Monday, May 26, 2008
|
|
The Obama Melt
|
|
Posted by:
Hugh Hewitt at
11:19 PM
|
Powerline's John Hinderaker details Senator Obama's, er, memorable Memorial Day speech.
It is difficult not to conclude that Senator Obama has developed his reputation as a powerful orator and skilled politician in a protected media environment and in races against candidates that were deeply flawed.
But with his nomination assured and the most important job in the world on the line, the criticism-free zone in which Obama has long prospered simply cannot be sustained, and even MSM's many accommodations cannot camouflage the gaffe parade that is Team Obama from top to bottom. The litany of stock responses from the left's library conveys that the senator really hasn't spent much time thinking through the issues that face the country, and his unpreparedness is both breath-taking and discomforting, even to his supporters. "Rolling the dice" with an untried rookie might be something a desperate NFL franchise might try with a quarterback, but the world cannot afford to have its only superpower turned over to a completely unqualified and wholly inexperienced lightweight.
|
|
|
Let's see some ID. Otherwise, you need to come back to this site with a grownup. Do yaself a favor: stop using the word "retarded' in any form. And don't talk about your interest in snuff videos and child porn. I have an FBI pal who monitors this site, and he's already interested in you. |
|
Second your Sigh!
Cannot get over with this hangover of some(you know who) with race!
It is insulting in 21st century to be lectured on race!
I think this race-baiting creatures are baiting us purposely. This is sooooo
ridiculous. |
|
Very sorry you feel the way you do.
I understand you are not "white", however, it matters not. Your comments remain offensive, those in judging Obama for his skin color. There is much about the guy which can be found as distasteful, without the superficial.
I am sure your heart is in the right place, your comments very likely brought about by the HATE and RACE-BAITING of BJob---and that goes to my point. She's been allowed to spew this stuff regularly. And the backlash is evidenced by yoru apparent need to vent similarly.
Please reconsider. |
|
...I must disagree with you.
BJob is not of entertainment value, never has been. Please do not mistake me, there's nothing wrong with "jousting" with those considered to be at odds with one's belief systems, ideologies. Indeed, that is entertaining.
This weasel is of a different sort. She employs race-baiting, hate-peddling antics, AT WILL.
I only observed one poster in the past 3 days call her out for the OBSCENE claims she made on this very thread, at 9:01 AM on Tuesday.
That was Bill Cross. He found two other comments to challenge her on---fully ignored.
I have now challenged BJob several times on this----NADA, Nyet, nein, nothing, nie.
OHM, my friend, you have personally observed the chagrin of one, LafferLawyer, in complaining of one comment by S/86, and armigerous, quite some time ago. He railed on for days---eventually declared that he was "taking a break" from this place---even made reference to it again in a post of his this week. BUT, BJob-----and her regular race-baits?
Largely unnoticed, at least to the extent of any specific backlash.
AND, here's my point. The mere fact this this race-baiting, hate-peddling weasel is not challenged, called-out, summarily dismissed by anyone reading this hate-crap, only encourages more of the same.
I do not find her entertaining in the least, unless you can also find some fun in listening to old recordings of Hitler. I have largely ignored her. She has offered up these race cards regularly.
I suppose that is one reason why most posters overlook the one above. It's become "okay", coming from her.
She's obscene.
There remains little in the way of redeeming value for this pelter's behind. And surely nothing entertaining about the race-baiting. |
|
Sarah,
B-Rob is just here for our entertainment value.
I wouldn't put too much stock into what she writes.
B-Rob's defense for why she won't condemn Bill Ayres is because she's "never met" Bill Ayres.
Unfortunately, Obama cannot use that defense, since, you know, Obama does know Ayres.
I guess that means B-Rob can't condemn Hitler, Mao, or even Lee Harvey Oswald, since B-Rob never met any of those people, either.
Ha, ha, ha.
|
|
|
and whites are racist? After ALL that the Clintons did to advance the black movement and make Jesse jackson and 2 digit millionaire, this is what they get. I am shocked at your 'selective' use of the term 'racist'. But then again, blacks are overwhelmingly voting for Obama because he has a law degree and he is a community organizer - being half-black is just a coincidence. Do you and the Obama camp think americans are stupid? better yet, do you not know americans think Obama and his cohorts are stupid? At least call both sides racist if you want to use the term effectively. |
|
|
Obama calls himself a 'constitutional professor' when in fact he was a guest lecturer. LOL! Please don't insult Hugh by comparing him to Obama. Even I, a Romney opposer, think that is the worst insult of them all. Plus Hugh has held an actual job, and Obama was a 'community organizer', exactly what is that? The guy who hangs out with people who hate america? Wait, I'll ask a real law professor. |
|
|
Since I am not white, I hate the half of Obama that is white. I also hate the half of him that is black. This makes me a great racist because I am neither white nor black and so a bi-racial guy who is half of each is just someone I hate. OR maybe I oppose Obama because he LACKS ANY NECESSARY EXPERIENCE TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF - his resume is best suited to serve in Wright's church as a 'community organizer', you know the kind that organizes thugs like Rezko into buying him a house and then organizes unrepentant terrorists like Ayers to form the Woods Foundation or is it serve in it's advisory role. And the kind that has the 'priest' and 'pastor' who are completely anti-american and can't find a kind word to say about 'whitey'. These are all the racist reasons I oppose Obama. Now go back and report to camp Obama, that he will not be president, americans prefer americans running for POTUS than foreign-influenced people who want to disarm america! |
|
|
Obama is UNQUALIFIED and that is the whole truth, nothing but the truth so learn to say it slowly because it will take you and the other people who are stuck with the least experienced man to ever run for POTUS as their candidate 5 months to practice saying......President McCain. If you gave us Hillary, it would be a decent competition, Obama is a joke.....his latest made up story included NOTHING FACTUAL and the so called 'uncle' was not even a real uncle and he served in a camp that was not what Obama said it was.....can your candidate get any 'dumber'? If he wants to be commander in chief, he should be experienced enough to know that military service unlike community organizing is an actual job and it's public information - so he just can't make up people and events for political gain. LOL!!!! |
|
|
The Real Talents are dying off one by one. sigh. |
|
|
I know better in re Brob. I just hate it when someone blatantly lies or uses outrageous non sequitors to try to make a point. He's the bastage child of Keith Olberman and Terry McAuliffe. Just a really slimy guy. I try to give him the benefit of the doubt but he really is just an unpleasant miscreant. So focused on winning that he stoops as low as needed and truth be damned. |
|
Hats Off!
God Bless, Harvey Korman.
Very funny person,
Surely will make Angels Smile! |
|
cottoneyed writes: Thursday, May, 29, 2008 3:57 PM
Hey Arch, pay NO
attention to dudley, he's called "little DuD" for a reason, go back through the threads and see for yourself, this "little DuD" has NEVER ever had even one comment of any consequence, not one, NO original thoughts, added NOTHING to the discussion, hence the apt name "little DuD", go back and peruse to see that it is so, for this reason, there is no reason to respond to a "little DuD", because, he's just a DuD, heck even, bjob, brings something to the threads, most of the time they are hair brained, but she does bring something, not the case with "little DuD", he says nothing, he's just not entertaining, theres nothing there, kinda' reminds me of obambi, an empty suit, good day to you, Arch..
vote obambi...give jimmah a 2nd term...FOOLS voting for a FOOL....
Arch writes:
Cottoneyed, I took your advice and read through some of the archives and see what you mean about the little Dud. These fools are so easy!! |
|
Dudley wrote:
You, on the other hand, are a major suck-up, say anything to appeal to anybody at the site. Plus, you are obsessed with using the word "retarded" in a variety of forms. Arch, you have a small mind because you choose to. Do not ridicule those who have limitations based on birth.
Arch says:
Speaking of small minds again Dudley? I never ridicule the retarded. I only ridicule those who imitate them while possessing warped yet normal mental faculties such as yourself and many other libtards who post here. You and Patriotic liberal are selling a load of hogwash and expect to be respected. I condemn you both for attempting to deceive others into a libtard fantasy and smile when others smack you down with such ease and intelligence such as Neo and Cottoneyed. You better learn to live with it as you have chosen a moronic world view and will never be accepted by logical reasoning thinkers here on Townhall. Take your snuff videos and child pornography somewhere else as they are rejected here. |
|
My hat is off.
one more thing. You're wasting your time with this RACE-BAITER, HATE-PEDDLER, BJob.
She deserves not your acknowledgement. |
|
|
|
"No, when the fight begins within himself,
A man's worth something."
Elizabeth Barrett Browning (1806-1861)
|
|
|
Harvey Korman just passed away. What a great comedic talent. |
|
|
"Our Kind of People" by Lawrence Otis Graham. Find it. Read it. |
|
Surely you jest!, we are all same in God's eye!
I'm sure there is no virtue greater than humility, still we are all equally, wonderfully loved by our Creator.
Every morning, when you look in that mirror, remember, Just for you alone Christ willing, loving went on the Cross, You Alone. What a God. |
|
You're an idiot. You don't get it. I was making a point that people don't like or dislike others based solely on race which you ascribe only to whites. You're wrong as usual. My point about Thomas was that many blacks don't like him or Condoleeza Rice for no other reason then they don't fit their preferred mindset. If a white person does it, you yell racism but it is the same thing whether black or white does it. As for Obama we have many reasons besides race to not like him but you can't handle it. You just try to hammer that square peg into your round hole.
Have you met any live black people yet? LMAO |
|
..No PL, don't sell yourself short. We ALL understand how unworthy you are.
There, I said it before you could. Pretty funny, tho.. |
|
I agree with you that we should not take ourselves too seriously. Which is why I agreed with CS's assertion that I see a worthless man every morning in the mirror when I shave.
As Scripture says (somewhere in Ecclesiastes), 'the severe face confers some benefit.' Your point is well-taken, of course, but I would take the tears of those who suffer to the laughter of fools. Better than both, of course, is laughter from authentic happiness, but when the choice becomes, as it often does, wisdom and sadness or ignorance and happiness, it is our duty to choose the former.
As I said earlier, much to the derision of your colleagues, I am the chap around here who is faithful to Lady Wisdom--even when her reality is 'the more wisdom, the more grief' (also somewhere in Ecclesiastes). I think today's exchange confirmed it again--as if it needed further confirmation. Your boys are cackling dolts. I am the worthy one around here--probably because I am the only one around here who understands how unworthy I am.. |
|
****Let the record show that PL asserts he's not "proud" of his American heritage.
He wrote;
------------
"I'm an American--neither proud nor ashamed of my background."
------------
If that is the case, why did he go out of his way to choose the Townhall monniker, "P-a-t-r-i-o-t-i-c Liberal" ?****
PL Says: We Americans are different from other countries. We are not organized around the normal national building blocks of race, religion, and/or language, but around a set of ideas--in particular, the rationalistic, natural rights ideas of our Founding Generation. That's all I meant, chump. And in fact, it is part of the difference between a patriot like me and a nationalist like you. How many times do I have to explain this to you? Or do you just prefer to live in bad faith, in the hopes that you can win a point, regardless of the truth.
Honestly, it is why your side is in such dire straits these days. If you had greater fidelity to truth to scoring rhetorical points, you would have known how to exercise better judgement. |
|
When liberals (Democrats) accuse you of anything, that is exactly what they are guilty of.
Hypocrites, delusional, ignorant destitutes preaching in despair, their ambiguous moralist virtue. |
|
I have pointed out repeatedly this weasel's RACE-BAITING, HATE-PEDDLING narrative of this week---multiple times.
She ignores it.
She is trash, frankly should not be given even the hint of attention nor respect.
Tuesday 3:38PM....this thread
I challenged her on it---NO RESPONSE.
Tuesday 6:39PM....this thread
I challenged her again on it---NO RESPONSE.
Here again, is her provoked, RACE-BAIT----No proof, No back up, Nada:
"...But you can't deal with the concept of a hyper-intelligent Black man, can you cons? Can't even accept the fact that, if he was not running for office, he would probably be on a short list for the federal court of appeals, the Supreme Court, or the Justice department."
CRAP, from someone who no doubt does this often to whites----as written by, Shelbey Steele in his book, "White Guilt".
|
|
Many black people reject Justice Thomas because he's not adhering to the NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Chingy version of what black is. Don't be ignorant of that fact.
Obama is a Marxist. That means he wants to take care of people from womb to tomb via govt programs. What is so hard to understand about that?
Repubs and cons don't bring race into question. Dem/libs live off that every election cycle. You are for groups of people and you hate individuals. |
|
|
That ain't true. If ever I saw someone in dire need of a bljob - a word you love to use - it is you. Arch knows what I mean, because he is one. Two peas in a pod. |
|
B-Job,
I have no idea who Bob Chambliss, Jeff Lundgren, or Michael Flory are.
If they did do bad things, then I condemn them for doing bad things.
But we all know who terrorist Bill Ayres is.
And you still can't bring yourself to condemn Bill Ayres.
And the reason you won't condemn him is because he is a close associate of your candidate Barack Obama.
In fact, that's the same reason that Barry Obama won't condemn Ayres.
In other words, B-Job, you will condemn Chambliss, Lundgren, and Flory....but not Ayres !
B-Job, your Orwellian postings are very amusing.
We hope you will continue to entertain us here at Townhall.
:) |
|
Normally you're just obnoxious but now you're despicable. Which party did Chambliss belong to, jagoff? What political statement was Flory making for the Repubs, dipshiite?
As for Flory, if he had not been convicted he would be eligible to run for Prez on the Dem/lib Party ticket. Ask BJ Clinton.
Repubs kick weirdos and criminals out of their party. You scumbags embrace yours. I bet you had to dig hard for these so-called examples, didn't you? Whereas, just skimming the Friends of Bill list would bring in about an 80% sleazebag rate. |
|
B-Job wrote;
--------------
"...some of the people here oppose (Obama) as much because of his race as his politics . . . because other than repeating buzz words like "he's a Marxist", few seem to be able to articulately explain WHAT he proposes that they actually oppose!"
--------------
B-Job, so you believe that we are "racist" because you believe we haven't sufficiently explained our opposition to Obama's nutty left wing policies ?
Sweetie, that's really strange.
No wonder your husband doesn't allow you out of the house very often !
Ha, ha, ha.
|
|
B-Job wrote,
---------------
"I told you that, in essence, I will no more "condemn" a person I have never met, never known, and couldn't pick out of a police lineup ESPECIALLY someone who was never convicted of any crime!"
---------------
B-Rob, you never met Hitler.
But can you bring yourself to condemn Hitler ?
I swear, your Orwellian logic is amusing.
Bill Ayres conspired to plant bombs in the women's restroom at the Pentagon.
He admits it.
His case was only thrown out of court due to rookie mistakes by the prosecution in their gathering of evidence.
Otherwise, he would have been convicted and executed.
That fact that he wasn't convicted doesn't mean what he did is not evil.
Bill Ayres is an evil man.
You refuse to condemn him.
So does Barry Obama.
:) |
|
attention to dudley, he's called "little DuD" for a reason, go back through the threads and see for yourself, this "little DuD" has NEVER ever had even one comment of any consequence, not one, NO original thoughts, added NOTHING to the discussion, hence the apt name "little DuD", go back and peruse to see that it is so, for this reason, there is no reason to respond to a "little DuD", because, he's just a DuD, heck even, bjob, brings something to the threads, most of the time they are hair brained, but she does bring something, not the case with "little DuD", he says nothing, he's just not entertaining, theres nothing there, kinda' reminds me of obambi, an empty suit, good day to you, Arch..
vote obambi...give jimmah a 2nd term...FOOLS voting for a FOOL.... |
|
Succinctly, you point out this pathetic Liberal's internal angst; those inner conflicts as manifested by his own monniker--and most of what he spews.
Consider for a moment:
He mocks me for what is his own interpretation of that which he considers as, "happiness". His quote:
"You're "happy." I guess when you've injested enough laughing gas, enough teevee and flimflam and hooey, you do sort of think of yourself as "happy."
He cheapens our own, Declaration Of Independence---in it's second paragraph, "...endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."
Yep---the pathetic Liberal outright laughs in the face of "happiness".
How telling.
Just as you have so correctly pointed out that he could have chosen ANY monniker on this site, he opted for "patriotic"---given his blase stance over his Americanism.
WOW-----ever the mindnumbingly confused one.
|
|
A being with the body of a leopard (he is descended from an African), the head of a bear (intellectually he has an avid interest in communism as practiced in Russia (the bear)), and the mouth of a lion (when he speaks people hear him as being strong). |
|
Clarityseeker wrote;
-------------
"I could give a rat's a$$ what color Obama is. However, I have repeatedly noticed the thinness of that skin whenever anyone has chosen to query his background, explore his character, address his wife's clear and conscious choice to publicly speak."
------------
Clarity hits the nail on the head; it's not the color of Obama's skin which is the problem, rather, it's the thinness of his skin which is his problem.
Obama simply cannot stomach criticism/inquiry about his positions.
Let the record show that PL asserts he's not "proud" of his American heritage.
He wrote;
------------
"I'm an American--neither proud nor ashamed of my background."
------------
If that is the case, why did he go out of his way to choose the Townhall monniker, "P-a-t-r-i-o-t-i-c Liberal" ? |
|
My point is as human beings, we have to lighten up, and have a sense of humor and not to take ourselves seriously.
Pat.Lib. A sad saint is a sorry saint!
There is nothing worse than "pride" for Obama. Why liberal left are always seriously, deeply concerned devoted to change people's way of life?
When, Dems. insist most firmly that conservatives are always irrational and demand stubbornly to be "reasonable". Then, laughably, Obama, starts telling tall tales assemblying, recalling odd incidents, what do you expect us to do?
Pat. Lib.
The Sky is always blue
It is up to you |
|
us of the advanced levels of his Integrity & Principles, the more I smell a ponzi schemer. Never knew anyone that had'um, with the desperate NEED to wear a sign saying he had'dum. Know what I mean?
Now, I got'sta round up my Homiies and hit a small convenience store. |
|
That is not only untrue, it also doesn't make any sense. And what I am seeking to spread around is something you clowns desperately need: principle! It is pathetic how unprincipled you right-wingers have become. The great conservatives from yesteryear could only shake their head at this generation--and when my articulation of timeless conservative principles is snickered at and ridiculed, well, go back to your preening, you frigging losers. You're "happy." I guess when you've injested enough laughing gas, enough teevee and flimflam and hooey, you do sort of think of yourself as "happy." But I always saw through the laughing gas and cut to the underlying principle, or lack thereof. And lemme tell you--in your case, it is the lack thereof.
Now I definitely have to go. I'll see you chumps when I feel like it.. |
|
...to being worthless, well, it explains volumes.
No man is happy, he who is worthless.
And for one who agitates as often as this clown, it is also evident that he's not satisfied being the only one unhappy---he aspires to spread it around to others.
It is now confirmed. |
|
|
You'll always be a punk to me, "Mistah"! Now, time to go earn an honest dollar.. |
|
guffawing over Blovie's preaching Kant to MaryS below, I nearly missed your query. Nope, I've not read the impeccable lineage thingy from the "racist" fella. I'm impressed, though. Deeply.
I tend to skip alot of Comrade Bro-Bay and The Bloviator, due to this thing called, "having a life." Been up to my eyebrows in Homie Moms & their Kids since Monday. The Little Rascals, 5 to 11 years, sang me a song they'd made up, from the white boy way I speak, yesterday. Made my month! |
|
You are in a deep enough hole. Don't make it worse by lying. My dad's side came to CA in the 1850s--almost directly from Ireland (via MA). The rest were already here: in KY, NJ, WI, and KS. "Native Americans" have nothing to do with it--although my Mom's Mom told the story, like Grandmas across the country, that we were related to Pocahontas.
Self-involvement has nothing to do with it. I'm an American--neither proud nor ashamed of my background. I'm a mutt of sorts--it is what it is.
So why don't you stop being so inferior and contemptible and just accept the truth for what it is, and not what you want it to be.. |
|
As Clarity said,"So be it."
Blovie's waaaaay toooo DEEP for me on this one. But, hey, if he insists on labeling himself(Trust me, it's some nefarious Lib-Left attention-getting device..)"RACIST", no matter to me. It's that eagerness to use the "We" word that throws his dweeby reasoning(sic)off the rails.
You ain't speakin' fo' this Old School guy, Fool. And, my refugee 'hood Homie Moms & their Kids call me Mistah Neo. |
|
Did you happen to catch that post of Pathetic Liberal a few days ago----a lesson in personal triumphalism, narcissism; while providing the world a detailed account of truly how deep his lineage is in California?
If one were to do the math, his family essentially predates Native Americans. It was predictably pathetic.
And yet, the dissertation he delivered was simply additional testimony to his established self-involved, self-focused, Boomer-Liberal legacy. |
|
|
Quite so. And the difference is I understand it. Lord shield me from the graceless louts who do not! |
|
No, not bitter about America and Americans, however contemptuous we are towards right-wing America and some right-wing Americans. I understand that you folks have a tough time grasping that distinction, but the distinction exists and it is important. We hate what the right-wing has done to our country. But America herself and the citizens within her? These are our brethren. These are the ones with whom we share a deep and profound heritage. These are the ones we love.
As for the "personae" that allows you to call yourself "cheerful" and your enemies "bitter," it is just flimflam--of a piece with the same phony and ill-conceived worldview that created the mess for our country in the first place. As Kant says, the moral purpose in life is not happiness itself, but making oneself morally fit for happiness. Happiness without the corresponding moral fitness is the crackling of thorns--the sort of self-satisfied nonsense that plagues American conservatism these days.
|
|
|
That mirror you face each day should sufficiently establish that which is worthless. |
|
Address appreciated.
Pal, it's not that BJob has so much offended my criterion for registering who it is that I decide to vote for.
It is this patent levelling of HATE and RACISM she employs to label anyone who will not vote, Obama. It should be summarily addressed, deemed flat out unacceptable by any rational, self respecting individual. Shelbey Steele speaks out against this vile narrative, wrote his book, "White Guilt", to cement his position.
Pathetic Liberal admits to his own racism, so be it. Indeed there are racists---on both sides.
I could give a rat's a$$ what color Obama is. However, I have repeatedly noticed the thinness of that skin whenever anyone has chosen to query his background, explore his character, address his wife's clear and conscious choice to publicly speak. |
|
8:48a post 'twas no trouble at all. Some things come effortlessly--such as giving the ol' jiu-jitsu to right-wing blowhards.
Speaking of right-wing bloviation, check out the sanctimonious chest-thumping from your colleague at 6:46p. As I said elsewhere, a shameless man is a worthless man. Maybe Clarityseeker is the blameless offspring of that much whispered, but never confirmed, union between William Seward and Harriet Tubman.
Btw, MaryStella is nice and all, but does all that syrupy talk actually work? I mean, I know ya gotta throw in a little flattery here and there, but jeez.. |
|
Correct. The white America (according to Wright) is responsible for everything from world hunger, genocide in Japan, AIDS.
There is interesting Article in National Review: The ObamaHeads project their bitterness.
The Left is bitter mostly about America and Americans, how cheerful at every point we are, optimistic, church-going, Bible-carrying, border-loving partrolling Americans.
These foolish Americans, Obama has hard time reaching, then, the left-wing hearts spreads with bitterness.
Bitterness, they shall harvest.
Americans, will at the end reject the racial victimization and opportunism, they will reject hypocricital elites preaching to them, as you always do.
Some time ago, Brob, called me an idiot, that's when my conversation with her stopped. |
|
|
Okay, I've not paid attention. Why are folks assuming that Bjob is a woman, fill me in... |
|
MaryStella, Clarity;
Thanks for the kind words.
To echo what John McCain said in his speech yesterday, I just want to state for the record that "I will never surrender...to the lefties in the Townhall threads."
Clarity, everyone can clearly see that you oppose Obama for his policies, rather than for his skin color.
B-Job is playing a transparent, cynical, demented game of labeling everyone a "racist" who doesn't support the radical left wing nuttiness of Barack Obama.
B-Job won't even bring herself to condemn Bill Ayres for conspiring to plant bombs in the women's restroom of the Pentagon.
What kind of evil human being plants bombs in a women's restroom ?
And what kind of pathetic human being resists condemning such a heinous act ?
The lefties are beginning to panic---in the darkest caverns of their secular souls, they acknowledge that Obama could lose this election due to the fact that he's a lightweight with some serious baggage.
They know there's nothing that can be done to alleviate the fact that their man is a lightweight, and they know they can't put Reverend Wrong or Bill Ayres back in the bottle.
Thus, all they can do is try to smear their opponents, Clinton-style.
Funny how the "lefties" never refer to themselves as "racist" when they vote against Bobby Jindal, Ken Blackwell, Michael Steele, Lynn Swann, J.C. Watts, or when they vehemently oppose the judicial nominations of Janice Rogers Brown and Clarence Thomas. |
|
That was a quote from "Hello, Vietnam," pinhead.
Who cares what cotton thinks..he's only at the site to entertain himself, as he freely admits; deep down sad.
You, on the other hand, are a major suck-up, say anything to appeal to anybody at the site. Plus, you are obsessed with using the word "retarded" in a variety of forms. Arch, you have a small mind because you choose to. Do not ridicule those who have limitations based on birth. |
|
|
You are always a lovely rainbow above the seething squalor of the Lib-Lefties here. |
|
Me, too.
Actually, always at awe and impressed with beloved A86.
A person, with good heart. |
|
Blovie goes to some effort to convince us of his lanceman talents. I wish to go on record as being awed & impressed. A86...You?
|
|
your quote:
"Though it is ironic that you hold other Townhall commenters accountable for everything that another Townhall commenter writes, but you don't likewise hold Obama accountable for the views of people he has hired to be his advisors."
As is generally recognized in your offerings, well stated. Too bad it goes over the heads of those directed at.
Be well. |
|
My post of yesterday (2:10 PM) refers to another of my posts where I provided specificity as to why I would not vote for Obama---I gave 5 reasons---NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE.
I am therefore part of your, "we", in your 2:29 PM post of today.
That is correct. WE.
However, the RACE-BAITER, BJob, will receive NO repudiation from the Leftist-ilk you correspond with, nor any other Liberals/Progressives/Leftists/Victicrats.
WHY?
Because they want this general election to be ALL ABOUT RACE.
They want for that which Shelbey Steele wrote about in, "WHITE GUILT". They want to shove it down yours and my throat for NO other reason other than, it "sticks" with a high percentage of white voters.
Not me.
Pathetic Liberal can reveal all he wants about his own racism.
So be it.
You want to go back 100 years, have at it. I was not alive then. I was not alive 200 years ago. My relatives---all from New York, were not slave holders. Underground Railroad---yep, some were part of it.
|
|
|
..OHM's reasoning was less "brilliant" than simplistic and opportunistic. But he does make an effort to be gentlemanly, and for that, he deserves a Dodger tip 'o the hat.. |
|
Who on earth isn't? Much better--more decent and humane--to fair-minded about it. There is a handful of people on the left who act as though there is no such thing as race. And there is a boatload of guys on the right who pretend race is not a factor. It is all a bunch of phony baloney nonsense, from the left and from the right.
Race is in the mix. It will play a role in this election. The beautiful miracle is that Barack is going to win anyway. God Bless America.. |
|
Always, always has spoken for me, here at this blog, and wholeheartedly, appreciate his wit and intelligence.
OHM, always straighforward, clear, and brillinatly reasoned, on issues where conservatives value most.
one hot minute; thanks for your wisdom. |
|
|
And I can criticise Obama with impunity because I bought my racial offsets from Rev Al,since then I have a very small racial footprint.I had a great,great grandfather who was blinded during the battle of Gettysburg now when he came back home he didn't hide in the attic,he became a very sought after chair caner,bought real estate and got married had kids.True story.I don't know if this makes me presidential but it does make me proud. |
|
Laborlawyer,
Friend, feel free to call me whatever names you like.
I've made it clear that I oppose Obama for his crappy ideas---not his skin color.
Though it is ironic that you hold other Townhall commenters accountable for everything that another Townhall commenter writes, but you don't likewise hold Obama accountable for the views of people he has hired to be his advisors.
P.S. I continue to wish you the best in your fight against Lou Gehrig's Disease.
:) |
|
.....the unimportance of civil discourse concerning basic principles to discussions here on Townhall is a lesson I learned from you, among others. Much better to simply call the people you disagree with "pathetic liars" and some such.
|
|
You write:
"We oppose Barack H. Obama because he is a radical left wing nut.
His skin color has nothing to do with it."
Using the royal "we", eh? It is pretty clear you don't speak for everyone on Townhall.
But go ahead, attack the liberals who post here for not doing what you won't do. Hypocrisy, after all, is the watchword of modern conservatism.
:)
|
|
The Laborlawyer wrote;
----------
"I'm simply playing by the rules y'all established."
----------
In other words, you're throwing your high-minded principles out the window in favor of partisan bickering.
At least you admit it.
:)
We oppose Barack H. Obama because he is a radical left wing nut.
His skin color has nothing to do with it.
|
|
I'm simply playing by the rules y'all established.
Obviously it is fine with Townhall posters to refer to Obama as a "chocolate hero" and "half-white" and to his wife as a "negress".
Which means you are enablers of racism.
Which means Brob is correct. |
|
Laborlawyer wrote,
------------
"Remember what happened when I called on righty posters to condemn the racist posts of Amerigenerous and S/A86?
Riiiiiiight.
And now we're all supposed to condemn Brob.
Riiiiiiight."
-------------
Laborlawyer,
So what you're saying is that you won't condemn "racist" remarks by people on "your side" purely out of principle---rather, you will only make condemnations in the context of partisan games ?
Niiiice.
|
|
Remember what happened when I called on righty posters to condemn the racist posts of Amerigenerous and S/A86?
Riiiiiiight.
And now we're all supposed to condemn Brob.
Riiiiiiight.
Just remember: Keep your eyes on the prize. We win this thing if it is decided on the merits. The only way the Repubs win is if they can convince enough Americans that Obama is so deficient as to be beyond any standard of acceptance- an argument so vapid as to be ludicrous on its' face. Theirs will not be a campaign of issues, but rather one of personalities, because they have left themselves no other choice. |
|
"Vets for Freedom PAC"
What a joke. Try starting in this country instead of worrying about the rest of the world. |
|
Today, we are releasing a second ad, featuring Iraq war veteran and Vets for Freedom member, Specialist Kate Norley. Kate, who served 16 months on the front lines as a combat medic, asks Senator Obama two simple, but powerful, questions:
1. Senator Obama, when will you finally decide to go back to Iraq, to see the progress first hand?
2. And when will you finally decide to meet one-on-one, unconditionally, with General Petraeus?
http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/multimedia/details.aspx?id=28 2 |
|
...with endorsement for the RACE-BAITING, HATE-PEDDLING antics of BJob.
It is no surprise to me. PL has exhibited similarly in the past; critical of one who offends his twisted ideals, only to support another Lefty who exhibits myriad examples of irresponsible Boomer-Liberalism.
It changes NOT a thing.
BJob is a RACE-BAITER.
And this RACE-BAITING is used by BJob to steer the dialogue and this campaign process, ultimately the general election towards divisive racial issues.
Pathetic Liberal is fully on board with it. Schmuck. |
|
Wine? Together with my charming and clever conversation, it puts her in the mood.
Thong twisted? After my artful removal of her brasiere, it is the final barrier.
Vapid? Actually, the word is "rapid," and I'm, uh, working on it.. |
|
It is called "personal responsibility," and it is something you guys inflict upon others, but never yourselves. As for straining gnats and swallowing camels? Yeah, you do that as well.
I don't know what you guys would do if I weren't here to provide a living example of how a principled, consistent, rational adult thinks and writes.. |
|
But, hey, what grief I'll feel for missing all this fun.
Comrade Bro-Bay...Trust me, Pal, you are a pleasure and a giant of intellect when compared to your whiney, thong twisted, vapid defender.
*Vast Inexpressable GOOD For('Homie)Mankind |
|
|
Who wants a president of the United States of America to be desired by despotic tyrannical fascist commie regime dictators? Do I hear the Libtards shouting "we do we do"? sure I do! all over the place especially at Obammy rallies. It is a sick world we live in!! |
|
Patriotic Liberal said:
These creeps are shameless, and men who have no shame are worthless..
Arch says:
Does that include women who have no shame as well? Seems that the libtards have a monopoly on the designation of shame upon humanity. Better pluck the log out of your own eye before you attempt to pluck the splinter out of other's eyes hmmm? Patriotic Liberal! |
|
"Continues to blather, chatter, splatter her spew......but nothing comes out." Clarityseeker,reflecting his post-modernism. Words are only words. There is no meaning. You are just blathering. And by the way, everyone who disagrees with me is a weasel!
"Conservative responses you've sucked into your Vortex! Congrats. Your Goal has been met...and, exceeded. A Black Hole of Emotional Need." Neocon, reflecting his pathos, his contempt for the notion of rational exchange of ideas and his insistence on reducing things to a personal emotional level
These creeps are shameless, and men who have no shame are worthless..
|
|
This is getting real comical.
According to the UK Telegraph:
Senator Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials took a further blow on Tuesday after his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination won the backing of Fidel Castro.
The former Cuban president gave a qualified endorsement to Mr Obama whom he described as "the most-advanced candidate" in the race for the White House. |
|
cottoneyed writes: Tuesday, May, 27, 2008 11:22 PM
no, i don't jest, clarity,
i know exactly what bljob said, and i know what i said, and i know what you said, so lets do this, you respond to these dirt bags the way that you want to, and i will respond the way that i want to, hows that, simple isn't it, look i have about 30 minutes total per day to comment on this board, i have a small business to run, i certainly don't have time to read everybody's posts, even if i did i wouldn't, my comments are meant to be as rude as i can possibly be to liberals, who i have utter contempt for, as i see them as arch enemies to this country's National security and no less enemies of my family, but i in no way take what goes on on this board very seriously, this is comic relief from the stresses of life, i find it soothing to stick the needle into their self righteous, pointy little heads, my purpose is to offend, never to convince, for i just don't have the time nor the inclination, my time is worth far more than that, to waste it on these fools.
Arch says:
And with that post, you are one of my heroes on this forum! Rock on Cottoneyed!! |
|
dudley writes: Tuesday, May, 27, 2008 6:40 PM
Cotton
You obviously in dire need of a bljob.
Arch says:
Displaying your libtard intelligence and class there are you dudley? It is so heartening to read your elite libtard vulgarities. Why don't you send your collection of child pornography to Townhall.com to make your libtard points? and I will have the feds notified asap! |
|
|
i know exactly what bljob said, and i know what i said, and i know what you said, so lets do this, you respond to these dirt bags the way that you want to, and i will respond the way that i want to, hows that, simple isn't it, look i have about 30 minutes total per day to comment on this board, i have a small business to run, i certainly don't have time to read everybody's posts, even if i did i wouldn't, my comments are meant to be as rude as i can possibly be to liberals, who i have utter contempt for, as i see them as arch enemies to this country's National security and no less enemies of my family, but i in no way take what goes on on this board very seriously, this is comic relief from the stresses of life, i find it soothing to stick the needle into their self righteous, pointy little heads, my purpose is to offend, never to convince, for i just don't have the time nor the inclination, my time is worth far more than that, to waste it on these fools. |
|
You said we should know BO by now because of his many votes in the Senate. Such as...
Are you truly for his World Poverty Act? A percentage of our GNP, by law, would provide welfare for third world countries? Aren't we, the poor middle class, already providing enough welfare with the taxes taken from our paychecks? I prefer to donate what I can, not another law that takes even more of my paycheck.
Also, this joke of a farm bill that BO voted for. Huge money for special interests...are these the same special interests BO says he doesn't support?
All I see is a man that says anything that fits the moment, just like he said in his first book,"smile, and don't show what you are really thinking". This sure is the man I want for President! |
|
disenfranchize Willie Horton. Shame, shame shame on you, BJob.
Horton campaigned long and hard from the Maryland State Penitentiary, even made TV Appearances to champion Dukakis' prison furlough program.
Just as you would disenfranchize Wesley Cook, aka Mumia Abu Jemima, who is campaigning long and hard for babakazama. He even made a broadcast on "dimocracy now" that radio show produced and hosted by Amy Goodman the multi-millionaire Bolshevik.
Shame on BJob for trying to dis Willie Horton. |
|
I totally disagree with everything you have said; however, I respect your right to say it. What I am asking poloitely for you to do is please refrain from your intentionally misspelled profanity.
I enjoy reading and participating on the blogs of TH because of the varying points of view; however, usually profanity is not an issue, which I appreciate.
I am offended at your profanity and flag as offensive each time you do it. I hope that TH will see it and remove your posts. |
|
Like you, I spent the day volunteering. At least when we work for free, the libs don't get the fruits of our labors to grow their destructive nanny state.
And you could say the Righties engaging Blob are engaging in charity work too. |
|
Conservative responses you've sucked into your Vortex! Congrats. Your Goal has been met...and, exceeded.
A Black Hole of Emotional Need.
Righties: Too much leisure time today? |
|
clarity notes that it's "highly predictable that no other spineless Liberals, Leftists have repudiated this immature weasel."
clarity it's only 6:45 pm east coast time.
most liberals are still in bed sleeping.
when they start the day later on they'll sign on at hugh's.
maybe then the blowhard will get a life rope.
|
|
Brob: "Other than you saying it is so, what evidence is there that Obama is a "Marxist"? Any votes, any decisions, any books, any treatises. Anything other than you flapping your diseased gums?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Barry: "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"
I think "other countries" is a euphemism for the government under Barry's administration with Harry and Nancy running Congress. |
|
|
You obviously in dire need of a bljob.. |
|
to change the subject.
brob huffs: "What will be your spin when the real shiite hits the fan this fall?"
ok, i'll touch on that subject.
if we lose ... we conservatives will say the republican party electorate selected a weak candidate that was at odds with the conservative base on key principles such as taxes, judges, spending, illegal immigration, etc and simple old personality. mccain to many is not likeable, just like hillary. we'll say the base wasn't energized which is true.
if we win ... we conservatives will say the country has elected a president that is at odds with conservative principles on ideas such as taxes, judges, spending and illegal immigration.
and if we win we conservatives will keep the heat on mcain and the rump republican delegation to get with it.
ok brob, what will the marxists say if obama loses?
let me answer for you: racism. |
|
Continues to blather, chatter, splatter her spew......but nothing comes out.
NO ADDRESS from her regarding:
1.) very real, race baiting
2.) definition of her use of, "normal people".
3.) the very hate-filled, "almost to a person" comment.
retraction over this quote from BJob:
"...But you can't deal with the concept of a hyper-intelligent Black man, can you cons? Can't even accept the fact that, if he was not running for office, he would probably be on a short list for the federal court of appeals, the Supreme Court, or the Justice department."
And we won't receive a retraction----for the very reason that BJob wants very badly for this election to be one of race, rather than one on the radical Leftist ideals of her candidate, Obama.
BJob, the consummate HATE-PEDDLING, RACE-BAITER.
footnote:
highly predictable that no other spineless Liberals, Leftists have repudiated this immature weasel.
|
|
|
obambi lives in a $1.5M home, and sends his children to private schools is proof positive that obambi is a full fledged market based capitalist and not a Marxist, yes sir, no Marxist here, right bljob, has this fool ever heard about all these Marxists like Castro, Stalin, Lenin, Chavez, et al, living in million dollar mansions and their children going to the finest private schools while the people eat shyte, bljob is it possible that you could be a bigger FOOL, you are the typical white obambi voter, a FOOL voting for a FOOL....you really are dumb as dirt, aren't you.... |
|
No self respecting poster/blogger should proceed from this point without addressing this immature little punk as stated above, in the "Subject" line.
I have made my case on this thread.
BJob is an unabashed RACE-BAITER.
A peddler of HATE.
An gratuitous agitator of the most scurrilous variety.
I have made my case that this BLOWHARD is really not even worth the spit she sprays onto her computer screen whilst responding to, "cons".
Not worth SPIT.
Anyway, she has the AUDACITY to adress me with this, I quote:
"...clarity, one, bill, neo -- You folks are NOT doing con politics any favors here today!"
BJob---listen up. It matters little, to me, whether I am doing myself "any favors here today". What really matters is that you are a RACE-BAITER, a HATE-PEDDLER. The likes of you should not be tolerated here.
You make unwarranted, undocumented claims, Bill Cross has offered a couple; OUTED YOU on. You have zero response to those.
You have NOTHING to productively add to dig yoruself out of the hell-holes you have dug. Yet, you laughably point fingers at omy contributions.
You little weasle.
You are nothing.
Nothing but a HATE-PEDDLING, RACE-HUSTLER. |
|
clarity, at leasy obambi meant what he said about change. obambi's positions change with the clock.
actually, i had knew in advance that obambi had changed his bad guy negotiating stance before i responded to blowhard on the negotiation point. i chose the first obambi poistion for my debate point.
my goal was to see if blowhard would admit that obambi had changed his mind on preconditions and negotiations.
then, if blowhard acknowledged the changed obambi stance i was going to blister him on his bloviations on how smart obambi was, and how obambi had thought everything through and had all the answers to the world's problems.
but blowhard didn't bite. maybe for once, he knew he was trapped. i doubt it though. they don't call him blowhard for nothing. |
|
Have you not heard?
Obama is now claiming he would NOT have a "no precondition" meeting with AckMADwackJOB.
I know, I know, you are verklempt, speechless, aghast this candidate who is all about, "FRESH" politics, this Obama who screams for a "CHANGE"---he is really about predictable pathetic "waffling", prevaricating, and most assuredly, now all about FLIP-FLOPPING.
The guy has taken another 180 degree turn---without concern for any "grilling", or, 'splainin', or, reconciling to his lemmings, er, followers, uhhhhh, supporters.
Of this they have NO concern.
Just last week they were DEFENDING this maroon, Obama, for his "courage" in meeting with rogue-state leaders. They loved that he would sit down, have tea with rogue-state leaders and convince them to stop supporting those who blow themselves up to kill their own peeps. Obama supporters last week saw their messiah as the guy who could eradicate all hate, killing, despots, etc.
Now, this week? Obama is admitting he will NOT hold these meetings.
No biggie!!!
His followers will simply "CHANGE" their definition of, "FRESH", to make it fit Obama's ever-"CHANGING" positions.
"FRESH" indeed. |
|
B-Job,
Why won't you condemn Bill Ayres ?
Do you approve of people who conspire to plant bombs in the women's restroom at the Pentagon ? |
|
You are wasting your time on here. You need to go and find OBLAMAS uncle you know the one who liberated the JEWS from that concentration camp. Wait if he liberated the people from that camp then he must have been RUSSIAN oh SH!T he is a COMMIE for Damn sure now that I have read that statement. What the hell is this country thinking when we start to elect COMMIES for POTUS. Better watch out for this one. Wait the uncle might have been Pastor Wreight since everyone of you LIBS swear that when OBLAMA was having problems with his pastor tht it was like talking of and old UNCLE that rants and ravces at Family REUNIONS.
You get on here and talk about CONS LIEING and you want us to elected a RACIST and LIAR. We would let you get by with having HITLERY as the Racist and OBLAMA as the LIAR but for having OBLAMA as the RACIST and LIAR what a joke you must be to your family if they heard the CRAP you are spewing on the internet. You are just like the TYPICAL LIB on here when it is the TRUTH you LIBS come a WHINING. Let us help yu.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Get out of your MOMS basement drinking that OBLAMA-FOOLED YOU KOOL-ADE ands smoking that LIB CRACK PIPE
|
|
Though I don't want to go there I can't help but think Obama is nothing more than part of a conspiracy to get McCain elected.
Are the Dems really this stupid to make this guy their candidate? |
|
brob pouts: "Bill Cross, the con moron . . .
Waterboards an Arabic speaking man, then asks him questions in the Queen's English! And wonders why he can't understand the man's "babbling"!"
on the battlefield a waterboard strategy on the enemy to get information that might save lives is appropriate.
blowhard, we have translators and you know it, although i'm not sure how trustworthy some of them are.
your obama strategy on the otherhand is to negotiate with iran, north korea, hamas and hezballah without preconditions and with no threat of force behind it stop the bad guys.
like i said, negotiating with you and yours is easy because you all are easily fooled. just tell you how smart you are, and the rest falls into place.
|
|
...surely you jest?
I was simply using BJob's own "comment" (even used her exact words in her "subject" line) to further illustrate a clearer thought.
BJob---she is the one who identified that YOU had a problem. I simply objected. Really, it was not about you, believe me. It was all about the pathos BJob suffers from.
I thought you would see through this. Clearly, I was wrong.
Man, I hate having to 'splain these things---one reason text messages are not the best in communicating ideas.
THE ONE OVERRIDING POINT:
BJob is an unabashed race-baiter---would love nothing more than to see this general election be ONLY about race---she sees it only in terms of race.
It is pathetic.
It is unacceptable.
And it should NOT be tolerated by any conservative or liberal on thses boards |
|
That is who Obama reminds me of. The subject is the title of a song we sang in choir when I was in school. The chorus went thus:
"It went zip when it moved, and bop when it stopped, and whirrrr!!!! when it stood still..."
"I never knew just what it was, and I guess I never will".
Substitute it for he, and you have Obama's political platform. Now he WON'T talk with Iran's president. He flip flops more than a frog on a hot griddle. |
|
created the horton ad. the ad was excellent in pointing out how dukakis was weak on crime.
but if it weren't for gore mentioning dukakis' furlough plan in the dukakis primary debate the republican party might not have become aware of the furlough plan or horton.
|
|
or half black, my point WAS that this FOOL of all FOOLS has NO credibility when it comes to proclaiming ones good character, she wouldn't know good character if it came up and hit her over the head with a two by four, she also has NO credibility when it comes to race, she cannot ever get passed ones skin color, the "content of ones character" is secondary to it, she projects this flaw on all others, as this primary season has shown, white democrats vote for Clinton, black socialist democrats vote of obambi, yet this FOOL of all FOOLS, projects her party's racism on "cons", and in yet another example of projection, her screwball comment that all college educated suburbanites have "banged someone of another race" and that the GOP risks alienation of said "bangers", can this, in any way pass for critical thought, the conclusion is so stupid that all one can do is laugh it off as just another inane comment from a FOOL of all FOOLS.
Clarity, i come on this board for laughs, this is just an outlet for me to be bombastic at liberals expense, you cannot be reasonable with these nuts, you can't convince them of anything, surely you know this, don't you, for goodness sakes all i try to do is make them as angry as possible, i have NO illusions of turning them away from their dark ways, quite the contrary, i want to rub their pointy little noses in it, i KNOW who i am and am very comfortable in my own skin, someone like "bljob" can't ever change that, so NO Clarity, "i have no problem", at least not on this board. |
|
|
|
|
then I guess the Scott Ott quote on the main Townhall page, which I had thought was there to commemorate Memorial Day must be a gaffe too. |
|
Obama said the same thing back in 2002.
Then said his uncle spent time in the attic because he suffered from what he saw at the camps.
Your buddy is a liar. |
|
brob pouts: "And, once again, you cons simply lose more and more credibility when you repeat this b.s."
notice how the blowhard dropped the reference to losing credibility with "normal people."
i guess the gay, lesbian and transgender community pulled him aside and read him the riot act. |
|
BJob.....the consummate RACE-BAITER.
Extracted quote from her 9:01 AM post:
..."But you can't deal with the concept of a hyper-intelligent Black man, can you cons? Can't even accept the fact that, if he was not running for office, he would probably be on a short list for the federal court of appeals, the Supreme Court, or the Justice department."
NO PROOF, NO EVIDENCE, NO BACKUP.
Just simple, ugly, hate-filled Race-Baiting.
|
|
Clarity,
You know I was just being facetious.
You're right about B-Job.
B-Job is a radical left wing nut who cannot defend The Obamamessiah on the issues, so she resorts to inferring that Barack's political detractors are "racist."
I wonder if McCain puts Condi Rice on the ticket, would B-Job also characterize people who don't vote the GOP ticket, as 'racist.'
(Yeah, right...)
My question to B-Job is, what kind of man cannot bring himself to condemn Bill Ayres ?
Bill Ayres conspired to plant bombs in the women's restroom of the Pentagon.
That is an evil person.
Obviously, Obama does not agree that Ayres is evil.
|
|
tucks tail back to daily kos. how many times have we been promised that before?
btw, he doesn't know himself all the questions he asked the board in his 3:19 post.
brob pouts: "HOW THE HECK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE GOING TO INTERROGATE AL QUEDA, morons?"
that's easy. i would waterboard them. then they would tell me what i needed to know. |
|
Brob: "Explain how a guy who lives in a million dollar house, sends his kids to private school, and invests his money conservatively is a "full blown" confiscation of private property Marxist! Do you cons even KNOW WHAT MARXISM is?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like all Marxist regimes, there's a privileged class of elites; they sympathize with the the proletariat but they live like the bourgeoisie. I have a buddy--former Sandanista--who tells me that when the Sandanistas came to power, they confiscated property but kept it for themselves and their cronies. Perhaps it's because from each according to his ability, to each according to his need. |
|
blindfaith writes: Monday, May, 26, 2008 11:48 PM
Teammates
It is possible to go with an untried rookie, but only if you have qualified and able veterans surrounding the rookie. Presidents are only as smart and wise as the advisors he surrounds him with...
WASN'T THIS SAID WHEN WE ELECTED GEORGE BUSH??? HEAVEN HELP US!! |
|
You know I hate to come late to the arguement, and I certainly agree with you about obamassiah - he scares me to death, but I just wondered what the name BJob stands for? Is she advertising? Is she a friend of bills?
OK, I guess that is a little grass, but I haven't heard anyone say or even suggest it.
And by the way, Michael Steele looks mighty good to me and I think he is a little darker than their guy. I'd vote for him in a heart beat, either for vp or president. So much for your racial card. |
|
Brob demanded:
"Explain how a guy who lives in a million dollar house, sends his kids to private school, and invests his money conservatively is a "full blown" confiscation of private property Marxist! Do you cons even KNOW WHAT MARXISM is?"
Yes, I know what Marxism is and the fact that you are not aware that the big-shots in a communist country -- people like Stalin in the old USSR and Castro in Cuba and Mao in communist China -- live in million dollar homes, have private tutors for their children and invest their money conservatively simply confesses your ignorance of how communism works in reality.
|
|
brob pouts: "Wilie Horton, we know, is a piece of cake in the con mind."
brob, who created the horton ad?
|
|
clarity magnificently states: "BJob is a bonafide RACE-BAITER. Really sick. With pathetic ad hominems and feckless allegations sprinkled throughout."
actually, i humor myself by posting at hugh's place. it's fun to school a blowhard like brob because for all his talk he's an amateur debater. he gives the opposition all the information they need to crush him.
like most leftists he's all emotion. he spouts off before he thinks. then once he's in a corner he's too proud and vain to admit he's wrong. so he digs deeper.
he's like the world's worst vegas gambler: with two face cards showing, he hits.
|
|
No, sir.
Don't you get it?
This pathetic little immature RACE-BAITER should be called out by every, let's see, how does she put it, "con" on this website.
Not one person should be made to tolerate her shenanigans.
Bill Cross does a damn good job of showing her other flagrant failures in arguing her points.
BJob's, "NORMAL PEOPLE". Mr. Cross calls her out.
BJob's, "...almost to a person...". Mr. Cross is not buying this and no other self respecting person should.
Bill Cross further refines the degree to which this pathos-driven little RACE-BAITER goes to agitate, irritate, enflame, spreading her hate far and wide.
Thank you, to Bill Cross.
OHM, you to should show this b*tch the disdain she has earned.
|
|
Now you are clearly understanding the pathos this BJob suffers.
Bill, you are exactly correct in your quote of BJob.
She makes the hilariously empty claim of, "almost to a person".......SAY WHAT??????????
And, as you so eloquently state, she is the first to demand PROOF of others who make claims.
Earlier, Bill, you point out her arrogant ignorance in referring to "NORMAL PEOPLE"........SAY WHAT????
Yes, Bill, you are correct to demand her definition of, "normal people"?
Bill,
BJob is a bonafide RACE-BAITER. Really sick. With pathetic ad hominems and feckless allegations sprinkled throughout. |
|
brob pouts: "Obama, in contrast, graduated magna from Harvard. He has academic horsepower in spades ... "
so what. i disagree with many of his ideas. and if i had only read his words without ever having seen his face i would still disagree with him.
in the meantime, explain the harvard magna's latest auschwitz gaffe regarding his uncle. or did obama's uncle serve with the soviets?
obama is but a man, knucklehead. he's no messiah. |
|
Clarityseeker,
When Republicans Michael Steele, Ken Blackwell, and Lynn Swann were running for respective offices in the 2006 election, we never heard from B-Job, Briggsy, the Labor Activist, or PL/LP that voting against t-h-o-s-e black candidates was "racist."
Gee, what a surprise.
But don't you get it ?
You cannot criticize Barack H. Obama---he is above reproach---he is the radical left wing saviour.
In a 2-for-1 deal, he and Michelle promise "to fix America's souls."
It doesn't matter that Obama believes there are 58 states in the United States, or that he mistakenly believes that we need Arabic interpretors in Afghanistan.
It doesn't matter that he said yesterday in a Memorial Day speech that he was speaking to some of America's "fallen" heroes in a-t-t-e-n-d-a-n-c-e.
He is the saviour, and you must accept it.
Obama was a "community organizer,"---and that is a prerequisite for becoming Commander-in-Chief.
Barack drove single moms with dependent children to the voting booth on election day, he organized after-school games of kickball at the local recreation center, and he made sure that inner city folks were appropriately agitated at "the man," and "the system."
Surely you can identify why he is the most qualified candidate running for President.
And if you can't, then it is due to "racism." |
|
You allow this pathetic race-baiter to frame the dialogue.......with pathetic details such as, half black, half-white......percentages of race. God, how pathetic.
Allowing this race-baiter to frame the discussion drags everyone down---especially where there is no issue there----EXCEPT that she wants it so be about RACE.
I refuse to provide this creep the attention her race-centric being operates from. That is what SHE wants it to be about. She has made allegations on this thread which have NO PROOF.
She has done this before. She has taken folks down this path many times. It's pathetic as is she.
Cotton, here is YOUR problem. You are playing HER games. Her pathetic games. |
|
brob pouts: "The GOP risks alienating the suburbanites who, almost to a person, banged someone of another race while they were in college OR married one themself!"
... "almost to a person" ...
yet he wants proof from us conservatives on what we say.
he makes this stuff up as he goes along and as the day goes on the tall tales get wilder and wilder and wilder.
who knows what he'll be saying by days' end.
i'm going to stick around to see what whoppers he'll come up with. |
|
VS Barack Hussien Obama
Any Questions????
PC will be our end
LEE |
|
Obama truly continues to fascinate me. Maybe he is the Messiah ? I see dead people(soldiers). It's obvious he's much more gifted than the rest of us mortals.
I can't wait to see what else he has for us. |
|
There is a big difference between a person who isn't an eloquent speaker and a person who pathologically lies. Bush makes gaffes... Hillary and B. Hussein are pathological liars.
|
|
Me thinks Brob is a tag bit pissed off. His buddy Obama is making one goof after another.
So Brob, how could Obama's uncle be in the Russia army? |
|
brob pouts: "The more you deny the obvious, the less credibility you cons have with normal people."
i thought the left said that the phrase "normal people" was an oppressive structure hoisted down by ancient theologians and dead white males through the ages of western civilization, and was to be overthrown.
brob, please elaborate on the meaning of "normal people."
the gay, lesbian and transgender communities await your response.
|
|
Where on this thread has any "con" given evidence---you know, PROOF, that they are deciding AGAINST Obama on the issue of his COLOR?
WAITING....................
WAITING....................
It aint there----you pathetic RACE-BAITER.
Hey Loser, you can't conceive of the FACT that there are some, like myself, who don't want to vote for your Messiah, simply because he's black---you racist.
I have already provided specificity as to why he aint my "cup of tea". Your ignorance does not allow this rationale to penetrate the density of that rock on your shoulders.
you race-baiting pathetic loser. |
|
is the more honest thing to say.
he had a minimum of 6 "oops" votes while he was in the Illinois state Senate. He has yet to release his senate records or calendar in order for the public to see who was or wasn't going in and out of his door.
He has yet to give a list of exactly what a "community organizer" does in Chicago and with whom he was "organizing." The only "history" anyone has of Obama is what he has written in books and you really should read how he rails against the "white man" in his books.
More reading should be done about the Illinois Combine and Operation Board Games to see exactly what type of candidate Obama really is.
While he plays a good game with his "change" mantra and his accusations of everyone but HIM playing politics as usual, he is doing nothing but lying out both sides of his mouth. You don't have the Chicago political machine at your beck and call and claim "honest" politics. |
|
brob pouts: "Which is: it is very hard for White people (and especially cons, apparently) to grasp the concept that, yes, a Black person can be 16 i.q. points smarter than you AND play basketball, too ... " i won't bore the board with the rest of his bloviation.
yet these same white conservatives love clarence thomas and revile ted kennedy.
as said before, debating brob is not competitive. he's so shallow.
brob is unable to distinguish between ideas and race.
is there any doubt that brob if given the power would make conservatism illegal. |
|
"Barack is one of the smartest people you will ever encounter who will deign to enter his messy thing called politics"
"Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed."
"Uninformed" is the emphasize of politics of grievances and racism in 57 states of B. Hussein Obama's America.
Yes, all B. Hussein's family especially his Uncles and Aunties, were very active in the Bolshevicks.
His great grandfather, a member of radical political party in Russia had siezed power in November, 1917. His paternal family formed the Bolsheviks the Communist party in 1918. Thus, his uncle was in the Red Army and was instrumental in the largest humanitartian act in History of mankind, and actually was the very first to enter and open the gates of Aushwitz, this is all historically and factually been authenicated by:
Mr. George Soros, because he was There.
And, if you disagree with Mr. Soro, then you are worst than Hitler! |
|
OBFUSCATOR
DOn't address the substance of the issue---only the fluff.
No one on these boards refers to others with more name-calling and denigrating than YOU.
So be it.
BUT-----when someone such as myself uses similar sophomoric behavior while calling you out for the RACE-BAITER that you are, you focus on the name calling.
You are not only a race-baiter.
You are an immature punk.
As the old saw goes:
"You can dish it out, but you cannot take it."
YOU RACE-BAITER!!
Pathetic Lefty-Loser RACE-BAITER |
|
[Do you cons even KNOW WHAT MARXISM is?]
Of course I do!
Socialism = Handing money out to people and programs Republicans don’t like, as opposed to conservatism which involves handing out money to people Republicans do like.
Marxism = Increasing taxation instead of debt and giving that money to even more people and things Republicans don’t like. May also involved a Night at the Opera and Duck Soup.
|
|
for our lack of credibility with "normal people", this from a fool of all fools, who for the last 16 years has ranted on and on about the hyper-virtuous Clinton's, us "cons" just couldn't handle such a hyper-intelligent couple, they were always 1 step ahead of us all, well lets ask "bljob", what she thinks of them now, NO impassioned defense of them any more, hey bljob, didn't think so, but now this fool of all fools, tells us that us "cons" just "can't deal with the concept of a hyper-intelligent black man", well for starters, "bljob", Mr. Soetoro is half white, you may have overlooked that fact, but you may have a point, maybe us "cons" just can't handle a hyper-intelligent half white guy, oh well, be that as it may, you little "darling" just do not have ANY credibility when it comes to ferreting out people of good character, absolutely none, cause little "darling" you were a Clinton sycophant for 16 years, so excuse us "cons" while we laugh you off again and look at you as someone who just can't handle, hyper-superior Conservative thought.
vote obambi...give jimmah a 2nd term...FOOLS voting for a FOOL... |
|
brob says "Do you cons even KNOW WHAT MARXISM is?"
i'm sure brob knows quite a bit about marxism, and would love for the rest of the country to experience its joys. |
|
acceptance.
be careful with him because if you treat him too roughly he'll hold his breath as would a three year old child.
consider his comment: "But you can't deal with the concept of a hyper-intelligent Black man, can you cons?"
he wants the board to think he's referring to the human gaffe machine.
however, he's really referring to himself, hence his bloviation to hawk that she's "jealous" that he 'smarter and more well read."
when brob speaks of obama he really is speaking about himself. he believes he is a genius. just ask him. he'll tell you.
as for me i would love to be on the opposite side of the table with him in a sales negotiation.
just tell him how brilliant he is and his eyes will glaze over narcistic images of himself in his mind.
then i would charge him full price plus a 20 percent premium.
we would both walk away happy.
|
|
|
|
Two waffles with a slice of chicken and turkey. Maybe some soft tofu too--for the "melt" part, and some sprouts.
A modified Monte Cristo sandwich for Democrats. |
|
|
melting back into obscurity would work for me.. ;) |
|
"Presidents are only as smart and wise as the advisors he surrounds him with."
That is false and symplistic. Judgement acquired through life experience is required both to select advisors and to evaluate what they are telling you. Experience-challenged lightweights like Obama will tend to surround themselves with people who agree with them, so they always feel like they are "doing the right thing" after conferring with their resident sycophants.
The left criticize Bush for having disagreements within his cabinet and circle of advisors. Their ignorance is symptomatic of what I said above. They do not realize or appreciate the absolute necessity of having people around an executive who are willing to disagree - and having an executive who values their disagreement. |
|
Is it flat bread with feta and arugula (finished with a nice vinegarette)?
Or is it a big waffle with a pat of melted butter on it?
What would be the best kind of Obama melt? Any ideas? |
|
|
When the Pubs act like Dems, yes. |
|
[If Obama Wants....
...to return power to us humble people, then he needs to do a complete 180: analyze and reduce government, defang dictatorial beaurocracies, promote a best-science-based environmental policy, keep the cap gains low and eliminate the estate taxes completely, get order on the border, defund sanctuary cities, promote domestic oil drilling, fight the teachers' unions for the sake of the children, stand up to public service unions, defund the nanny state, protect the people from enemies foreign and domestic and defend the Constitution.]
What you're saying is, he should pretty much do the exact opposite of the Republicans. |
|
his intelligence. Orator? How about bumbling bloviator...
Without a teleprompter to read from Obama makes one gaffe after another. This is either caused by his burned out brain caused by the cocaine or the simple fact the he may have the sheepskin degree but didn't learn a thing but the socialist crapola from his Leftist "education".
SO when Pres. Bush makes a misstatement he is an idiot and when Obama does the same 10X times he's the best thing to ever come downthe political pike?
Get a clue Libs, Obama is going to lose big time...unless you can find many more dead to vote.
|
|
be patient.
brob needs a hug.
my hunch is that his significant other was away for the long weekend, and what with light posting at daily kos he had no one to tell him how gifted he is.
so he's power posting at hugh's place in the hope that somebody, anybody will affirm him.
so would one of brob's fellow marxists please - for the love of God and all that's good - tell brob how brilliant he is so he will quit boring us.
remember, brob's - as marxists - are people, too. |
|
I won't do your work for you. You claim to know so much about your "candidate." You can do your own search; helpful hints on where to look would be the NYTimes and Chicago Sun-Times to get you started. As well, there are probably articles here on Townhall for your edification on the subject.
You might also ask yourself why it was important for Obama to have someone in the courtroom during the Rezko trial. |
|
...to return power to us humble people, then he needs to do a complete 180: analyze and reduce government, defang dictatorial beaurocracies, promote a best-science-based environmental policy, keep the cap gains low and eliminate the estate taxes completely, get order on the border, defund sanctuary cities, promote domestic oil drilling, fight the teachers' unions for the sake of the children, stand up to public service unions, defund the nanny state, protect the people from enemies foreign and domestic and defend the Constitution.
|
|
the day you can write a coherent sentence in English is the day you can start criticizing someone else's intelligence. We aren't there yet . . . .
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wow, look who's talking! LOL |
|
Obama has rewritten WWII history such that the allies liberated Auschwitz.
…Obama also spoke about his uncle, who was part of the American brigade that helped to liberate Auschwitz…
Auschwitz of course is in Poland. It was liberated by the Red Army on Jan 27 1945. Poland, on most maps is usually placed to the east of Germany, although we may need to investigate the geography textbooks the Messiah used as a child…
|
|
|
|
|
Not only was the Memorial Day enlightening, but view a text of the graduation speech he gave on Sat. Anti-corporate, almost no mention of Memorial Day weekend. Only said something about in a time or war we need help making the peace.... Hugh is dead on about a Obama admin. being Carter redux. |
|
uncle (per cbs) was with the force that liberated auschwitz in january 1945.
of course, it was the soviet army that liberated auschwitz.
at first i was confused.
but then i remembered that both obama and senator bluto ("the germans bombed pearl harbor") blutarsky had/have chicago connections.
now i understand. |
|
Republicans have helped build the office of the President into a neo-monarchy with supremacy over the other branches of government.
Instead of helping return the office to its earlier humbler roots, they have praised and spread the image of the warrior-king inspiring the complacent masses and saving us from ourselves.
If you are truly concerned about the possibility of an 'unprepared' man assuming executive authority, maybe that should give you a bloody clue that you've let executive authority get a little too big to be trusted to one man.
|
|
what ever prediction or position hewitt takes you can take it to the bank that the opposite will happen.
he has been wrong so many times it is almost unbelievable that he continues to make them.
from harriet miers to the 2006 elections he has been wrong.
the romney obsession was the worst though because he literally was so biased he would put up articles and polls that said romney was certain to win despite overwhelming evidence to the oppostite.
hewitt has no credibility and cannot be trusted to give informed objective opinions on politics. |
|
If you recall, Brooks's article discussed VP choices for both Obama and McCain. One of the two he highlighted for McCain is one who NEVER gets mentioned in Townhall.com threads: Rob Portman of Ohio. Someone to keep in mind.
Anyway, I heard Bill Kristol address a point I read made above--that is, that Obama can't be cited for lack of experience if McCain puts Jindal on the ticket. Kristol's response, to paraphrase, was Obama quite rightly couldn't be considered to be too inexperienced--to run as a vice presidential candidate.
Beyond that, Brooks suggested Tom Daschle for Obama--would I love that because Daschle would make a great crybaby complement.
|
|
I am in total agreement with you. Obama can read from a teleprompter but outside of that he's Ted Kennedy.
The guy on SNL does a great impersonation. |
|
|
|
I am laughing here because you are so correct.
Obama is a stammering, stumbling speaker. Whether it is sincere, or, planned for the purpose to convey that spectre of vulnerability, that air of a "folksy" communicator.
The real deal here is that Obama's job appears to be one of politicizing every conceivable event in our country---the latest is this past Memorial holiday, where every sentence was one of attacking our administration, but more importantly denigrating our system. He's made his livelihood one of complaining, one of activism (organizing).
Barack er, umm, aahhhhhh, uhhhhhhhh, Obama, is, uuhhhhhh, for hmmmmm, ahhhhhh, so many, uhhhhhh, er, you know, a, uhhhhhhh, er, great, ummmmmmm, ahhhhhhh, er, orator.
Is he smooth? Yep. In his cadence and slow speech patterns. His message? Well, now that we've heard more of his, er, ahhhhhh, you know, articulations, well, ahhhhhhh, er, taking into consideration the number of gaffes, this guy is pretty common. But, the Left will not allow you to focus on this; petty, they declare are such critiques. And this, from those who reveled, catterwauled about, "Bushisms" for all of these past 8 years.
Pathetic.
|
|
If Mack is indeed going to pick Palin, I quite agree with your preemptive strike plan. Waiting until Hill is VP looks like a me-too.
However, if the VP is a man, then keep the suspense and media attention going.
I love the idea of Palin simply for the media sensation. Any man on the VP list will just be another ho-hum. Palin will charge the place with curiosity and excitement. |
|
Maybe when delievering a prepared speech but this guy can't speak two, off the cuff, sentences with out a half dozen --ohhhh, ahhh, errr---meaning I cannot say what I feel so I have search my mind for words that will be acceptable to the Elites and the Media. The same holds true when he answers a question he has not been errr, ahhh , ohhhh, "prepared" to answer.
I guess the make of a powerful orator is now judged on how many errrr's you utter.
Doubt me, review his debates or off the cuff media minutes.
|
|
We are talking about the highest, most powerful position in the world here. We know very little of Obama - in the short time he's been in the senate he has done virtually nothing besides running for president. We could list many socialists and marxists who have gone to some of our best universities and excelled academically. That does not qualify any of them to be POTUS.
Because we know little about the man we must look at his background, who he has CHOSEN to associate with and learn from (Michelle, Wright, Ayers, Rezko, etc.). This is relevant because we know nothing else about him.
The man, as far as I can tell is a full blown Marxist. Barrack and Michelle have been very successful in their lives but they apparently think none of the rest of us are nearly as capable because we are all oppressed and victims of big wealthy corporations and have no chance of escaping this victimhood they convince all of us we are mired in unless we have the government rescue us. |
|
Here's an important piece of advice: If it looks like it's going to be McCain/Palin anyway (and that should be a "no brainer" for Team McCain), McCain should announce NOW or VERY SOON, rather than later towards the convention. There's currently a growing chorus for Obama/Hillary (as VP) ticket (in fact the Dems are likely aware of the Palin phenomenon). If the GOP waits while movement for Hillary as VP grows -- even worse until after it is solidified that Hillary will/could be VP pick -- selecting Palin will be portrayed by Dems/liberal media more as a reaction by GOP selecting its own female (overshawdoing Palin's own remarkable assets), rather than McCain taking the lead on this. Selecting Palin now or early (contrary to the punditocracy) will mean McCain will be seen as driving the course of this campaign overwhelmingly, and the DEMS will be seen as merely reacting. And, there's absoultely no down-side to this because even if Hillary is a no-go as VP for Obama, the GOP gains by acting early. McCain the maverick. Palin the maverick. Do it now!
There's no reason, and actually substantial negative, in McCain waiting to see what the Dems do first insofar as his picking Palin as VP, because, no matter who Obama picks, Palin is by far (and I mean far) the best pick for McCain and the GOP, especially in this time of GOP woes. The GOP can be seen as the party of real 'change' (albeit I hate that mantra, change, change, bla bla), while not really having to change from GOP core conservative values, which Palin more than represents.
In light of the current oil/energy situation, as well as the disaffected female Hillary voters situation, and growing focus on McCain's age and health, Palin is more than perfect -- now.
(Perhaps Team McCain is already on to this.)
|
|
There's something fishy about a candidate and a party who want to dismantle our defense system as Barack has said he will do. It would be a different story if he said he wanted to modernize, make our weapons more efficient, more cost-effective. But he hasn't said that. He wants to dismantle to save money for his nanny state. He naively believes he can have a nuke-free world if the US takes the lead by disarming.
In San Diego near the Mexican border, Blackwater, with a contract from the US Navy in hand, developed a facility to train sailors how to defend themselves in case of attack a la USS Cole, etc. The facility is in a warehouse in an industrial park surrounded by open space. No nearby homes or businesses.
The permits were pulled, the money has been invested, the facility is completed, and is ready to begin training sailors to defend their lives, but the SD city attorney, Aguirre, is shutting it down because he "doesn't like what Blackwater did in Iraq."
Aguirre is insisting on more stringent environmental studies/permits or whatever red tape it takes to thwart the facility. Down here we know it is the anti-war crowd that is using the ploy to thwart defensive military training.
The Blackwater attorney, a former general, is appearing in court today seeking a writ of mandemus. SD, already in debt because the city council voted humungous retirement packages for themselves and city workers, has another potential law suit as the taxpayers expense.
It's no surprise Obama has the same disdain for Blackwater. And the same love for a bigger nanny state at the expense of hard-working Americans.
Birds of a feather...........
|
|
I would suggest you read up on your "candidate" as it relates to Rezko and the words coming straight from the horse's mouth.
I am not a sheeple and while you may turn a blind eye to Obama and his associates many of us don't. To think Obama is a "virgin" when it comes to the political game is laughable.
Fitzgerald is not finished issuing his indictments. |
|
|
And by the way, I am sick of these "gaffe watches", or whatever. It's obvious what he was trying to say, which was respect for all veterens and those in the armed services, so what is the big deal. It's like when McCain said we might be in Iraq for 100 years -- obvious what he is trying to say, which is stay as long as need be until Iraq is somewhat stable, and it gets all twisted out of context. |
|
|
some of us have not forgetten that one of the first job offers Obama got when he was named editor of the Harvard Law Review was from Rezko. Let's put Obama on that short list of yours and see how he stands up to the scrutiny. |
|
|
many of the posters above Hugh has lost all credibility about this election in light of his embarassing Romney-mania, and should probably stick to some other topic. |
|
If the goal here is to point out Obama's gaffes as making him a poor candidate then on that basis Bush should be no where's near the presidency and McCain either. I mean seriously do I really need to log a list of the decider's pathetic oral gaffe's. They wouldn't be so bad if his actions and lies didn't get soldiers killed and destroy our economy.
There is a long list of McCainisms as well.
Issues boys...issues and actions. Obama just voted for a bill that helps the Vets when they come home and Bush and McCain were against it.
All right so here is one. Bush trying to be like Obama.
"Let me start off by saying that in 2000 I said, 'Vote for me. I'm an agent of change.' In 2004, I said, 'I'm not interested in change --I want to continue as president.' Every candidate has got to say 'change.' That's what the American people expect." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 5, 2008 DOPE!
|
|
of Obama's stump, he is asked about Blackwater and claims he is going to take them on. How does he reconcile taking on those type security firms when John Brennan is one of his "advisors?"
Makes a good soundbite, but there is no truth to anything Obama says. |
|
For starters, the corporate media is much more friendly to Mac than Barack.
Second, when Hugh hears a "litany of stock answers from the left's library," that does not mean Barack has not thought through the issues. What it means is that Hugh has heard the arguments before. Conservatives these days tend to confuse having heard an argument with having disposed of one.
Finally, everyone is perfectly aware of the seriousness of these times. Everyone is perfectly aware of the seriousness of the office. Americans in general, and Barack supporters in particular, do not need lectures from a Boomer conservative about 'unqualified lightweights.' They have been inflicting lightweights on the American electorate for more than a generation, and our country has suffered for it.
Barack is no bucked-up dilettante, like Hugh's boy Mitt (or the current President, for that matter). He is not a career Washingtonian, like McCain. And his avenue to 1600 Pennsylvania is unconventional, if one can derive "conventionality" from the prior 43 data points. These are not deal-breakers, though. They are selling points. See ya at the ballot box.. |
|
|
|
Obama is simply about returning power to the people Mr Hewitt. Our government is so corrupt on so many levels with money being transfered from the treasury to the wealthy elite. You are asking your gullible audience to support more of the same.
Mr Obama understands this. He has the people behind him.. not the corporations and the wealthy. People like yourself who continue to promote the Republican party are guilty of selling out this country. The mass media is no darling to the left. It is a corporate media that understands the threat of it's break up that a man like Obama represents.
If you are for a country dominated and run by multi-national corporate media you will listen to Mr. Hewitt and all his fear tactics. If you want a strong democracy run OF, BY and FOR the people you will question him and his mis-guided motives.
|
|
|
A bit of arugula w/ vinegarette and feta melted on flat bread? |
|
is this a subliminal message from Obama telling us that the Chicago political machine is at work again and the roster of dead people are making it to the voting booths?
(no disrespect is intended to our fallen veterans) |
|
dimocrat party be like?
As the golden-haired boy may yet lose the nomination to hillary Rod'em, we may find out soon enough. But, that is not likely at this juncture.
The post-babakazama dimocrat party will start in Denver and end in November, and his defeat at the hands of a man old enough to live at Seizure World will effectively return complete control of the dimocrat party to Bill Clinton.
But, a lot of dimocrats have said not nice things about Bill, Hillary, Socks the Cat and Chelsea in an effort to firm up the candidacy of the melted Easter Bunny.
Not a nice place to be.
And, speaking of geography, how windy is it in Denver in August? This could be important...dispersing tear gas and all of that.... |
|
is that the International Atomic Energy Commission has released a 9-page report on Iran's defiance of IAEA requests for information re-Nukes. The report says that Iran continues with development of nuclear warheads with missile delivery capabilities.
IF Johnny Little doesn't hammer B.Hussein O's head with this stuff, he's a dope.
One assumes that the Affirmative Action Press--very much including the aforementioned Times--will be ever gentle. |
|
|
The current President misspeaks, it is reviled, but when Obama misspeaks, the MSM acts as if it is "cute" or something. Get a high traffic site to keep track, and compare, the "Bushisms. |
|
blindfaith wrote:
"Obama obviously has the intelligence to make wise decisions regarding his advisors."
I think David Axelrod has to be the sleaziest operator I've seen in this election. Every time he's interviewed, he sounds as if he just spent a half hour doing bong hits. He's just one of a number of sketchy Chicagoland advisors that Obama has. In short, I'm not buying it that Obama knows how to surround himself with good people. Look at his choice of spouse, then start working out from there to Wright, Ayres, Rezko, and the like--all CLOSE associates.
Turning to Obama, I think it's important to separate his mistakes into at least three distinct categories: (1) simple mispeaking (forgivable, but he makes a lot of them); (2) serious speaking gaffes (Bittergate; daughters being "punished" with a child; "Iran is no threat; no wait, Iran is a threat"; and any other bonehead statements); and (3) the policy-based screw-ups and failings (all of his questionable associations; meetings without pre-conditions; left-wing position on judicial appointments; ghoulish position on partial-birth abortions; baffling grasp of tax policy; and the like).
The point, I suppose, is to catalogue the first category for purposes of humorous criticism and to begin an assessment of his practical intelligence. And, then, save the more serious criticism for the latter two categories because they are far more alarming and, certainly, as numerous. A more perjorative term for the third category would be desirable--gaffe is just too light-hearted. |
|
|
Obama Melt sounds like sandwich you'd find in Hawaii-- or a TH fantasy. |
|
It is very important to actually refer to them as "Bushisms" coming from the mouth of Sen. Obama.
It wouldn't hurt to continue to compare positions, campaign slogans, and press release high points using Obama and VP Quayle. |
|
ly, then get everyone to start referring to them as "Bushisms"
When the current President misspeaks, it is reviled, but when Obama misspeaks, the MSM acts as if it is "cute" or something. Get a high traffic site to keep track, and compare, the "Bushisms" coming out of President Bush vs. those coming from the anointed mouth of Sen. Obama. |
|
In the 1960 election campaign a key issue was the Missile Gap. In 2008 it seems to be the Gaffe Gap -- who makes the most, who the least. What really counts are the vision and the blunders. McCain's support of unncessary war in Iraq counts as a huge blunder.
I'm delighted that Iraq and the economy will be the top 2 issues-- both of which McCain is out of step with American voters. Let the debates begin! |
|
Regaining our brand is not about "messaging." It's about action. It's about courage. It's about priorities. Most of all, it's about being willing to give up our political careers so our grandkids don't have to grow up in a debtor's prison, or a world in which other nations can tell a weakened and bankrupt America where we can and can't defend liberty, pursue terrorists, or show compassion.
John McCain, for all his faults, is the one Republican candidate who can lead us through our wilderness. Mr. McCain is not running on a messianic platform or as a great healer of dysfunctional Republicans who refuse to help themselves. His humility is one of his great strengths. In his heart, he's a soldier who sees one more hill to charge, one more mission to complete.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121184690228421415.html?mod =opinion_main_commentaries
|
|
|
|
|
And America is at war with Islamonazis. I am not sure if the world can afford an inexperienced, suspicious candidate ruin the war efforts |
|
In looking at a candidate, you can look for past actions (not many in Obama's case), stated positions (eloquent, if consistently liberal), and associates. In the absence of any balance in the associates that he has chosen during his adult life, one must assume that he is comfortable with people like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers. Within the Democratic Party, most of the moderate pragmatists have gone with Hillary, further compounding the problem of who he will choose, if elected. A scary thought.
http://www.RightinSanFrancisco.com |
|
In looking at a candidate, you can look for past actions (not many in Obama's case), stated positions (eloquent, if consistently liberal), and associates. In the absence of any balance in the associates that he has chosen during his adult life, one must assume that he is comfortable with people like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers. Within the Democratic Party, most of the moderate pragmatists have gone with Hillary, further compounding the problem of who he will choose, if elected. A scary thought.
http://www.RightinSanFrancisco.com |
|
|
Obama is getting the Affirmative Action version of Presidential candidate vetting by the MSM. He's black so, instead of making him have to answer the really hard questions or have someone point out his non-stop gaffes, he is given the old affirmative action attaboy and all is forgiven. Now that is truly racial profiling! |
|
Could Obama really not know the difference between Veterans Day and Memorial Day?
Wow, a scary thought...if so.
|
|
I haven't read your posts enough to know whether you're serious or not. I'm going to assume, given your moniker, that your statement, "Obama obviously has the intelligence to make wise decisions regarding his advisors" was a sarcastic slam against Obama and Team Cool-Aid.
If not, we need to talk. |
|
brave reporter hold an impromtu war history quiz with BO - nothing superhard just stuff like:
what was the name of the last major island taken by force by the US prior to the atomic bomb being dropped? (okinawa)
What was the name of the town where Stalin, Truman and Churhill met? (potsdam)
etc.
I think BO is a real light-weight in foreign affairs stuff like this would reveal in a easy-to-grasp manner. |
|
we all knew he was a lightweight...that "Hope & Change" got rained on by the broom pilot.
So how about Denver? Ready to parTEE?
|
|
|
It is possible to go with an untried rookie, but only if you have qualified and able veterans surrounding the rookie. Presidents are only as smart and wise as the advisors he surrounds him with. Obama obviously has the intelligence to make wise decisions regarding his advisors. He may throw a few unwise passes, but name me one president who has never made a mistake. As a point of reference, obviously Reagen and GWB lacked experience and intelligence, but we somehow made it through their terms with minimal damage. |
|
It's a shame that the MSM doesn't wish to be objective where this year's election is concerned. Perhaps Pinch and the gang want to go down swinging but I think it's going to be from the end of a rope not from a swing chair.
Which only means that the blogosphere has to step in more so than it's been doing so far and really deliver that strong blow to the glass chin of the MSM chumps.
|
|
|
|