Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Sunday, September 24, 2006
The Clinton Freak-Out: 'Um, Wow.'
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 5:52 PM

Watch the delicious highlights over at Hot Air. It's really quite amazing.

I think K-Lo nails it when she calls it Clinton's "Tom Cruise" moment. I would not have been very surprised to see him jump on the couch.

Marshall Manson is stunned.Everyone is fact-checking.

I like Geraghty's catch:

Bill Clinton, in that Fox News interview:

OK, now let’s look at all the criticisms: Black Hawk down, Somalia. There is not a living soul in the world who thought that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with Black Hawk down or was paying any attention to it or even knew Al Qaida was a growing concern in October of ‘93.

Not a living soul in the world... except for President Clinton's own Justice Department. The U.S. Justice Department's indictment of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda's military commander, Mohammed Atef, on Nov. 4, 1998, for conspiring to kill Americans:

More on it later, but click around from Michelle's post to find many more reactions.

Wallace does a great job, asking the tough questions, but he remains really polite and non-combative. It's telling that Clinton's the one who flips. It's a "right-wing conspiracy," you see?

The Clinton Freak-Out is the No. 1 Most Viewed video on YouTube this weekend. And, in a little Internet victory, Fox was touting that point as part of its advertising of the interview. You know, instead of ripping the video down because it violated copyright. Good move, Fox. Now, almost 900,000 people have seen the great preview, and undoubtedly many of them tuned in for the whole thing as a result.

Update: Isn't Clinton supposed to be the consummate politician? Didn't he know this was gonna get a world more attention-- and mostly negative attention--than just glossing over it and saying, "well, I don't doubt that I made mistakes, but we should really be looking to the future," or something like that? Does he really think this is helping him or Democrats? I guess he probably cares most about whether it's helping him, but does he actually think this will? He looks like a very immature man who knows he screwed up.

Update: "Just read Richard Clarke's book!" Or, not.

Update: The Post's coverage leaves out that Wallace agreed with Clinton that they would do 15 minutes on the Clinton Global Initiative and 15 minutes on other topics, playing into Clinton's version of events-- that he had been brought into the interview "under false pretences." It also leaves out the fact that Wallace tried several times to steer back to the CGI, but Clinton wasn't done ranting:

Clinton had planned to discuss his climate change initiative during his appearance on "Fox News Sunday," but he turned combative after host Chris Wallace asked why he hadn't "put bin Laden and al-Qaeda out of business." Clinton shot back that "all the conservative Republicans" who now criticize him for inattention to bin Laden used to criticize him for over-attention to bin Laden.

Neither the Post nor the AP report does a lot of fact-checking of Clinton's actual assertions-- just repeats them. You'll have to go to the right-wing conspirators on blogs and Fox News for that kind of dastardly stuff.

Check out the Fox News Sunday panel right now for some of that fact-checking.

Update: "No Dan Coats-- no airstrikes. It's as simple as that."

Update: I was looking for this, but Patterico's already found it. Chris Wallace asked Rumsfeld the same questions.





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 5 Minutes 41 Seconds Ago
Last updated 28 Minutes 59 Seconds Ago
Last updated 56 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 1 Minutes 27 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Frey
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Spudder
UnBalanced: You Fool
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Al Franken
 Re: AFL-CIO, Sen. Franken Get Cozy
  By Not of this World
Bob Munch: The population of Norway
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Quite Right: Currently the Fat Old Rich
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Bob Munch: My age has been revealed
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
balanced 12:32: Name the author
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Marty
The Plumber
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Sky Pete
Xian--"Wealthy White Old Men"?
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Julie
I'm sorry, but...
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By johnsq316
Marty 12:23 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
arch 12:18 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
HOUSE OF SAUD DESCRIPTION
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
MARTY
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
PERCEPTOR II
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
Yikes, this is going to be a problem
 Re: From the Department of Crazy: Racism Alive and Well
  By Andrea
Bob Munch 12:03: I gave you more info
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Munk Gets Owned!!
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By arch
Don't Try To Claim You're Any Better...
 Re: Disservice to MJ, Disservice to Ourselves
  By The7Sticks
Andrea!
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By arch

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll