Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Friday, July 10, 2009
Side Note
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 11:37 AM
Is anyone else secretly happy that Drudge has left the picture of Obama and Sarcozy staring at a woman's derierre as his main headline photo since yesterday afternoon? It's still there after, what, 18 hours? I hope it stays there all weekend!





Friday, July 10, 2009
The Audacity of Reading The Bill
Posted by: Dwayne Horner at 10:27 AM
Is it too much to ask our lawmakers to actually read the bill? I posted on this earlier, Let Freedom Ring has a petition for members of Congress to pledge to READ the healthcare bill BEFORE they vote on it.

Colin Hanna of Let Freedom Ring recently spent time with Megyn Kelly on Fox News:







Friday, July 10, 2009
Do This
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 9:58 AM
Congressional bills often range from hundreds to thousands of pages, and the Democratic Congress has been shortening the amount of time allotted between when a bill is penned and a Member must vote. The health care bill will probably run at least 1,500 pages, and Congressional Republicans will have 3 days to peruse it. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D.-Md.) laughed when asked if Members should have enough time to read a bill -- and that's not right.

DownsizeDC.org is trying to mandate the reading of bills before Members can vote on them. They're encouraging all constituents to write their representatives and express support for the measure. It's a worthy cause.




Thursday, July 09, 2009
Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 7:27 PM
USA Today reports today that billions more federal aid dollars have been reserved for areas around the country that supported President Obama during the 2008 presidential election.
Much of it [$17 billion of the stimulus package spent to date] has followed a well-worn path to places that regularly collect a bigger share of federal grants and contracts, guided by formulas that have been in place for decades and leave little room for manipulation.

"There's no politics at work when it comes to spending for the recovery," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says.
However, an analysis of government accounting records by USA Today has found that counties that supported then-Senator Obama last year have received twice as much money per person from the federal economic stimulus package as those that voted for his rival, Republican Sen. John McCain.

Jake Wiens, an investigator with the non-profit Project on Government Oversight, says it's too soon to draw meaningful conclusions about whether the type of aid in the stimulus favors Obama's constituents.

But, he says, "it will be important to pay close attention as the data come in to ensure that political favoritism plays no role."

We'll keep you posted...







Thursday, July 09, 2009
Government Spends More to Show How it's Spending
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 6:50 PM
Smartronix, Inc. has been tapped by the General Services Administration (GSA) to spruce up the government's stimulus money-tracking website Recovery.gov.  The agency awarded the $9.5 million government contract to Smartronix late Wednesday on behalf of the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board responsible for tracking spending under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.  Think $9.5 million is a little excessive for redesigning a website?  Smartronix is also slated to receive an additional $8.5 million for website "maintenance" through January 2014.

Spokesman Ed Pound says the website, dubbed "Recovery 2.0," will be a "highly functional" website and rejects any suggestion that the government may be overpaying.  Meanwhile, the Washington Examiner reports that similar government websites have been developed in the past for significantly less money, costing as little as $10,000.

In summary, American taxpayers are being tapped to pay $18 million dollars for a website that already exists; a website created to report on how the government is  spending our money.  Oh, the irony! 




Thursday, July 09, 2009
"Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
Posted by: Michael Medved at 6:13 PM



Last night, my husband invited me to a pre-release screening of the new Sacha Baron Cohen flick, "Bruno." Our son has been anticipating this for weeks, because he just loved "Borat," where Baron Cohen plays a bigoted, backward "innocent" journalist from Khazakstan interviewing and grossing out people across America. I happened to attend the Borat screening and found myself at many points laughing (and feeling guilty about it) and at other points completely revolted.

I felt guilty because the Borat character created hilarious situations by taking advantage of people. Kindly, helpful teachers, dinner companions, hoteliers and others were exploited and made to look either stupid or prejudiced. A scene where children run in real terror from an ice cream truck equipped with a ferocious live bear is funny, but at the same time painful. I think my son liked Borat because it's the kind of immature humor that 15-year-old-boys appreciate, in which scatology and others' embarrassment serve the cause of personal kicks. Luckily, he got an invitation to go camping with a friend, so wasn't in town for the Bruno screening.

From the buzz about the new film and a few teaser clips, I knew that Borat would be tame by comparison. I'm not eager to focus on anyone's rear end, and the word about Bruno was that orificial humor was prevalent. So, much as I enjoy an evening out with my husband, I chose to skip this one.

I'm so glad I did.

My husband--who was highly disappointed in the movie--came home ready to give me a detailed description, but had to phrase things carefully, and even then several times I stopped him mid-statement. The plot sounds not only disrespectful of gays, but downright degrading of them, as well as of straights. Inserting items in dank receptacles apparently comprises a large portion of the action.

The Internet Movie Data Base features a "Parents' Guide" page listing potentially objectionable scenes. There are no entries under "Profanity," "Alcohol/Drugs/Smoking" and "Frightening/Intense Scenes" for Bruno. But what's provided under "Sex and Nudity" sounds frightening enough to me; I'm uncomfortable repeating them. "Grade inflation" or crafty producers managed to nab the film an R rating; my husband felt this was a definite NC-17.

After hearing the contents of this film, my only question was, "who'd want to see this?" It's certainly not a date movie. All women, lesbians included, would be turned off by the exaggerated gay stereotypes, and certainly by the anal fixation. Heterosexual males won't be attracted to the crude overt homosexuality; it's not politically correct even to laugh at it. And I'd guess that gay guys wouldn't find Sacha Baron Cohen's crass portrayal of their sexuality either arousing or supportive of their cause.

I could be wrong, however.

There might be enough immature guys who enjoy watching animated, talking members, champagne bottles in unusual holders, and cage-fighting that devolves into men making out, to carry this film to success. But, to the credit of our national sensitivities, I doubt it.





Thursday, July 09, 2009
Hardly a Surprise
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 5:59 PM
Today, the Washington Post reports, in effect, that Sonia Sotomayor doesn't seem either to grasp or else to honor by the distinction between a trial judge and an appellate one.

Can anyone truly be surprised?  Sotomayor is "empathetic" -- she doesn't understand that a judge's role isn't to make policy; it's to interpet the law.  If she's willing to ignore a judge's role altogether, why would she bother abiding by the traditional understanding of the different roles of a trial and appellate judge?




Thursday, July 09, 2009
Roll Call: DOJ Says Murtha Earmark Money Was Illicitly Distributed
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 5:12 PM
Paul Singer from Roll Call reports:

A contracting firm that had hired the brother of Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) as its lobbyist took the proceeds from a Murtha-provided, $8.2 million Air Force earmark and distributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to other companies represented by the Congressman’s brother for items that were not part of the project, the Justice Department charged Thursday.

The charges make no indication that the Congressman had any involvement or knowledge of the transactions.

Roll Call reported in June that Murtha used a 2005 tsunami relief bill to take away $8.2 million of government funding from a company called AEPTEC Microsystems that had severed ties with his brother’s lobbying firm and moved that money to Coherent Systems International, which had hired his brother’s firm. The lobbying firm, Rockville, Md.-based KSA Consulting, had hired Kit Murtha and Carmen Scialabba, a former Appropriations Committee staffer for Congressman.

Charging documents filed Thursday by the Justice Department in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida allege that Richard Ianieri, CEO of Coherent, paid a total of $1.8 million to other firms for items that were not part of the “Ground Mobile Gateway” project that Murtha’s earmark had funded. Ianieri is charged with one count of presenting false purchase orders to the government.

For the whole story, click here.







Thursday, July 09, 2009
Climate Change Debate on Hold
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 4:50 PM
President Obama's push for quick and decisive action in Congress on climate change legislation suffered a minor setback today.  Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer announced work on the bill will be delayed until after Congress returns from its August recess. 

From the Washington Post:

"We'll do it as soon as we get back" from that break, Boxer told reporters. Asked if this delay jeopardizes chances the Senate will pass a bill this year, Boxer said, "Not a bit ... we'll be in (session) until Christmas, so I'm not worried about it."

But Boxer did not guarantee Congress will be able to finish a bill and deliver it to Obama by December, when he plans to attend an international summit on climate change in Copenhagen. 

"I want to take this as far as we can take it (before Copenhagen). The more we do the better," Boxer said.

Expect the ongoing climate debate to pick back up in September.  Perhaps Senators will use the extra time to read the bill? 





Thursday, July 09, 2009
Congressional Report: Government Was Culprit in Housing, Economic Crisis
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 4:40 PM
According to a report released from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Tuesday, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were the leading culprits in the housing crisis because they encouraged people to borrow money, despite the fact they might not be able to pay it back.  Duh. 

It took 9 months and a 26-page government report to realize this?

Conservatives have long been warning that federal programs like the Community Reinvestment Act would build an inflated housing market resting on shaky foundations. 

In fact, the report explains how Fannie and Feddie--government programs exempt from the oversights governing other publicly-traded firms--"privatized their profits but socialized their risks."

CNSNews reports.









Thursday, July 09, 2009
AFL-CIO, Sen. Franken Get Cozy
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 4:20 PM
Fresh from his swearing-in as Minnesota's newest U.S. Senator, Al Franken wasted no time this week in thanking labor unions for their support of his campaign.  The Washington Examiner reports:
Only one day in office and already Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., is getting special treatment--special treatment from special interest groups.

Labor union AFL-CIO was the first group to cozy up to the new senator, hosting a party in his honor Tuesday evening at the union's headquarters ... He told the crowd of AFL-CIO and Working America supporters... that his long-debated election win was because of them.

"It's completely accurate to say that I wouldn't have won this without you," he said.
Not surprisingly, Sen. Franken quickly moved to reciprocate his love and support, adding his name to the list of co-sponsors on controversial union-backed card check legislation.







Thursday, July 09, 2009
Justice Ginsburg on Abortion as Population Control
Posted by: Olivia Offner at 4:19 PM
In an interview with The New York Times Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg discusses the concept of abortion as a way to control population growth, specifically of certain groups. Ginsburg, who was commenting on the role of women on the court and the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor, said "Reproductive choice has to be straightened out." She then went on to say, in response to a question about the availability of abortion for poor women and the case Harris v. McRae (in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions):
Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.





Thursday, July 09, 2009
Carry-On Baggage Next on Illinois Rep's Agenda
Posted by: Meredith Jessup at 3:40 PM
Three-term U.S. Congressman Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) this month introduced a bill that would impose a federal limit on the size of baggage allowed to be carried by passengers boarding aircraft.  It sounds like while jet-setting to and from the nation's capital, the Congressman has been somewhat inconvenienced in the past: "The passengers who board the plane last often don't have any place to stow their carry-ons because the people who got on first fill the overhead bins with oversize roll-on bags," Lipinski said. 

Instead of arriving for flights earlier to secure overhead space, let's introduce some legislation!  While we're on the subject, can we ban carry-on luggage from being stowed beneath seats?  Air travelers should have a right to overhead compartment space and adequate leg room!


If you're interested, get out your tape measure and read the full story to see if Rep. Lipinski would deem your carry-on acceptable. 







Thursday, July 09, 2009
Best of the Blogs
Posted by: Chris Regal at 2:53 PM
The Left's worst nightmare: Is Sarah Palin now more viable than ever

What happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?  What sacrifice did they make?

Why is the Left so in love with spending our money and controlling our lives?

Has the American Disabilities Act been destroyed by lawyers, undercutting its original purpose in favor of hurting small business?

As always, be sure to follow us on Twitter!




Thursday, July 09, 2009
Health Care Bill Funds Community Transformation Projects
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 1:57 PM
You would think that any health care bill brought forth in Congress would actually be focused on reforming health care. Alas, it seems that both House and Senate proposals are packed with pork as well.

As the Boston Globe has reported, tucked into bills in both chambers are provisions funding what Senator Ted Kennedy’s staff calls “Community Transformation Grants.”  Essentially, we’re talking about federal funding for bike paths, lighting, jungle gyms, and even farmers markets.

In the House bill, at least the spending is capped -- $1.6 billion per year.  The Senate bill leaves the sky the limit – leaving the amount of spending up to the Obama Administration.

While these projects may have merit, they certainly don't belong in a health care reform package.  With priorities like this running amok on Capitol Hill, is there any doubt that health care costs will only continue to skyrocket under government-run health care?





« Previous12345678910904905Next »
Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 11 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 16 Minutes 42 Seconds Ago
Last updated 33 Minutes 31 Seconds Ago
Last updated 37 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 16 Minutes 1 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Hermeneutics
 Re: Justice Ginsburg on Abortion as Population Control
  By vladimir estragon
Pix
 Re: Side Note
  By vladimir estragon
Enjoyed your Journal
 Re: Honey Journal #25
  By Mona
Marty--where do you live?
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Kaboom
Sascha Baron Cohen...
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By nihilist
Vlad asks:
 Re: Government Run Health Care Inevitably Leads to Rationing
  By BK
Exeye 12:03 PM
 Re: Government Spends More to Show How it's Spending
  By Bob Munck
Exeye writes:
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By BK
Bat Guano
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Kaboom
If ....
 Re: Do This
  By Tim
Plumber
 Re: The Audacity of Reading The Bill
  By BK
Profound, wbfrank9
 Re: Side Note
  By Cicero
Cicero,
 Re: Side Note
  By David WI
Before you go to the movies
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Preston
ah....
 Re: Side Note
  By wbfrank9
It's a funny still.
 Re: Side Note
  By Cicero
Cuban Pete 12:04 PM
 Re: Do This
  By Bob Munck
Bob
 Re: Hardly a Surprise
  By The Plumber
How About
 Re: The Audacity of Reading The Bill
  By Big Sky Cowboy
Not nearly as funny
 Re: Side Note
  By Col Bat Guano

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll