Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Tuesday, September 29, 2009
BREAKING: Public Option SHOT DOWN in U.S. Senate vote...
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:58 PM
http://blogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/schumer-et.jpg
The mighty Chucky has struck out!

Just crossing the wires, Chuck Schumer and those pushing the public option have been voted DOWN in the Senate Finance Committee for the Health Care bill being formulated in that body.

Poor guy...







Wednesday, March 04, 2009
WSJ: Deficits and Fiscal Credibility
Posted by: John Campbell at 12:11 PM

Today, the Wall Street Journal featured an Editorial by Indiana Senator Evan Bayh regarding President Obama’s Omnibus Appropriations Bill.  He encourages a ‘No’ vote and a return to fiscal responsibility in Washington.

WSJ

Deficits and Fiscal Credibility

A Democratic senator says no to a huge federal spending bill.

By: Evan Bayh

This week, the United States Senate will vote on a spending package to fund the federal government for the remainder of this fiscal year. The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 is a sprawling, $410 billion compilation of nine spending measures that lacks the slightest hint of austerity from the federal government or the recipients of its largess.

The Senate should reject this bill. If we do not, President Barack Obama should veto it.

The omnibus increases discretionary spending by 8% over last fiscal year's levels, dwarfing the rate of inflation across a broad swath of issues including agriculture, financial services, foreign relations, energy and water programs, and legislative branch operations. Such increases might be appropriate for a nation flush with cash or unconcerned with fiscal prudence, but America is neither.

Drafted last year, the bill did not pass due to Congress's long-standing budgetary dysfunction and the frustrating delays it yields in our appropriations work. Since then, economic and fiscal circumstances have changed dramatically, which is why the Senate should go back to the drawing board. The economic downturn requires new policies, not more of the same.

Our nation's current fiscal imbalance is unprecedented, unsustainable and, if unaddressed, a major threat to our currency and our economic vitality. The national debt now exceeds $10 trillion. This is almost double what it was just eight years ago, and the debt is growing at a rate of about $1 million a minute.

Washington borrows from foreign creditors to fund its profligacy. The amount of U.S. debt held by countries such as China and Japan is at a historic high, with foreign investors holding half of America's publicly held debt. This dependence raises the specter that other nations will be able to influence our policies in ways antithetical to American interests. The more of our debt that foreign governments control, the more leverage they have on issues like trade, currency and national security. Massive debts owed to foreign creditors weaken our global influence, and threaten high inflation and steep tax increases for our children and grandchildren.

The solution going forward is to stop wasteful spending before it starts. Families and businesses are tightening their belts to make ends meet -- and Washington should too.

The omnibus debate is not merely a battle over last year's unfinished business, but the first indication of how we will shape our fiscal future. Spending should be held in check before taxes are raised, even on the wealthy. Most people are willing to do their duty by paying taxes, but they want to know that their money is going toward important priorities and won't be wasted.

Last week I was pleased to attend the president's White House Fiscal Responsibility Summit. It's about time we had a leader committed to addressing the deficit, and Mr. Obama deserves great credit for doing so. But what ultimately matters are not meetings or words, but actions. Those who vote for the omnibus this week -- after standing with the president and pledging to slice our deficit in half last week -- jeopardize their credibility.

As Indiana's governor, I balanced eight budgets, never raised taxes, and left the largest surplus in state history. It wasn't always easy. Cuts had to be made and some initiatives deferred. Occasionally I had to say "no."

But the bloated omnibus requires sacrifice from no one, least of all the government. It only exacerbates the problem and hastens the day of reckoning. Voters rightly demanded change in November's election, but this approach to spending represents business as usual in Washington, not the voters' mandate.

Now is the time to win back the confidence and trust of the American people. Congress should vote "no" on this omnibus and show working families across the country that we are as committed to living within our means as they are.

Mr. Bayh, a Democratic senator from Indiana, served as governor of Indiana from 1989 to 1997.






Friday, December 12, 2008
Obama: "None of my staff... er none of my non-cabinet staff... er eh..."
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 1:03 AM
http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/Rahm_Emanuel(1).jpg
"Yeah, um boss..."

So if someone all of the sudden has dropped off the President-Elect's press conference stage, completely disappears from the public, and when later reappears refuses to give a simple "no" to a simple question...

I'm thinking the President-Elect was a wee bit over demonstrative in his adamant denials of association.

Look, I was the first pundit in the nation to predict that Obama would be president. As I said on the Fox News' Strategy Room this morning, his rise through the democrat machine was key in his preparation for the tough fight he waged against Hillary, and then McCain.

But NO ONE from Chicago, nor anyone who lived there for any time thinks for a second that Obama didn't know the type of graft, corruption, and "business politics" (his term) that was going on there.

Even in Obama's explanation of the "two different brands of politics" in America this morning at his press conference he made the oddest assertion that Chicago style corruption was endemic in "state assemblies" and "city councils" across the nation.

He then tried to draw a very thin line between the Governor he helped raise money for, campaign for, and voted in support of--Rod Blagojevich and the "rest of the politics of business" crowd that "barely fit within the realm of legality."

Now as it turns out one of his earliest appointments just might very well be tangled up in the Fitzgerald web of indictment. My guess is he certainly will not be the last.

Mara Liason made a brilliant point two nights ago on Special Report with Brit Hume citing that politicians often over reach in their vehement rejection of association with someone who is caught doing something wrong.

It would be a completely NORMAL thing for the President Elect to help guide his home state in who would replace him in the United State Senate. (For what its worth it looks like David Paterson may even seek his blessing on the replacement for Hillary's seat in New York? How much more so would his home state worth with him on his replacement?)

To make overt statements denying ANY association, connection, or knowledge of Blagojevich was just stupid. Some Obama peeps are going to get snagged by this.

And it would be better for Obama to be out in front of it than to constantly be playing catch up to it and be left with the deer-in-the-headlights look he had on his face at his presser yesterday morning.





Monday, June 09, 2008
Senate Food Fight
Posted by: John Campbell at 4:38 PM

Since 1993, the Senate side restaurants have lost more than $18 million and it is estimated that the cafeterias have lost as much as $2 million already this year, and without a $250,000 subsidy from taxpayers, the Senate won't make payroll next month. 

I know this may seem like something of pure fantasy, but I assure you it is true, and yet another example of government mismanagement. 

Last week in a late night voice vote, the Senate passed a measure agreeing to privatize its restaurants and cafeterias. According to GAO, the Senate Restaurants bring in more than $10 million a year in food sales but have turned a profit in only seven of the last 44 years in operation. 

Senator Feinstein (D-CA), blames the poor quality of food, but I am inclined to believe, as is the case in many government endeavors, the lack of entrepreneurial incentive contributes to poor food quality, high prices, and eventually the need for more government subsidy.

Senators needn’t look far for confirmation of a successful example of privatization; the House privatized its cafeterias in the 1980s, and since 2003 has turned a profit of roughly $1.2 million.





Tags: Franken   senate



Wednesday, May 28, 2008
More Franken Fun
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:49 PM
The NRSC released this video -- asking for people’s thoughts on Franken’s tale.



Tags: Franken   senate



Tuesday, May 27, 2008
More Trouble For Al Franken ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:10 PM

What a long, strange trip it's been!

... U.S. Senate hopeful Al Franken's inability to provide workers compensation for his employees brought to light Franken's failure to receive twelve (or more) missing pieces of mail delivered to his NY residence.

Even more peculiar, however, is the certified mail receipt signed by "J. Gauthier", Franken's doorman.  Following much speculation, it is now clear that Gauthier was indeed Franken's doorman.  However, when confronted with receipts -- Gauthier shockingly responded that the signature that appears on the mail receipt is not his!

Which raises the question:  Why would anyone on Team Franken forge Gauthiers signature?

... The mystery is unsolved, and this campaign just keeps getting weirder and weirder.



Tags: Franken   senate



Thursday, May 22, 2008
It's a Special Day ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:34 AM
... And to celebreate, here's a birthday video for Al Franken.

Oh yeah; it's also Morrissey's birthday ... so there's that. 

Tags: senate



Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Liberal Bloggers to Franken: Get Out!
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:01 PM
Two liberal bloggers are asking Al Franken to end his campaign.

Tags: senate



Friday, May 16, 2008
Senate Candidates & The CA Decision
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:59 PM

Think Senate races don't matter this year?  These are the folks who would be voting on judicial nominations.  In light of the California Supreme Court's ruling on gay marriage, here's a quick run-down some of the Democratic Senate candidates up for election this year ...

Al Franken (MN) – Franken has stated he wouldn't have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).  (CNBC’s “Tim Russert,” April 1, 2006).

Rick Noriega (TX) – Noriega was one of only nine Representatives to vote against banning gay marriage and civil unions in Texas.  (Dallas Morning News, May 1, 2003).

Mark Udall (CO) – Voted against a ban on same-sex marriage in the Colorado House -- and in the U.S. House, he twice voted against a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Tom Udall (NM) – An advocate of domestic partnership who has said the issue of same-sex marriage does not belong in the Constitution. Udall twice voted against a Constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Mark Warner (VA) – Attempted to block a legislative ban on all legal recognition of gay relationships.  He also recommended striking partnership contract provisions from the Affirmation of Marriage Act for the Commonwealth of Virginia.



Tags: senate



Friday, May 09, 2008
Meet John Kennedy
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 7:23 PM

Earlier today, I had the chance to interview Louisiana state treasurer -- and current U.S. Senate candidate -- John Kennedy(You can listen to the un-edited interview above.  Note:  The sound quality is not terrific).

This was his first major interview with a blogger since becoming a candidate for the U.S. Senate.

As the presumed Republican nominee, Kennedy's campaign to oust incumbent Sen. Mary Landrieu is viewed as the only realistic chance Republicans have to take a Democratic seat this fall (check out the latest on Ladrieu's ties to Jack Abramoff).

One thing is abundantly clear:  Kennedy isn't running for Congress -- he's running against Congress.  A conservative reformer bent on changing things (not a bad strategy considering the toxic political atmosphere out there), Kennedy hopes to tap into some of anger voters currently have regarding all things Washington. 

And when the topic turns to taking on Washington, Kennedy becomes truly passionate, and his rhetoric is ratcheted up a few notches.

"I think Washington is a ditch ... and you will never change it by sending the same people back," he tells me.

"I don't think you can point to a single ... major problem that keeps moms and dads awake at night, worrying about, that Congress has solved in the last decade in this country," he says.  This, of course, is presumably a shot at Republicans (who have been in control for most of the last ten years).

Though he seems to be willing to at least implicitly criticize Republicans, it should be noted that his criticism is that they haven't actually governed as conservatives. 
"They spend money like it was West Virginia ditch-water," he tells me.

Criticizing the refusal of Congress to fix healthcare, he said: "We ought to have a healthcare system that looks like somebody designed it on purpose." 

His timing might be surprisingly perfect.  Kennedy resides in the one state that seems to be trending Republican (note:  In my estimation, Woody Jenkins loss last week is not a harbinger of things to come -- or at least it's not fair to interpret a low-turnout election as an indicator).  Louisiana has always been a unique state, but this year, the state is even more "out-of-touch" with the national zeitgeist than usual.  The election of up-and-comer Bobby Jindal to governor has been a rare sign of hope for national Republicans (Jindal has endorsed Kennedy). 

And so, at a time when many are fleeing the Republican Party, Kennedy switched from being a Democrat to become a Republican, because (as he says) if you want to be a reformer in Louisiana -- the Republican Party is the only game in town.  As evidence of this, he cites his past effort to pass ethics legislation.  Though he was a Democrat at the time, the only support he received was from Republicans.

Kennedy is impressive inasmuch as he possesses a rare quality that allows him to be simultaneously "down home," likable (which fits Louisiana well), erudite (he did study at Oxford) -- and very well-read. 

As I mentioned, this was Kennedy's first interview with a blogger since becoming a senate candidate.  I'm looking forward to keeping an eye on this race, as it promises to be one of the most exciting in the country.

Tags: senate



Thursday, May 08, 2008
Hillary on Supreme Court?
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:56 AM
... To paraphrase Thad Cochran, that idea sends shivers down my spine.

But it's a real possibility.  Getting rid of Hillary will presumably require some sort of deal -- and I still don't buy the premise that Obama will go for the "dream ticket" -- not so long as Bill Clinton is hanging around.  Even if Obama wins the nomination, having the Clintons subtly undermining him -- and hoping he loses to McCain -- won't do him any good.  So maybe, just maybe, Obama promises to nominate her.

That's why I am occasionally writing about senate races here at Townhall.  Granted, these posts elicit very little attention or comments -- but that doesn't diminish their importance -- if you care about nominating and confirming good Supreme Court Justices. 

... If Barack Obama wins the presidency, every Senate seat will be vitally important to keeping liberals off the Supreme Court. 

... John McCain's recent speech on activist judges gives us a lot of hope -- but even if he picks strict constructionists -- they will still require senate approval.

If you believe John McCain will win, there is an argument that says we will really need to help elect good senators.  It's based on a psychological phenomenon called "switch-back."  This theory essentially says that if voters want to vote for Obama, but they can't bring themselves to pull the lever for him (because he has been demonized for one reason or another) -- they will vote for McCain, but vote Democratic on all the down-ballot races.  Presumably, voters do this in order to "make-up" for their presidential vote.

But getting involved in senate races has become even more of a challenge for conservatives, because almost all of the vulnerable Republicans this year are moderates.  So it becomes a pragmatic choice as to whether or not the stakes warrant your involvement.  When one considers that one of Bush's accomplishments was in nominating Justices Roberts and Alito, the prospect of allowing the court to lurch leftward, once again, is unappealing (why willingly surrender one of the few vitally important positive accomplishments we have gained in recent years?).  As such, supporting moderate Republican senators becomes a more appealing proposition.  (Getting involved in House races is another thing altogether, since they don't have a voice in Supreme Court confirmations).

One appealing reason to get involved in senate races is that you have a real chance to make a difference.  While it is difficult for one person to make a significant impact on a presidential race, "maxing-out" to a senate campaign can have a real impact.  And when it comes to the supreme court, you could make a good argument that good senators are just as important as a good president ...

Tags: senate



Tuesday, May 06, 2008
Al Franken's Accountant
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 7:45 PM
Al Franken doesn't think his accountant is good enough, nor smart enough. Just ask him and he will tell you as such.  According to Franken, his accountant of 18 years, Alan Chanzis is to blame for all of Franken's recently uncovered financial woes -- and not the company's CEO & CFO, which would happen to be Al Franken.

So as Franken continues to blame Chanzis for everything short of global warming, one is left to wonder if the accountant is nearing the point at which he will talk to clear his name and affirm his competence.  So far there has been silence as Chanzis has yet to talk because, in his words, "I've been told to say, 'No comment.'"

Doesn't sound like someone on board with the silence plan does it? Also who is telling him not to talk? Franken?

At what point does Chanzis speak to either reaffirm he has provided 18 years of incompetent service to Al Franken, and any other celebrity clients he and his firm specialize in servicing, or to contradict Franken's transparent efforts to pass the buck and have the account play the patsy?


Tags: Franken   senate



Friday, April 25, 2008
Frankly Franken
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:16 PM

The NRSC's new website, Frankly Franken just posted their latest YouTube video press release on "Hollywood" Al Franken.  The site also includes a clock, beginning when Franken's New York problems first surfaced.  The question remains:  Will Al Franken ever take address the questions about his business issues in New York and California?  



Tags: Franken   senate



Thursday, April 24, 2008
"Hollywood" Al Franken Falling Further ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:25 AM
Photobucket

We continue our coverage of the 2008 U.S. Senate races by looking at Al Franken's failing campaign in MN.

As TPM reports
:
"The round of negative stories about Al Franken's failure to properly pay business taxes in all the states he was active now appears to be damaging him and endangering his effort to oust Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN), a new poll finds.

The latest numbers from Rasmussen, compared to last month:

Coleman (R) 50% ( 2)
Franken (D) 43% (-3)
National Democrats have viewed this seat as a top pickup opportunity, but unless Franken can figure out a way to deal with his travails, the bad publicity hitting him may cause Dems to squander the chance to oust one of the GOP's most vulnerable incumbents."

Maybe lying to voters isn't a good campaign strategy???



Tags: Franken   senate


« Previous12Next »
Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 17 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
Last updated 19 Minutes 16 Seconds Ago
Last updated 20 Minutes 31 Seconds Ago
Last updated 22 Minutes 7 Seconds Ago
Last updated 23 Minutes 11 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

This is just too rich
 Re: Sen. Reid Compares Obamacare Opponents To Supporters Of Slavery
  By Robyn
.
 Re: EPA to Force Businesses to Regulate Carbon Dioxide
  By Terry
Nice try, sky pete
 Re: Sen. Reid Compares Obamacare Opponents To Supporters Of Slavery
  By Brian'61
The thing is...
 Re: OBAMA’S STUMBLES REFLECT LACK OF EXPERIENCE
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Poor Old Guy
 Re: Sen. Reid Compares Obamacare Opponents To Supporters Of Slavery
  By Tommy
Reid
 Re: Sen. Reid Compares Obamacare Opponents To Supporters Of Slavery
  By BillK9
It's Totalitarianism or Bust
 Re: EPA to Force Businesses to Regulate Carbon Dioxide
  By SandMan
Actually, we haven't demonized them
 Re: No Senator Reid. It's Just Bad Legislation
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Fascistero....
 Re: Those Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy . . .
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Proctologist
 Re: Those Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy . . .
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
NeoZionistTool
 Re: Those Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy . . .
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Actually, Reid hits it on the head...
 Re: Those Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy . . .
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Sky Pete .. Pavlov's Dog
 Re: Sen. Reid Compares Obamacare Opponents To Supporters Of Slavery
  By carlos
Mikey
 Re: Abortion Clinic Tells Us How They Do "Sacred Work" UPDATE: Video Working
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Cav- Example 2 & 3
 Re: Governors Aren't Judges: Huckabee's Well-Meaning, Politically Fatal Mistake (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Cav- Example 1
 Re: Governors Aren't Judges: Huckabee's Well-Meaning, Politically Fatal Mistake (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Zeke
 Re: Governors Aren't Judges: Huckabee's Well-Meaning, Politically Fatal Mistake (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
If you were a future historian...
 Re: The Copenhagen Climate Comedy
  By terry
DocForesight
 Re: A "Non-Traditional" Christmas?!
  By Molotov
link for previous post-
 Re: Look For Abortion Vote Tomorrow
  By Ruth

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll