Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!

Friday, June 20, 2008
Operation Malicious Mortgage
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 11:58 AM

You have to give credit where credit is due, and the FBI and the Department of Justice deserve to be recognized for their effort to crack down on mortgage fraud schemes. From March 1 to June 18, 2008, more than 400 defendants were charged for roles in mortgage fraud schemes as part of operation "Malicious Mortgage." The FBI estimates that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes employed in these cases.

Most recently, two senior managers of failed Bear Stearns Hedge Funds were indicted yesterday in separate mortgage-related security fraud cases.

Since July 2002, the DOJ has made almost 1,300 corporate fraud convictions, including the convictions of more than 200 chief executive offices and corporate presidents, more than 12 corporate vice presidents, and more than 50 chief financial officers.

These efforts are crucial for the benefit of American homeowners and taxpayers and the housing market. All the agencies involved deserve a great deal of respect for their efforts.

On Wednesday, I appeared on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the Countrywide Mortgage Scandal involving “VIPs” Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND). Take a look.








Monday, June 16, 2008
Do the Rich "Capture" More Than Their Share?
Posted by: Michael Medved at 9:00 PM
A front page story in USA TODAY highlighted the alleged collapse of “The American Dream” while revealing the twisted thinking behind contemporary liberalism. While acknowledging that “living standards have improved dramatically” and that “on the stuff front people are doing better than ever,” reporter David Lynch focused on national anger over the disproportionate prosperity of the super rich. He wrote that “from 1993 to 2006, those families captured about half the nation’s overall growth.” His language is revealing – speaking about wealthy people “capturing” their share of growth, or elsewhere, saying they “received” their portion of “total growth.” He seems to suggest that growth is the abstract product of society at large, rather than the result of millions of individuals. Successful Americans didn’t “capture” their share of growth, they created that share of growth –and using government to give the benefits of that wealth creation to others remains the core desire of redistributionist Democrats. It’s destructive to moan about your own success just because someone else is doing even better—especially when that someone else contributes entrepreneurial energy and business building to all participants in the economy at large.




Friday, June 13, 2008
Bad News: It's Not All Bad
Posted by: Carol Platt Liebau at 11:58 AM
Obviously, when the press is in love with the candidate talking about "change" -- and in the wake of eight years of a Republican presidency -- it's to the Democrats' advantage for it to seem as though life in America is falling apart.  And only one man (Barack Obama!) can fix it.

In today's Wall Street Journal, Gregg Easterbrook notes the newest form of political incorrectness: Being willing to admit that things aren't, well, all that bad.  Here's his proof:

Unemployment is 5.5%, low by historical standards; income is rising slightly ahead of inflation; housing prices are down, but the typical house is still worth a third more than in 2000; 94% of Americans do not have threatened mortgages, and of those who do, most will keep their homes.

Inflation was up in 2007, but this stands out because the 16 previous years were close to inflation-free; living standards are the highest they have ever been, including living standards for the middle class and for the poor.

All forms of pollution other than greenhouse gases are in decline; cancer, heart disease and stroke incidence are declining; crime is in a long-term cycle of significant decline; education levels are at all-time highs.

Apparently, John McCain can't say that not everything is terrible, lest he be nailed again by the DNC -- and seem terminally out of step with the hysterical zeitgeist being promoted by the press.  But facts are facts, and they are worth knowing.






Thursday, June 12, 2008
More Money for Doing Much Less
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 11:01 AM
Having fallen short yesterday, the Democrats have brought H.R. 5749, the so-called "Emergency Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2008" back to the floor for a vote. Under their parliamentary maneuver yesterday, the Democrats needed a two-thirds majority to pass the bill yesterday -- it fell 3 votes short. The Democrats are pretty much assured to succeed the second time around using a floor procedure that requires only a simple majority for passage. However, the shortfall yesterday doesn't look good against the looming veto threat from the White House.

This bill is another example of how Democrats take a decent idea that could help desperate Americans who need it the most, and in the process of hijacking it for political gain they ruin it.

Clearly, some states are feeling the unemployment crunch more than others, but this legislation makes no distinction for that. Even states with low unemployment rates would receive the 13-week extension. The White House and Republicans are willing to accept a targeted exception, but the bill as it is now is simply irresponsible.

Furthermore, this bill allows someone with as little as two weeks of work to qualify for up to 52 weeks of unemployment benefits -- a dramatic cut from the 20 weeks currently required by law. H.R. 5749 would increase entitlement spending by $12.8 billion over five years and increase the deficit by $12.2 billion.  However, the bill contains no spending cuts to offset this new spending.







Monday, June 09, 2008
"Why Popcorn Costs So Much At The Movies." (Bumped)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:38 PM
Richard McKenzie will be my guest in hour three to discuss the many pricing puzzles he reviews in his fascinating new book, including why the federal government's ethanol mandates are starving people to death, why subsidized housing for grad students hurts universities, and why there will always be after-Christmas sales.  

Why Popcorn Costs So Much at the Movies: And Other Pricing Puzzles








Monday, June 09, 2008
"Why Popcorn Costs So Much At The Movies"
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:01 PM
Richard McKenzie will be my guest in hour three to discuss the many pricing puzzles he reviews in his fascinating new book, including why the federal government's ethanol mandates are starving people to death, why subsidized housing for grad students hurts universities, and why there will always be after-Christmas sales.  

Why Popcorn Costs So Much at the Movies: And Other Pricing Puzzles








Saturday, June 07, 2008
Weekend Reading: "Why Popcorn Costs So Much At The Movies"
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:32 AM
Why Popcorn Costs So Much at the Movies: And Other Pricing Puzzles

Richard McKenzie takes the reader through the conundrums of pricing --why are there after-Christmas sales, why do new cars instantly lose so much value when they leave the lot, and how does subsidized university housing burden the university in  unforeseen ways.

And, of course, why popcorn costs so much at the movies.  Fun but also illuminating on the power of markets to value your time and the products and services you purchase.

Why Popcorn Costs So Much At The Movies, And Other Pricing Puzzles makes pricing theory interesting!




Monday, June 02, 2008
Andy Stern Faces Uprising
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 11:16 AM
At a convention in Puerto Rico this week, SEIU President Andy Stern is attempting to push through his "Justice for All" plan.  ... Of course, the real goal is to support Barack Obama in '08, and to advance his liberal agenda into the future.  

In typical Marxist fashion, Stern opened up the convention with the theme: "workers of the world, unite". 

Surprisingly, though, Stern is facing strong rank-and-file opposition.  Essentially, many SEIU members are angry that decisions are made by the powerful few in DC, and that they should have more of a say in making decisions.  It seems he has managed to offend people on both sides of the political spectrum.  Even this socialist rag takes shots at him for siding with companies over employees.

... For obvious reasons, Stern doesn't want people to know just how much opposition he's facing -- so he's already hard at work quashing internal dissent in Puerto Rico.  Stay tuned ...






Monday, May 19, 2008
Visiting the NYSE
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 3:45 PM


This is something I just had to share with all of you now that I received the pictures. Last week, I got to stop by the New York Stock Exchange and meet with their new CEO, Duncan Neiderauer. Despite the meeting starting in the early AM, this was one of the most interesting and worthwhile experiences I’ve had during my time in Congress. We met for almost an hour to discuss ways to enhance America’s global competitiveness.

Soon I’ll be posting a recent column I sent to the local Chambers and Rotaries in my district that highlights ways to put America’s economy on the fast track to greater prosperity. 

Sign.jpg picture by repmichelebachmann

BoardRoom.jpg picture by repmichelebachmann

Memento.jpg picture by repmichelebachmann





Thursday, May 08, 2008
The Housing Bill: Slow Down And Let The Public See It
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:44 AM
Barney Frank is pushing a huge housing bill through the Congress.  President Bush has threatened to veto it.

Good.  Nothing that has to be rushed through without publication and debate on the web for at least a week or two can be good news.  Like the immigration reform bill of last year, the key is in the details.  Mr. Frank should publish the latest version on the web and listen carefully to the comments. Perhaps Heritage can post an on-line edition like it did with the immigration bill. (The Heritage analysis of the Frank-Dodd plan is here.)

Look, Frank is pretty smart, but he's not so smart that his handiwork couldn't use some review and criticism from the many, out of which would come some keen insight.  I want to see if they are using the idea that would allow homeowners to use their retirement funds --without triggering tax or an early withdrawal penalty-- to pay down their mortgages so as to keep their greatest asset.  I'd like mortgage bankers to be able to review and comment on the write-down provisions, and home-builders to be able to comment on the impact on new home starts.

In short, the Frank bill is proposing an overhaul of a crucial portion of the economy.  A little transparency please.




Thursday, April 17, 2008
Heavy-Handed Union Runs PA Ads for Obama
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 6:01 PM
Earlier I talked about all the "questionable" friends Obama has.  Add Labor Unions to the list ...

Today, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) began running an ad for Barack Obama in the Pennsylvania primary. Obama has previously welcomed this endorsement.

Why is this endorsement of interest?  Just this past weekend, the SEIU sent hundreds of "members" to disrupt a labor conference in Michigan.  They were apparently shoving people to the ground and apparently even went so far as to inflict a head wound on a retired woman (story here, video). In California, they are stalking nurses in a rival union by going to their homes with cameras -- and even made a YouTube video of themselves doing it.

California judge even issued a restraining order against them.

So the question is, wIll Obama repudiate these violent tactics -- and reject their ads? I wouldn't hold my breath...





Thursday, April 03, 2008
SEIU Sneakiness
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 1:15 PM
What?  Union Bosses are trying to undermine dissenters?  Never!




Thursday, March 27, 2008
Obama's Economic Plan Would Be a Disaster
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 8:54 AM

Barack Obama will deliver a speech today in NYC on the economy.  The truth is that there is not a single thing  Obama's would do as president that would make you or I more wealthy -- and there is a lot in he would do to make us less wealthy.  

An Obama Administration, based on his campaign and his record, would likely include higher income taxes, higher corporate taxes, and, at least, a step closer to socialized healthcare.  And that's just the things we know about ...

Of course, rhetorically, Obama almost always acknowledges both sides of any given argument, which tends to give the false impression that he is open-minded.  The fact that the the non-partisan National Journal named him the most liberal senator in 2007 demonstrates which ideology he always settles on, after acknowledging the other side. 

When it comes to the economy, Obama frequently mentions the conservative fiscal policies that have brought us unprecedented wealth since the Reagan Administration -- but at the end of the day -- he looks to FDR's New Deal.  As he wrote in his book:

“But our history should give us confidence that we don’t have to choose between an oppressive, government-run economy and a chaotic and unforgiving capitalism. ... What might such a new economic consensus look like? ... [W]e can begin to modernize and rebuild the social contract that FDR first stitched together in the middle of the last century.” (Barack Obama, The Audacity Of Hope, 2006, pp. 158-159)

Obama's positive rhetoric often belies his Leftist ideology.  Anyone hoping he be a "deliverer" who will invent some sort of hybrid system that provides for a fiscal "third way" -- has not been paying attention to his past positions, or his campaign promises. 

While Obama will likely seek to talk-down the economy, harp on the down-turn, and promise government give-aways for supporting him, McCain is actually providing the public with straight talk, and honest solutions.  For example, one of the things McCain supports -- but Obama will all most certainly demagogue against as a "tax cut for the rich" -- is the reasonable and important idea of cutting the corporate tax rate.

McCain realizes the fact that only Japan has a higher corporate tax rate than the U.S., puts us at a strategic disadvantage.  Moreover, he realzes that cutting it-- and the capital gains tax -- would provide an influx of money for businesses to begin creating jobs, building factories, etc. (not bad for a guy who supposedly isn't an "expert" on the economy.)

McCain's plan would mean 401 K's would also bounce back by the end of the year, and that would be good news for many of us (something like 60 percent of Americans now "investors" in some form or another -- so this will be harder for Obama to criticize than it would have been in the past). 

And because people who create businesses today are concerned about long-term economics, a long-term solution is also a short-term solution.

If Americans hope to make this a short-term down-turn, they will resist the temptation to support Obama's long-term Leftist fiscal policies.





« Previous123456Next »

FEATURES FEATURES

America Is Not An Accident

Posted by: Tom DeLay
7/3/2008

WEASLEY'S "JUDGMENT"

Posted by: Michael Medved
7/3/2008

Obama's Favorable Home Loan (And the "Other" Lender To Be Named Later? ...)

Posted by: Matt Lewis
7/2/2008

Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 4 Minutes 55 Seconds Ago
Last updated 40 Minutes 12 Seconds Ago
Last updated 43 Minutes 49 Seconds Ago
Last updated 50 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
Last updated 57 Minutes 24 Seconds Ago
 

Archives Archives

Blog Search



Townhall Blogs Townhall Blogs
Columns Columns
Your Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 January 2008
 December 2007
 November 2007
 October 2007
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007