Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Tuesday, September 05, 2006
The Obligatory Katie Post: A Milestone For Women's Rights?
Posted by: Mary Katharine Ham at 5:48 PM

I'm a woman. Will she get me to watch? Nah, because I've confirmed that Allah will, which means I don't have to.

It's just too bad that by going to trivia night tonight instead of watching, I'm abdicating my responsibility to my fellow women by ignoring Katie's attempt to stick one to the patriarchy (emphasis mine):

If she can successfully navigate the anticipated gauntlet of scrutiny and ultimately be judged on her competence, she will make it easier for other women who seek to break through gender barriers and be evaluated on their job performance.

In a world free of gender bias, we would not wake up on Wednesday to detailed stories about Katie Couric's first broadcast that focus more on style than on substance. But we do not yet live in that world, so the media scrutiny will likely flourish in its analysis of her clothing, perkiness level, and whether she exuded the appropriate level of gravitas. But like everything else she has done under the spotlight, Katie Couric can be expected to handle the glare with grace. That quality will serve as a positive role model for women everywhere who are striving to succeed in unfamiliar territory. Women need this success story to have a happy ending.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, seriously? Maybe I should rethink my plans for tonight.

I haven't watched network news since I was a kid, and I can't imagine Katie will change anything for me. Although, I must say inviting Rush onto the show in the first week might get a peek out of me.

Of course, there are many reasons I have a feeling Katie won't change much at CBS except for the footwear behind the desk.

And, just when I was feeling okay about not watching, Rochelle Riley comes and knocks me down again (emphasis mine):

Katie Couric really isn't my cup of tea. I prefer Diane Sawyer on ABC or my friend Renee Syler on CBS.

But when Couric takes the CBS nightly news anchor chair Tuesday night -- the first woman to do so alone -- I'll be front and center, with my daughter, watching. And I encourage every other woman in America to do the same.

You don't have to be a fan. You don't even have to like the news. But progress requires it.

Uh-huh. Let's find out exactly what Hell my watching Katie Couric will release my oppressed American sisters from:

Unlike the '60s and '70s when Walter Cronkite was the national anchor and "The Most Trusted Man in America," and women were covering bake-offs and weddings, we now live in times when women can serve in Iraq, dictate America's foreign policy and be among the best in the broadcast business (CNN's Christiane Amanpour, NBC's Lisa Myers and PBS' Gwen Ifill). Even the nation's top broadcast star is a woman, Oprah Winfrey. It is past time for any job in America to be for men only.

And, progress requires I watch Katie Couric? Looks like these ladies have done fine without my watching them. The irony is that the same women who talk about how Katie's debut is of paramount societal import due to her gender are the exact same women who complain that she's coming under extra scrutiny due to her gender.

I prefer to see Katie Couric's rise to the anchor chair as just another accomplishment of the thousands of high-profile, amazing accomplishments American women make every single day. Couric's promotion to Rather's seat was not all that surprising except, it seems, to a couple of women writers. The fact that it was not that surprising is testament to the fact that we are not oppressed.

Katie is not a symbol for all womankind. She's a woman with a big, big job to do, and the chance to do it well. We will watch and we will judge her performance, but my career hopes do not hang on it. The glass ceiling is not reinstalled if Katie fails to pull CBS out of third place in the ratings.

The women writers who tout Katie as a symbol complain that she will be judged on her hair, her suit, her earrings. This is trivializing, they say, and scrutiny a male anchor wouldn't have to face. I would argue that treating Katie's ascendance to head talking head as a milestone for women's rights is a bit trivializing as well, to the relative frequency of major accomplishments by women in American society.

So, I won't be watching Katie. If you're worried about women's oppression, your time might be better spent reading this or this or this.



View in ascending order View in descending order
ilja writes: Tuesday, September, 05, 2006 10:39 PM
More like a gallstone?
Well you are not alone Mary Katherine in missing the great debut of Perky Katie. Though I meant to watch it but probably for more nefarious reasons than what our fellow women suffrages suggested.

Perhaps my forgetting about it was part of God's plan to keep me from writing a slam piece against Katie. I quit liking her when I was still a lib. It was the interview that she did with Perot that got under my skin. Before that, I loved The Today Show.

Though I do plan on watching Thursday's program . . . for some reason.
4TheLittleGuy writes: Tuesday, September, 05, 2006 11:41 PM
I didn't notice
Great post, MK.

It really didn't enter my head that Katie was a woman until I heard a few "feminists" harping on it. I guess I just took it for granted that there was no good reason that a woman couldn't anchor the news.

Regardless, the broadcast was just the same nonsense I didn't want to watch when Dan Rather did it.

Lazlo writes: Wednesday, September, 06, 2006 11:35 AM
Katie's Ok, but...
If I want my news delivered in 'Perky Style' I will drink twenty cups of coffee, and watch FOX.
I applaud her (I really do)for climbing to the top of (what used to be) a man's game; but I think she is partisan, and it will show in her choice of news to tell.
I'm tired of MSM and it's partisanship, I cast a jaundiced eye on them all.
I will watch her; once. If she seems fair I will watch again.
Let no man say that in my breast there beats not a fair heart.
pokie okie writes: Wednesday, September, 06, 2006 12:48 PM
The question is ...
not if a woman can do the job as well as a man (Dan didn't do his fellow males any favors with his biased outlook and reporting), but whether CBS News can overcome the fact that they are very liberal and do not report the news. They like to deliver opinion dressed as the news. I quit watching CBS news 20 years ago. Unless Katie can show me a real effort toward reporting the news and not spouting personal (or corporate) opinion, I probably won't watch CBS News for another 20 years.
foolSpotter writes: Monday, January, 28, 2008 9:01 PM
Mary Ham
You are one dumb kunt! If you can read, TRY READING HISTORY.
The next time you blather on about anything, try using a history check.
You're good for laughs. If you lead your life as recklessly as you print your blog, you should be at the free clinic daily for blood tests.
impeachbush writes: Monday, January, 28, 2008 9:36 PM
Olbermann comments on Mary Kate.
Olbermann just skewered you on Worst Person in the World. If you don't watch him you ought to see that comment.
Keith  writes: Tuesday, September, 09, 2008 10:11 AM
MSNBC and Undeducated Woman Voters
From http://www.lemacks.com/wordpress (The Daily Charter)

Moderator Note: I always used to think that Andrea Mitchell was always well researched, balanced and had a lot to contribute to the political spectrum. Almost in the same lineage as the late Tim Russert. . How could someone who is married to one of the most respected and revered figures on the planet make such a cartoonish comment. She needs to go back to the political laboratory on the cartoon network,



http://www.madman.com.au/wallpapers/dexters_laboratory_325_ 1680.jpg

Or…




Andrea M. makes a cartoonish comment about undeducated voters.

Say it aint so Polly Purebread of the Political Underdogs..




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Brokaw’s Meet the Press this week was as prosaic as ever, but for one little line uttered by the increasingly partisan Andrea Mitchell. In a discussion about the McCain VP pick of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, guest Doris Kerns Goodwin, plagiarist/historian, said that the choice of Palin is a “very strange choice,” showing how little she bothered to even think about the facts. But the most outrageous analysis came from Mitchell who said that only uneducated, female voters will be drawn to Sarah Palin, not those smart, college educated ones.

At about 5:57 into this clip Andrea Mitchell was brought onto Meet the Press with Goodwin, David Gregory and host Tom Brokaw to tell us all that Sarah Palin will only appeal to uneducated women, not educated ones.

After Brokaw asked Mitchell what this Palin pick means to Hillary voters, we find that Mitchell took the occasion to attack instead of answer the question with serious analysis.

More…




Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 10 Minutes 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 27 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
Last updated 32 Minutes 9 Seconds Ago
Last updated 48 Minutes 21 Seconds Ago
Last updated 49 Minutes 9 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

Representation?
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By Cuernos
promises declared
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By mike
Liberal DREAMS and
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By douglas
careful
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By mike
BillK9
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
I was going to wait for the DVD
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
BK FAIL
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Mike
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Rhymes With
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Single Payer
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By BillK9
Arch
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Vegastracon
It's nice that the FCC has this money
 Re: Federal Aviation Administration Spends $5 Million On Drunken Holiday Bash
  By Patrick Michael
I don't think so
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By Dave M
Uuummmmmm...Hello, Y'All...!
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By NeoConScum
Lilly
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By Token Canadian
**My 7:52pm Comment Below** DITTO !
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By NeoConScum
I have to dissent
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By douglas
Can you spell Obamanomics
 Re: The Price of Freedom
  By reaganite
Mike
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By arch
Matthew Shepard was that poor gay kid
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By will

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll