|
|
McCain was your best shot. It wasn't your year--face it. In fact, Republican popularity has decreased since election day.
You lost it by selecting Palin. That, combined with the economic crisis, sealed the deal.. |
|
|
..this talk about "treeger" and "cleekity cleek" and "epitaph" is making me a little uneasy. Maybe if I saw the Big Labowski? but it is a little on the creepy side. Just FYI.. |
|
I hope McCain loses his reelection bid in Arizona. I wouldn't care if it was to Chairman Mao. He lost the election with stupidity.
Rush and Levin nail it. Cottoneyed is right on the money. |
|
Please tell me that the stone has been moved away from the tomb and the messiah has arisen. You sure wouldn't know it by the tone from the usual suspects.
It's your show now folks. Let' see how well the country is in three years. I think it will be a replay of 1979 but I will reserve judgment and allow the most merciful to continue to hire Clinton hacks from yesteryear. Whew! That's what I call change!
Delizioso |
|
"government is not the solution; government is the problem".
Of course, they're talking about the BUSH government. |
|
|
are the only 2 who are correctly identifying the problem. From Hewitt to Prager to Medved to Bennett, all wringing their hands, "what to do, what to do", guest after guest has their own suggestions but none gets it. Conservatism, RONALDUS MAXIMUS'S, Conservatism, that is it. This attracts voters of all ages, and of all persuasions. For crying out loud, 44% to 40% of obambi voters agree with RONALDUS MAXIMUS'S sentiment that "government is not the solution; government is the problem". That's people who voted for obambi, for goodness sake! If they can identify it, how come Hewitt, Prager, Medved, and Bennett can't? |
|
What is hugely hilarious is that he claims credit for invectives (1:34 PM)---ones he claims I stole from him---LOL.
(I guess he will have something for his epitaph)
How incredibly pathetic and so very indicative of his adolescence.
Yes, I know, he's not worth the trouble, however, the truth is.
And his truth is that he's, "scaling back". He has been for months now, just by another route---one of increased posting.
And the truth is, "he has better things to do with his time now".
I know, I know, I cannot say that with any degree of seriousness neither. Nor can he. |
|
:-)
...know what I mean, Clarity, me Boyo? |
|
..I thought we took great pride in the quality of our insults around here. THAT is not bullying and browbeating. Bullying and browbeating is relentlessly pestering whenever someone tries to put forward a view. There's a difference.
Whatever. Who cares. I can handle 'shrieker just fine. Or should I say Dr. Shrieker, as he is now assuming the pose of a mental health clinician.
Col Bat: sorry about your Niners. It is a topsy-turvy world when the AZ Cards are looking at a playoff spot.. |
|
|
..self-promoting worm, maybe, but also right on the money. And who was wrong down the line? oh yeah--it was you. How's it feel to be dumber than a lyingneedyloutishselfpromotingworm, chump-o-la!! Neo "RomneyClintonMcCain" Conscum. Smell the teargas. Operation Chaos. Clang clang. Yowza. |
|
This thread is what a morbid sense of curiosity will get me.
Clarity, me'boyo. Focus...Gooooood...Now...Pick up that which I asked you to put down 6 or 8 months ago, Lad. Got a grip on the aforementioned..? Gooood...Now, place it firmly up the tailpipe of the lying, needy, loutish, self-promoting worm and--pardon the borrow from "The Big Labowski"--pooool the treeeeeger 'till she goes cleeeekity-cleeeek..!
Therrrrreeeeeee. Gooooood. |
|
|
Sorry CS, I would indulge for a moment, but I'm too busy throwing beer cans at the tv. Ohhh Romo just got sacked. Too bad it wasn't a clothesline. That woulda called for another beer. |
|
|
SF is stinking up the joint!! They started out making me think they might make a game outa it. Oh well, "Psshht, glugg, glugg, What a relief it is!" Beer, that is. Jeez, I hate T.O!! |
|
Indulge me, if only for a few moments here.
This pathetic, Pathologic Liberal is exhibiting more of the same, of his version of, "scaling back". He's never done the very thing he emoted about.
But here's something for you to consider.
This pathetic individual claims:
"I identified Boomer conservatism as a destructive and narcissistic force in our body politic--'shrieker started doing the same with liberalism.
I started calling guys "second rate," 'Shrieker did the same.
I started calling guys "louts" and "clowns," 'Shrieker did the same.
I pointed out the pathology of conservatism, he started doing the same."
Salty Alaskan, Col Bat Guano, consider what this yahoo is taking credit for.
Invectives.
Indeed, his has never been a mission nor a goal of productive dialogue.
By his own admission, laughable when you really consider his open distaste for being "bullied" or "browbeaten", this schmoe wants:
1.) unfettered, unchallenged ability to do the "bullying" of conservatives.
2.) free reign in the "browbeating" conservatives.
Should anyone dare challenge him on these "browbeating" tantrums he engages in, well then, welcome to his wrath.
This individual has serious mental issues, the likes of which are only left for the professionals.
ONCE AGAIN---he has not "scaled back" by any stretch. I NEVER asked the dolt to do so---merely called him on his narcissistic need to tell EVERYONE he was doing so.
|
|
|
Fair enough. I'm ashamed of myself. Lets play some football!! |
|
And you guys are the "grown-ups?" Reading the last post, I'm reminded of a great philosophical treatise from my youth:
"I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!"
Grab a beer and turn on Dallas vs. SF for crying out loud. |
|
..why are you guys getting so lazy? It is like you have capitulated to your self-indulgence. No wonder conservatism is in such a disreputable state.
I'm going to show my respect for you, SA, and waste a few minutes of my precious time.
I identified Boomer conservatism as a destructive and narcissistic force in our body politic--'shrieker started doing the same with liberalism.
I started calling guys "second rate," 'Shrieker did the same.
I started calling guys "louts" and "clowns," 'Shrieker did the same.
I pointed out the pathology of conservatism, he started doing the same.
Hey, whatever. I don't own the phrases. He knew those words before I gave them a particular context. Maybe "plagiarism" is the wrong word. Maybe CS is just flat and banal and uncreative and uninteresting.
And btw, I have addressed already your gratuitous accusation that I plagiarize. You're living proof of the distinction between what we think we know and what we really know. Ciao, chump. |
|
|
"projection," eh. It beats a real argument, I guess. |
|
You said: "..you can plagiarize from me and incorporate it into your psychotic rampages against me: you are driven by a need to feel morally superior.."
I've pointed out before how you are the master of projection, and you are still the master with that one.
Carry on your tiff fellas. |
|
..out of here, 'shrieker. You can kick and scream and hold your breath until you turn blue, but I am in control of my activity here.
Here's another notion you can plagiarize from me and incorporate it into your psychotic rampages against me: you are driven by a need to feel morally superior. You encounter a guy like me, who is obviously articulate, although contrary in view, and something internally explodes. After all, our soul is our opinions and values. My views are like a little death of your soul. To shield yourself, and gain some traction on what you perceive to be your eroded dignity and grandeur, you work desperately to gain some leverage over me. Others in here are the same way. Some ignore me, feigning indifference and moral superiority in that way, like I'm not worth the effort. But your response is just to hurl insults and announce to one and all what an inferior I am. You pat yourself on the back, as though you have disposed of me, and you go running to like-minded souls to chortle and high-five. The whole thing is motivated, not by the truth and fidelity to the truth, but as a kind of low information way to stay even with those who really do make the moral effort, who really do have the humility and honesty and decency, to subordinate themselves to the truth.
Anyhow, I fully expect some elements of this criticism to be leveled against me in time. And btw, I can type like a ball of fire. This post here took me all of ten minutes. Now, this man who values his time, is going to stop wasting time with you for a bit. |
|
...enters the room, once again, and all one sees is adolescent, juvenile behavior.
WHY?
Clearly, as I have shown several times since he "felt" the need to grace everyone with his declaration that he was "scaling back" his posts on HH's site, because, "he has better things to do with his time now".
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......yeah his comments, just two posts from this one exhibits how he values his time. And, levels of his "scaling back".
What a second-rater. Pathetic. |
|
Bottom line:
You addressed me, not the opposite.
You made a weak, hyperbolic comment, in impugning GWB's "competence".
When I called you out on this, all you had was,
"Just watch, for the next eight years. Then compare to your guy's accomplishments, if you can find any."
That hardly represents any serious attempt at dialogue---again, you addressed my, Munckey-boy. And then---you could not back up the challenge---pathetic.
|
|
|
..there is a stench in the air, like someone cut a nasty one. Oh. 'Shrieker has been here. |
|
"Yours is not a genuine effort to dialogue in any reasonable fashion"
No, I actually have had quite a few substantive and interesting discussions with various people who post on this site; arguments that have caused me to think long and hard, do a great deal of research, and put serious effort into expressing myself clearly and explicitly.
I don't believe you've ever been a part of that kind of discussion. As illustrated by your posts in this thread, you don't really have anything to contribute other than name-calling and invective.
So yes, when a substantial discussion isn't available, I amuse myself making fun of some of the dumber people here, such as yourself, Anne, Laura, Arch, cottoneyed, MaryStella ... the list is long. |
|
And there you have it, Munckey-boy...
you write:
"Ah, but I enjoy making fun of people like you. It's a good feeling."
1.) Yours is not a genuine effort to dialogue in any reasonable fashion---simply about "making fun of others" as you admit to.
2.) As I have argued in several responses to you, yours is a party only based upon "feelings". You visit this site on a feelings-based motive.
Narcissistic.
You are.
And your pals like Pathologic Liberal are cut from the same cloth as you. |
|
"We agreed as a neighborhood to fly the American Flag upside down to denote "nation in stress"."
Do all the bunkers in your neighborhood have flagpoles? Remember, you can't fly both the confederate flag and the American flag on the same pole.
And according to the Flag Code, it's a symbol of disrespect to the flag to fly it upside down "except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property." |
|
"What a feckless answer, after impuning GWB's "competence" the way in which you did."
You both use the word "impugning" (well, almost) and put "competence" in scare quotes? Isn't that rather a mixed message.
I think you misunderstand the term "project feelings." It doesn't refer to HAVING feelings, but rather the specific feelings you're trying to project: uncomfortable with, not confident in Obama. Our feelings about him are the opposite of that.
'IT WAS NOT ME who brought up the subject of "competence"'
Sure you did. You said that Obama promised to go in a "dramatic opposite direction." Obviously competence is the opposite of what we've had for the last eight years. Or are you claiming that Bush has been competent?
"if you were so confident and comfortable with your choice, you'd hardly "feel" the need to visit this site."
Ah, but I enjoy making fun of people like you. It's a good feeling. |
|
That makes me sick.
Now all we are going to hear from the leftist is how everyone loves Obama. Not where I live. We agreed as a neighborhood to fly the American Flag upside down to denote "nation in stress".
This is the first stealth president for the US, ever |
|
Essentially, you expounded on my earlier comments about, ADOLESCENCE, otherwise known as, the democrat party.
You also acknowledged my comment about Pathological Liberal and his liberal use of hyperbole---none of which he could back up withany degree of logic or rationale. And not without choking on his own laughter over his nonsense.
Pathological Liberal's 9:47AM use of "moral reputation" is only one example of countless hyperbolic harangues he levels at his opposition.
It's tiresome, it's tedious, it's pathetic.
AND-----Munckey-boy's adolescent attempt at referencing "competence", without any ability to define or make concrete his assertion, well, it's the same pathetic crap dished up by Pathologic Liberal.
No different. |
|
Another pathetic, touchy-feely Liberal you are.
I asked you speicifically to back up your comment about "competence" and you dance and dally with your euphoria over the messiah.
YOU SIDESTEPED MY QUESTION.
Let's see, what did you say? "Just watch for the next 8 years...".
What a feckless answer, after impuning GWB's "competence" the way in which you did.
IT WAS NOT ME who brought up the subject of "competence", lightweight.
And now, you got nothing of substance to respond with.
WHAT A LAUGHER!
SPECIFICALLY, you write:
"Your attempt to project feelings onto us is rather pathetic."
OH REALLY!?!
Let me count your use of adjectives, warm and fuzzy terms----just those ones dedicated to "feelings", YOURS---as communicated by you:
"thrilled"
"joyful"
"great hope and anticipation"
"laughing"
"cheering"
Munckey-boy, if you were so confident and comfortable with your choice, you'd hardly "feel" the need to visit this site.
Rather, yours would be a reveling with those like yourself, those who project the above behaviors and characteristics.
Ahhhh, but, that's not the case.
Instead, try as you may, you "feel" the need to convince yourself and your positions by coming here.
A rather odd behavior, at the very least.
And, indeed, very pathetic.
This cabinet selection process is looking less and less like "CHANGE" everyday.
It's more of the "SAME 'OL, SAME 'OL".
|
|
"unless you can explain how "competence" applies."
Just watch, for the next eight years. Then compare to your guy's accomplishments, if you can find any.
"You are neither comfortable nor confident with your choice of [Obama]"
No, in fact I and most of the people I know are still quite thrilled and joyful, looking forward with great hope and anticipation. The night Obama was elected, people were coming out of their houses and gathering in the streets to celebrate. Our little town of Haymarket had a substantial crowd milling around laughing and cheering. We still feel that way; perhaps more so.
Your attempt to project feelings onto us is rather pathetic. |
|
Please, please, please, someone tell me what "moral reputation" even means, and how it translates into real world differences in anything. People are still killing themselves to move here. Countries are still lining up to do business here. It is a meaningless term and concept.
The left treats politics like a junior high popularity contest and gets all verklempt whenever they think someone doesn't like them. And just like an insecure junior high teenager, they're willing to compromise themselves to gain acceptance. Now that the D's are in power, its time for them to grow up and realize we (the US) have a lot going for us and act accordingly.
We're good enough, we're smart enough, and damnit, people like us just the way we are.
|
|
"Competence"?
It means nothing, your comment, unless you can explain how "competence" applies.
Neither does PL's comment mean anything.
It's all hyperbole.
But, it is understandable.
You are neither comfortable nor confident with your choice of BO being crowned as Messiah (Louis Farrakhan's term). So, you are therefore compelled to post your persistent hyperbolic comments as has been the case for 8 full years now---including that time before GWB even took oath for his first term. That's how far back, and deep, your ugliness is rooted---and further exhibits how adolescent it has been, continues to be. |
|
|
A bunch of old white people from the Clinton years! hahahaha. You know, I call them the Stupid Party on the right. I reckon the Dem/libs should be the Gullible Party or the Naive Party or the best one yet: The 13 Year Old Sensitive Girl Party. |
|
"If indeed conditions were as bad as you have claimed they've been for years"
Specifically, the last EIGHT years.
"then his "CHANGE" would therefore be defined as dramatic opposite direction."
Yes, indeed. Competence, for one. |
|
"Barack will set a different tone than Slick Willie."
Yeah, that's why Barack is choosing Slick Willie's spouse as his Secretary of State. That's why he chose Slick Willie's man, Rahm Emmanuel. That's why he continues to choose Slick Willie's team for his.
'Cuz, like you say, BO is, "setting a different tone than Slick Willie".
God, you are one confused lout. |
|
Please do not replace the words OB used.
He never said, "transform".
His was the drumbeat of, "CHANGE".
If indeed conditions were as bad as you have claimed they've been for years---then his "CHANGE" would therefore be defined as dramatic opposite direction.
***and you are correct about one thing. He never defined his platform while campaigning---other than massive doses of claims of, "CHANGE", and, "HOPE". Only in the final weeks did he begin to drop hints about some specifics of his intentions. This gave him much more than what many might call, "wiggle room". It would allow CHUMPS like you to defend him on aspects of, perceived, "elevated expectations" by opponents.
Speaking of expectations, yours is a constant reminder to the disappointment of expectations YOU established regarding your, "scaling back" on postings as you promised just months ago.
And it is quite clear that you have no, "better things to do with your time now", as you hysterically declared to HH posters. |
|
MS: it is funny how you Reeps are trying to inflate expectations about Barack. Once again, you are treating Americans as if we are idiots. No one expects miracles from a politician. Only the right-wing and the corporate media is demanding that Barack wave a magic wand and fix everything. Everyone else will be satisfied if we can restore our moral reputation--which you clowns shred--and avert another Great Depression. We are in for a tough span of years. Only rabble-rousers and agitators are demanding that Barack "transform" things. True Americans, rather, will work together to incrementally clean up this godawful mess. It will take humility. It will take earnestness. It will take a service orientation. In the end, though, we will be a better nation than we are now--a better nation, a better people.
POF: as for Dem retreads, that's the way it goes, chump. Experience counts for something. We got a bench and you got a--well, talk show hosts. The difference is leadership. Barack will set a different tone than Slick Willie. Leadership counts for a lot. But, yeah, elections have consequences, and you Reeps are going to be dealing with a government that has Democratic faces. |
|
@ Friday, November, 21, 2008 4:39 PM
Dustoff-507 writes:
"Obama said he was something new...
Instead retreads. I wonder how Hillary will handle N. Korea."
North Korea nothing; I want to see her and/or Joe "Stand up Chuck" Biden go head to head with Vladimir Putin. |
|
LOVE Sarah Palin. Rush Limbaugh himself claims to exalt her and bestowed what little praise he had for the McCain campaign upon the decision to name her as VP running mate.
She supposedly represents all that is good and wholesome and plain spoken about America.
Conservatives claim that the media conspired to make her look bad, and that the gargantuan mistake of nominating McCain was that he isn't more of an undiluted conservative like Sarah is.
If this is the base of your party, why the heck are you worried about Democrats?? |
|
"DailyKos surely doesn't have the kind of coordinated stormtrooper response which Rush Limbaugh has at his disposal when he puts out a call to action."
Are you serious? Do you really think Limbaugh could command the Republican party luminaries to come kiss his ring the way Moulitsas does with Democrats at his "Yearly Kos?"
Who do you think sends all those emails telling their representatives they'd better attend? It's the Kos-acks and their minions -- the Birkenstock Bundeswehr, Compassion Fascists, Subaru Samurai, Vegan Volkskriegers and various other members of the Leftwaffe.
Sure, not all of them smell good, and they tend to shamble rather then march in lockstep. But like the hordes of George Romero zombies they resemble, they will form an inexorable force that will overrun voting booths disguised as Republicans and eat the living flesh from Republican bones by pulling the levers for Sarah Palin or someone equally likely to doom us in 2012.
It'll happen. |
|
|
|
|
advanced Parkinson's and is in permanent disability retirement. |
|
|
YOU MEAN JOHN MCCAIN'S CANDIDACY????? |
|
....all these nineties people again, isn't it?
I can't wait to see Janet Reno again!
I just love change....!
(sarc/off) |
|
Not in my rearview.
Please remember your quote in four years " you should be thanking your lucky star that your nation has chosen him(Obama) to lead."
Just look at his track record, he has never lead, he has never managed anything, has not even voted on bills, mostly "present". How could such a man lead, he will be lead.
But I do thank my lucky star today, and everyday, for just living in America, the greatest nation on earth.
Briggsy, I really like your sweet child-like innocent hopefullness in Obama, for your sake and our beloved country, I hope he will do well.
|
|
|
I'm ready for CHANGE! Can't wait for 2012! |
|
"He is a guy who could have had a lucrative career on Wall Street."
Eh? This is a guy whose biggest accomplishment so far has been selling autobiographies - two of them now! Obama may speak well and be smart enough pose Che Guevara chic in his photo-ops to get leftists all tingly-legged, but that's ALL he's done to date. So far he hasn't displayed anything above average other than his mouth. Lucrative career. Yes, let's "hope" so - there's one of those words again!! |
|
...this Briggsy-buffoon.
Each bit of new tripe emanating from him eclipses his previous nonsense.
what a zero. |
|
|
A poor idea from the start. It didn't work, it perfectly illustrated that conservatives would rather disrupt than admit they were wrong. It highlight the bankruptcy of Rush Limbaugh's thought: he's being paid millions for his cynicism and profound misunderstanding of our country, and he's laughing at you. |
|
You are priceless!
You actually believe that swill!
God bless you and have mercy on you, |
|
Obama said he was something new...
Instead retreads. I wonder how Hillary will handle N. Korea. We see how badly Not-so-bright working for Bill did. (-: |
|
you're missing the big picture.
The mere fact that the new man at the top does not crave global conquest and does not have fat cat petrol and war machine cronies is the beginning of the promised change.
He is a guy who could have had a lucrative career on Wall Street and chose instead to struggle alongside ordinary people.
You shouldn't mock him for this. You should thank your lucky stars that your nation has chosen him to lead. |
|
we'll have NONE of that. At your acceptance speech, that creepy, acceptance speech of yours, what was that chant, "yes we can, yes we can, yes we can", and now it's "no we can't, no we can't". "Tempering expectations". Now just wait a damn minute here, fan tan, your the "Messiah", Messiah's don't ever "temper expectations", they always exceed expectations. Come Jan. 20, you promised, "change and hope, hope and change", and by G-D we are holding you to it, too. You've got to deliver, baby, your the "Messiah", "the one we have been waiting for", as such none of this "tempering expectations", will be tolerated! The seas will lower, peace, harmony and love will brake out, universal love for America will be experienced.
This is the big time, obambi, you no longer can "vote present", decisions must be made by YOU. Never mind that the average obambi voter can't walk and chew gum at the same time. Couldn't tell you what party controls congress, couldn't pour pea out of a boot with the instructions on the bottom, has no idea who Harry Pelosi or Nancy Reid is, and doesn't know who "Joe Biden", is! Those fools voted for ya' and they think that they no longer have to make mortgage payments, or pay for gas. "Lower expectations", not on your life, obambi!!
|
|
The Republicans owned mass mailing for many years.
Rove and others were extremely good at using it and did so very well.
The democrats have some advantage now on internet. They certainly opened new frontiers in quesitonable massive fund raising by way of allowing massive anonymous donations.
These lessons are not being ignored.
The results of this election indicate that a well run, focused campaign by evene an empty suit with nothing but platitudes and flase promises of hope and change can win.
Certainly a well orgnaized, focused campign by someone actually offering substance would be able to win in the future.
|
|
What Have you left?
L o w e r i n g your expections?
From the ONE you were waiting and hoping, in time of CRISIS.
To do What?
At this time, his people are singing tough times, tough challanges, hard times, no quick fixes?
Wasn't he the ONE we have been waiting, hoping beside lowering the sea levels solve all these CRISIS.
PROMISES, PROMISES, of transformations of all problems the nation is facing.
Where are Mr. Obama's magical solutions?
Today, Mr. Obama's chosen people are asking all Americans to lower their expections, asking patience for all near future explications.
One major reality, taxes will have to increase for every wage earner.
The rich, will never pay their fair share they have their money safe in off-shore banks or trust funds, ask the Buffets, the Clintons, Kennedys, and Sorros.
|
|
What are you gonna do when Obama has to bomb some other countries just like W? And he gets ZERO done in the way of the socialist utopia you so wish for because there is no money left and the American people will only go so far? i think y'all are misreading the election just like the Stupid Party. We are still mostly conservative - we are just irritated at the greedy morons who are running things. Obama will run to the Center and stiff-arm the Wild West lefties like Reid and Pelosis. You'll have to save your rubber chaps a while longer until the San Fran values get another chance.
No offense there, Briggsy. |
|
to draw on experienced Democratic administrators of the federal government, who do you expect him to go to?
James Carter's people? Lyndon Johnson's people? John Kennedy's people? Harry Truman's people? Franklin Roosevelt's people?
Who is still living and has the human working energy available to provide? |
|
which sums it up:
"I'm not a member of any organized political party. I'm a Democrat."
DailyKos surely doesn't have the kind of coordinated stormtrooper response which Rush Limbaugh has at his disposal when he puts out a call to action.
Goose steppers always have the advantage in this regard. |
|
...for showing up here and heaping your tolerant compassion on the rest of us. Your rhetorical venom and eloquent hate speech is always inspiring to us "stupid" and "evil" conservatives.
But OUR new president has already broken the core of his campaign promise, "CHANGE" we can BELIEVE in. His new administration is a defacto Clinton 3rd term! Al Zawahiri's characterization of Mr. B. Hussein O. was accurate though obnoxiously expressed. You have to live with this new president also. |
|
"And who do you suppose has a similar obedient nationwide audience to Rush's who could call out the Democratic troops like he did? That's a unique characteristic of the fascist right wing isn't it?"
No. Check out a website called Dailykos.com.
It's kinda like the Rush Limbaugh show, only maybe not quite as fair-minded, thoughtful, responsible or pleasant.
Surprised you hadn't heard of it. |
|
isn't adolescent. The term has an interesting origin. By the way, there is another term used in conjunction with the Stupid party. That is the Evil party. I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count on who is referenced here.
Answer below.
http://www.vdare.com/pb/contra_costa_times_article.htm
I think both terms are well deserved. |
|
Wait just a minute there, goat-cheese breath.
You write:
"All you people on the Right have now is hope, anger and wishful thinking."
Your sentence typifies the very platform you Libs ran on;
"hope"
It was/is your hallmark brand for OB's candidacy.
"anger"
Every Liberal posting here exhibits anger. Continuing to lash out as posters on this very thread do with adolescent remarks such as, "STUPID PARTY" when in fact many conservatives admit that technology has not been their strong suit.
"wishful thinking"
Indeed, a Liberal characteristic throughout the past couple of years when Dems had nothing to offer up to American voters other than vacuous chants of, "hope" and "change". And, "We are NOT Bush".
Deep, very deep. All you are about is "wishful thinking" in hoping that your man's promise of socializing government is the panacea for anything which ails us.
Damn, what a hoot.
|
|
Their Messiah "wins" and they still find the time, make the time, to run around to the conservative blogs and spew their negative crap----such as the case withe the nearby posters here.
How laughable---the misery they reside in.
They have a democrat dominated congress. They have a democrat led executive branch. They are in store for the same, judicial skew.
What is their focus----RIGHT HERE, FOLKS!
"STUPID PARTY"
"I can't wait to see all the wonderful thing President McCain has in store."
It is nothing less than fascinating that many conservatives are willing to engage in self-introspection, of which Liberals/progressives/Leftists are bereft of similar self examination---and you have these two yahoos in their misery-wallowing ways deciding to throw their continuous cacaphony of caca at everyone other than themselves.
It can really only mean one thing, for this I am certain:
LIBERALS ARE NOT HAPPY WITH WHAT THEY JUST VOTED IN. IN FOCUSING ON THEIR ADOLESCENT NAME CALLING, THEY MERELY REVEAL THAT THEIRS IS NOT A "FEELING" OF CONFIDENCE WITH WHAT THEIR CANDIDATE BRINGS--IT IS JUST AS IMPORTANT TO CONTINUE THEIR DOGGING, AND IMMATURE RANTING ABOUT THEIR OPPOSITION.
It is deliciously revelatory, this one dimensional misery they exist within.
>:D
|
|
"What does bother me is not so much that there aren’t conservatives developing technology, ... it’s that conservatives and conservative candidates are not necessarily skilled enough to even use it. And they don’t know how to use technology, and they don’t even know what they don’t know sometimes."
Yet another aspect of the "Stupid Party" characteristic of conservatives.
And is there any better indicator than the horrible software that TH has for this blog? |
|
|
Because, like, "Operation Chaos" was such a success. I can't wait to see all the wonderful thing President McCain has in store. |
|
|
We already had our weakest 2008 candidate chosen by lefties and moderates in all the "open" primary states. Easy to see why most conservatives were lukewarm on McCain. Then he ran an awful campaign to boot. Nice going, Johnny! |
|
All you people on the Right have now is hope, anger and wishful thinking.
Come up with a candidate and maybe 2010 and 2012 will go your way.
Otherwise, maybe you could write in a few of your own golden parachutes. |
|
are you trying not to let Democrats help win your primaries?
Can you name them, please?
Or are you just thinking Romney is the strongest nominee and you fear Dems ruining it for him?
Because plenty of Dems would have been just as happy to have had Mitt to run against this time around. So these stealth voters could very well be Romney voters.
And who do you suppose has a similar obedient nationwide audience to Rush's who could call out the Democratic troops like he did? That's a unique characteristic of the fascist right wing isn't it? |
|
|
|