Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, September 24, 2009
Glo-ry, Glo-ry, Hail O-ba-ma, His Class-room's March-ing On!
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 1:17 PM
http://www.thebrowardrepublican.com/Images/People/Obama_God.jpghttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/img/story/092309_class.jpg

"Those at the B.Bernice Elementary School in Burlington Township, New Jersey, may be unable to overcome their sycophantic Obama obsessions, but the children of America should not be required to chant his name, raise their hands, and repeat dogma that may not be exactly based in reality."





Tuesday, March 31, 2009
A word about President Huckabee... Integrity trumps everything!
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 12:06 AM
http://sitebuilder.yola.com/sites/D074/D51b/D70d/D4de/U8a4986cb1bdffd12011bed4d07b15470/8a4986ca1cfca030011d0654a34e5547/resources/IMG_0979.JPG
"Salt and Light..."

There are a handful of times in life where you get to experience something that has the feeling of brushing the presence of greatness. In my life at various times that has been something I didn't always realize up front. But having returned from a day and a half and a sum total of nine events over that period of time with one person in particular I have to tell you... I think I did this weekend.

In December of 2006 I wrote a column in which I was the first pundit in America to predict that Barack Obama would be president in 2009. I predicated that theory on a number of variables, but specifically foreseeing the possible match-up against a candidate John McCain, I felt that the overwhelming historicity of the race, the lack of specifics that the substance would come down to in the debate, and the inability for a candidate like McCain to take Obama on squarely would work against him, and in favor of Obama. Boy did I call that one...

Knowing that McCain as a candidate would have a squleching effect on the base, and more or less finish him off, was primarily due to one large reason. He did not wish to embrace evangelicals. He was offered significant help by major marketing firms that could have put him directly in front of evangelicals, and should he wish to champion the issues, character, and enthusiasm they would have brought to the trail, it was well within his realm of influence to reach out to them.

Instead he chose badly. He made a strategic decision NOT to offer the hand to faith based people, and as a result Obama was given free reign on the matters that people of faith cared about. McCain never even challenged, nor disputed blatant statements made by Obama that violated the basic conscience of the Bible-believing Christian.

Riding the wave of that bit of history, running a campaign on nothing but empty words of "hope" and "change", and being left unchallenged intellectually, and spiritually on his messaging, Obama ran the table, and my prediction came true.

I saw it all in December of 2006...

I'm a wee bit weirded out by what I'm about to tell you, mostly because there is so much time to go until the campaign for 2012 begins, but I believe that Governor Huckabee will win the nomination, and in a very possible scenario President Huckabee will place his hand on the Bible in January of 2013.

But like my impressions about Obama, this is not a random feeling I have but rather an atuned set of circumstances that would pave the way for it to happen. (Some of which I've even begun referring to on this blog...)

Here they go:
1. Unlike the 2008 contest - the conservative message will be the ideas that the American people will be seeking. In only 75 days President Obama has distinguished himself as the most progressive, least values oriented, furthest left, most hostile to faith, risk, productivity, national welfare, border security idealogue the nation has ever seen. His attempt to devalue the American currency alone sets him in a class already of running the risk of being perhaps the most anti-American President to reside in the White House. His love for the limelight, his empty suit/no experience abilities in solving real problems are unable to hide his leftist principles/tendencies and he is being exposed. Buyers remorse is high, and the move towards sound economic policy will be the screams from every sector of the economy. In unison, the employee, the business owner, the manager, marketer, producer, and seller will all be screaming for financial policy overhaul. America presently has the second most punitive tax policy towards business in the world. This cannot continue to be the case and expect our economy to rebound any time soon. President Huckabee's financial policy message for the foreseeable future will be the fair tax. Taxing consumption is an equal opportunity tax, and people pay only on what they consume, the need for the IRS would be history, businesses would feel the freedom of venture, risk, and opportunity to return and the growth cycle economy would see historic achievement.

2. Unlike 2008 - the genuine believers in the social/moral causes of the day will be empowered. Barack Obama has turned out to be a lie of historic proportions. He has not championed the inclusion of Christians nor their perspective in his cabinet. (There is not a single born-again Christian advising him in any capacity.) His view of morality is absent, and his moral judgement is then flawed because of the absence of values in his own soul, much less his Godless policies that he's already pushed far harder than any Christian who voted for him ever believed he would. The persecution that is already being unleashed on the American Christian culture will continue to grow, but Christians will benefit from this in the purification of doctrine into action. In doing so, genuine believers will develop greater conviction on living faithfully, and their stewardship in their portion of "We The People" will be taken far more seriously. They will look for and expect from those they support to deal with the issues of the day with transparent honesty, individual decency, and lasting integrity. In short Megan McCain is NOT the future of America and the McCainish disdain for moral clarity will in turn be disdained. President Huckabee will be someone the nation will be proud of in terms of his personal character, his pragmatic insight into solving problems, and his ability to help those who even dislike him initially to be swayed with humor and humanity.

3. Unlike 2008 - a base will emerge and rally to the Governor's aide. Unlike the non-enthusiastic campaign of Senator McCain, Governor Huckabee will have vibrant, faithful, and enthusiastic volunteers who form armies in every state. It is an easily provable fact that had Senator Fred Thompson not remained in the race in South Carolina (thus doing a favor to Senator McCain) Huckabee would have steamrolled McCain and taken the momentum in Florida. To lose to McCain by a single point in South Carolina stole the momentum away, allowed McCain to claim the mantle, and head to Florida with a lead in last minute fundraising. This will not happen in 2012. Huckabee's brand will be the most established voice and brand of the GOP by the time the primary elections get underway. And hopefully this time National Review will not be bought off by alias PACs funded by the Romney camp to create abjectly false impressions and misrepresentations of Huckabee's platform while overlooking significantly noticeable gaps in Romney's. (As an aside, I spent more time with Romney and Huckabee in the 2008 primary than any two of the other GOP candidates... I like both men personally. And would've supported either of them in the general election. But make no mistake about it, Huckabee is the more electable of the two.) These impressions formed outlandish mischaracterizations by some conservative icons of Huckabee in 2008. But by having his own talk vehicle, platform, and extended reach through ABC network commentaries and the Fox News Channel's television network, Huckabee is avoiding any future dependency on a singular conservative outlet getting his message out. He's taken control of the message, and the distribution rights of the medium, and he won't be bullied in 2010,11, and 12. The home-school groups will return, so will the college kids, so will African American and Latino voters -- all of whom share a natural affinity with Huckabee that will be lacking in every other GOP candidate. They will volunteer for him, they will walk districts for him, they will pull all-nighters for him. Because they will see their efforts in doing so as them being able to take charge of their own future.

Long story short I've just completed two days and nine events with Governor Huckabee. In multiple settings from private meals to public speaking, from morning church to a University convocation service (pictured above) he was embraced and given standing ovations in every location. (Including the 10,000 college kids picture above!)

The reason is clear... no one believes Governor Huckabee walks on water, but they have learned that his word is his bond. They hear from his heart and they see that he is more like the everyday guy than any man to ever run for President.

They also value his judgment, and his ability to speak to what they are feeling.

The combination to do those two things, combined with his taking control of his medium and message is demonstrating that even only 75 days into THIS administration Pastors across America are already telling their congregations they wished Huck had been the candidate, and knows he will win in 2012.

And after spending this past weekend watching him, talking with him, and being with him up close... all I can say is, I see what they are feeling, thinking, and saying... and there is something happening *ALREADY* that will not be able to be countered!



TRACK KMC 24/7:
http://www.brtstage.org/images/myspace_logo.jpg






Monday, March 23, 2009
Ed Morrissey gets naked...
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:26 PM
...or talks about the ramifications of it at least...

http://www.fraterslibertas.com/Images/Radio/EDPatPicnic05.jpg
Olympian Radio Host... special or not!

Monday's we chat. Here's today's line-up:
Today, on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), Today, on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), Kevin McCullough joins us again to discuss the crossroads of faith and politics. Kevin and I will talk about his latest column, in which he calls Barack Obama “President Gaffe”. What does Obama’s Special Olympics joke say about him? Is this similar to his DVD gift to Gordon Brown? Is Obama “punch drunk”? We’ll also talk about Kim Basinger and her newfound embarrassment over 9 1/2 Weeks, and the role of nudity in art and culture. Expect Notre Dame’s invite to Barack Obama and Bishop Chaput’s scolding of the Catholic Church to be a topic today, too.
Ed's got a nifty chatroom experience as well, so come and join the fun between 3p-4p today! (Or now just watch the podcasted version below:)




TRACK KMC 24/7:
http://www.wfrd.com/Portals/0/Myspace%20Logo.jpg





Monday, March 16, 2009
Irony... WIZBANG blog be THY name...
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:39 PM
http://files.adbrite.com/httpads/alexa_thumbnail.php?url=wizbangblog.com
Um... oh yeah?

Sometimes it's just fun to run across things. Today I Googled the title of my most recent column to see where it had been pinged across the blogosphere and I ran across this which must have run the same day my history making column ran making me the first pundit in America to accurately predict Obama would be elected President:

NO BARACK OBAMA WILL NOT BE ELECTED PRESIDENT
DJ Drummond
December 6, 2006

I must say that I like pundits who are willing to make a bold prediction. So I begin here with some praise for blogger Kevin McCullough, as he makes his case for the run by Barack Obama for the White House in 2008. However, I have evaluated the conditions and must disagree with Kevin. Senator Barack Obama will not be elected President of the United States in 2008.

Kevin bases his prediction on what he considers five essential bases for Obama, what McCullough calls "Raging Liberals", "Disgusted Conservatives', "Exhausted Moderates", "Energized Blacks", and "Gullible Evangelicals". McCullough seems to be claiming that Obama will flim-flam his way to the Oval Office, and I must admit History warns us that politicians are quite able in that trait, and I agree that Obama possesses the sort of moral inadequacy to choose the way of the snake to get what he wants. However, I cannot agree with McCullough's opinion that Conservatives and Evangelicals would find Obama a suitable choice; the weakness in those groups comes when they stay home out of petulance, but they do not vote for a candidate who is clearly Liberal in his politics or for a Democrat. Those groups will be in play when the Republican candidate either excites or disappoints them, but Obama will not get their vote and cannot sway them except to drive them to his opponent if he reveals himself to be extreme. As to the Liberals, no Democrat in twenty years has lacked their support, so Obama gains nothing in the General Election from them, especially as fewer people than ever consider themselves Liberals. Liberals are angrier than ever, but that does not give them extra votes, except in places like Chicago and St. Louis.

Which forces me to say that sometimes its fun just running across things like this...
The DailyKos kids having to invoke my name for being... ta-da... RIGHT!


Keep tabs on KMC - "24/7": http://www.wfrd.com/Portals/0/Myspace%20Logo.jpg





Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Does President Obama Really 'Get It?'
Posted by: John Campbell at 1:58 PM

This morning, the DC Examiner, a beltway newspaper, featured an interesting editorial about President Obama’s rhetoric versus actions on earmarks.

The editorial highlights a question from Time Magazine, “Does Obama have a double standard on earmarks?”  I am not sure if you caught it, but during the President’s speech to a Joint Session of Congress, he boasted that there were no earmarks (however, earmarks have a multitude of guises) in his $787 billion dollar ‘Big Spending Package’ disguised as “Stimulus.”  Yet the President remains quiet when Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats ram a bill through Congress the very next day, neatly stuffed with nearly 9,000 earmarks.

To say that each of these earmarks is ‘worthy’ is complete fantasy, here is a healthy sampling courtesy of the Examiner’s Editorial Department:

“$1.8 million to manage swine manure in Iowa, $190,000 for a “Buffalo Bill Historical Center” in Wyoming, $2.2 million to study grape genetics in New York, $175,000 for “fa?ade improvements” on a dilapidated theater in Pennsylvania, $162,000 for cricket control in Utah, and a total of $41.5 million for the presidential libraries of three former Democratic presidents: FDR, JFK and Lyndon Johnson.”

Nevertheless, the American taxpayer will be on the hook for these projects, worthy or not.  President Obama has repeatedly said he “Get’s It,” but perhaps it is time he gets on board with the rest of America on earmark reform.  Even Congress is slowly beginning to get the message; this issue is not going away.






Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Begging for an Obama Mulligan!
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:09 PM
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/02/10/gall.obama.biden.gi.jpg
Yep... we know the feelin' Yo!

Ok these are just the issues of the last 48 hours that are making the Obama administration look like a high school junior varsity group trying to play against a major league team...

You got Russia brushing him aside as completely irrelevant.
He's got our absolute best ally totally flummoxed.
He's choking on his own $410 billion omnibus bill like a chicken bone.
His own party members revolting/laughing at him.
His own policies are sending the economy down le toilet.
He refuses to find a sensible solution.
In fact his economic "leadership" has averaged a 1400 point loss per week since he's been in office.
His administration now believes they may need another 1,000,000,000,000 to "save the banks."
You've got Hillary making bigger, more important policy announcements as Secretary of State than Obama does as President.
She's also finally admitting what Obama can't seem to as our President.
And instead of dealing with the weightiest matters of our day, President "Present," seems to think its more URGENT to engage himself with talk-radio personalities.

Are you kidding me?

But whatever you do - don't stop the party-train coming from the White House on Wedneday nights...

And his big response to all this crisis, "Community health centers."

Do we HAVE a President right now? Where the heck is he? Where is the leadership in this administration? Is there any?

I want an ELECTION mulligan!



Keep tabs on KMC - "24/7": http://www.wfrd.com/Portals/0/Myspace%20Logo.jpg





Monday, February 23, 2009
Gov Jindal Lacks Poker Face When Asked If He Will Run In 2012
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 10:57 AM





Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Oh NOW We'll Talk Fiscal Discipline
Posted by: Ericka Andersen at 8:18 AM
The White House is planning a "Fiscal Responsibility Summit" to address America's deep debt after passing the $787 billion stimulus package. President Obama told a group on Friday that "over that midterm and long term, we're going to have to have fiscal discipline. We are not going to be able to perpetually finance the levels of debt that the federal government is currently carrying."

Discipline is almost always the best route but Obama didn't find it necessary in the short-term. Saving the hard part for later? Sounds pretty irresponsible. How will this bipartisan meeting produce any meaningful results? It promises to be a continuation of the political bickering the stimulus has fueled for months.

The Caucus reports
invitations will be sent to 90 people: 30 members of the House, 30 senators and 30 scholars and representatives of advocacy groups such as AARP. Apparently, the attendees will be divided into discussion groups on topics including health-care costs, Social Security, tax reform, defense procurement and the federal budget process. Economy camp!

In Obama's inauguration speech, he quoted the Bible, saying it was time to "put childish things away." He's yet to live up to that.





Monday, February 09, 2009
Campaign Promises, Presidential Reality
Posted by: Ericka Andersen at 10:12 AM
Mike Allen reports:

Thomas E. Ricks, the nation’s best-known defense correspondent, writes in a book out this week that many Iraq veterans believe the U.S. is likely to have “soldiers in combat in Iraq until at least 2015 – which would put us now at about the midpoint of the conflict.”

That would mean American forces would remain in danger past President Obama’s terms, into his second term if he wins reelection or the 45th presidency if he doesn’t.

The man who campaigned in large part on his opposition to the war and in dedication to getting troops back home cannot fulfill his promise. Of course, many people knew his ambitions were unrealistic but will those who believed him then call him out now?

Obama advisors have reportedly urged flexibility when it comes to troop withdrawal. In a USA Today piece, Reidar Visser, who runs the Iraq-focused website historiae.org, said "Obama is going to find he has to chart a different course in Iraq than he campaigned on."

In the last month, Obama has proved his presidency is quite a contrast to his campaign in regards to the economy. Iraq policy threatens the same fate. The Wall Street Journal:
Here's the lose-lose scenario: Allow Iraq to deteriorate by withdrawing too soon and push into Afghanistan without a better strategy. Mr. Obama has inherited a victory in Iraq that he can't afford to squander.

I am hopeful he will not squandor the victory but it demonstrates who was honest with reality during the 2008 elections -- and it was not President Obama.





Friday, February 06, 2009
Aborted Baby Born Alive, Treated Like Trash
Posted by: Ericka Andersen at 9:28 AM
Two weeks ago, I attended (and wrote about) the premier of "22 Weeks," a film depicting the horrors of a partial-birth abortion gone wrong. When a young woman delivers her aborted baby alive, the clinic refuses to help her save the baby's life. It is a true story and speaks directly to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which President Obama voted against.

The reality of "22 Weeks" has occurred again and the brutality is shocking. A pregnant Florida teen went to a clinic for an abortion but when her baby girl was born alive, a non-licensed clinic worker cut the umbilical cord and tossed the live baby out in a medical bio-hazard bag. The child's remains were found in a cardboard box a week later.

The news article that broke the story documents Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique's five past medical malpractices and reports he showed up late to complete the procedure. It was then that the woman delivered the baby alive at 23 weeks -- extremely premature but survival is possible if given the right medical treatment.

Renelique is being investigated by the Board of Medicine and will likely lose his license. Though this is an extreme case, it's happened before and it will happen again. The pro-choice culture contributes to the de-valuing of human life as a whole.  It is no wonder than a worker at an abortion clinic thought it easier to treat the baby like trash. Had it been born already deceased -- as was the goal -- that's exactly what would have happened anyway.






Monday, February 02, 2009
Where in the World is John Galt?
Posted by: Ericka Andersen at 2:42 PM
People of all political beliefs often consider Ayn Rand required reading, but libertarians and conservatives identify most closely with the obsessive focus on the individualism represented in her books. I made it my priority to get through the hefty 1,000 page Atlas Shrugged a couple of years ago and tackled The Fountainhead shortly thereafter.

Since the 1957 publication of Atlas Shrugged, many a political reference has been made to the elusive character “John Galt,” all-encompassing figure of individualism, creation and invention.  With an encroaching government in full effect today, an extreme clash to Rand’s ideal world abounds and the comparisons are inevitable.

The fate of our country begs for analysis in this regard. The imposition of socialism in Atlas results in a miserable society where prosperity is dead and the freedom loving must escape. 

Dr. Arthur Robinson considers this idea in Human Events today, noting that the technological creators and artists of today have been slowly forced to “distraction.” These “men of the mind”, as Rand designated, “understand the consequences of the government oppression…so, they are taking actions to protect themselves and their families.”

Robinson continues:

… There are immediate effects upon our well-being and long term effects from the things that they are no longer working full time to create.

What is the cost of the distraction of our real leaders -- of the men of the mind -- of the John Galts among us?


Rand’s society is extreme, as is the tone of this article. However, the liberal agenda of  “common good” and President Obama’s condescension of America’s “childish” ways of the past (a strong, free and prosperous past) do not anticipate a liberty-based future. The cult-like way in which Obama gained unquestioned support so quickly, in light of multiple scandals and minimal experience, predicts a foolish pattern among the American people.

The “moochers” and “looters” are thickening in America. Bailout after bailout promises to destroy responsibility and the value of investment. As these Atlas characters are described, so mimics our society:

They use guilt as a weapon against those who produce value. They seek to destroy the producers despite the fact that they are dependent upon them.


In a famous excerpt from the book, Francisco d’Anconia speechifies:

Money is a tool of exchange, which can’t exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce.

...Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money…


Are our producers – “men of mind” -- becoming irrelevant in light of recent events? Is success less achievable on personal merit as government doles it out on our dime? Rand’s world is fiction but the facts are shaping up to be eerily similar.






Friday, January 16, 2009
"America must maintain our moral clarity!"
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 2:57 PM

"I have confidence in the promise of America,
because I know the character of our people."

It was the last time he will address the American people as their President, but it was thirteen minutes of transparency, gratitude and humility.




Critics will disparage it as another speech from the simpleton in chief.

President Bush did not get a free pass from me on a good deal of his handling of term two. The bail-out mania that ended his second term perhaps historically misguided, his refusal to take strong measures to merely fence up the southern border, and his expansion of government entitlement through the drug programs for medicaid/medicare are some of the biggest mistakes movement conservatives will point to.

No President gets to a 21% approval rate (still double that of Reid/Pelosi) by merely ticking off his opponents.

But as I have stated before, history will see Bush differently than the intense leftists in today's political discussions do. We know this to be true already because the incoming administration made a sudden centrist jerk after being elected and are now headed smack dab into the more or less same directions, particularly on national security/terrorism.

The fact that Mr. Obama has moved his position from "bring them home day one" on Iraq to an identical position with Bush will eventually be noted in the textbooks. The fact that Mr. Obama may sign a symbolic piece of paper indicating a vague future date to close Gitmo, but then chooses to do nothing to change it will also prove Bush right on the need to detain the most serious of monsters off of our own shores.

One thing that is difficult to be critical of President Bush in any way is his compassion for people. Karl Rove told me over dinner in New York, not two months ago that every time official business would take Bush in the vicinity of immediate relatives of fallen service personnel he would have meetings set up where he would meet individually with family after family. Looking them in the eye, putting his arm around them, and expressing his sorrow at their loss.

The blame dumped on him for Katrina was unjustified and dishonest. Anyone with an ounce of integrity that sees the facts can easily confirm. Yet again, he has time and again met with families who did lose loved ones in that tragedy.

And one thing that riveted my attention sitting across from Rove was that the President did so regardless of whether the families were pleased with his performance or angry with him. And there were ton's of both.

At the end of the day Bush's Supreme Court appointments will be seen as genius for champions of the Constitution, and perhaps his longest lasting legacy.

America stayed safe on his watch, and post 9.11 not another American life was lost on American soil due to "disruption" his strategy and commitment levied against those who wished to kill us. He chased the terrorists into caves--exactly as he promised, and from their position they have been unable to re-organize, re-supply, re-finance, or re-strategize against us.

I was the first pundit in all of America to predict that Barrack Obama would be the next President. I have been just in my scrutiny of Obama prior to his election, and I have been fair to him in commenting on his moves since, giving credit where credit is due.

Unfortunately those on the left will never recognize, even after his admission of things that did not work out so well, that President Bush's motivation in all of it was to do what he felt was best for the nation he loved and served.

And though I hope for President Obama's success, because the nation depends on it... (And have even cut him a bit of slack since his election, understanding that his actions will have merits to be judged by once he is in office.)

I will miss President Bush, and I wish him well for guiding us through America's most terrified season, and reminding that some things like freedom are virtues still worth protecting and even dying for.





Wednesday, November 05, 2008
President Elect and forward...
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 12:52 AM
Veteran civil rights campaigner Reverend Jesse Jackson reacts to the news of Barack Obama's victory. [AFP]
"N u t s!"

With the closure of the second of two national speeches aired in the early minutes of Wednesday morning the swoon became final.

Senator John McCain exited the national scene with a speech filled with grace and goodness, striking themes he had repeated dozens of times in weeks previous. But he did so in pledging his good will and effort to support the new President in the challenges he will face in the days to come.

And there will definitely be challenges...

By contrast I thought that Obama's speech was in some ways almost equally gracious, and as he has done through out the campaign he uttered extremely moderate rhetoric. He referenced John McCain, Republicans, and Abraham Lincoln and attempted to offer an admirable tribute to McCain's life long service to his country.

The self-indulgent, self-important, and self-historic projection through the reciting of some of the same, "out of the many - one" themes that he has used again, and again on the trail seemed to wear on me by the end.

It is an historic moment. It was the longest campaign ever run for President. In many ways for Barack Obama it also the most lucky. For after all without the total collapse of the housing/mortgage crisis this race would've looked very different tonight.

But now the rhetoric is through, the time to shut up and get to work is upon us.

He promises to be honest and transparent with us about the challenges we face. He promises to listen to those who do not now support him. He promises to work with those who oppose him to attempt to achieve genuine progress. He promises to move beyond race, and in that post-racial reality lift America to a place she has not been before.

The policies he has promised, in this correspondent's humble opinion, will do exactly the opposite. And in my opinon Barack Obama was largely elected by an electorate that was mostly ignorant of who he has been, or what he has voted for.

But let's say for tonight we let it be what it is... an historic moment.

Let's say for this minute that he will resist his idiology and move toward a more John F. Kennedy-esque pragmatism model of governance.

For tonight we have no choice but to take him at his word. We might even do so for about 143 days or so.

The ironic thing now is that the shoe is on the other foot - and in about three months - he starts being held responsible for every word and action...

...now, I need to go investigate the legal aspects of off shore savings accounts...





Tuesday, November 04, 2008
Just remember - I WAS THE ONE who told you he would be President FIRST.
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 11:07 PM
http://www.mensvogue.com/images/business/2006/08/21/buar01_obama.jpg
Mr. President

I was laughed at, mocked, scorned, ridiculed, and told I was smoking something.

But I was the first pundit anywhere on the planet that accurately predicted this historic moment.

I did not want to see it happen, but everything I wrote in the column predicting it came true.

And I am afraid that many of the things I have written since will as well...

Here is what I wrote in the fall of 2006:
Why it will be 'President Obama' in 2009
Kevin McCullough
Sunday, December 03, 2006

Barring several series of near seizure-like corrections, Barack Obama will take the Presidential oath of office in January of 2009. It will be a cold January morning, his beautiful wife and daughters will be by his side and they will shiver as he places his hand on the Bible and swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States. His presidency that will follow, if reflective of anything at all of his legislative record, will then seek to dismantle that same Constitution.

I have a long track record of predictions on Obama, and all of them have come true. I have no reason to believe that this one will conclude any differently.

There are reasons that this event is destined to take place, and given the option of knowing them but remaining silent, or mentioning them in the hope that the scene I've just mentioned never comes to path - I choose the latter. If any of these were to take significant turns, the formula might collapse. This is given the fact that the nation will be in a holding pattern for the next two years with absolute gridlock on pretty much everything (with the possible exception of amnesty for illegal aliens.)

RAGING LIBERALS - In 2006 the message of the voters was not Ned Lamont. Rather it was the "Crash Dummy Class of '06." Democrats who looked, and tried to talk like people of faith - at least long enough to get elected. George Soros, the Daily Kos, Al Gore, Susan Sarandon, and not to be forgotten Howard Dean, have made their go at it. They failed. But since their party won the midterms - they believe they've been justified. Their anti-American rhetoric will increase. They will express dissatisfaction with Pelosi/Reid and demand an increased presence in the 2008 picture. The democratic primary voter will reject this increased extremism and look for a "consensus builder." They will long for someone who is "above the frey." Obama will fit that profile and will bring "together" the left and right in his own party. He will do it with a sense of style, smoothness, and humor - a stark contrast to Hillary, Gore, Kerry, et al.

DIGUSTED CONSERVATIVES - Still reeling from the "ginormous" let down of the Senate under Bill Frist, and the second term Presidency of George W. Bush, normally energized conservatives will look to a field that offers a pro-choice/pro-gay mayor from New York, a Mormon from Massachusetts - who was pro-choice/pro-gay but genuinely seems now not to be - but may have hired illegal aliens, blah blah blah, or John McCain (whose single biggest problem is that he IS John McCain.) Normally eager "tax-cutting, government shrinking, let's defend our nation, pro-life, pro-family" voters, organizations, and leaders will be assaulted with speeches on Romney's health care reform, or Giuliani’s crime initiatives, or John McCain. Whoever emerges, will have not one tenth the oratory skills of Obama and they will come off looking as tired, dry, and stale as day-old toast.

EXHAUSTED MODERATES - They are tired of the stale toast, and will be looking for anything exciting. Mind you, moderates by definition don't truly stand for anything so it doesn't really matter what the candidate stands for. These people voted for Kennedy, Reagan, and Clinton all based on one thing, "how does he make me feel?" Realizing this Obama will be a lightening rod on the campaign trail. He will draw record crowds for every appearance he makes (something he's already begun to do.) Money will flow in as a result. Obama's strategy of talking about cooperation, sounding bipartisan, and seeming to curtly rebuke both sides of the aisle will seem to validate his "ability" to "stay above the frey."

ENERGIZED BLACKS - The true voice for alternatives for black voters will not be heard because the voices of great men like Bishop Harry Jackson will not yet have become distinct enough within American media, and because the media, in ignoring the Bishop, will instead return again and again to the altar of Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson. Instead, as the media is already doing, there will be near non-stop fawning over the Senator from Illinois as he flashes the big smile. Black voters, who in the majority vote for party and not conviction anyway, will see Obama as the personality that no one since Dr. King has been able to live up too. Obama will be invited to each and every significant black pulpit in America. He will rail with poetry, sing with soul, rhyme when appropriate, and never will the IRS even think of threatening even one of these houses of worship for illegal political action.

GULLIBLE EVANGELICALS - The most reliable base of voters for the Republican Party since the days of President Reagan have been the social conservatives. Church-going born-again Christians who believe in God, the importance of His word, and the significance of living out their faith in an open and compassionate way every single day have been the backbone of the GOP. This past Friday Rick Warren, through the implied endorsement of allowing Obama to speak at one of the largest evangelical churches in America gave Obama the opportunity to split evangelicals who will be misled by Obama's words instead of opening their eyes to his actions. In my gentle admonition to Rick Warren over the past couple of weeks I reiterated time and again that it was this opportunity being extended to Obama that would be manipulated by both the press , and Obama himself to pose as a "person of faith." Warren's stubborn action of insisting upon having Obama speak at Saddleback Church in southern California has had that exact effect .

From this point forward should the trend of any of these five areas shift significantly Obama's chances could be compromised. But there are credible reasons to believe that they won't be.

So mark this date down, because it is the first time anyone accurately predicted that Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.

And you have no idea how much I hope this prediction does not come true!








« Previous12Next »
Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 5 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
Last updated 5 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
Last updated 15 Minutes 26 Seconds Ago
Last updated 16 Minutes 51 Seconds Ago
Last updated 20 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Words of wisdom displayed!
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By arch
decline of the abortionists!
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By arch
Monkey Girl?
 Re: Pope Benedict XVI Attacked During Christmas Eve Mass
  By Dose of Reality
WHY are we happier?
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By Wrat Wrangler
It started a long time ago.
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Wrat Wrangler
Neo
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By BK
Typical leftist behavior!
 Re: Pope Benedict XVI Attacked During Christmas Eve Mass
  By arch
BK..I Heard Steyn the Great Say That We
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By NeoConScum
2:36pm.."Hygeince Product"
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By NeoConScum
Axe
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By BK
Axe
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By BK
Axe
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By BK
Axe:
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By BK
Oh, No!
 Re: Pope Benedict XVI Attacked During Christmas Eve Mass
  By KATZ
Best media outrages of 2009
 Re: Best Media Outrages In 2009
  By douglas
DELUSIONAL IS ALL I CAN SAY
 Re: A QUESTION OF GIVING MORE, NOT “GIVING BACK”
  By douglas
Earth to Earthpig:
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By K.G.
Obama and his administration
 Re: Obama: Maybe We Should Do Away With Filibuster
  By Kenny Z
clarity:
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By K.G.
no it will cost
 Re: Obama: Maybe We Should Do Away With Filibuster
  By douglas

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll