simple, but mandatory, for employers to verify that their employees are legally eligible to work in the United States.” His presidential campaign website says the “new employment eligibility verification system” would make getting work verification “fair to legal workers and tougher on employees.”

In a June 19 letter to the amendment’s sponsors, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said passage of the amendment would “be a serious step backwards in our enforcement effort.” The letter was also addressed to Sen. Arlen Specter (R.-Pa.) and Sen. Ted Kennedy (D.-Mass.), chief negotiators of the bill.

Chertoff said the amendment “eliminates needed tools and allows unscrupulous business to continue to freely hire illegal workers.” Grassley-Baucus-Obama also contains language to put a 5-year limit on the amount of time the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration could share tax information.

"In the end, the Grassley-Baucus-Obama amendment unfortunately fuels public skepticism about whether enforcement will work or political forces will frustrate serious efforts to bring employers into compliance with the law," Chertoff's letter said. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Amanda Carpenter is the author of “The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Clinton,” published in October 2006.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Amanda Carpernter. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Several misspelled words...
After rereading my post I saw several words that were misspelled. Please don't use that as a reason to attack what I said. My laptop is overworked (kinda like me!) so I am requently several words ahead on typing and don't look back to make sure I didn't mess up on any words.

Attacking others...
Arby and George P were both attacked (called idiots) by Anne (aka Lynne) for their posts and it turned out they were both in at least basic agreement with her position. Over the months I have read TH columns and the responses I have seen many examples of downright dirty attacks by various conservatives against those they disagree with and I just shake my head.

We denigrate those on the left who use vitriolic posts to disagree with the oppsition (us) and rightly so. but I would love to see us raise our level of discourse above thses who resourt to attacking the messenger without once addressing the meesage. I am clearly not asking "Can we just get along!" Instead I would lke to see our side (the "correct" side) to attack the opposition with facts and let them do the idiotic thing that we expect from them.

And Anne, tis is not an attack on you but on our propensity to get exasperated at the rantings of the left and "do as they do unto us!" Easy to fall in to but we will never convince "an idiot" that his position is wrong based on fact by calling him "an idiot!"

Best regards,
Steve
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.