Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Monday, October 19, 2009
Environmentalist Proposes Tax Breaks For Only Having One Kid... Because Of Carbon Footprint
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 6:45 PM
It's only a "thought experiment," said Andrew Revkin, an environmental reporter for the New York Times.
...probably the single most concrete and substantive thing an American, young American, could do to lower our carbon footprint is not turning off the lights or driving a Prius, it's having fewer kids, having fewer children.





Friday, October 16, 2009
Richard Dawkins: Creationists Don't Read Books
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 12:37 PM
If Dawkins is what you get out of evolution, sign me up with the creationists. From a recent interview about his new book, "The Greatest Show On Earth."
Salon: You say in the beginning of the book that you would like to convince people that creationism is not a feasible or a viable belief system, but you also make it clear that you're not a big fan of creationists.

Dawkins: That's putting it mildly, yes.

Salon: Doesn't that make it difficult for a creationist to read this book without feeling insulted? Won't that hurt your goal?
Dawkins: No, I'm not really aiming it at creationists. I don't think they read books anyway, except for one book.
Oh, and, Americans who voted for John McCain and Sarah Palin are unintelligent, but those who voted for Barack Obama are smart.

Salon: Do you also think there's a greater degree of anti-intellectualism in America compared to a lot of other countries?

Dawkins: There does seem to be evidence of a divide in the United States between two cultures. It does seem to be a deeper divide, and maybe even a widening one, perhaps we don't see in European countries. There seems to be a divide between what shall we say -- the Sarah Palin voters and the Barack Obama voters.






Thursday, October 15, 2009
6-Year Old Boy Floats Away In Homemade Helium Balloon Aircraft?
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 3:21 PM
You can watch live coverage on network television, or on Breitbart.He's traveling between 15-20mph, 4,000 feet in the air above Colorado. This is completely terrifying.

UPDATE: The thing just landed. No one came out. No one knows where the kid is. Developing...

UPDATE: He was hiding in a box in the attic of his home. Just.....wow.




Wednesday, October 14, 2009
"In my country there is problem. And that problem is transport."
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 7:59 AM
How the government helped create our traffic problems. 

(And why American conservatives should give Mass Transit a second look) ...





Monday, September 07, 2009
Another Radical for Obama
Posted by: Dwayne Horner at 4:13 PM
http://www.scienceprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/michaels_event_591.jpg

An editorial in today's Washington Times highlights David Michaels -- President Obama's nominee to head the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA).  As the Times describes Mr. Michaels, he is "a virulently anti-business
epidemiologist" who "is one the nation's foremost proponents of allowing junk science to be used in jackpot-justice lawsuits."

You might remember that a couple months ago I wrote about BPA,  an innovative chemical for plastics which radical environmentalists have unfairly targeted.

Well, it turns out David Michaels was also one of the zealots behind
the anti-BPA junk-science scare campaign which has cost Americans untold numbers of jobs -- and has lined the pockets of trial lawyers with millions of dollars from the pockets of hard-working parents who bought into his fear campaign.

The Senate must reject David Michaels' nomination to head OSHA.




Thursday, September 03, 2009
CNN: No, Obama Cannot Control The Internet
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 10:47 AM
CNN actually sought the counsel of experts to prove it.

As the country's messy debate about health care reform continues, some online observers are starting to wonder if Obama has lost his grip on Internet discourse.

They're also wondering if it's possible for any one person -- no matter how powerful -- to control public dialogue on a medium like the Internet, where conversations are driven by millions of users instead of TV pundits and heads of state.

So, Obama just isn't powerful enough to control the internet? Or he is being overshadowed by others who are less powerful overall but have more internet-power? Are these people taking internet steroids? If so, how is the President supposed to get some of those?

More importantly, how am I supposed to get some of those?






Thursday, August 13, 2009
Clunkers Update: It's Even Worse Than We Thought It Was
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 12:30 PM
This isn't surprising: some cars at the very edge of the margins of the government's fuel-efficiency requirements are being bought with cash-for-clunkers money. The Ford F-150 truck and the Cadillac SRX Crossover, which weighs over 6,000 pounds when loaded and have 248 horsepower, are being purchased with government dough. I'm not sure how much longer the lie of environmental activism can be kept alive....


Tags: clunkers



Thursday, August 13, 2009
Gov Considers Reversing Policy on Tracking Citizens' Computers
Posted by: Jillian Bandes at 12:21 PM
For the past nine years, the government has been forbidden to track cookies from its users— you know, the bits of information that a computer transmits to a website when it visits that website. Now, they want to start tracking that info, in a move that alarms even the ACLU. From Michael Macleod-Ball, Acting Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office:
Without explaining this reversal of policy, the OMB is seeking to allow the mass collection of personal information of every user of a federal government website. Until the OMB answers the multitude of questions surrounding this policy shift, we will continue to raise our strenuous objections.
In the words of Ace of Spades: "Tracking Terrorists on the Internet: Bad. Tracking American Citizens on the Internet: Good."


Tags: Privacy



Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Science Czar: Forced Abortions and Sterilization?
Posted by: Katie Pavlich at 2:48 PM

Paul Holdren, the new science czar, another radical to add to President Obama’s list of questionable connections, is coming under fire for his controversial, and as some would say, morally wrong statements and ideas.

During Holdren’s Senate confirmation hearings, senators were unaware of a textbook he co-authored in 1977 titled, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment.” 
    
Portions of the book explain possible ways of controlling the human population in order to benefit the environment including forced abortion and involuntary sterilization. Read more here.






Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Proof Central 'Planning' Doesn't Work
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 6:40 AM
"In all the briefing papers prepared for the famous Clinton Little Rock summit in late 1992, the word Internet never appeared." - Newsweek




Friday, May 01, 2009
Swine Flu: Out to Get You (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
Posted by: Michael Medved at 2:43 PM
(Note from Diane: Michael asked me to re-post this from my blog, www.brightlightsearch.blogspot.com)

In just a few days, the world has become afraid to breathe.

All of a sudden, anyone coughing or feverish or imagining a scratchy throat is sure he's got Swine Flu. And all he had to do was inhale.

BTW, this malady will not be renamed, despite an MSNBC story reporting Jews offended at the term because pigs aren't kosher. (And flu is?)

In our northwesterly corner of the country, the Seattle Times blares in a headline much larger than the masthead, "Swine flu found here." I can see students perking up; they're talking about closing all the schools because three unconfirmed cases have surfaced. One of them, an 11-year-old boy who attends Madrona K-8, gave his fellow pupils there an unexpected vacation--the institution closed down for a week (the boy's doing just fine).

Meanwhile, 230,000 five-day courses of Tamiflu antidote are on their way to our area. When health officials announce such things, people think, "uh-oh, we're going to need it!" And so hospitals and clinics are filling up--with people who want to be tested, just in case. We're not going to get the "reagents" required to confirm that Swine Flu is here until next week, but the runaway publicity is enough to make you sick.

Even if you're not. Ubiquitous photos of people in blue face masks everywhere foster paranoia, but this is just the latest manifestation of the overkill of medical information. Remember SARS? That got the same publicity treatment a couple years ago. Not nice to endure, I'm sure, but certainly not the pandemic it was predicted to be. Avian flu got a lot of ink (nowadays, a lot of pixels) and is more deadly than its Swinely counterpart, but despite the scare, it fizzled out near where it began.

Cancer. It's everywhere and nobody knows when and who it will strike. But thousands of books, websites and blogs document its grisly course and the agonies of its treatment, mounting in our consciousness. Hospitals court clients with ads reminding, "It's your cancer..." Heart-rending stories of valiant children battling disease are the staples of grocery-store check-out line mags. Fundraisers for every illness increase awareness of maladies we can't spell, but now personally fear. Radio ads seek participants in clinical trials for diabetes, dementia, insomnia. As I write this, I hear a radio ad that assumes all men are desperate for "prostate support:" "So why wouldn't you try new Beta Prostate?"

In so (too) many words: you're a goner. You're in line for enlarged prostate, some kind of cancer, and now, Swine Flu, no matter what you do. Wash your hands. Take bee pollen. Avoid eating red meat. Wear a surgical mask. Better, don't read the newspaper (I know, nobody does anyway), or listen to the radio, or check online news. BTW, in every normal year, 35,000 Americans die from flu. Mexico, its 75,6066 square miles being ground zero for the porcine problem, has had 99 cases, total.

Okay, the World Health Organization yesterday gave Swine Flu a level five pandemic warning--meaning it's imminent, crouching at your door, seeping through the cracks. But I just don't know how much more paranoid we can get. We're already hyper-aware of disease risks; kindergartens require parents to provide bottles of anti-bacterial gel along with pencils and crayons for their kids.

Panic among the population may soon mean isolation--Mexico's President Filipe Calderon told all citizens to stay home, inside, and all non-essential services are suspended for five days. (Starbucks closed ten of its Mexico City stores, so you know this is serious, but it's got 249 others in the country.)

Why don't I hyperventillate over Swine Flu? Because unlike cancer, it can be prevented, has a relatively simple treatment, can be tackled with drugs, and is unlikely to be deadly any more than "normal" flu. But you can bet in the next month or so, we'll have a swine-specific vaccine for sale in every drugstore.

Each autumn we receive relentless urgings to get flu shots. I used to listen to them, but every year I got a flu shot, I lost two weeks to some bug, shivering, sweating and miserable (probably one not covered by the vaccine). Every year I did not get a flu shot, I stayed healthy.

Should we bolt when somebody sneezes? Twitch rather than scratch our noses? Refuse to shake hands? Should we avoid movie theaters, and wear rubber gloves for escalator handrails? Should we live our lives even more worried about infection than we already are?

Well, it's up to you. But the next time I see you when I dash into the supermarket, maybe we oughta just wave hi.

(Reuters photo above is couple saying goodbye at Cancun airport)




Wednesday, February 04, 2009
What's Your Latitude?
Posted by: Ericka Andersen at 6:10 PM
Google Latitude, a breakout online tracking feature that allows users to locate people based on cell phones and GPS systems, is futuristically cool but some have concerns over privacy issues. The software was released today and has been marketed as a tool for parents to keep track of their kids and friends to keep up with eachother. It's all the buzz in the PC world today, despite the fact that another software -- Loopt --has been around for several years.

Like its creepy predecessor Google Earth, Latitude's "stalker-like" capabilities seem abrasive. But, the feature is optional and users must give permission to be tracked. Like an away message or a limited Facebook profile, users can also select a "blanket location" to broadcast where they want others to think they are.

Latitude has been described as "location-based Twitter," and receives location descriptions via nearby cell phone towers. The WSJ's report on their testing of Latitude revealed some inaccuracies, including the tracking being off by more than a mile and precision differences depending on cell phone service. (It does not yet work for the iphone, though iphone does have similar applications.)

As hip and networked as Latitude is, does it put us on a pathway to eventual privacy invasion? Even though the program is opt-in only, it could possibly allow hackers and computer savvy predators a way into your personal life. Last year, Google itself said "complete privacy does not exist" and probably isn't very interested in yours.

Cord Blomquist, who has written about Google and online privacy issues before, said "concerns from privacy watchdogs are misplaced here" and that voluntarily sharing information "often makes life more interesting." He also noted how the tool can be used to find crime victims.

So have fun with Latitude but watch who you allow to "follow" you because they might be right behind you.





Tuesday, January 20, 2009
iNauguration
Posted by: Jonathan Garthwaite at 12:20 PM
UStream advertised that they were streaming the inauguration through a new iPhone application. ? It actually worked as advertised.




Tuesday, December 23, 2008
TweetCongress.org
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 5:07 PM
Have you ever wondered whether you can follow your Senator or Congressman on Twitter? Well, now you can find out. TweetCongress.org keeps track of which Members of Congress are tweeting and which ones have yet to join me in the revolution. They also track how many people follow each congressional tweeter, as well as the partisan breakdown of said tweeters (despite being in the minority, there are almost twice as many GOP tweeters as Dem tweeters). 

Specifically, you should check out our good friend Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who is rapidly climbing the "most followed" rankings. Currently, he clocks in as the 8th most followed tweeter in Congress (that's counting both houses and both parties).





Wednesday, July 23, 2008
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:04 AM

Over at the WaPost, Jose Antonio Vargas has a good profile of GOP internet guru Cyrus Krohn.  Here's the money quote:

"The use of TV in campaigns is kind of like our dependency on foreign oil. We know we have to get off it. We know we need to find alternative energy sources. But we keep on going back to the pump," Krohn continues. "Fact is, we need to develop a higher degree of comfort with allocating media dollars to the Web."





« Previous123Next »
Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 9 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
Last updated 24 Minutes 52 Seconds Ago
Last updated 25 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 27 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
Last updated 28 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Celebrate is right!
 Re: Health Care Vote Looms: Where Does Your Rep. Stand?
  By lTz3Td52
axinine hates his country
 Re: CAIR Exec. Dir & Matthews Not Happy Hasan's Islamic Faith Is Discussed; "So What" If He Said "Allahu Akbar!"
  By Clay Allison
NY-23
 Re: Dem Leader Hoyer: We'll have the votes by this evening
  By Paul
Careful with that Lenin
 Re: The Truth Behind Today’s Job Numbers
  By Exeye
I believe the tragedy lies in the fact
 Re: Prominent Muslim Groups Immediately Condemn Attack
  By Ronna
axinine the commie
 Re: The Truth Behind Today’s Job Numbers
  By Clay Allison
Someone gave him a wedgie
 Re: Matthews on Ft. Hood: "We Don't Know Whether Religion Played Any Role In The Shootings"
  By Exeye
Exeye
 Re: CAIR Exec. Dir & Matthews Not Happy Hasan's Islamic Faith Is Discussed; "So What" If He Said "Allahu Akbar!"
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Carefully weigh the evidence
 Re: Just Clueless
  By Exeye
Obamao is his own enemy, and can't show
 Re: Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting
  By Ronna
Careful with that illogic
 Re: CAIR Exec. Dir & Matthews Not Happy Hasan's Islamic Faith Is Discussed; "So What" If He Said "Allahu Akbar!"
  By Exeye
What can America do?
 Re: Prominent Muslim Groups Immediately Condemn Attack
  By Enrique
Listen to the exit polls!!
 Re: A CAN’T MISS FORMULA FOR VICTORY
  By Wrat Wrangler
How Sad
 Re: Matthews on Ft. Hood: "We Don't Know Whether Religion Played Any Role In The Shootings"
  By KATZ
Europe has lived with
 Re: Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2%
  By ROG
Don't you just LOVE it when.........
 Re: Flashback: Glenn Glenn Beck Explains MSM News Cycle
  By Wrat Wrangler
Mathews the Clown
 Re: CAIR Exec. Dir & Matthews Not Happy Hasan's Islamic Faith Is Discussed; "So What" If He Said "Allahu Akbar!"
  By les
Arch
 Re: Just Clueless
  By Ronna
CAIR Anti-American
 Re: CAIR Exec. Dir & Matthews Not Happy Hasan's Islamic Faith Is Discussed; "So What" If He Said "Allahu Akbar!"
  By KATZ
Jeffrey ...
 Re: Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2%
  By Cliff

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll