Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Wednesday, November 19, 2008
The so-called "Employee Free Choice Act": Which Senators to Watch...
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 9:33 AM


North Dakota's two Democratic senators, Dorgan and Conrad are likely to be influential in helping decide whether or not the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act" is passed.  North Dakota is a Right to Work state, but the two Democrats will be pressured to toe the line by the powerful special interests in the Democratic Party.


Well, with the election out of the way, I guess we can get back to the real issues we will face. Remember the deceitfully-named “Employee Free Choice Act” (aka: Card Check)?

... If you don’t, you should get acquainted with it real fast, because if you're a worker, you just might find yourself paying unwanted labor union dues if it passes (and if you're an employer, the reason to oppose this is obvious).  

While a lot has been written about it, you might not really be sure what it is.  The act passed the House in 2007, but will require 60 votes in the senate in order to overcome a Republican fililbuster.

Basically, the act states that if a union can collect signed cards from more than half of a company’s workers, the shop can be automatically unionized with no secret-ballot -- and no chance for employees to hear from their employer and learn about the pros and cons of the union before making a final decision (for example, employees might want to know about union corruption, that they would lose the right to negotiate pay raises and promotions based on merit, that they might be forced to strike, etc).

The proponents of the bill point out it doesn't not eliminate the option for a secret ballot -- and technically speaking, they are correct.  

However, the truth is that there’s almost no way that procedure will ever be used if the easier card-collection mechanism is legalized.  In essence, this act wouldn't just eliminate the secret ballot, it would actually eliminate the ballot.  ... So yes, this effectively would eliminate the secret ballot by rendering it a moot point.  Once the cards are collected, there is no need for an election -- businesses are mandated to begin negotiating only with the union representative.

Of course, there might be a potential balance here if the card-collection procedure were also available for de-unionization.  The vast majority of Union members today never voted to join a union (it came with the job).  And, of course, there is no easy way to opt out of unionization.  So if Unions would allow the same rules to apply when workers want to opt-out of unionization (collect cards from more than half of the workers saying they no longer want to be in a union), this would be a consistent and palatable argument.  

The real goal, of course, is not to be fair, but to unionize more workers.  And, of course, the unions are ignoring people who bring up that idea -- because the vast majority of currently unionized workers never voted to enter a union, and the bosses are scared that they would get voted out.

So essentially they want to be able to harass you into signing a card to unionize yourself, then make it hard for you to get out of the deal when you figure out that you’ve been gamed. Yeah…that sounds like “Employee Free Choice” to me!

The Republicans are going to have to filibuster to stop this monstrosity from passing the Senate…meaning we need to hold at least 41 votes.

One Republican, Arlen Specter (PA), has already crossed to the dark side, and the unions claim they are going to put pressure on Olympia Snowe (ME) and George Voinovich (OH). We should definitely be contacting those three to encourage them to oppose this act. 

But there are also a lot of Democrats from fairly conservative, right-to-work states whom we might be able to bring over as insurance.

The easiest will probably be Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln from Arkansas, Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan from North Dakota, Tim Johnson from South Dakota, and Ben Nelson from Nebraska.  These states are all Right to Work states, which means the state legislatures -- and the population -- would most likely oppose this act (if they are made aware of it, that is).

Some other targets may include Senators Udall (CO), Salazar (CO), Warner (VA), Webb (VA), Bayh (IN), and Bill Nelson (FL).  Virginia and Florida are both Right to Work states, by the way.

Of course, the ultimate goal of the pro-union forces are to support Democratic political causes.  While 30-40 percent of union members are Republicans, the vast majority of union money goes to Democrats.  As such, many union members are contributing financially to causes they abhor.

It’s going to be one heck of a fight trying to shoot this thing down, and we had better get on it now.   

Townhall's Adam Brickley contributed to this post.



Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 16 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 18 Minutes 38 Seconds Ago
Last updated 26 Minutes 21 Seconds Ago
Last updated 35 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
Last updated 41 Minutes 29 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Frey
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Spudder
Frey
 Re: Climate Change Debate on Hold
  By Spudder
UnBalanced: You Fool
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Al Franken
 Re: AFL-CIO, Sen. Franken Get Cozy
  By Not of this World
Bob Munch: The population of Norway
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Quite Right: Currently the Fat Old Rich
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By K.G.
Bob Munch: My age has been revealed
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
balanced 12:32: Name the author
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Marty
The Plumber
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By Sky Pete
Xian--"Wealthy White Old Men"?
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By Julie
I'm sorry, but...
 Re: "Bruno:" You Don't Have to Wait for The End (Guest Blog by Diane Medved)
  By johnsq316
Marty 12:23 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
arch 12:18 AM
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Bob Munck
HOUSE OF SAUD DESCRIPTION
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
MARTY
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
PERCEPTOR II
 Re: Billions in Aid Going to Areas That Backed Obama in '08
  By balanced
Yikes, this is going to be a problem
 Re: From the Department of Crazy: Racism Alive and Well
  By Andrea
Bob Munch 12:03: I gave you more info
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By Marty
Munk Gets Owned!!
 Re: Politico: What Obama’s Poll Numbers Mean
  By arch
Don't Try To Claim You're Any Better...
 Re: Disservice to MJ, Disservice to Ourselves
  By The7Sticks

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll