Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Make up your minds people....
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 12:50 AM

By the time I die, everything that was good for me will have become bad for me - and probably will have gone back and forth a few times in between.

This just in...

Taking too many vitamins 'raises prostate cancer risk'

US scientists investigated the impact of vitamin use on cancer in 295,344 men enrolled in a national diet and health study.

After five years, they found a surprising link between rates of advanced and fatal prostate cancer and men who regularly took multivitamins.

Those who used the supplements more than once a day were significantly more likely to suffer dangerous advanced forms of the disease than men who took no multivitamins.






Monday, May 14, 2007
Taxpayers Gouged by Multicultural Prof
Posted by: Michael Medved at 11:59 PM
. A sexual harassment incident at Washington State University highlights some nationwide problems in higher education. Professor Bernardo Gallegos, accused of making advances toward a married graduate student in his home in 2005, resigned his tenured position. In exchange for his resignation, the University paid him more than $87,000. It turns out his yearly salary amounted to more than $132,000 – though he’d only held his academic position for less than three years! Far from the old stereotype of underpaid professors toiling in genteel poverty, today’s faculty often draw lavish pay —even at rural, publicly funded institutions like WSU. Meanwhile, Gallegos held a position as “Professor of Multicultural Education.” –a fashionable but ludicrous discipline, especially in a state where the white, Anglo population represents 86% of the total. The idea that Washington taxpayers provided $132,000, plus additional thousands in benefits, for a post in multiculturalism should anger them even more than the professor’s lecherous misbehavior.




Monday, May 14, 2007
Palmetto State Powerbrokers Re-Match
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 5:48 PM

In preparation for tomorrow night's debate, things are already buzzing in South Carolina.  I just got off the phone with a well-known GOP operative in South Carolina.  He's on his way to the Silver Elephant Dinner.  (Sean Hannity is the guest speaker.)

He tells me that McCain and Romney, by far, have the best on-the-ground operations.  Ultimately, it's a clash between two well-known state operatives, who faced each other in the bitter 2000 race between McCain and Bush ... 

McCain's South Carolina operation is headed up by Richard M. Quinn -- a former partner of Lee Atwater.  Quinn also ran McCain's SC operation in 2000.  (Of course, McCain is tight with Sen. Lindsay Graham.)

I'm told that Romney's operation is headed up by Warren Tompkins, the same guy who headed Bush's SC campaign in 2000.  Tompkins is also widely respected, and, I'm told, is tight with Sen. DeMint.

(Giuliani's guy is Barry Wynn, a CEO and former chair of the SC GOP.)

Politics is different in South Carolina.  It seems that on-the-ground, things are already a little nasty.

 






Monday, May 14, 2007
Now Guest Blogging at Green Eyeshade Blog ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:46 PM
Congressman Paul Ryan, the Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee, has a good guest blog up over at Green Eyeshade Blog.  The topic is:  The Democrats’ FY08 Budget: Setting a Dangerous Course.




Monday, May 14, 2007
Hello Cleveland!
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:17 PM

(Note:  If you're reading this because of the headline and associated picture; Bret Favre has not been traded to the Browns.  This is purely a Spinal Tap reference ...)

Remember when John Kerry referred to "Lambert Field"?

Well, Sam Brownback made a similar mistake on Friday when he used a football analogy in Wisconsin, and in the process, said that Colts star Peyton Manning was the "... Greatest quarterback, maybe, in NFL history."

... Of course, this didn't go over well in Packerland, where Bret Favre is still revered. (Note to political candidates: Make sure your football analogies mention the home team.)  Of course, this reminds me of the part in Spinal Tap where, during the concert, they yell: "Hello Clevelend!"  (They were not in Cleveland).

Brownback was trying to make the point that focusing on families is "fundamental blocking and tackling... " That analogy also applies to public speaking, except, in this case, the fundamentals are to "know thy audience."

Were Brownback either an effete windsurfer -- or a serious contender for the nomination -- this mini-scandal would probably have been a bigger deal.  Instead, it's just a dropped ball.






Monday, May 14, 2007
Don't Forget Newt
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 2:50 PM
Newt has been awfully quiet lately.  But he's still flirting with running.




Monday, May 14, 2007
Rudy and the Anti-Clinton Correction
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 2:37 PM

Is it just me, or is it hard to imagine a Clinton making this correction?

When Rudy was introduced to a class of Citadel graduates this weekend before giving his commencement speech, his bio included a mention of his "magna cum laude" graduation from New York University Law School. Here was Rudy's opening:

Thank you very, very much, General Rosa. And thank you very much forthe degree. It wasn’t as hard as what you had to go through to get it.And I should correct you, I was Cum Laude at New York University LawSchool, not Magna. But it’s an honor to stand before you and a greathonor to be able to say congratulations to the 438 graduating cadetsfrom The Citadel Class of 2007.

Did a politician just voluntarily demote himself from "high honors" to "honors" graduate when he could have let the slight promotion stand? Well done, Rudy. A small gesture, but a meaningful one, it seems.

Of course, one can hardly blame Gen. Rosa for mixing it up. It seems the city of New York thinks Giuliani graduated magna cum laude, as well.

I wandered around to the rest of his biographies to see if perhaps Rudy's correction was an attempt to wipe clean some resume embellishment he'd allowed to happen earlier in his career, but it appears that most of his online biographies (Wikipedia, Answers.com, and his own Guiliani Partners) have him listed as cum laude. Only NYC gets it wrong.

Click through for his whole speech-- very heavy on 9/11, importance of military strength, striving for victory, and plain old inspiration. I have a theory that the fewer headlines come out of a candidate's commencement speech, the better the speech served the audience for which it should be intended-- the graduates-- as opposed to the speaker. Giuliani's speech, when compared to Clinton's on the same weekend, in the same state, has gotten very little ink.







Monday, May 14, 2007
The Democrats’ FY08 Budget: Setting a Dangerous Course
Posted by: John Campbell at 2:26 PM

Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), who serves as ranking member of the House Committee on the Budget, put together this insightful post for the blog.  Paul is a real source of knowledge and wisdom when it comes to fiscal issues in Congress.  Check it out below.

I believe that the Democrats’ FY08 budget represents an enormous missed opportunity, and sets a disastrous course for our nation’s fiscal and economic future. 

First: The key – and seemingly only – fiscal policy of this budget is to raise taxes. If it stays within the scope of the House and Senate bills, this budget will impose on the American economy and American workers either the largest tax increase in our nation’s history, or the second largest tax increase in our nation’s history.

One of the most frustrating parts of our debates on the House budget was the Democrats’ dogged insistence that they are NOT raising taxes – pointing to some language they threw in there saying that they hope not to take this course. But a budget is numbers, and their numbers don’t lie. They unequivocally show a tax hike in the House of $400 billion, and a tax hike in the Senate of over $200 billion.

Even the Washington Post found the Majority’s claim inconsistent with the facts, noting that the House budget raises taxes nearly $400 billion; the Senate budget raises them more than $200 billion – the latter of which my House Democratic colleagues appeared to commit to following our motion to instruct on the floor this week.

But I’d hardly consider a $200 billion tax hike a "win" for American workers.

The Majority’s enormous tax hike will clearly threaten the economic and fiscal progress our nation has made these the past several years. As I’ve said many times before, the tax relief that we passed in 2001 and 2003 has turned this economy around and brought us out of a recession. It has improved job growth, GDP growth, the unemployment rate, business investment, and the entire market. In addition, it has led to surging revenues coming into the federal treasury. Raising taxes would threaten to reverse all of this.

And just think of the impact that tax hike will have on our small businesses. Our small businesses, who already have the second highest tax burden in the industrialized world, will be told that they are just not paying enough. In this increasingly global economy, where these companies are struggling to compete with China and India, imposing an even larger tax burden will be crushing. It will severely threaten our ability to compete – led alone lead.

Second: This budget does absolutely nothing to control spending. At every opportunity, the Majority has chosen to increase spending – they increased discretionary spending by $6 billion in this year’s omnibus appropriations bill; they’re proposing another $20 billion or so of extraneous spending in the supplemental; and now, the House budget would increase discretionary spending by $26 billion in FY08.

For all the talk we’ve heard about how the Democrats have to "clean up" what they call the "fiscal mess" Republicans left them, their only response seems to be spend more and tax more. This formula has never worked for getting control of the budget, and it won’t work now.

Finally, the Democrats’ budget not only avoids any effort to address the unsustainable growth of federal entitlement spending for at least the next five years, but in fact, actually compounds the problem, by including in so-called "reserve funds," promises to add another $150 billion in NEW entitlement spending – without, of course, any way to pay for it.

They’ve chosen to do this even after a parade of highly respected witnesses – including the U.S. Comptroller General, CBO Director, OMB Director, and Chairman of the Federal Reserve – warned us that the path of entitlement spending threatens to devastate both the budget and the economy.

Even with the $400-billion tax increase included in the House-passed budget, entitlement spending will quickly outpace revenue again, and by increasing amounts. We cannot raise taxes fast enough, or often enough, to deal with this unsustainable growth in spending.

So why has the Majority failed to do anything? Because, as Senate Budget Chairman Conrad recently put it on 60 Minutes, "it's always easier not to. [I]t's always easier to defer, to kick the can down the road to avoid making choices. You know, you get in trouble in politics when you make choices."

I appreciate the sentiment, but we all know that’s not what budgeting is about. It’s about making choices – even when they’re tough, even when they’re not politically popular – because that’s what we’re here to do.

And again, I believe that the budgets we’ve seen fail to make any real choices – let alone the right ones.

Our House Republican budget PROVED that we can not only balance the budget – we can do it without raising taxes – by keeping our economy growing strong and creating jobs, and by restraining federal spending.

This Congress must work together to change the dangerous course the Democrats’ budgets appear poised to set, and craft a plan to better our nation’s future.

 






Monday, May 14, 2007
The Blandness of Obama
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:25 PM

The AP does these "personal side" questions with all the presidential candidates about once a week. Sometimes it's, "What's your hidden talent?" or "What's your favorite TV show?"

For these lifelong politicians constantly battling to prove their regular Americanism, it's a chance to reveal how politicians are "just like us!" Or, at the very least, they get the chance to act like regular Americans. At their best, the answers can be revealing, genuine, funny, and endearing.

This week, the question was, "You're busy on the trail. What is it that's left undone at the house when you're out working?" All of the candidates were wise enough to avoid saying: "Nothing! My butler takes care of all the arrangements while I'm away."

Hillary Clinton said she hasn't organized her closets in a while. Presumably, the skeletons are as big a deterrent as her schedule. Chris Dodd pulls the cute-baby card, saying it's his 2-year-old's late-night tantrums that he's dealing with.

And, what insight do we get into Obama's life?

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama: "Too numerous to list"

The charmer ain't all he's cracked up to be.  Last week, he was too tired to know the  difference between 10,000 tornado victims and 12. This week, he can't even put an answer to the softest of softballs without a multiple choice option.





Related Articles
  • Obama's HillaryCare



  • Monday, May 14, 2007
    If You Can Stomach It
    Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:15 PM
    Here's Bill on Hill ...




    Monday, May 14, 2007
    Joe Biden's UnKempt Shrubbery, and Other Political Stories
    Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 12:02 PM

    First step: muzzle Al Gore.

    Democratic majority set to "save auto industry from itself," presumably by alleviating any remaining pressure or ability to earn a profit.

    America will accept a Mormon, Romney says. After all, Massachusetts already accepted a Republican. Stranger things have happened!

    House Democrats: From micromanaging the war to microfunding it

    Joe Biden fails to maintain his shrubbery.

    Anyone up for a tea party?

    Newsflash: Clinton says bad things about Bush.

    Edwards encourages graduates to become liberal protesters, not gainfully employed members of the workforce. Seventh-year seniors dub it "best graduation speech evuh."

    Will the most likeable Clinton bother campaigning for the barely tolerable one?

    Obama courts insurance industry votes: "We shouldn't be rewarding the insurance industryfor deceiving and defrauding our seniors, we should be doing everythingwe can to stop them."






    Monday, May 14, 2007
    The President Bush You Like
    Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 11:09 AM

    You know, there are times-- Medicare Drug Bill, No Child Left Behind, comprehensive immigration-- when I forget why I like President Bush. It happens to all of us. We're at the end of an eight-year haul, here, and any president in his eighth year has had sufficient time to make sufficient missteps in any direction to displease every single part of his constituency. It's the curse of being twice elected by that constituency.

    So, yes, sometimes I get frustrated and forget things like this:

    JoAnn Falletta was doing what a conductor should _ concentrating on the orchestra in front of her. No wonder it took her a few seconds on Sunday to realize someone behind her was motioning for a try. President Bush.

    "Smiling at me kind of devilishly," Falletta said.

    She gave him her baton and stepped aside.

    Gesturing exuberantly, the president led the orchestra during part of its performance of "Stars and Stripes Forever."

    "We didn't expect him to know the score so well," Falletta said afterward. "He was not shy about conducting at all. He conducted with a great deal of panache."

    Never underestimate likeability when you're dealing with the American voter. It's why Rudy has led for so long despite his lack of social-con cred. It's why I doubt the true strength of the Hillary juggernaut, powered as it is, partly by a woman who public speaks like she's opening doors at the Addams mansion, and comes across about as warm as flounder skin, and as real as a fish tale.

    This is the kind of stuff that made Bush that guy you want to have a beer with over Sir Kerry of Windsurfingham, and it's part of what wins elections. A large part. It doesn't eclipse policy questions, but in the close elections we're likely to face in the next generation of American voting, it can be huge.

    And, before the liberals read this and jump all over Bush's sense of propriety or some such nonsense, please remember that if Bill Clinton had done the same, he likely would have been promoted to a full-time job in front of the Boston Pops, so lauded would he have been.

    Oh, look! They're already making a fuss. This take-down of Bush's musical "bullying" is particularly melodramatic. Get. A. Grip.
     






    Monday, May 14, 2007
    Reason 101 Why Tommy Thompson is Lagging
    Posted by: Matt Lewis at 10:41 AM

    This is hillarious ...

    LAKE GENEVA, Wis. - Tommy Thompson cited a dead hearing aid and an urgent need to use the bathroom in explaining on Saturday why he said at a GOP presidential debate that an employer should be allowed to fire a gay worker.

    H/t: Hanlon






    Monday, May 14, 2007
    "The Mike Wallace Question"
    Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:09 AM

    My concern with the Mike Wallace question is: Where does it end?

    Some may argue that Romney opened the door to the question (by alluding to it himself). I watched the video, and still feel a line was crossed by Wallace.

    The fact that Romney laughed off the question does not mean we should excuse Wallace's question. From a political perspective, Romney handled it exactly right: Had he refused to answer; he would have looked like he was trying to hide something. Getting angry wouldn't have won him any points, either.

    But by answering the questioned, he, in a sense, validated it.  I am concerned that we are going down a dangerous path.  If you can ask a candidate that question, how about asking him about ... anything and everything personal...  Personally, I think that will ultimately demean the process, as well as the position of President.

    Some pundits are today apologizing for prematurely jumping on Wallace earlier this week (when Drudge linked to excerpts of the story). The truth is that 60 minutes most likely leaked the most salacious information to Drudge, specifically to generate buzz about the interview. It worked.

    Of course, the reason reporters ask these types of questions is, because it gets people talking. ... Including us. Interestingly, this is getting more play than the more substantive interview that McCain did with Russert, yesterday morning.

    So I'm hoping this is my last post on the topic... 






    Monday, May 14, 2007
    Romney on 60 Minutes
    Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:22 AM

    If you missed 60 Minutes, here's the infamous "pre-marital sex" question ...

    Regarding the question, K-Lo writes:

    Last week, when advance excerpts were circulated via Drudge, I thought Wallace ridiculous for asking Mitt Romney about his record on pre-martial sex. Actually, in context, it wasn't that weird for him to ask — the governor introduced the topic of hormones at BYU. Still odd, but not outrageous.

    MyManMitt has more video of Romney on 60 Minutes

      • According to MyManMitt's Justin Hart, key takeaways were:
      • Mitt's criticism of the war is eye-opening
      • The "pre-marital sex" question is awkward but not outrageous in its context
      • Mike seems rather taken with the Romney family
      • Mitt calls his wife "a babe"
      • Mitt aptly explains himself on the charge of flip-flop
      • The Romney's lake house has an awesome island designed for extra grandkid participation (see below) 




    Your Blog Postings:
    Last updated 10 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
    Last updated 13 Minutes 17 Seconds Ago
    Last updated 21 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
    Last updated 28 Minutes 10 Seconds Ago
    Last updated 31 Minutes 18 Seconds Ago
     

    Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

    Blog Search



    Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
    Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
    Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
    By Month
     December 2009
     November 2009
     October 2009
     September 2009
     August 2009
     July 2009
     June 2009
     May 2009
     April 2009
     March 2009
     February 2009
     January 2009
     December 2008
     November 2008
     October 2008
     September 2008
     August 2008
     July 2008
    By Issue
     A Culture of Life
     Budget & Government
     Campaigns & Elections
     Education
     Energy & Environment
     Faith & Family
     Foreign Affairs
     Health Care
     Immigration
     Jobs & Economy
     Judges & Courts
     Media & Culture
     Property Rights
     Safety & Security
     Science & Technology
     Second Amendment
     Social Security
     Tax Relief
    Advertisement

    Comments Comments

    NOTW 1:40 AM
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bob Munck
    arch 1:22 AM
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bob Munck
    Monk
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By NOTW
    Cicero
     Re: What Abdulmutallab's Half-Cup Of Explosives Could Have Done
      By Brendan
    douglas
     Re: What Abdulmutallab's Half-Cup Of Explosives Could Have Done
      By Brendan
    Bob Munck!
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    NOTW 12:48 AM
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bob Munck
    arch 12:46 AM
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bob Munck
    Bea
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    Great Fun, I had tons of laughs....
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bea
    Bea
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    Vlad was Muncks Halfback!!
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    Hey Arch and Homer....Where are you
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bea
    monk?
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By NOTW
    Give it up Bob!
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    Origanalist 12:09 AM
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bob Munck
    Origanalist
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch
    I'm outa here
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Origanalist
    Mr. Munck Has an Insatiable Need to.....
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By Bea
    Munck;s veal cheeks!
     Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
      By arch

    The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


    Blog Roll Blog Roll