Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Amanda Carpenter :: Townhall.com Columnist
Big Labor Pushes for Big Payback
by Amanda Carpenter
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Big Labor bussed thousands of activists to Capitol Hill Tuesday to lobby for the Employee Free Choice Act—an act union leaders have called their top legislative priority for the 110th Congress.

Event organizers claimed they brought 2,000 participants on 62 busses from the Campaign for America’s Future’s “Take Back America” conference to the Upper Senate Park.

There, a parade of Democratic congressmen and senators delivered hard-line progressive rhetoric to their pro-union advocates.

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D.-Mass.) furiously ripped up a full-page advertisement sponsored by the Center for Union Facts that was published that morning in the New York Times, USA Today and Roll Call.

The Center for Union Facts opposes the act, and their advertisement featured a large quotation: “There’s no reason to subject the workers to an election.” This quotation appeared with the question, “Who said it?” and displays photos of the former President of Uganda Idi Amin, President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and President of the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees Bruce Raynor.

Kennedy held the advertisement high and said, “Here is that advertisement! They say there is no reason to subject the workers to elections. [It asks,] 'Who said it?' And then it says union bosses are pressuring the Senate to change the rules on union organizing. Learn about their scheme to eliminate workers’ right to a secret ballot at Union Facts.com. This is what I say to that!”

At that point Kennedy tore the advertisement into shreds-- an act that drew wild applause from the crowd.

Small print at the bottom of the Center for Union Facts’ ad reveals the quotation came from Raynor. The quotation was published in a May 31, 2003 article by the New York Times titled “Labor Turns to a Pivotal Organizing Drive.”

Brett Jacobson, a senior researcher at the Center for Union Facts, watched Kennedy’s outburst. Responding to this, Jacobson said: “Ripping up the ad tells you how desperate labor leaders and their politicians are to only have one side of the story told.”

The Employee Free Choice Act would allow unions to organize places of employment through a public petition-like process called “card check.” Currently, in order to organize, the majority of workers must cast votes of support to unionize their workplace in a secret ballot process. Opponents of “card check” believe eliminating secret ballots would encourage union bosses to intimidate workers into supporting Big Labor.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) also appeared at the rally in support of the bill. She told participants: “We [politicians] work better when you [labor] work for us!”

Other Democrats who addressed the crowd included Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), Sen. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio).

Before the activists were bussed to Capitol Hill, Democratic candidate for President and former North Carolina senator John Edwards spoke at the “Take Back America” conference. He said, "If you can join the Republican Party by signing your name to a card, any worker in America ought to be able to join a union by doing exactly the same thing."

Brendan Steinhauser, grassroots manager of FreedomWorks, a non-profit that also opposes the Employee Free Choice Act, protested the rally with signs. He was physically confronted by union workers. Steinhauser said he was pushed and that one of Freedomworks’ female interns had her hair pulled. [View related photos here.]

Steinhauser said, “It’s ironic that the unions claim they were rallying against worker intimidation when they sought to intimidate FreedomWorks supporters by trashing our signs, pushing us, and threatening us with physical violence. They were not interested in any democratic debate, and only representatives from the Socialist Workers Party would actually talk to us.”

FreedomWorks plans to post video footage of their confrontational interactions with union supporters.

On Wednesday, Majority Leader Harry Reid interrupted debate on energy legislation to file for a cloture vote in the Senate on the Employee Free Choice Act. A vote to end debate on the Employee Free Choice Act and proceed to a final vote of passage on the bill, called cloture, could occur as soon as Thursday.

The Employee Free Choice Act passed in the House on March 1, mostly on party lines. Only 2 Democrats voted against the bill. Thirteen Republicans crossed party lines to vote for it.

Greg Mourad, who specializes in legislative affairs for the National Right to Work Committee, said he does not expect the Senate to pass a cloture vote on the bill. He said Democrats just need to “throw a bone to their labor union bosses.”

He also said it was “obscene” that Democrat leadership would “interrupt important debate in immigration and war issues to have a throw away vote they know is going to lose on an issue as evil as card check.”

He was not hopeful that defeat on a cloture vote would discourage Big Labor from continuing to pressure members of Congress to pass bills favorable to unions. “They [unions] have spent a billion dollars each election cycle for the last 10 years,” Mourad said. “They want a massive return on that massive investment.”

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Amanda Carpenter is the author of “The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Clinton,” published in October 2006.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Amanda Carpernter. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I see that
I see that the unions and their supporters do not really believe in the secret ballot. Too easy with the secret ballot to vote against the union versus deciding to check or not check with the union facility rep standing over you.

Oh that wild and crazy Teddy
That Teddy Kennedy. He's just too, too hip for words. Did you see him tear up that paper? WOW! That man is full of action. Yea, Teddy!! We love you, man.

What a total waste of air.

YouRepubsMakeMeLaugh makes me wonder...
Wondering what's wrong with current process of carefully supervised balloting that we're trying to rectify through this legislation.

I've been through a couple of union organizing drives myself, worked for a while at NLRB headquarters, and also have handled grievances, negotiations, and so forth. So I have a pretty good idea of what goes on, and have "friends" on both sides of the union/management table.

Certification election rules are a very settled, fair, enforceable, and effective thing insofar as I can see.

So tell me again -- what's the need for this change?

Thanks for the Reminder
Unable to exist on merit, desperate unions now want to substitute threats and intimidation to ensure survival. A secret ballot allows individuals to express themselves freely. Unions clearly do not want that and neither do the Dims, led by their contribution-seeking howler monkey clan.

Free Elections
To union goons you're free to vote for the union or they're free to bust your skull. An anecdote to illustrate. There was a particularly contentious labor negotiation in out city a number of years ago. During the process, some management employees were having their vehicles and homes vandalized. Initially, the incidents were thought to be unrelated until it was discovered that the wife of one of the union officers was employed by the Sec of State(DMV) and had accessed the records of the victims and passed to her hubby the vehicle descriptions and home addersses. She was fired and proscecuted.

A letter to my Senator.
Congress does have a way with words. " Employee Free Choice Act" that allows the union to bypass the secret ballot, for expedience sake no doubt. It just boggles my mind that such a bill could even be brought to the floor, let alone passed in the House already. How could anyone in Congress vote to allow the unions to force employees to form a union by duress? And what other reason for a Card-check system?

So this bill doesn't do away with the secret ballot - just allows the union to replace the ballot with a card-check system! How nice for them. And the House is all for it. At least we know that the unions spent their bribe money wisely. Now they can get Wal-Mart unionized and destroy that too.

Please do not support this bill.

Duncan Hunter's Missed Opportunity...
Duncan Hunter has the precise message that the Union "rank and file" want to hear. Not Union leadership but the average "Joe" union member. His China Trade message. Bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., sealing the border so that wages will once again rise, etc. This is what they want to hear! Not some stupid voting rule rhetoric.

But where is Hunter? AWOL!

I'm really wanting to support Hunter but he's simply not doing whats necessary to get his campaign into high gear. He should be right in the middle of this thing, muscling Ted Kennedy out from behind that podium and getting his message to the rank and file union members. Darvin Dowdy.

Democratic Elections? Yea right.
Yes the elections conducted by the NLRB and the FLRA are democratic, but not the actions of the employers who hire their own gang of anti-union lawyer goons who are really responsible for the major amount of intimidation. Of course the pro-employer views of the so called "unionfacts.com" do not mention the number of Unfair Labor Practice charges leveled against employers who illegally fire employees for engaging in organizing or the number of employees threatened with loss of their jobs if a union is elected. The unions don't have half a chance in the current process because of the overwhelming power and control exerted by the employers.

Take that crazy ad supplied by "unionfact.com" that shows a school room election between a little girl and a male bully and his henchmen who says that he reached an agreement to do away with the secret ballot election and that his henchman will collect cards from the students.

The ad would be a whole more accurate if the rest of the story was being told. The so-called bully would actually not be able to win a secret ballot because the teacher would be in full control of the class and promise to fail all the students if they voted for the bully and make them repeat the entire year until they voted the way she told them to vote.

That is the truth. I ought to know. I tried to organize a company where the employees (scientists) were required to sign employment contracts before being allowed to work there and were regularly sued for violations. They were paid approximately 25% of the amount of the rest of the scientists in their field; had only 3 paid holidays per year; poor to none health care benefits, etc, etc, etc. And the union still lost the elections because we did not have the access to the employees or the money to hire an army of lawyers to fight the employer. Would have won with card checks though and those employees would have the advantage of representation, and better wages and benefits right now.

THE most outrageous legislation?
Thinking some more about this, it occurs that this might be the most outrageous piece of legislation I can recall; starting with the name of "Employee Free Choice..." which is such an Orwellian irony and then failing test #1 which is "please support the law by explaining why it is needed or advisable."

How would a proponent of this legislation answer the following question:

"If approximately three-quarters of those whose interests are hypothetically 'served' (in this case, union members) are not in favor, why enact it?"

Boggles the mind. No wonder the American public is ready to toss out most of the scoundrels posing as 'national leaders' and legislators acting in America's best interest.

If not the best example of outrageous legislation (care to nominate some other piece?), it is at least THE textbook example of puppet masters calling the shots in Washington.


Not buying it
To The Goon (@ 9:21 am)...

I am unimpressed by your argument because it does not speak to the issue of "what is this going to fix that is currently broken?"

We HAVE laws against intimidation, and I have conducted training for management about what they can and can't do during a union organizing drive. As you note, there ARE unfair labor practice complaints brought when those lines are crossed by companies who abuse the process. In your story about one organizing drive, were such charges filed, and what happened as a result?

Your example strikes me as preposterous in that scientists were working for a small fraction of their "market rate", both as to pay and benefits. Presumably they had every right to leave, pursue employment elsewhere, and challenge the validity of any "noncompete" agreement they had signed; those agreements that are unreasonably restrictive are tossed out by state courts. You would have served their interests by advising them about this elementary and fundamental alternative.

Let's take this a bit further ... suppose the employer did clean house after its employees went union. Of course they would NOT because that would probably damage the company in a major way. But, that aside, how successful do you think they would be in recruiting replacements for the pay and benefits you claim they offer.

Finally, what do you mean when you say that you "didn't have access to the employees"? How can that be? Were they locked up in company housing after leaving work?


Goon, what a CROCK
"I tried to organize a company where the employees (scientists) were required to sign employment contracts before being allowed to work there and were regularly sued for violations. They were paid approximately 25% of the amount of the rest of the scientists in their field; had only 3 paid holidays per year; poor to none health care benefits, etc, etc, etc."

Uh... right. And these "scientists" -- why, exactly, did they remain in a job earning 1/4 of what they would earn elsewhere?

The anti-union Big Meanies aren't the ones not telling the whole story, here. You are.

Oh, and do tell us -- exactly how does giving the bullies the power to force the rest to vote their way, solve any one of the problems you enumerate? Sounds to me like you're saying, "Somebody else gets to push the little guys around, and we want it to be US pushing the little guys around." I don't find that very convincing...

The Goon
If Unions do not intimidate then why was it that when the union went on strike where I work I got called names things thrown at my car and what not. I started work Months before and I did not even do a job that had anything to do with the union. I was a contractor to write technical publications. if this is not intimidation then what is.
By the way the union got some of what they wanted for health care but lost many jobe because when they were on strike the company out sourced a lot of mfg to other states. they also lost six weeks of pay that they will never get back.

If Unions were useful to workers
they would not need to beg, cajole, and bribe pople into joining. If they offered anything other than lock-step liberalism and political donations to dimwits, they would not find their ranks dwindling. If they just made an honest attempt at serving their members, rather than their leadership and the politicians those leaders prefer to bend elbows with, they might even find their membership on the upswing.

But no. The average union wants to be able to spend union dues with no accountability whatsoever to their members, and that is pretty much all they do. Union members are simply the worker equivalent of taxpayers.

Hillary's comment is interesting, however. Kind of makes it clear just who she sees as the employer here.

UNIONS WANT MORE MONEY TOO
Unions want to unionize illegals ...
when in doubt, follow the money trail, as usual... :(
BTW -no southern fence, because of the upcoming NA Union

once Unions were needed
but they have gone to far in their arrogance and quest for power. Since when is it democratic to take away the secret ballot? Democrats are shills for the union thugs. As a former president for a local teachers union I saw up front and personal the abuses that too much power can produce.

Busses!?
Busses and Bussed are kisses and kissed--I think she means bused and buses. Can't stand Americans who cannot use the English language. We're turning into a nation of union idiots!

Unions hate the secret ballot...
for the same reason the Soviets did - it makes intimidation and reprisal so much more difficult.

The Employee Free Choice Act - even the name is a cynical lie.

In 1934, the soviet central party congress held all their proceedural votes publicly on the floor by a show of hands. Of course, every one of them supported Stalin or his proposals unanamously. The last vote to be held was the one to decide the Central Committee Secretary, and the indulgent Stalin agreed to allow it to be secret.

Unbelievably, Stalin got three votes and Kirov got over a hundred (i.e. the secret ballot had encouraged them to vote their conscience, something the public show of hands did not). A seething Stalin not only falsified the vote but killed all but five of the delegates - Kirov as well less than six months later.

So much for the Union bosses, their lib/socialist democrat allies and their desire to hold open non-secret 'Free Choice' elections. How are they going to know who to intimidate and threaten if they don't know for sure who voted how? The last thing they want is free and fair elections, just like democrats.

HB 800 - WWFD?
You can always tell that legislation is crooked and phony, when the name of the bill is diametrically opposite to the content of the bill. Simply put, the “Employee Free Choice Act” is an act that invalidates the current free and fair secret elections. Hmmm – do we think that employees, if they had their choice, would prefer to do away with their right of privacy (i.e. being able to cast their vote in confidentiality from union bosses and company management) and instead subject themselves to the pressure of both union and management?

I don’t think so! It is like requiring the employees to wear a scarlet letter, designating to their fellow employees, the union, and management, which side they chose. Everyone knows that being labeled, in that way, would seriously erode the workplace relationships.

The shallow arguments of (the aptly self-named) Goon and YouRepubs are the same old fabricated bromides and phony examples that you always hear from the leftists. The one and only point that one needs to consider in this ridiculous bill is the choice between secret ballot and bulletin board ballot.

Put another way, consider the thought process of the democrat party in matters of this sort. “WWFD?” “What would Fidel do?. It seems to me that a choice between the democracy of the private ballot and the totalitarian public “check-off” is an easy choice.

Come to think of it, I guess you can always tell that a political party is crooked and phony, when the name of the party is diametrically opposite to the actions that they take. Thus I guess we should expect the democrat party to oppose democracy.

2000 Prodigal Sons!
Voicing their opinions,exclaiming the glory, and benefit,of paying someone to secure your needs,without self responsibility. A workforced raised with the ideals of self profit,not being responsible to betterment of the company.Birds of a feather flock together!

Dear Chuck:
According to Merriam-Webster, bused and bussed are both acceptable versions of the transitive verb "bus."

http://www.m-w.com/

Search for "bus" and look at the verb entry (the 2nd one).

Just doing my job. :)

YouRepubsMakeMeLaugh
YouStupidCommiesMakeMePuke.

"The labor union is the most perfect form of communism on Earth", Karl Marx

What else needs to be said about labor unions?

Like the Communist Party of Russia, today's labor unions want to be able to see how someone votes, or not votes, and put the screws with threats of physical harm and property damage made to force compliance.

Like most commie stooges this (YouRepubsMakeMeLaugh) points out that the website Union facts is financed by business, so what, he conveniently overlooks that Big Labor is financing (with big bucks) the purchase of Congressmen to get the votes for their "bill".

I am overjoyed that someone financed the publication of the truth about union activities, that is someone who is in business is not in the least a reason to reject the truth.

Bottom Line
Union Labor = Incompetence and Inferior Product(s) at an inflated price. I give you education (NEA), the collapse of Big Steel (USWA), CONSTANT RECALLS of domestic automobiles (UAW). Unions are used by drunks, incompetents and other losers to keep from getting fired. The sooner Unions are extinct, the better off America will be!

Unions have way outlived their
usefulness. They've helped drive manufacturing jobs overseas and south of the border. The teacher's union here in PA has managed to drive up benefits and salaries for teachers and administrators at the expense of the rest of the taxpayers.

It is a gravy train for union workers, however. They consume resources and produce absolutely nothing of value. Very similar to congress.

THE HECK WITH AMERICANS, SAYS BUUUSH
Guest Workers Aren't Cheap; They're Expensive
President Bush entered the White House in 2001 hoping he would be known in history books as the education president who improved public school standards with "No child left behind." It now looks like his legacy will really be "No illegal alien left behind."
As President Bush's poll numbers drop even among his base, the question most frequently asked by angry Republicans is, why, oh why, is Bush so stubbornly rejecting the advice of his supporters even though that advice is consistent with the thunderous message from public opinion surveys? The reliable Rasmussen survey, for example, reports that by a 63% to 19% margin, voters want legislation that controls the borders before trying to change the status of illegal aliens.
Bush's dogmatic statement that we can't stop aliens from illegally entering our country unless legislation is packaged "together" with a guest-worker program is a non sequitur, nonsense, and untrue. So what's the explanation?
Grassroots Republicans are speculating about reasons for Bush's behavior:
a. Bush prides himself on being a man of his word and he gave his word to Vicente Fox that he would never stop the migration of Mexicans into the United States;
b. Bush made a Faustian bargain with the big-money guys who raised more political money in 2000 than all other Republicans combined in order to nominate and elect him president;
c. Bush is a globalist at heart and wants to carry out his father's oft-repeated ambition of a "new world order";
d. Bush meant what he said, at Waco in March 2005, when he announced his plan to convert the United States into a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" by erasing our borders with Canada and Mexico.
MORE DETAILS: PHILLIS SCHLAFLY, EAGLE FORUM




YRMML
Oh, it's such an outrage that Rick Berman and his organization sponsors a lot of lobbying groups and websites. What a shill! And that makes George Soros a...?

FREE ELECTIONS
Why is that union bosses hate free elections? Because they lose. Why do they lose them? Because they can't intimidate someone into voting for them with a secret ballot. So, lets just get rid of the secret ballot so we can have more unions and more bankrupt industries like the steel and auto industries.

Drunkie poo thinks this bill will help the economy? States like Michigan and Massachusetts will feel the economic crunch as companies relocate to right to work states in order to survive.

I live in a state that allows union slavery. A friend of mine works at a company with a closed union shop. He belongs to the union or he doesn't work there. Since there are certain jobs that need done every day, they have to have some people work weekends and holidays. This forced overtime is undesireable and is administered on the basis of seniority per the union. He has averaged about 351 days a year for the last 10 years. No weekends. No holidays. Does he complain? Yes. Do they do anything about it? No. Does his union help him get a day off once in awhile? No, he doesn't have enough seniority.

If Congress had any guts, they would pass a real "Employee Free Choice Act" and outlaw closed union shops, forced payment of dues and other union abuses. If people want to join a union, they should be allowed to. They should not be forced to.

unions
Unions are an albatross around the American worker and taxpayers neck. They are behind much of the corruption in Congress. We will never be able to totally have free trade and be competitive in a world economy as long as we have unions. My question is why are the Democrats so afraid of secret ballots? If their message is right, they need not be. Our ballots electing them are private so why not? Rejection. That's why. We need more of these union laws challenged in SCOTUS.

Unions fail to see the irony
Their objection to secret ballots is that they can be manipulated by a business' management, through intimidation.

They fail to see that the card campaign is equally vulnerable to the use of intimidation, if not more so.

We just experienced a union's idea of "fair play" this winter, when a county-run nurisng care facility was faced with unionization (Allentown PA). The union used the card check instead of a secret ballot. Of course they got the result they wanted, but not before numerous employees of the home reported that they received unwanted phone calls, and were approached in the parking lot of the home, as well as while going about their private business at stores, picking up their children at school, and at their own homes.

(As to approaching workers in the parking lot at work, a union organizer said that the law prohibits him from canvassing works in their workplaces. He failed to see how it might be initimidating to a nurse to approach her in the parking lot.)

Unionists trotted out the old saw about owners calling workers into an office, one at a time, and intimidating them. They failed to see how their behavior was any different. They've also forgotten that it was their very unions that fought for the right to have secret ballots in the first place, to fight that intimidation.

Workers of the world, who really represents you? Your union leadership? Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Hillary delenda est.

Unions are Bad for America
At one point in our history the labor unions served an important function. They helped give workers a better life when industry was just getting started in the modern sense. Today big labor equals big bullies. Believe me I know a few of these thugs and they don't like democracy they are punks who push others around.

Their continued assult on business, both big and small, has driven American jobs to Asia and Latin America. It has caused the quailty of our products to go down while the price has gone up. And they vote in lock step for the currupt Democrats that continue to harsh and harm the American taxpayer.

Unions have to go, they should be extinct. Many companies offer great benefits to their employees today because of what unions use to do and because they want to attract a work force. Workers want to be treated like management, go start your own business.

Now no employee should be abused but realistic demands should also be made. I would also ask labor unions what they thought of their Democratic friends' support of cheap labor by amnesty.

Well funded bad idea
For those that actually consider this bill to be a good idea, think about it for a moment.

If completely open union elections are a good idea, then why aren't we doing that in U.S. general elections? It's not a trick question, and easy to answer. We allow secret votes in the general election to protect the integrity of the voting process and prevent voter intimidation.

There are some disadvantages of secret ballots, but I don't think there's anything with union voting that those disadvantages become oabstacles to fair voting. I could list what the disadvantages are, but they are pretty obvious: like accuracy of the vote count if the counting process gets corrupted (i.e. Florida 2000). Since the union elections are smaller than statewide elections, the total available votes is well known, preventing that type of fraud.

All in all, the last word on this bill should be: does it fix anything wrong? NO.

Yes Americanus...
And Hi-liar-y's vast right wing conspiracy of '98 turns out to be in reality the ultimate projection of the vast left wing conspiracy of dims, unions, minorities, old media, Hollywood and academia.

What is a "tedkennedy"?
Three hints: A tedkennedy is brown. A tedkennedy draws flies. Sometimes a tedkennedy has to be scraped off the sole of ones shoe.

I've know a lot of Goons in my life,
but another one always comes along. As a young man, I worked for a company that was unionized the old fashion way. Worked pretty well for a few years until the union got greedy. Being a manufacturing company, most of the employees were low skilled, poorly educated, easily manipulated people that bought into the union BS hook, line, and sinker. Ended up putting the company out of business and those low skilled, but well paid employees found themselves unemployment with no hope of ever finding another job at half the pay.

Now being a small business owner, I prefer to reward people based on the hard work and dedication to their job, not because some union dictates that I must. I learned a lot working for that now defunct company. Never belonged to the union, though I was eligible. I thought that even back then I could be rewarded on my own merit, which I was. Plus it always stuck in my craw to see the union reps circle the wagons around some sorry no good lazy a$$ that deserevd to be fired, but the company just didn't have the will to fight the union.

Union have served their purpose and like the dinasaurs they are, they need to crawl in some swamp pit and sink into oblivion. Employers can recognize and reward those employees that bring them success. Of course if any seem a little blind to the efforts of their best employees, they might take notice when the employee gives their notice. It's a free country boys and girls and your welcome to work where you want at the highest wage you can command.

If you don't like what I'm willing to pay or the benefit package I can afford to provide, just head on down the road and find yourself a better deal. If you're worth keeping, I'll pay you every cent I can afford to pay and still justify keeping the doors open. Bottom line, that too many whiney liberal feel good types seem to lose sight of, is that I am in business to make money, not give you a job.

Buss the Bus?
I'm surprised it took so long for someone to note the improper use of busses and bussed. Thanks Chuck, kudos to you. Amanda, you should know better. In order to communicate, you must use the proper words to express your thoughts. When you don't do that, your whole essay comes into question as to what you really mean. Miscommunication is the bane of any peoples, and improper use of the language leads to difficulties and quotes, such as 'it depends on what is is', for individuals to try to hide behind word usage and otherwise obfuscate the situation.

I've given up trying to figure out Teddy the Swimmer. He's a Liberal blowhard with the natural socialist actions, and he feels the necessity to stifle freedom of choice by backing the big, usually corrupt, Unions. Teddy's still living in the days of the robber barons. The only thing he's up-to-date on is the change in the label of his favorite scotch. And in the photo at the top of the essay, he's his usual ranting self, taking up most of the picture---any picture. The major Unions have long since outlived their usefulness, and their declining membership rolls prove it. Instead of forcing people to pay for the Big Union Bosses and their Liberal politicians, they should be allowed to die a natural death.

I belonged to a Union back when I was a teenager working part-time in a grocery store. I was paid about $1.60 an hour. But, I had to join the Union in order to continue working. Yes, I had to pay a $25 initiation fee, and weekly Union Dues [I don't remember that amount.] And what did I get? A raise to $1.80 an hour. So, all things factor, the Union requirement caused me to work for barely over a $1.40 an hour net. Thanks Amalgamated Meat Cutters' and Butchers' Union. What I needed was an Open Shop, but that was forbidden in the Unions of the day.

Calling this travesty the 'Employee Free Choice Act' is the Liberals' way of labeling a bill/law exactly opposite to that of which it is. That way, they can criticize opponents as being against 'free choice.' Once again, we go back to words and word usage. They are both vitally important in the political scheme of things. Confuse the issue and hope no one of importance notices. And of course, the MSM---whether it notices or not---just continues to operate in accordance with the Liberal Playbook and Obfuscation Manuel.

Unions
I think unions are SO useful. In fact I'm going to Washington to lobby for this bill!!

Just let me make my reservations on TWA, that wonderful, unionized airline......

After working alongside union workers -
As operations manager for a technology company (we installed cabling, voice and data systems) I got to see union workers in action for many years. It was not impressive. I was amazed that adults could act that way, and that it was condoned and encouraged by their management. Cutting cabling, damaging of hardware, vandalizing cars, throwing trash, stealing tools, etc. It was amazing. The only good part was that most of them were so fat and out of shape from not actually doing any real work (the fastest they moved was at quitting time), that when the occasional fist fight occured, they got thumped soundly. My brother owned his own electrical contracting company in LA and lost so much money having to go back and re-do work performed by his unionized electricians that he quit bidding on union jobs. The problem is not the concept of a union per-se, it's that the workers confuse unionization with a sense of invulnerability and entitlement (which in retrospect I suppose it is).

Unions
Never talk about the merits or demerits on the particulars of a piece of legislation. The only question that needs answering is : "Do we need this legislation at all"? The answer to this legislation is easy--no! Neither do we need to continue to prop up the final vestiges of Communism in the work place. Unions are collectivism and a tenet of Marxism. They are not needed, nor have they ever been. Propaganda sold the workers on Marxism at the same time Marxism was being debated all over Europe and Russia. Utopia in the work place--tenure has ruined our education system and unions ruined our auto industry. In fact, unions ruined all of our heavy industry.

As a rule of thumb
wouldn't you say that the only reason NOT to have secret ballots is allow for intimidation? I mean, what other reason is there against them?

What does jihadists and Ds have in
What does jihadists and big labor and certain members of Congress have in commom?

They believe in rule without elections and protections of the secret ballot.

Everyone who reads this needs to call his/her Senators and give them this message:

If you wish to show your support in the safeguards of our political system as it has in the past protected INDIVIDUAL workers' rights, you will vote against the Employee Free Choice Act. It is fine example of Orwellian doublespeak that does the opposite.

People who work for a living should have the protection of the secret ballot in organizing elections.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.