Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers

View in ascending order View in descending order
NeoConScum writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 11:55 AM
Clarity...Paddy...Joe...Lads...
These cretins from kosland are feeding like vermin on any response.I suggest strongly we don't spoon them what is obviously insatiable.

Suggest:ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
NeoConScum writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 10:47 AM
Let's See...Totalitarian...Warmonger...
..They must be talking about Ahmaspitooey...Right?

Nope.Just the kosroid infestation at HH talking about our country and our president.
talisman writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 10:36 AM
Suspending Reality
It works for Bush's warmongering and fearmongering, doesn't it? No one can twist the fact that bin Laden and his mooks LOVE keeping Americans embroiled in Iraq than BushCo's war machine.
talisman writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 10:35 AM
Suspended Reality
It works for Bush's warmongering and fearmongering, doesn't it? No one can twist the fact that bin Laden and his mooks LOVE keeping Americans embroiled in Iraq than BushCo's war machine.
clarityseeker writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 10:31 AM
Who really needs clarity here?
It is very obvious the increased "chatter" is testatment to this cabal-network being apprised and notified of one of their beloved ones, ahmedinijad, speaking before a highly recognized university in the much reviled America.

Their senses are being heightened. They are working into one more version of frothiness. They are preparing themselves for the "unknown" as to how Iran's leader will be received----they are readying themselves for this event----looking for fuhrer--ooops, further affirmations of their beliefs, their understanding.
Mahdi will provide this to them when he edits the video they will all see of his appearance at Columbia. Mahdi will indeed deliver to them his "message", hand delivered to the American students. And he will be further elevated as hero to Islam extremists everywhere. The chatter mentioned in this article is merely eveidence of them all speaking amongst themselves in getting the message out that Mahdi is bravely going to America to spit in their face.
'Nuff said.
muirgeo writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 9:33 AM
Who's in charge
Bin Laden and Zawahiri? You mean we haven't caught those two yet? Who's in charge here?
NeoConScum writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 7:15 AM
Buffobore...Has Set A New World Record
..for Wordiness/Windage.Congrats.He's kind of a marriage twixt Gertie Stein & Jack Kerouack.Yikes.

Not worth another wasted minute of any sane righty's time.
Petrovian writes: Sunday, September, 23, 2007 4:39 AM
ARE ALL THEY REAL?
Just curious.
clarityseeker writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 11:12 PM
buffoonboreas
C'mon, you know we can't count that high. Please try to keep your points limited to 2, 3 at the most.

And I love that first post of woManFred's, and his term; "Looser-in-Chief".
When he first entered office, he was referred to as tight, now he's "Loose". Geesh, make up your mind already.
KGK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 10:15 PM
Talking points Virginia P
It is so odd and frustrating to see Harry Reid and Pelosi clear their views, agendas and even legislation with Moveon . Any ideas that might have come from the old type of Dems in the Scoop Jackson, Nunn, even JFK, Mansfield days is long gone. Now it is 'investigations, special prosecutors, defunding of the military, attacks on gun rights and hatred-absolute hatred against the Prez and any type of conservative legislation. No wonder the Dempacifistsocialists hate it when Rudy, Fred, Mitt, even McCain and Huckabee rail against their programs and efforts to undermine the WOT and even the ear marks which both parties seemingly defend.
NeoConScum writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 9:45 PM
al Qaeda Was A Blissfully Dry Flatulance
..at the pre & week of the Petraeus Report of the Surge Progress.The MSM had been aquiver for weeks that al Qaeda would pull off some spectacular damage in Iraq to undermine General Petraeus.Nada.

Because,guess what...He and his troops have been killing al Qaeda and its kin and screwing up its plans really good under the Surge.They couldn't pull off anything attention-getting.Instead,they issued Osama's Keith Olberman Talking Points tape.
Let the record show that we're quaking and our troops are near retreat.Uh-Huh.Not.

No wonder the nutters on these threads are getting mo' & mo' wacko.You can easily sense their growing alarm.America is WINNING!Oh,NOoooo!
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 9:26 PM
KGK
I've noticed a convergence of the language of the Democrats and the Islamists. It was weird for OBL to bring up things from the DNC points list. And it's weird that most Dems want us to quit. They really don't get it.
KGK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 9:08 PM
The run of propaganda
Perhaps the run of propaganda from the Islamofascists is to prop up the anti-war crowd in the Dem Party and the Dem
Senators running for Prez. The talking points look like suspiciously , Durbin's, Kerry's, Dodd's , Clinton's and Edwards.
hvs writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 8:24 PM
Joe, you may

be right. But irrelevancy is a defining symptom of defeat...and I suspect that AQ is grasping for a response. The defeat in Afghanistan, the success of the surge and the growing pressure on Iran is limiting their options.
The walls are literally closing in on them. Agitprop is a last resort.
They may indeed have something big on the way, and they may succeed with it...but they are at this moment swirling in to the dust bin of history.
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 8:07 PM
This is the bigger story. . .
All al Qaeda activity is troubling, and is in fact more important than homunculus Ahmadinejad playing big man on campus.

Part of this communication blitz may be because al Qaeda is worried it is losing relevancy. Arabs note that secular (actually down right decadent) Dubai and the Emeriates seem to be doing quite nicely, thank you very much. Everyplace al Qaeda goes it manages to alienate the local population (except apparently those Pashtun tribes in Afghanistan and Pakistan). Even there it is only that they then go and terrorize, rape and pillage all the other other surrounding tribes.

Which makes me worry something big is on the way. I doubt bin Laden wants to ensure a GOP victory by attacking us before 2008, but overthrowing Pakistan and having the fundamentalists controlling its weaponry would be very bad!
hvs writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 7:59 PM
AQ agitprop
AQ is losing...and they know it, hence the high volume of agitprop. They have learned at the knee of liberals here and employ the same tactics that succeeded after Tet.
What they haven't mastered (but no doubt understand) is the new media here.
Anne writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 6:49 PM
How long was after 9/11 that the

libidiot fools started with "What did he know and when did he know it..." garbage? Oct. 2001 maybe?

Now we know that al Qaeda has plans for this counrty... such as "Death to America." How do we know that? Because they keep telling us!!! Hellooo!

Yet the libidiots do EVERYTHING in their power to make it as difficult or impossible for the government to do what they can to protect us...

And, according to the experts (NOT the libidiots, obviously!) increased chatter is an indicator that "something is up" yet what do we hear in the libidiot posts above....?

Fools! Each and every one!!!




SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:38 PM
that's Bufoboar
I'm sure everone knew who I was referring to.......
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:37 PM
Also
Didn't need the Bay of Fundy link. Understood and agree.
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:36 PM
Fellow travelers quit worrying!
Bufobre will not procreate because those blow up dolls are sterile! And I'm sure his drugs will wear off before the weekend ends.
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:35 PM
Joe
saw the benner comment, off base, not every post has a slam on Romney. I could probably vote for him, too, if he gets the nod. Not my first choice, as you know. He does have a pandering problem, but I do think his religion is a liability. My wife, self-described liberal, very open minded, who thinks Islam is a peaceful religion, thinks that LDS is weird. Personally, I don't care what anyone chooses to believe as long as their faith does not infringe on others. I've liked every Mormon I've ever met. Wouldn't stop me from voting for him, but it may for others.
The so-called "top tier" will not get out the voters necessary for a GOP win. Increasing turnout is the key. Give people something to vote for. Not just the lesser of two evils. Won't work this time. People are fed up with the inundation of illegal aliens. They would come out in droves for the clear choice of D=amnesty or R=enforcement. They will stay home if they both equal amnesty.
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:08 PM
Opps my bad
Romney's surges back and forth are like the tides in the Bay of Fundy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Fundy
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 5:05 PM
I am sorry about the Romney link
I should not mix jokes, because the first link fit bufoboreas like one of his tiny gloves (and a lot better than Hammer's pants).

benner made a comment about me a while ago that the chances are 100% that I would criticize Romney in every post. Actually I think Romney would be a decent president and I would support him 100% in the general election if he were the nominee (given the choices on the other side), but I am troubled by his weakness in the polls and I doubt he could beat Hillary. Because of this I do not want Mitt to win the nomination. I will keep an open mind till the primaries, but comments like the one I linked too above are not swaying me yet.

I do not think Mitt Romney being a Mormon is the problem. I think Romney tries to appease people too much, he has a pandering problem. Hence the flip flopping. I am not the only one saying this, Michael Medved said exactly that on Friday.

I like the fact that Giuliani, Thompson and McCain have the guts to say things I and others disagree with. Romney seems to carefully couch his positions on appeasing the GOP base. In the general (if he were the nominee) he would move to the center. While all politicians do this to some extent, Romney's surges back and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Fundyforth are like the tides in the Bay of Fundy.

Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 4:35 PM
Joe
First link is funny. Not sure what I think of the second. I don't think I'm alone being confused about Romney.
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 4:05 PM
bufoboreas, why do you remind me
of this guy?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzkd_m4ivmc

Hint: Not the guy in the baggy pants.

And because brenner acccuses me of including something anti Romney in every post, I will share this because it is funny and sad at the same time: http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NzA0OTUxZTc2YTk3MmQwY2VlMmNhZjY2ZGMzMTI2Nzc=
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:56 PM
bufoboreas
Little hands held up, very cute imagery when it is done by a nine month old. I was in a supermarket check out line the other day and a little chubby kid who was facing me sitting in his cart did that to me. He had a face like Chubby on the Little Rascals. I said sorry little man, you got to get that from your mom, which prompted her to turn and give him a cuddle and he started to giggle. Cute as a button. . .

but it is a little creepy coming from an adult. You should try just making a point.
NeoConScum writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:35 PM
Paddy...Joe...VirginiaP...Pray for Buffo
..He's been swacked outta his mind for 2-days.Hope
he's got a designated driver.You guys got any...
err...'suspicions'as to why he keeps telling everyone that he's...wink,wink... cough.."Heterosexual"...??
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:32 PM
bufoboringass
Maybe you are not nearly as 100% as you would have us believe.
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Joe
I am also in favor of LEGAL immigration. I know many naturalized citizens. I think current levels of LEGAL immigration are all we can handle. If we don't get controlof the illegal alien situation, we will lose control of our country. We have foreign nationals marching in OUR streets demanding rights they would not ask of their own governments, if they had, maybe they would not be here.
angel66 writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:00 PM
Not Concerned
But Bush said OBL was "marginalized" and he "truly not concerned" about him. Didn't the pentagon say he was irrelevant last week?

Of course, all we have to do is ask our ally Pakistan to maybe help us find him in their country. But we invaded Iraq for no reason.
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 3:00 PM
bufoboreas
Why the attack on Virgina Patriot? He told you he was a guy from Virgina--so why the sex change references? I don't agree with everything VP says (I am pro immigration provided it is legal, he would like immgration reduced), but he is rational and makes good points. I respect his opinion.

I am not sure what part of my point you disagreed with. You description of yourself pounding your tiny fists was funny--but all I said is I would like more legal immigration and less illegal immgration. Do you disagree with that?

Glad to hear you are "100% heterosexual or nearly so". . . although I am not sure what the "nearly so" refers to. This is probably not the forum to share your adolecent experimentation.
Paddy Ofurniture writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 2:54 PM
Lib....
Don't worry....you're safe. Even if I was one of those deviate sodomites, in your case, there have been too many before me....

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm shutting off to watch football....
Liberal Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 2:43 PM
Paddy Ofurniture
Let me just say that I care WAY more about Al Qaeda than making fun of you. But since the one does not preclude the other, I imagine one better protect his backside with the likes of you sniffing around--what with "sphincters" and "asoholics."
Paddy Ofurniture writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 2:34 PM
It never ceases to amaze me...
....what sphincters the lefties are who visit this post.
Ignorant, idiotic and unashamedly asoholic.
"Who cares about Al Qaeda, I'd rather make fun of you...."
bufo....do us all a favor and have yourself fixed. We don't need your DNA in the gene pool.
Unbelievable....

Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 2:03 PM
bufoboreas
Virginia (my home state) Patriot (love my country) 47 year old man. No grandchildren.
dantana writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 1:58 PM
Herr Soros
Hey, the George Soros shock troops are out in force today!
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 1:33 PM
Virginia Patriot
In a word: Yes

The reason is France has seen up close what you get when you have unrestricted immigration. France is showing some common sense.

Does that mean I expect the same here? No, not yet. Mexican and Latin immgrants are not Algerians. Nevertheless, we have to get a handle on unrestricted immigration. The current system is broken. Immigration reform is not likely anytime soon (in a form we can agree on). The first step is to seal our borders (both land and ports of entry). I am pro immigration and would like to see legal immigration greatly expanded (and illegal immigration greatly reduced), but under our terms and restrictions.
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 1:25 PM
France Has More Guts Than We Do?
Read this:
http://townhall.com/news/world/2007/09/22/france_races_to_oust_illegal_immigrants
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 12:44 PM
News Headline
"Dems end week with another Iraq defeat"
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 12:42 PM
Left one out!
Left:deny, depress, rage and DEFEAT, Democrat's winning issues!
Joe writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 12:35 PM
Farah does not know what it means. . .
frankly neither do I--other than his call for taking over Pakistan is probably even more troubling than Iran getting a nuke.

I know we have to kill al Qaeda members every chance we get and Osama and Zawahiri should be on the top of the list.
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 12:27 PM
No doubt
The Left: deny, depress and rage. Winning issues!
Virginia Patriot writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 11:34 AM
Democrat(ick)
Give them their (ick), they've earned it.
NeoConScum writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 11:32 AM
Errrr...Chorus of Leftoids...Focus,Focus
Focus...Buffo,Briggs and Manny:You know that the American Left is fully capable of loving and admiring ALL enemies of Boooooosh & America at once.C'mon,you can EASILY do it whilst having your morning Starbucks.Not even breaking a sweat to hate GWB,luv Osama,harbor lust for Ahmaspitooey,rhapsodize for the Taliban...ALL AT ONCE.Ya see,Pygmies,you can Multi-Task.We proud.We
proud.
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 11:21 AM
stages of denial
The three posting Leftists are in various stages of mourning....denial, depression and anger. Very bad for DEMOCRATS, very good for AMERICA!!!
SEEHAWK writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 11:19 AM
Three stooges
The previous 3 stooges have alerted us, they exibit denial, anger and depression. All stages mourning. Victory for U.S. is defeat for Dems!!!Mourn stooges mourn!
Eileen O'Connel writes: Saturday, September, 22, 2007 10:40 AM
So what?
Big deal -- there was an enormous rush of "chatter" starting in January 2001 that our Looser-in-Chief chose to ignore.

Think they are going to start now?
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
 


Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 20 Minutes 15 Seconds Ago
Last updated 20 Minutes 21 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 19 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 44 Minutes 10 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 48 Minutes 34 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

"clarity"seeker
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By MellorSJ2
Seadawg...How Dare ACORN's Corruption Be
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By NeoConScum
MellorSJ2...just curious:
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By clarityseeker
douglas 11:59 AM
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By Bob Munck
clarityseeker claims
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By MellorSJ2
Jillian says:
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By DanNV
Lonny
 Re: NYT: Being On Food Stamps No Longer Carries A Stigma
  By peacefrog
Jo--for the utterly pedantic Libs...
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By clarityseeker
Lonny and Pat
 Re: Christmas Outlawed
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Lonny
 Re: Christmas Outlawed
  By Patriotic Liberal
Jo
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Both Sides Now?
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By DanNV
Careful
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By MellorSJ2
Rainey may be wrong
 Re: ACORN and "Journalistic Standards"
  By Kermudjin
Examining Dreadnuts view on movies...
 Re: Twenty lessons your teenage daughter will learn from the Twilight movies
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
Jo
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Patriotic Liberal
Jo
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Careful with that axe, Eugene
I have to go
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By Jo
They'll ignore it
 Re: Only Global Warming Critics Can Save Climategate Scientists
  By Stoic Patriot
Flunck 12:15 PM...I rest my case...
 Re: Here Comes the Judge?
  By clarityseeker

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll