Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Monday, December 21, 2009
Republican Hardball Tactics Are Not Only Fun To Watch -- They're Working
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 10:14 AM

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has made a name for himself by launching barbs in the Senate designed to undermine the Democratic majority. Procedural tricks, an aggressive media campaign, and the ability to get all but one member of his 40-member caucus in line for votes has amounted to a minority that's remarkably empowered. In order to combat it, Majority Leader Harry Reid has needed to step up his game.

Reid has been able to do that, but at a high cost. With stimulus packages and bailouts, Reid has been forced to get all 60 of his members in lockstep -- not an easy task, considering the gravity of the legislation that's at play. (see Nelson, Ben). This in turn has enabled McConnell to -- rightly -- portray legislation as partisan and poorly thought-out.

Some think that McConnell's hardball tactics are too much. He's smirked at supposedly-hallowed Senate tradition by making annoying procedural demands, and turned the chamber into a funhouse with gasp-inducing rhetoric.

But stimulus packages are flying through the Senate like paper airplanes in a kindergarten classroom, and health reform will restructure one-sixth of the U.S. economy in one of the worst downturns in American history. Hours before the 1AM vote, several Democratic Senators weren't able to articulate their position on the bill, even though Reid had publicly said those Senators were on board with it. If there was any time to throw tradition and respect out the window, this would be it.



Tags: health   care



Monday, December 21, 2009
Yet Another Sweetheart Deal
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 10:05 AM
The New York Times finds an obscure little giveaway to Senator Max Baucus in the monstrosity that is the Senate health care bill.

Really, did the Democrats just pay off almost every member of their caucus to support this awful thing?

So much for the world's "greatest deliberative body" -- as they vote for a bill that hardly anyone's read, and in the dead of night.  How appropriate.




Monday, December 21, 2009
Senate Passes Health Care Hurdle
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 7:49 AM
At 1:30AM today, with most of D.C. snowed in, the Senate voted for cloture on the final version of Obamacare. It will be subject to two more cloture votes in the Senate, though this vote was thought to be the most significant. Then, the bill must be reconciled with the House version, a process that will probably be painful.

Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and conservative Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska were given personal favors in order to win their vote. The legislation mandates the purchase of health care, subsidizes the insurance for low-income people, and provides tax breaks or penalties for businesses who do not provide it for their employees. It cuts Medicare by over $150 billion, increases taxes on anyone making over $88,200, and clocks in at over 2,733 pages.

Here's Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's statement:

Any challenge of this size and scope has always been dealt with on a bipartisan basis.  The senior Senator from Maine made that point at the outset of the debate, and reminded us all how these things have been handled throughout history..

The Social Security Act of 1935 was approved by all but six members of the Senate.  The Medicare and Medicaid Acts of 1965 were approved by all but 21.  All but eight senators voted for the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Americans believe that on issues of this importance, one party should never be allowed to force its will on the other half of the nation.  The proponents of this bill felt differently.

In a departure from history, Democrat leaders put together a bill so heavy with tax hikes, Medicare cuts and government intrusion, that, in the end their biggest problem wasn’t convincing Republicans to support it, it was convincing the Democrats.


Tags: health   care



Sunday, December 20, 2009
The Real Cost of Health Care "Reform"
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 1:24 PM
As Jeffrey Anderson points out over at The Weekly Standard, the real cost of the Democrat health care "reform" bill remains $2.5 trillion dollars.

Well, that, plus our freedom.

But don't worry -- you'll get the chance to pay (and pay, and pay!) for it, too.  There are seven significant tax hikes for those making less than $250,000 per year.

Remember when everyone was talking about Obama as though he were some kind of Messiah?  Who knew his salvation would extend only to the big insurance companies? 




Saturday, December 19, 2009
Don't Give Up!
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:43 PM
Want to express your disgust with the backroom sweetheart deals Harry Reid is using to push through a health reform bill that's hated by left, right and center?

Check out ReverseTheVote.org.  It targets 24 Democrat congressmen in swing districts who voted for health care "reform."  Remember, it doesn't take much for one of them to change his or her mind when it comes to the final vote on health care.

And one could be all it takes.




Saturday, December 19, 2009
Obama in Copenhagen: Our Dramatic Breakthrough "Limits Warming To No More Than 2 Degrees"
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 3:35 PM
It's not even funny any more; scary is what it is.






Saturday, December 19, 2009
The Acid Test
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 3:26 PM
Shouldn't Democrats who vote for the health care legislation be willing to live under it? 

If you run into your "representative" (note the scare quotes, because many of those voting for the bill are doing so in defiance of their employers, the voters) while he or she's out on Christmas recess, ask if s/he is willing to forgo the federal employees' health benefit plan in favor of this new legislation being imposed on the rest of us.

That's the acid test.




Saturday, December 19, 2009
What's the Next Step?
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 1:35 PM
Now that the health care bill will likely pass in the Senate with Reid's 60-vote majority, the next question to consider is this: How do you think Pelosi will buy-off enough pro-life Blue Dogs and pro-public-option progressives to pass the measure through the House?

While the Speaker is trying to figure that one out, Politico is reporting today that Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak, Mich., is working behind the scenes with House GOP leadership to sink the compromise

An aide to Rep. Bart Stupak (D. Mich.) coordinated opposition to a Senate compromise on the place of abortion in health care legislation this morning with the Republican Senate leadership, the Conference Catholic Bishops, and other anti-abortion groups, according to a chain of frantic emails obtained this morning by POLITICO.

The emails show that Stupak — who has so far remained silent on language accepted by Senator Ben Nelson (D. Neb.) and faces intense pressure from the White House to accept it — is already working behind the scenes to oppose the compromise.

They also demonstrate a previously unseen degree of coordination between Stupak and the office of Republican leader Mitch McConnell.






Saturday, December 19, 2009
HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 12:04 PM
I'd love to ask Sen. Ben Nelson exactly which "concessions" were made in order to line-up his support behind Reid's Obamacare bill.  First of all, the bill does NOT prohibit the use of federal funds for abortion.  In fact, unless states act in passing legislation that would ban the practice, taxpayer funds WILL be used to subsidize abortions. 

The only 'concession' I see is that states have the option to "opt-out" of abortion funds--note the language is "opt-out," not "opt-in."  The default position of the bill is to fund abortions.  Way to stick solidly to those principles, Ben. 

Furthermore, Reid's managers amendment reads:
(1) NO PREEMPTION OF STATE LAWS REGARDING ABORTION.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt or otherwise have any effect on State laws regarding the prohibition of (or requirement of) coverage, funding, or procedural requirements on abortions, including parental notification or consent for the performance of an abortion on a minor.
At last count, there are 13 states in which state supreme courts have mandated public funding for abortions and an additional 4 states which voluntarily provide the funding.  The way that I read this provision is that this bill will not preempt these state laws or voluntary practices, and, with its passage 17 states will automatically begin funneling federal tax dollars to abortion clinics.  

Is Ben Nelson only pro-life in Nebraska--a state which currently restricts publicly funded abortions?  Or is he actually against the practice of abortion, regardless of state? 

If Nelson is signing his support onto this bill, he is agreeing to support the public funding of abortions in at least 17 states.





Saturday, December 19, 2009
What Was Nelson's Price?
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 10:55 AM
Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson gave up his fight against the Obama health care plan this morning when Majority Leader Harry Reid introduced his own 383-page "managers amendment."  Call me a skeptic, but I believe there are probably things included in that amendment which helped "persuade" Nelson to vote 'aye.'

We all know Nelson's opposition to the bill was largely about the bill's federal funding of abortions--a practice the bill new language "limits," but specifically does not ban.  In fact, page 39 of the newly released language specifically outlines "abortions for which public funding is allowed." 

But in addition, Nelson has recently complained that the bill's proposed expansion of Medicaid entitlements to certain low-income individuals would put stress on the state of Nebraska.  Nelson suggested states should be able to "opt-in" to the program if they wished to participate. 

Surprise!  Page 98 of today's new managers amendment specifically identifies the state of Nebraska for a higher level of federal matching funds--funds that would fully fund its Medicaid expansion an entire year past those of other states:  
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (b) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, the Federal medical assistance percentage otherwise determined under subsection (b) with respect to all or any portion of a fiscal year that begins on or after January 1, 2017, for the State of Nebraska, with respect to amounts expended for newly eligible individuals described in subclause (VIII) of section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i), shall be determined as provided for under subsection (y)(1) (A) (notwithstanding the period provided for in such paragraph)
So in order to get Nelson's support, the country is bankrolling additional benefits for the state of Nebraska.  Nice.

Update:
Like a true politician, Nelson says he supports the bill now, but says he "reserves the right" to change his mind.





Saturday, December 19, 2009
JAM DOWN
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 10:32 AM
Bargaining behind closed doors, Democrats have prevailed upon Ben Nelson to provide the 60th vote for a health care bill that no one -- besides, apparently, 60 Senate Democrats -- really wants.

No one really knows what's in the bill and no one really knows how much it will cost.

People from the left, right and center have made their opposition clear.

But in the greatest act of legislative arrogance of my lifetime, Democrats have pressed on. 

Here, Senator John McCain complains about the breakdown of comity in the Senate.  I'd submit that the problem is much larger -- even going so far as to say that it's a breakdown in a representative democracy when the people's servants in the national legislature ignore their clearly stated wishes.




Saturday, December 19, 2009
Updated: Man Faces Up to Year in Prison for Being Naked in Own Home
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 7:20 AM
From Fox News:
A Virginia man is scheduled to go on trial for indecent exposure Friday after police say he stood naked inside his house as a 7-year-old boy and his mother walked by.

The mother and child allegedly observed the defendant, Erick Williamson, first through a doorway and again through a window that had no drapes, MyFoxDC

Williamson, the father of a 5-year-old, said he was in the confines of his home and should be allowed to be naked there. Police said he made a point of making himself visible to the pair as they walked to school along a path outside his home.

Williamson denied the allegations, saying he's not an exhibitionist and didn't know people could see him in his kitchen, MyFoxDC reported.

Williamson's arrest received national attention and spurred debate about whether a person should be subject to arrest for exposure from inside his own home.

His trial is set to kick off in Fairfax County General District Court, if convicted he could face up to a year in jail.
Update: Williamson has been found guilty of "indecent exposure."  He received a suspended sentence and no fine for the misdemeanor.  If you live in Virginia and don't already own one, you might want to invest in a good bathrobe. 





Friday, December 18, 2009
Obama Dispassionately Reads Through Copenhagen Speech: "We Are Running Short Of Time"
Posted by: Greg Hengler at 5:24 PM
As Ace writes, the brilliant windbag gets quite a neck workout without Mr. Teleprompter. BTW: I think I had the same cadence while reading "Where The Wild Things Are" out loud to my parents when I was in second grade.








Friday, December 18, 2009
Why Does AARP Support Obamacare?
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 3:07 PM
Young America's Foundation & Hot Air demonstrate:






Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 10 Minutes 21 Seconds Ago
Last updated 16 Minutes 31 Seconds Ago
Last updated 17 Minutes 29 Seconds Ago
Last updated 36 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
Last updated 38 Minutes 28 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

SEXIST MUNCK
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Jo
Dear Jo, Bea, et al
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By dreadnaught
Munck gives his thanks:
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By homer noble
Arch, Cicero, Ronna, all
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By AliveInHim
In 20 days... Ted Kennedys Senate Seat
 Re: Byron York: Get Going For The 2010 Elections
  By Dan
Damn it Cicero!!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
A.J. Go Straight To Hell!!!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
dreadnaught
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Jo
AJ
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By BK
DeBuncked writes. . .
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Cicero
Munck. What a display!
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Brendan
 Re: What Abdulmutallab's Half-Cup Of Explosives Could Have Done
  By Cicero
Terrorism is a cost of Empire
 Re: What Abdulmutallab's Half-Cup Of Explosives Could Have Done
  By Cicero
Bea 11:19 PM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
dreadnaught
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Jo
Some brute, Cottonpuff
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By A.J.
Jo 10:37 PM
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bob Munck
Dreadnaught (12-29 @ 10:44 PM):
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By Bea
Cotton
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch
Jo
 Re: Capitol Goes Into Lockdown
  By arch

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll