Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, August 13, 2009
Top Ten “Fishy” Truths about a Government Takeover of Health Care
Posted by: Matt Lewis at 3:37 PM
Rep. Mike Pence, Chairman of the House Republican Conference, has released the "Top Ten 'Fishy' Truths about a Government Takeover of Health Care. 

They are as follows ...

Truth #1:  Abolishes the Private Market for Individual Health Insurance

What the bill does:  Section 102(c) of the bill states that after 2013, “individual health insurance coverage…may only be offered” through the government-run Exchanges established in the bill.

What this means for Americans:  Purchasing private individual coverage will be outlawed.  Individuals will likely have fewer, and more expensive, coverage options—a “Hobson’s choice” allowing Americans to choose any plan they like, so long as it’s the “bureaucrat-approved” one.

Truth #2:  Federal Grants to Care for Pets; Federal Debt for People

What the bill does:  Section 2231 of the bill creates a new Public Health Workforce Corps, complete with its own scholarship program.  Among those eligible for scholarships—which include “tuition, fees, books, equipment, and laboratory expenses,” as well as a stipend that could exceed $15,000 per year—are individuals studying at “an accredited graduate school or program of…veterinary medicine.”  Veterinary students are also eligible for loan forgiveness of up to $35,000 annually through the Public Health Workforce Corps.

What this means for Americans:  At a time when this year’s annual budget deficit could top $2 trillion, the federal government will spend additional money it does not have to train veterinarians to care for pets—even as the Democrat health “reform” legislation would still leave 17 million Americans uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Truth #3:  Federal Bureaucrats Will Teach Americans How to Write in “Plain Language”

What the bill does:  Section 133 of the bill requires certain disclosures to be made in “plain language,” which the bill defines as “language that the intended audience…can readily understand and use because that language is clean, concise, [and] well-organized.”  The section further directs the Health Choices Commissioner—the new insurance “czar”—to “develop and issue guidance on best practices of plain language writing.”

What this means for Americans:  At a time when this year’s annual budget deficit could top $2 trillion, the federal government will spend additional money it does not have so that federal bureaucrats can enlighten Americans on how to write in “plain language.”  Moreover, given Democrats’ creation of a 1,018-page bill replete with bureaucratic jargon, some may view the development of such guidelines as an exercise in futility.

Truth #4:  Democrats Want to Do to Health Care What Fannie and Freddie Did to the Housing Market

What the bill does:  An amendment adopted in the Energy and Commerce Committee authorized up to $5 billion in federal spending for grants and loans to establish health insurance cooperatives.  The amendment included no language prohibiting such cooperatives from returning to the federal government for a bailout in the event that they cannot survive without additional taxpayer subsidies.

What this means for Americans:  The co-op proposals being discussed could result in Congress creating another government-sponsored enterprise that would be “too big to fail” and could in time require another federal bailout.  Therefore, Americans may be concerned that a co-op could do for health care what Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have done for the housing sector.

Truth #5:  Yet Another Taxpayer-Funded Giveaway to ACORN?

What the bill does:  Section 205 of the bill allows the Health Choices Commissioner—the new insurance “czar”—to use “appropriate entities…to inform and educate individuals and employers about the Health Insurance Exchange.”  The bill includes no definition of “appropriate entities,” allowing the Administration wide latitude to determine the entities with which it will conduct outreach activities.

What this means for Americans:  The American people could see additional taxpayer dollars going to so-called community activist organizations like ACORN.

Truth #6:  The Federal Government Will Collect Personal Health Care Data

What the bill does:  Section 221(e) of the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to “collect such data as may be required to establish premiums and payment rates for the public health insurance option and for other purposes.”

What this means for Americans:  The American people could see their personal health records and other data being used by the federal government in order to establish a government-run health plan that will cause as many as 114 million Americans to lose their current coverage.

Truth #7:  A Giveaway to Trial Lawyers

What the bill does:  Section 153 of the bill establishes whistleblower protections for any employee who “provided, caused to be provided, or is about to provide or cause to be provided” a complaint regarding non-compliance with the bill’s provisions, or “objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, practice, or assigned task that the employee…reasonably believed” to violate the bill’s provisions.  Individuals alleging discrimination may bring suit under the provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act.

What this means for Americans:  Employers will be subjected to additional lawsuits instigated by trial lawyers—possibly on the basis that an employee was “about to provide” a health insurance-related complaint at the time the business took an adverse employment action.

Truth #8:  Federal Compliance Audits on Employers—Paid for by Employers

What the bill does:  Section 142(b) of the bill requires the Health Choices Commissioner—the new insurance “czar”—to “conduct compliance audits of qualified health benefits plan compliance with Federal requirements,” including “random compliance audits and targeted audits in response to complaints.”  The bill further permits the Commissioner “to recoup from qualified health benefits plans reimbursement for the cost of such examinations.”

What this means for Americans:  Employers who offer coverage to their employees—will be subject to random audits by the insurance “czar,” who can scrutinize their paperwork looking for even inadvertent errors—and then leave the employer with the bill for the investigation.  As a result, employers may spend their time wondering if a complaint by a disgruntled worker could lead to a knock on the door by the “health care czar”—and even a dismissed complaint could lead to a charge by the federal government for the “privilege” of being cleared.

Truth #9:  Taxes on Health Benefits

What the bill does:  Section 1802(b) of the bill includes provisions that would finance a new Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund.  The bottom of page 835 of the bill makes clear the funding source: CHAPTER 34—TAXES ON CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES.”

What this means for Americans:  The American people will see their health insurance taxed for the first time ever, breaking two central campaign promises made by then-Senator Obama—not to raise taxes for individuals with incomes under $250,000, and not to tax individuals’ health benefits.  The language also breaks a promise by Speaker Pelosi that, “We will not be taxing [health] benefits in any bill that passes the House.”

Truth #10:  Taxpayer-Funded Research Could Deny Patients Needed Health Care

What the bill does:  Section 1401 of the bill establishes a new multi-billion dollar Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research, so that the federal government can compare various health care treatments.  However, the bill contains no prohibitions on government-run health programs using such research to deny patients access to life-saving treatments, and a draft House Committee report earlier this year noted that such research funding meant that “more expensive [treatments] will no longer be prescribed.”

What this means for Americans:  The billions in federal taxpayer dollars spent on comparative effectiveness research could be used by federal health programs to deny patients access to life-saving treatments.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Mike writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 3:54 PM
#1 is the most disturbing
and has not gotten a lot of attention. What is this insurance 'exchange'. I've yet to hear an explanation. There is lots of ambiguity in this bill overall. Why would anyone get behind something so vague? It would be the equivalent of entering into a business contract that has unwritten contingencies. Most people, pro or con, don't even know what they are even discussing and debating.
vladimir estragon writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 4:02 PM
Number one truth about opposition
When you refer to tuition aid for veterinary students as "federal grants to care for pets," the rest of us know you're getting REALLY, REALLY DESPERATE. That's even sillier than the "death boards" hoax.
Andrea writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 4:18 PM
8 Ways Reform Provides Security...

"Tell the elderly they are secure with Medicare - a government run program. Give low income people a chance for health care with the affordable public option." -- Andrea

8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage:

1. Ends Discrimination for Pre-Existing Conditions: Insurance companies will be prohibited from refusing you coverage because of your medical history.

2. Ends Exorbitant Out-of-Pocket Expenses, Deductibles or Co-Pays: Insurance companies will have to abide by yearly caps on how much they can charge for out-of-pocket expenses.

3. Ends Cost-Sharing for Preventive Care: Insurance companies must fully cover, without charge, regular checkups and tests that help you prevent illness, such as mammograms or eye and foot exams for diabetics.

4. Ends Dropping of Coverage for Seriously Ill: Insurance companies will be prohibited from dropping or watering down insurance coverage for those who become seriously ill.

5. Ends Gender Discrimination: Insurance companies will be prohibited from charging you more because of your gender.

6. Ends Annual or Lifetime Caps on Coverage: Insurance companies will be prevented from placing annual or lifetime caps on the coverage you receive.

7. Extends Coverage for Young Adults: Children would continue to be eligible for family coverage through the age of 26.

8. Guarantees Insurance Renewal: Insurance companies will be required to renew any policy as long as the policyholder pays their premium in full. Insurance companies won't be allowed to refuse renewal because someone became sick.

Learn more and get details:

http://www.WhiteHouse.gov/health-insurance-consumer-protect ions/
NeoConScum writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 5:02 PM
WHEW...Boy, I'm So Hugely Relieved of My
nefarious suspicions that the Bill(s)is a massive, gigantic, vast nanny State Ponzi Scheme to diminish our liberties and freedoms. You know, those quintessential American values and possessions that make us unique on the planet?

I'm soooooooooooooooo relieved, Duuuudes!

NOT.
Ind Observer writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 5:41 PM
Andrea
Thanks for the typical troll post you just made. Instead of discussing anything from the article,you post some talking points fed to you by your master. FYI, the vast majority of the things you pretend are promised in this bill are already provided in my private insurance plan. Also, if I have a disagreement over treatnent options, amount charged etc., there is an appeals process built in to my policy. If I think my insurance company is violating the terms laid out, I can go to the Insurance Commisioner or sue them in court.

In the government option, what can I do if I disagree with my health care options decreed by a bureaucrat in DC rather than by my doctor? Please explain the appeal procedure that this bill provides me.
mzJakes writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 6:08 PM
But....
....we'll be allowed to keep our doctor and insurance plan....Right?

Please don't confuse the issue with relavent facts. After all, Secretary Sebilius assured us we "don't have to sweat the details".


Apologies to all for the heavy sarcasm....
cottoneyed writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 6:30 PM
Examples that tell us that the left is
imploding, and that they are losing the argument. Let us begin with the Speaker of the House, Nancy, "stretch" Reid, commenting that American citizens who attend town hall meetings, are "wearing swastikas". "Stretch" also called them a "mob". Senate Majority leader, Harry Pelosi, today said that those same Americans are "evil mongers". In an example of a leftist losing her mind, Debbie Stabenow, today said that she can "feel" global warming when she flies. No word on whether that "flying" was on an airplane or on her broom, or both. Has anyone mentioned to this genius that there are naturally occurring things called, thermals? Also, another wacky leftist has declared that calling someone a socialist, is tantamount to calling them a nig.er! Having your "messiah" with approval numbers of 47%, with Republicans now holding a 44% to 41% advantage in who the country trusts concerning health care, with the generic congressional ballot favoring Republicans by 4%, a ballot that has historically showed democrats leading(in 1994, the year that Republicans won a majority in the House, this same generic ballot showed Republicans down 4%), so is it any wonder that leftists are imploding, and saying wacky, crazy things. "I can feel global warming"! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
Libertad writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 6:51 PM
It's just crazy
to question whether the government can effectively and efficiently run a national health care system. Only wild-eyed extremists could possibly have reservations about that. LOL
William writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 7:13 PM
Exchange
My secondary insurance provider gives me once a year a booklet listing several insurance companies with rates and such information as might be useful in choosing. My primary insurance is Medicare.

My provider acts an exchange, an open market where vendors may display themselves.

I believe "Mike" will have seen or experienced the concept.

I believe we must recognize that we are not looking at an insurance plan but rather at the structural relationship which will provide for the development of changes in health insurance offerings. It cannot be much different from what is currently available to some employees and to those on Medicare. Many will benefit a little from a more level field of competition. For profit companies will still exist, perhaps even more profitable when the field is the same in every State.
Pat writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 7:32 PM
access to health care for all Americans
As the guarantors of justice and promoters of the general welfare, governments have the unique role of ensuring equitable access to health care for all. This role does not necessarily entail a specific governmental program or one approach to health care coverage. It does mean, however, that governments have the obligation to provide leadership and coordination in balancing competing private and social interests in moving toward the goal of equitable access to health care. In ways that are fair in both process and outcome,
Citizen representatives in government must take on the challenging task of defining the level of health care services to which all persons should have access.
Achieving these obligations of love and justice requires sacrifice, goodwill, fairness, and an abiding commitment to place personal
and social responsibilities of love and justice above narrower individual, institutional, and political self-interests. For some
people, this may mean paying more in taxes or in direct payments to assure that everyone has care. As difficult as this may be, citizens should not shrink from these moral challenges. We urge all people to advocate for access to basic health care for all and to participate vigorously and responsibly in the public discussion on how best to fulfill this obligation. The chronic failure of our society to provide its members access to basic health care services is a moral tragedy that should not be tolerated.

Tom Ketchum  writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 8:45 PM
andrea
it still rations care,that alone is more than enough to oppose it .
William writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 9:20 PM
Clay Allison and rationing are not a
good fit. Your insurance company, should you be insured, has a back story with wonderfully legal language which describes how and if you shall be covered for this and that.

Some of your conditions will be limited to a coverage amount. "Cancer" is usually near the front of the categories limited.

You will look until your eyes fall out before you find the "limit" in proposals currently in study of the houses of Congress that will equal the limit in private insurer offerings.
BK writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 9:37 PM
Government option is simply
garbage. This is a series of lies. It does not save any money and actually costs more moeny (see CBO) to operate. It does not cover everybody..it can't. It will ration care as it cannot dump 20-30 million people into the system without adding any doctors, nurses and hospitals.

This proposal is a sham. 90% of Americans are currently covered by healthcare and more than 80% of those are happy with their heathcare.

Don't be duped. This is about control. Nothing more. Contact your representatives and tell them to vote against government healthcare.
William writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 9:42 PM
BK hyperventilates
Because nothing has been approved by all three parts of our constitutional republic.

Look in the mirror. Do you see a person who is glad to be wound up, to be a toy for another?
RonnaRonna writes: Thursday, August, 13, 2009 11:19 PM
Obama lied
he told 20 lies in his townhall address in New Hampshire. How can anyone support him? Check out
HeathHennesy.com
Tom Ketchum  writes: Friday, August, 14, 2009 8:32 AM
william
When I purchase my healthcare ,I know what I am buying ,If I need more I purchase more.This not rationing . with your "logic" and I use the term loosely ,when I buy a tank of gas for my car I should not have to purchase more, to do so would be rationing . Insurance is a commodity not a right.Iam well aware of the limits on care with cancer ,I also know that you can purchase additional coverage just for cancer and even with no insurance you will treated .Our system does need reform just not Obamas .
BK writes: Friday, August, 14, 2009 9:50 AM
William whines:
Look in the mirror. Do you see a person who is glad to be wound up, to be a toy for another?
_____________________________________________

Now this makes sense??????? Sounds like he enjoys being a toy for Obama!
William writes: Friday, August, 14, 2009 10:43 AM
Proposes and Disposes
BK, perhaps you recall from your civics classes that Presidents can propose a good bit from their bully pulpit, but that the House and Senate prepare, measure and approve legislation. Legislators occasionally pass laws repugnant to the president and sometimes rebuke the veto.

You are obliged by your citizenship to be a loyal minority.

BK writes: Friday, August, 14, 2009 11:07 AM
William
BK, perhaps you recall from your civics classes that Presidents can propose a good bit from their bully pulpit, but that the House and Senate prepare, measure and approve legislation. Legislators occasionally pass laws repugnant to the president and sometimes rebuke the veto.
_______________________________________________

Most certainly do recall. It does become much easier when you can control the Presidency, House and Congress at the same time though.

However, that is why my suggestion was to contact legislators to voice opposition to this proposal.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 25 Minutes 10 Seconds Ago
Last updated 26 Minutes 40 Seconds Ago
Last updated 27 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
Last updated 31 Minutes 57 Seconds Ago
Last updated 35 Minutes 54 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

The Singapore System
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By Ste. Denis
solvent?
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By sceptyczny
Stoic Patriot,
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Crispian
Stroic Patriot,
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Crispian
Almost forgot
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Stoic Patriot
Sceptic
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By NOTW
Crosseyed
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
DOTM and NOTW
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Clintonian, but you have to define
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By sceptyczny
Rhymes with
 Re: You Will Subsidize Abortion
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Go Stupak!
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By Stoic Patriot
I can spot a Democrap libturd...
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By Caprock
Conservatives are happier than liberals
 Re: Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals
  By Jim
Review - Part 2
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Stoic Patriot
Review - Part 1
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Stoic Patriot
Lonny, you said:
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By Kevlar
abortions
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By rdk
Looney
 Re: Stupak: White House Is Pressuring Me To Keep Silent On The Abortion Amendment
  By NOTW
Aheno
 Re: Dem Sen: Opponents of Health Bill Are Birthers, Right-Wing Militias, Aryan Groups
  By Lonny
Yeah
 Re: “AVATAR” OFFERS STUNNING STYLE, INANE SUBSTANCE
  By Dread

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll