Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, November 05, 2009
Gibbs: I'll tell you what a local election is...
Posted by: John Hanlon at 6:00 AM
I just saw this CNN.com story about Robert Gibbs referring to the state elections in New Jersey and Virginia as local elections while putting a lot of emphasis on a Congressional race in upstate New York.
 
I might not be an expert in geography but shouldn't an election in one out of over 400 Congressional districts be considered more of a local election than a Governor's race?





Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Esquire: 'Dear Mr. President: Stop Being Such A Celebrity'
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 8:57 PM
Even the Left are getting sick of it. They probably forgot why they voted for him.

Click image:

http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20081119/425.fox.obama.lc.111908.jpg





Wednesday, November 04, 2009
2012: Disasters Strike Christianity, Fear Islam
Posted by: Kevin Glass at 5:06 PM

2012, the big disaster movie starring John Cusack (that looks to be a disaster... seriously, the movie just looks bad) is about the end of the world and, as I'm sure you've all seen in the previews, uses a wide variety of special effects to destroy most of the world.

Director Roland Emmerich said he had great fun taking a CGI powered swipe at some of the world's landmarks, especially Christian houses of worship and symbols. But a major Muslim holy site managed to escape destruction.

On St. Peter's Basilica: 

"Why ... don't [we] have the church fall on people's head?" Emmerich said. He added: "The whole Vatican kind of tips and kind of rolls over the people. It said something, because in the story, some people ... believe in praying and prayer, and they pray in front of the church, and it's probably the wrong thing, what they would do in that situation."

The movie goes on to destroy the Sistine Chapel and Christ the Redeemer statue in Rio de Janeiro, the director says, "because I'm against organized religion."

The one that got away? Mecca. Even the Hollywood anti-religion director didn't want to draw the Jihadist ire of Muslims:

"My co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right. ... We have to all ... in the Western world ... think about this. You can actually ... let ... Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have ... a fatwa."

He said he "wanted to" show the destruction of Mecca, but was worried about violent repercussions against him.






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Sessions Urges Colleagues to Oppose Obama Nomination of Radical Judge David Hamilton
Posted by: Garrett Murch at 4:07 PM
Yesterday, Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), sent a letter to his Senate colleagues urging them to look into the radical record of Judge David Hamilton and to oppose his nomination to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Judge Hamilton's controversial decisions include:

  • ruling against public prayer in the Indiana State Legislature over "the use of Christ's name or title".  Yet, a Muslim imam's prayer to "Allah" was seemingly okay to Judge Hamilton


  • opposing the placement of a menorah in the Indianapolis-Marion County Building


  • blocking the implementation of an informed consent law for 7 years


  • disregarding the prior conviction of a repeat drug offender, effectively ignoring a law requiring the Judge to sentence the convicted offender to life in prison

Many of Judge Hamilton's rulings were subsequently overturned by higher courts, sometimes with scolding rebukes of the Judge's decisions. 

Click here to read Senator Sessions' letter to his colleagues.

More to come soon...

UPDATE:  Word on the street is the Judge Hamilton nomination could come to the floor for a vote as early as next week.  If you don't think this sort of behavior should be rewarded with an appointment to a circuit court, call your senators and let them know!





Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Health Care Update: Republican Reading Room
Posted by: John Campbell at 3:17 PM

Factoid of the day: President Barack Obama's economic recovery program saved 935 jobs at the Southwest Georgia Community Action Council, an impressive success story for the stimulus plan. Trouble is, only 508 people work there.

– Quote from an Associated Press Report on overstating of stimulus job creation by the White House. 

Pelosi Health Care Update: Last night at 10:07 PM Eastern time, Speaker Pelosi released the latest version of her health care plan. This version added 42 pages to make the total bill now a whopping 2,032 pages. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) had pledged to have the final bill in print for 72 hours before it is voted upon. That means that the soonest the bill could be brought to a vote on the House floor is 10:07 PM on Friday night.

But by all accounts, they have not yet cajoled the necessary 218 votes to ensure the bill’s passage. It also appears clear that they may make more changes to the bill in order to secure more votes before Friday night or Saturday. But they have also been clear that they will not wait until 72 hours after any further changes.

Reading the Bill

Yesterday, I spent some time in a “bill reading room” set up by Republicans to read the bill. In between floor speeches and committee votes, I randomly picked 3 sections of the bill to read. Each one was instructive. Here’s what I learned that I had not before known about the bill in just a short reading:

1. The bill contains a section called “Individual responsibility.” It is less than 20 words long. It merely refers to a section in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. But immediately following, is a section called “employer responsibility.” It goes on for many sections and pages. We will never control health care costs as long as people are disconnected from the choice, cost, and quality of the services they receive. This bill moves people farther away.

2. In another section of the bill, I only went a few pages before encountering an entirely new “private right of action.” A “private right of action” is an opportunity to file a lawsuit on the basis of federal law. This particular new lawsuit opportunity would be for employees to sue employers if they don’t like their health care choices. There are many more such new litigation opportunities in this bill. It is universally (except of course for Pelosi and her minions) acknowledged that lawsuit abuse is driving up health care costs through direct costs as well as “defensive medicine”  by tens of billions of dollars annually. However this bill not only contains no lawsuit reform, it actually will make the problem far, far worse.  The trial lawyer lobby, however, must be very happy.

3. There is a 5.4% surtax on incomes over $500,000. This is just a “soak the rich” tax to partially pay for socialized medicine. But interestingly, the tax applies to adjusted gross income, not to taxable income. That means if you make $500,000 and give it all to charity, you will still pay a surtax of $27,000 even though you have no net income. I am not aware of any other provision of the tax code that applies the tax on gross income, rather than taxable income.

It just gets worse and worse and worse.  We will keep up the fight. I hope you will too.






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Axelrod: When You Campaign On Obama's Progressive Program -- You Win!
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 2:24 PM
Bonus: MSNBC's show titled "Andrea Mitchell Reports" fails to live up to its name as evidenced in the last seconds of this clip:






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Dave Weigel On NY-23
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 1:54 PM
His reporting isn't particularly friendly to conservatives, but it is very, very good:
Hours before the polls closed, Hoffman backers were echoing the pundits’ spin–this race would be a referendum on President Obama, and a victory for Hoffman would put the brakes on health care reform by making Democrats worry about challenges to their re-elections in 2010. As a Hoffman victory became more and more remote, the rhetoric changed. The message became the message of two weeks ago. This election wasn’t about showing Republicans that conservatives could win. It was about showing Republicans that they couldn’t win without conservatives.





Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Joy Behar: Profits Are The "Real Immorality" Of Abortion
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 1:13 PM
Joy reflects the Left's view of real immorality: profit. It all boils down to economics. Marxism is alive and well, just repackaged under a different name. Observe CNN's newest host [H/T: Colleen Raezier]:






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
The Gray Lady Goes Gaga
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:59 PM
Over at American Thinker, Ken Blackwell takes the NYT down a peg.




Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Gibbs: Obama Watched His HBO Special Instead Of Elections
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 12:50 PM
Hopenchange indeed:






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
The Message
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 12:44 PM
It will be interesting to watch the 80 Democrat congressmen from the districts that McCain won last year -- just how far will they be willing to walk the plank for Obamacare, given that the president couldn't save Jon Corzine, who outspent his opponent 5:1 in a deep blue state like New Jersey?

As Politico points out, most people polled say that they weren't voting specifically for or against the President.  Fair enough.  But before anyone reads too much into that, consider the fact that it's still a bit "politically incorrect" to be "against" Barack Obama; that's why everyone still insists to pollsters they like him and that their vote isn't about him, even as they vote against politicians who share his agenda.

Finally, consider the magnitude of the vote shifts between last year and this.  The 20-point swing in New Jersey and Bob McDonnell's comfortable victory in Virginia -- just four years after barely squeaking in -- has a lot to say about the reasons for Obama's victory last year.  And they have nothing to do with a new left tilt in the US.

First, there were a lot of people who were tired of George Bush, ready for a change, and disgruntled by the war.  Second, John McCain was a lackluster candidate, who didn't have the enthusiastic support of his own party's base.  Third, lots of people (especially the young) were interested in "making history" -- without much consideration of Obama's ideology.  And that latter factor worked perfectly for the President -- whether by design or because he simply lacked details (or both), he kept his pitch largely agenda- and ideology-free, and the press let him get away with it.

Now the pendulum is swinging the other way.  Nervous Democrat congressmen must be realizing that a fuzzy fog of Obamania can't save them from their voters if they ignore the electorate's wishes.  And that's as it should be.




Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Steele: Elections Show "Transcendent" GOP
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 12:43 PM
Is it me or does CBS's Harry Smith seem a little upset about the election results?






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Fox Isn't A News Channel? At Least They Provide Coverage Of The News.
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 12:19 PM

I wasn't watching MSNBC last night, but Geraghty was. Ha, ha, ha:

It is pretty darn astounding that with all of the insistence from the White House that Fox News Channel is "not a real news network," their preferred channel, MSNBC, did not have live coverage at 10 p.m. Eastern on ELECTION NIGHT. They reran Olbermann's 8 p.m. coverage, which was, of course, two hours out of date.

No, really, when you stop covering the news, people can legitimately say you're not a news network. That has nothing to do with percieved bias or ideology (although we can speculate as to why Olbermann disappeared from the 10 p.m. coverage, where he was previously expected); it's because you're not actually bringing any new information to viewers.






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Tea Party Leader to Chris Matthews: "You're Making My Leg Tingle"
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 12:05 PM
A little entertainment for ya, via Breitbart:






Wednesday, November 04, 2009
About Last Night ...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 12:03 PM
Just talked about the elections with G. Gordon Liddy.  You can listen to the audio here.



Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 26 Minutes 26 Seconds Ago
Last updated 29 Minutes 30 Seconds Ago
Last updated 29 Minutes 44 Seconds Ago
Last updated 33 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
Last updated 33 Minutes 41 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

sceptyczny
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By AFCHIEF
sceptyczny 6:12pm
 Re: Berlin -- Hillary Pays Tribute To Those Who Destroyed The Wall; Doesn't Mention Reagan or Thatcher
  By Paul
Without Ronaldus Maximus, and Lady
 Re: Berlin -- Hillary Pays Tribute To Those Who Destroyed The Wall; Doesn't Mention Reagan or Thatcher
  By cottoneyed
Yo jerkwad inthemajority
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By RonnaRonna
Eugene
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By sceptyczny
A huge waste of money
 Re: An Adventure on Seattle's New Light Rail
  By koala
Hey Bob
 Re: On Hillary at the Wall
  By Eugene
majority
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By sceptyczny
white repubs are afraid of me, too
 Re: Steele: White Republicans Are Scared Of Me
  By Speedicut
OMG!
 Re: Steele: White Republicans Are Scared Of Me
  By Col Bat Guano
kaboom
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By Eugene
D'oh!
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By inthemajority
SHUT UP, "sceptyczny" , "kaboom"
 Re: Berlin -- Hillary Pays Tribute To Those Who Destroyed The Wall; Doesn't Mention Reagan or Thatcher
  By cottoneyed
vonryan..
 Re: On Hillary at the Wall
  By Eugene
Matt Lauer/sceptyczny - no credibility
 Re: NBC's Lauer: It's "Egocentric" To Think Fall Of Berlin Wall Was An "American Victory"
  By luckymick
RonnaRonna
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By inthemajority
Retired Lady
 Re: CNN's Kyra Phillips Uses Hasan To Prove Military Is Bigoted & Cause PTSD
  By sceptyczny
wow
 Re: Obama's Environmental Policies Could Hurt 2010 Dems, Too
  By sceptyczny
Poor Kyra so many stories and
 Re: CNN's Kyra Phillips Uses Hasan To Prove Military Is Bigoted & Cause PTSD
  By Retired Lady
Eddie
 Re: Steele: White Republicans Are Scared Of Me
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll